Next Article in Journal
Preparation and Performance of Different Modified Ramie Fabrics Reinforced Anionic Polyamide-6 Composites
Next Article in Special Issue
Photocatalytic Treatment of Paracetamol Using TiO2 Nanotubes: Effect of pH
Previous Article in Journal
Investigating the Molecular Basis of N-Substituted 1-Hydroxy-4-Sulfamoyl-2-Naphthoate Compounds Binding to Mcl1
Previous Article in Special Issue
Degradation of Aqueous Polycyclic Musk Tonalide by Ultraviolet-Activated Free Chlorine
 
 
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Developments in the Photocatalytic Treatment of Cyanide Wastewater: An Approach to Remediation and Recovery of Metals

1
Escuela de Ingeniería Química, Universidad del Valle, Calle 13 #100-00. Cali A.A. 25360, Colombia
2
Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, San Nicolás de los Garza 64570, Mexico
3
Department of Chemical Engineering, Universidad de Cartagena, Sede Piedra de Bolívar, Avenida del Consulado 48-152, Cartagena A.A. 130001, Colombia
4
Graduate Programs in Environmental Applied Science and Management, and School of Occupational and Public Health, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
5
Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Thompson Engineering Building, Western University, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2019, 7(4), 225; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7040225
Received: 6 March 2019 / Revised: 10 April 2019 / Accepted: 15 April 2019 / Published: 20 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Advanced Oxidation Processes)

Abstract

:
For gold extraction, the most used extraction technique is the Merrill-Crow process, which uses lixiviants as sodium or potassium cyanide for gold leaching at alkaline conditions. The cyanide ion has an affinity not only for gold and silver, but for other metals in the ores, such as Al, Fe, Cu, Ni, Zn, and other toxic metals like Hg, As, Cr, Co, Pb, Sn, and Mn. After the extraction stage, the resulting wastewater is concentrated at alkaline conditions with concentrations up to 1000 ppm of metals. Photocatalysis is an advanced oxidation process (AOP) able to generate a photoreaction in the solid surface of a semiconductor activated by light. Although it is well known that photocatalytic processes can remove metals in solution, there are no compilations about the researches on photocatalytic removal of metals in wastewater with cyanide. Hence, this review comprises the existing applications of photocatalytic processes to remove metal and in some cases recover cyanide from recalcitrant wastewater from gold extraction. The use of this process, in general, requires the addition of several scavengers in order to force the mechanism to a pathway where the electrons can be transferred to the metal-cyanide matrices, or elsewhere the entire metallic cyanocomplex can be degraded by an oxidative pathway.

1. Introduction

Gold has always had a high value since prehistoric times as ornaments in rituals, and it occupies an essential role in the world economy. By mid-2017, the world gold reserves were around 33,450 metric tons, with a demand of 4337 tons in 2016, destined for jewelry (47%), technology (7%), investments (36%), and central banks (9%) [1].
The gold exploitation depends on the way it is present in minerals, and its extraction can be done in the acid phase (pH < 3) with thiourea, thiocyanate, chlorine, aqua regia, ferric chloride; in neutral phase with thiosulfate, halogens, sulfuric acids, bacteria; and in alkaline phase (pH > 10) with cyanide, ammonium cyanide, ammonium, sulfur, and nitriles [2,3]. However, the practical application of these processes is limited to extraction in the alkaline phase using cyanide because of its high selectivity with respect to gold [4,5,6].
Latin America and the developing countries exhibit one of the primary gold and silver exploitation scenarios based on the leaching of ores with solvents, such as sodium cyanide (NaCN)—The Merrill-Crowe Process. In this extraction process, the gold-concentrated effluent is later taken to a precipitation stage with the use of zinc, called cementation [7]. The wastewater resulting from this process is rich in heavy and non-heavy metals, poor of gold, and it contains dissolved silver, which is very harmful to the environment [8]. The mining wastewater is well known to be the predominant cause of pollution problems in surface water bodies (lakes and rivers). The problems, such as death, due to poisoning, lead poisoning; cancer, due to chromium, blindness and congenital malformations, are attributed to the contamination of surface and underground water sources [9]. Furthermore, heavy metals in these waters could be bioaccumulated and present biomagnification causing serious health effects, due to their high levels of toxicity [10,11,12]. Besides, mining wastewaters can show problems of metal mobility and local cyanide release where they are stored; mining wastewaters are directly discharged to tailings ponds for periods of three to six months where degradation is expected by the sun (photolysis and evaporation) [13].
In large-scale operations, wastewater treatment is carried out with highly oxidizing processes, such as chlorination, sulfur dioxide, hypochlorite oxidation, electrolytic oxidation, ozonation, use of hydrogen peroxide, high thermal transformation, biological treatments, adsorption on activated carbon, among others, usually at high oxidation conditions and operation cost [14].On the other hand, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have the advantage of removing liquid and recalcitrant gaseous matrices by non-selective chemical species. Among these processes, heterogeneous photocatalysis (HPC) has received considerable attention as a promising technology, able to use renewable energy from the sun. It is conventionally defined as the acceleration of the rate of a chemical reaction, induced by the absorption of light by a catalyst or coexisting molecule. This definition of photocatalysis may be the most widely accepted as it encompasses all aspects of the field, including photosensitization [15].
HPC is one of the AOPs that allows the elimination of toxic compounds in a non-selective pathway, due to the generation of oxidizing species, such as the hydroxyl radical (OH), perhydroxyl radical (HOO), superoxide (O2•–), and photogenerated holes (h+), transforming recalcitrant and toxic molecules into biodegradable or less harmful compounds [16]. Photocatalytic processes not only are applied to oxidize recalcitrant organic matter, but also to promote reduction reactions. Some examples are the photoreduction of benzaldehyde to benzyl alcohol, metallic ions, such as Fe3+, Cr6+, Hg2+, Cu2+, inorganic nitrogen and carbon dioxide to formic acid, simulating part of artificial photosynthesis.
The photocatalytic reduction represents an option when traditional oxidative pathways are not feasible and when the nature of semiconductor is able to transfer electrons at a high energy level on its conduction band. Although the current applications of large-scale photocatalytic processes are scarce, different assessments have been made for the contamination associated with gold mining wastewaters. In this review, different photocatalytic processes used for the elimination of synthetic and real cyanide matrices of gold extraction are explained and described.

2. Production and Characterization of Cyanide Wastewater

Cyanidation is used when gold is in the pyrite form and is not extractable by physical separation methods. This process is carried out through the use of sodium cyanide in the alkaline phase and with an excess of oxygen, as shown in Equation (1) [17]. Once Au is extracted from the ores, the gold is precipitated by adding Zn (cementation), replacing the gold of the aurocyanide ion with zinc cyanide and precipitating it in metallic form, as indicated in Equation (2). Although the efficiency of the process is in the order of 99%, the wastewater has metal cyano-complexes strong acid dissociable (SAD), such as iron, copper, and cobalt, as well as weak acid dissociable (WAD), such as nickel, silver, zinc, and arsenic [14].
Leaching or cyanidation:
4Au + 8NaCN + O2 + 2H2O → 4Na[Au(CN)2] + 4NaOH
Cementation:
2NaAu(CN)2 + 4NaCN + 2Zn + 2H2O → 2Na2Zn(CN)4 + 2Au↓ + ↑H2 + 2NaOH
Table 1 shows the metallic and semi-metallic cyano-composites, sorted by the logarithms of their stability constants. Thus, the most unstable compound corresponds to the hydrogen cyanide in the gas phase; the easily dissociable WAD corresponds to complexes of Cd, Zn, Ag, Ni, Cu, Cr, and the most stable SAD correspond to complexes of Fe, Au, Co. The stability of strong complexes makes necessary the use of tailings ponds for removing them by solar-evaporation [18].
On the other hand, weak complexes are easily hydrolyzable by changing the pH of the solution. In principle, weak complexes tend to be destroyed over three months with or without photolysis; however, strong complexes, such as Fe(CN)63–, Co(CN)63– remain over time, turning these waters into recalcitrant. Additionally, degradation products, such as NH3/NH4+, NO2, NO3, CNO, sulfates, and carbonates are formed by the slow rupture of cyano-metallic complexes. Thus, the resulting wastewater (concentrated by these complexes) is not suitable for being poured into surface bodies of water [13,21].

3. Existing Treatment Options

The existing treatment options of oxidative processes for the treatment of cyanide wastewater, such as natural attenuation [18,22], chemical oxidation [23], thermal treatments, precipitation, biologic oxidation [24,25,26,27], and ionic adsorption [28], are well documented [18]. Nonetheless, strictly photocatalytic treatments are scattered, and there is no clarity of existing photocatalytic processes applications for degradation of cyanide complexes.
Figure 1 shows a relational diagram constructed with VOS Viewer® using technology watch tools [29] on the main topics related to cyanide. In this figure, it is observed that the relationship with the word “photocatalysis” is not very broad. However, it appears related to “activated carbon” and “titanium dioxide” (in yellow). Likewise, other technologies appear, such as: “Biodegradation”, “ozone”, “hydrogen peroxide”, “electroplating”, and “adsorption”. For this review, some applications of photocatalytic processes used in the degradation of this type of cyano-metallic wastewater are depicted.

4. Photocatalytic Treatment Alternatives

4.1. Classic Oxidative Photocatalysis

AOPs are generally based on mechanisms capable of producing profound changes in the chemical structure of pollutants. Heterogeneous Photocatalysis (HPC) is a photochemical AOP where redox reactions are promoted by the interaction of a semiconductor catalyst and photons, generating active species able to degrade recalcitrant organic matter to allowable concentrations for final discharge [30].
Figure 2 shows the photocatalytic mechanism on a TiO2 particle. The photocatalytic process initiates when a semiconductor is irradiated by photons (from solar or artificial light) whose energy is equal or greater than the band-gap energy (Eg) of the semiconductor, promoting the electrons from the balance band to the conduction band. Then, the electrons at the conduction band can react with the adsorbed oxygen on the semiconductor surface to form superoxide radicals (O2•–), and other radicals with water, such as the perhydroxyl (HOO) or generating reduction reactions by the direct or indirect transfer with adsorbed compounds. On the other hand, the holes in the balance band can react with the adsorbed water generating hydroxyl radicals (OH), characteristics of the AOPs [31]. Conversely, it has also been evidenced that hydroxyl radicals are obtained by reduction of H2O2 and not by direct oxidation of water adsorbed on the catalyst surface [32]. Furthermore, the holes in the valence band can react directly with other adsorbed molecules as sacrificing agents oxidizing them to simpler substances [32]. This final step is the most argued mechanism in the photocatalytic treatment of recalcitrant molecules.
In the case of the cyanide, the use of different catalysts, such as titanium dioxide, nickel oxide, zinc oxide, platinum, zirconium, cadmium, and cobalt, have been studied for removing potassium cyanide and sodium cyanide [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50].
In general, all the photocatalytic evaluations are carried out using the oxidative chemical pathway that works in the presence of oxygen. This process transforms the adsorbed substances in less toxic compounds (nitrates, carbonates, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen). Table 2 shows the most applied processes in matrices containing synthetic cyanide solutions of KCN and NaCN. It can be noticed that the initial concentrations oscillate around 100 ppm of CN (3.2 mM CN). Moreover, photocatalytic degradation with doped TiO2 and ZnO has been evaluated, with the main doping agents of Ce, Ag, Zn, Pt, and Co. These photocatalysts have achieved degradations of free cyanide (over 8 and 10%) in oxic conditions and with artificial radiation using UV-C (light emitting diodes) LED light. The photocatalytic evaluations in batch and continuous reactors for degradation of organic cyanide compounds show how they have degraded and mineralized acetonitrile (CH3CN) in the gaseous and liquid phase, obtaining better results with the gas phase [47].
Other combinations for free cyanide involve combined treatments of oxidation processes, such as photocatalysis/ozone/electrolysis/electrocoagulation that achieved degradations greater than 90% [51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59]. Although in those photocatalytic evaluations, more than 90% of the substrate was removed. Most of them were carried out with synthetic solutions of pure free cyanide, which does not address the issue related to the metal-cyanide complex remediation at laboratory scale, as shown in Table 2.
The photocatalytic degradation of free cyanide is summarized in Figure 3. As mentioned before, the oxidation is carried out by different pathways: Oxidation by holes (h+), oxidation by superoxide (O2) and oxidation by hydroxyl radicals (OH). The reaction of CN with radicals transforms it into cyanate (CNO), ammonium (NH4+), nitrates (NO2, NO3) and carbonates (HCO3, CO32–). Although these photocatalytic treatments were used for the degradation of free cyanide, all applications were limited to synthetic solutions. Complexing agents like the metals in the ores represent the main problem of mining wastewater.
It is well-known that the application of photocatalytic processes for chemical remediation and disinfection via hydroxyl radicals and holes oxidation has shown promising results. However, it is possible to develop other types of photodegradation without direct oxidation. Since photocatalysis is a redox process, the transformation of metallic ions and inorganic substances using the conduction band (holes) instead the valence band (electrons) can be developed. This pathway depends on the conduction and valence band energy level in the catalyst, the redox potential of the inorganic substance and the pH of the solution. In most cases, the electron transfer to a substrate is favored in the absence of oxygen in a process called reductive photocatalysis. Reductive photocatalysis has been applied to substances with oxidation states similar to CO2, such as CCl4, which could hardly enhance the oxidation of carbon via interaction with holes. Another example is the removal of transition metals in the solution given their multivalences when the oxidation potential is very similar to the valence band value [32].

4.2. Photoreduction of Metals

Photoreduction of metals was one of the first motivations for developing photocatalytic processes, and it was intended to be applied for precious metals exploitation. The main differences between photocatalysis with inorganic substances and photocatalysis with metals are (1) There are greater types of states excited by the participation of metal orbitals and ligands, (2) Conversion from one state to another is not always efficient, (3) Some excitations are achieved in the visible spectrum, (4) Heavy metals form strong spin pairing in the orbitals, generating stable and long-tripled states, and (5) The modular structure of the complexes does not allow radicals attacks, due to the organic substances. However, the excitation process by electron transfer can occur by direct transfer of the electron from the conduction band to substrates adsorbed on the surface of the catalyst; or indirect reduction by the formation of a radical product of the oxidation of organic molecules of low repulsion with the complex. Similarly, the presence of metals, such as Tl, Pb or Mn in solution has demonstrated their reductive ability of metals in solution [75].
Photoreduction processes require the absence of molecular oxygen for avoiding the formation of superoxide radical by transfer of the electron promoted to the conduction band. Furthermore, the efficiency of the reducing mechanism can be improved by the action of a sacrificing agent that is more selective for hydroxyl (OH), hole (h+), and perhydroxyl (HOO) oxidant radicals, so that recombination is avoided and the probability of reducing other species adsorbed on the catalyst increases [76]. This reductive mechanism can decrease the oxidation state of inorganic ions and metals in solution, leading to smaller forms or their zero-valence state. This promotes the precipitation on the semiconductor surface; nevertheless, it is required that the standard potential of the level of the conduction band of the electron is sufficiently negative for generating the reduction half-reaction of the metal [77].
Figure 4 shows the different conduction and valence bands of some metal sulfides and oxides with semiconductor properties. The standard potentials (NHE) of the conduction bands (upper) and valence bands (lower) of each semiconductor are depicted. For the semiconductors with a conduction band more negative than the H+/H2 redox couple potential, the predominant mechanism is the reduction of adsorbed species; those are known as reductive semiconductors. In the opposite, for semiconductors with a balance band more positive than the H2O/O2 redox couple, are considered oxidative catalysts, generating oxidation reaction to adsorbates as its predominant mechanism.
As it can be seen in Figure 4, the sulfides of La, Zn and Mn have conduction bands more negative than the H+/H2 redox potential, whereas metal oxides, such as Zr, Ni and BiTiO3 have valence bands more positive for the H2O/O2 potential. Depending on the reduction potential of the metal or inorganic ion in solution, the most suitable semiconductor will be selected for a photocatalytic desired reaction. The most applied semiconductor catalyst in photocatalytic processes is the TiO2; however, it appears in three different crystalline forms: Anatase, rutile, and brookite. From them, anatase and rutile are the most used crystalline phases in photocatalytic processes and the most commonly used in photocatalytic applications.
Few studies reported the photocatalytic reduction of metals in cyanide complexed matrices. Table 3 shows some studies related to metallic cyano-complexes using photocatalytic processes. The first evidence of solar-assisted TiO2 photocatalysis studies with real mining wastewater by using As, Fe, Hg, Cu, and Zn complexed for precipitating metals, reported that three days were needed for free cyanide elimination and 17 days to achieve 99% of Hg and As removal [44]. Other studies were focused on the degradation of complex in synthetic samples and studied the degradation of Cu, Ni, Fe, Co, Pb, Cr, Au, and As cyano-complexes.
Generally, the main characteristic of these photocatalytic treatments is the use of UV lamps with a high irradiation capacity (about 150, 400 or 700 W) and in some cases metals are recovered by reducing them to their zero valence state [37,38,39,40,41,46,47,48,50,54,59,62,63,66,81,82,83,84,85,86,90]. Nevertheless, photocatalytic processes for stable metallic cyano-complexes destruction are not yet fully effective for the treatment of mining wastewater, due to the presence of metal re-oxidation-redissolution and photocatalyst poisoning by deposition.
It is known the role of chemisorbed oxygen in photooxidation reactions. The TiO2 chemistry depends on the O2 coverage, temperature and the characteristics of the semiconductor crystalline phase. Those studies are performed using molecules, such as Ar, Kr, N2, CO, CH4 in order to understand their interaction with the adsorbed oxygen using a photon stimulated desorption. This technique has been used to understand and monitor photochemical processes occurring on the surface of photocatalyst [91]. Although these methods require specialized equipment, practical applications require more investment. A simpler method to understand the global mechanism is related to scavengers’ addition to the bulk of the photocatalytic system.
In the case of metallic-cyanide matrices, the addition of scavengers increases the selective photoreduction of the metals (charge transfer efficiency) without oxidizing the free cyanide. Thus, several acceptors have been used as electron donors for hydroxyl, perhydroxyl, and holes. This selectivity enhancement was used to precipitate Ag from a solution of sodium cyano-argentate and sodium aurocyanide [83].
Table 4 shows examples of the main acceptors with which the mechanism studies on photocatalytic degradations in several matrices have been carried out. Compounds, such as NaF, have been used to inhibit the adsorption effect on the semiconductor particle and demonstrate the importance of the degradation reaction in bulk and not on its surface [92]. Moreover, the application of radical scavengers has been used to determine the main pathway that affects the photocatalytic degradation and to study the selectivity for certain radicals.

4.3. Application of Traditional Photoreactors and LEDs in Mining Wastewater

Sunlight and UV lamps (as natural and artificial photon source, respectively) have been used directly on photocatalytic processes with several reactor geometries, such as compound parabolic concentrators (CPC), flat plates, spinning-discs, submerged lamps and microchannel among other systems, in order to harvest light energy [108]. Nevertheless, available sunlight radiation is very variable and depends on the weather condition, geography, time of the day and year. Reversely, UV lamps as a source of UV photons for photocatalysis make this process more controllable, and it is a better alternative for fine photochemistry. The development of semiconductors for being irradiated by UV LED is a trending research topic and a promising source of photons. LED lamps have been replacing traditional incandescent halide and fluorescent mercury lamps for a wide variety of applications. The advantages of LEDs are not only the small geometry, versatility, and robustness but also a more prolonged time life, a high electrical efficiency (more than 60%) and a capability for generating radiation at a particular wavelength [109,110,111]. This type of artificial light has been used for water purification, sterilization, protective coatings and photo sensors from the near visible, UV to the IR spectrum range [112,113]. Table 5 shows the application of this type of diodes for photocatalytic processes as an alternative to the treatment of other organic matrices. There is only a study that reported a successful application for removal of free cyanide [21]; therefore, it can be an emerging solution for the issue of availability of UV radiation from the sun by coupling with another renewable source of energy instead using direct sunlight or traditional incandescent lamps.

5. Conclusions

In this review, the state-of-the-art in the application of photocatalytic processes for the decontamination of synthetic and real cyanide wastewaters was presented. Photocatalytic processes can be effective for removing free cyanide content via oxidative pathways. Complexed cyano-metallic compounds are less studied in photoreactors, and usually, it requires the modification of selectivity by applying electron donors as scavengers of unwanted radicals in order to enhance charge transfer to the cyano-complex. The metal removal from inorganic cyanide matrices using photocatalytic processes has been explored, and the direct metal reduction on the conduction band appears to be the main mechanism as an electron acceptor at the conduction band. The use of unconventional UV LED lamps represents a growing area for development of photoreactors. Likewise, little evidence has been found of the treatment of metallic cyano-complexes from mining activities by using this type of UV source, and the existing applications are not aimed at improving the use of photons in the illuminated area. Although the evidence shows UV-vis LED application for other types of organic compounds, the knowledge about its use for the elimination or treatment of inorganic substances is still scarce. As far as it is known, none of the studies has compared the performance of the processes between different types of radiation sources at different wavelengths for cyanide wastewater treatment using UV LED.

Author Contributions

L.A.B.-B. compiled the literature references for photocatalytic treatments of gold mining cyanide wastewater. F.M.-M., A.H.-R., J.A.C.-M., C.F.B.-L. and L.R. restructured the information and contributed to the design, analysis and edition of the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Colciencias (GRANT No. 1106-669-45250).

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Universidad del Valle and Colciencias for the financial support to produce this work (GRANT 1106-669-45250. Recuperación de oro y tratamiento de aguas residuales cianuradas en la industria aurífera de la región pacífico Colombiana).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Gold Council Gold Demand Trends Q1. 2017. Available online: http://www.gold.org/research/gold-demand-trends (accessed on 1 June 2017).
  2. Sparrow, G.J.; Woodcock, J.T. Cyanide and Other Lixiviant Leaching Systems for Gold with Some Practical Applications. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 1995, 14, 193–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, J.; Miller, J.D. A review of gold leaching in acid thiourea solutions. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2006, 27, 177–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Konyratbekova, S.S.; Baikonurova, A.; Akcil, A. Non-cyanide Leaching Processes in Gold Hydrometallurgy and Iodine-Iodide Applications: A Review. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2015, 36, 198–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Haque, K.E. Gold Leaching from Refractory Ores—Literature Survey. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 1987, 2, 235–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Brent Hiskey, J.; Atluri, V.P. Dissolution Chemistry of Gold and Silver in Different Lixiviants. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 1988, 4, 95–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mpinga, C.N.; Bradshaw, S.M.; Akdogan, G.; Snyders, C.A.; Eksteen, J.J. Evaluation of the Merrill-Crowe process for the simultaneous removal of platinum, palladium and gold from cyanide leach solutions. Hydrometallurgy 2014, 142, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Norgate, T.; Haque, N. Using life cycle assessment to evaluate some environmental impacts of gold production. J. Clean. Prod. 2012, 29–30, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dozzi, M.V.; Saccomanni, A.; Selli, E. Cr(VI) photocatalytic reduction: Effects of simultaneous organics oxidation and of gold nanoparticles photodeposition on TiO2. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 211–212, 188–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ramírez, A.V. Toxicidad del cianuro. Investigación bibliográfica de sus efectos en animales y en el hombre. An. Fac. med. 2010, 71, 54–61. [Google Scholar]
  11. López-Muñoz, M.-J.; Aguado, J.; van Grieken, R.; Marugán, J. Simultaneous photocatalytic reduction of silver and oxidation of cyanide from dicyanoargentate solutions. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2009, 86, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Little, E.E.; Calfee, R.D.; Theodorakos, P.; Brown, Z.A.; Johnson, C.A. Toxicity of cobalt-complexed cyanide to Oncorhynchus mykiss, Daphnia magna, and Ceriodaphnia dubia. Potentiation by ultraviolet radiation and attenuation by dissolved organic carbon and adaptive UV tolerance. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2007, 14, 333–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Logsdon, M.; Hagelstein, K.; Mudder, T. El manejo del cianuro en la extracción de oro; ICME―Consejo Internacional de Metales y Medio Ambiente: Canada, 2001; ISBN 1-895720-35-4. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chi, G.; Fuerstenau, M.C.; Marsden, J.O. Study of Merrill-Crowe processing. Part I: S, olubility of zinc in alkaline cyanide solution. Int. J. Miner. Process 1997, 49, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gaya, U.I. Heterogeneous Photocatalysis Using Inorganic Semiconductor Solids; Springer Science & Business Media: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014; ISBN 9789400777750. [Google Scholar]
  16. Domènech, X.; Jardim, W.F.; Litter, M.I. Procesos avanzados de oxidación para la eliminación de contaminantes. In Eliminación de Contaminantes por Fotocatálisis Heterogénea; Blesa, M.A., Ed.; CYTED: La Plata, Argentina, 2001; ISBN 987-43-3809-1. [Google Scholar]
  17. Malloch, K.R.; Craw, D. Comparison of contrasting gold mine processing residues in a temperate rain forest, New Zealand. Appl. Geochem. 2017, 84, 61–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dobrosz-Gómez, I.; Ramos García, B.D.; GilPavas, E.; Gómez García, M.Á. Kinetic study on HCN volatilization in gold leaching tailing ponds. Miner. Eng. 2017, 110, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Adams, M.D. Impact of recycling cyanide and its reaction products on upstream unit operations. Miner. Eng. 2013, 53, 241–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Johnson, C.A. The fate of cyanide in leach wastes at gold mines: An environmental perspective. Appl. Geochem. 2015, 57, 194–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kim, S.-O.S.H.; Lee, S.W.; Lee, G.M.; Lee, B.-T.; Yun, S.-T.; Kim, S.-O.S.H. Monitoring of TiO2-catalytic UV-LED photo-oxidation of cyanide contained in mine wastewater and leachate. Chemosphere 2016, 143, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Vymazal, J. Constructed wetlands for treatment of industrial wastewaters: A review. Ecol. Eng. 2014, 73, 724–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dai, X.; Simons, A.; Breuer, P. A review of copper cyanide recovery technologies for the cyanidation of copper containing gold ores. Miner. Eng. 2012, 25, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gupta, N.; Balomajumder, C.; Agarwal, V.K.K. Enzymatic mechanism and biochemistry for cyanide degradation: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 176, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Luque-Almagro, V.M.; Moreno-Vivián, C.; Roldán, M.D. Biodegradation of cyanide wastes from mining and jewellery industries. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2016, 38, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  26. Mekuto, L.; Ntwampe, S.K.O.; Akcil, A. An integrated biological approach for treatment of cyanidation wastewater. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 571, 711–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Dash, R.R.; Gaur, A.; Balomajumder, C. Cyanide in industrial wastewaters and its removal: A review on biotreatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 163, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Al-Saydeh, S.A.; El-Naas, M.H.; Zaidi, S.J. Copper removal from industrial wastewater: A comprehensive review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2017, 56, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gómez-Luna, E.; Navas, D.F.; Aponte-Mayor, G.; Betancourt-Buitrago, L.A. Literature review methodology for scientific and information management, through its structuring and systematization. Dyna 2014, 81, 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Malato, S.; Blanco, J. Solar Detoxification; Ilustrada; UNESCO-United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: Paris, Francia, 2003; ISBN 9789231039164. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wen, J.; Li, X.; Liu, W.; Fang, Y.; Xie, J.; Xu, Y. Photocatalysis fundamentals and surface modification of TiO2 nanomaterials. Chinese J. Catal. 2015, 36, 2049–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pichat, P. Photocatalysis and Water Purification; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2013; ISBN 9783527645404. [Google Scholar]
  33. Pollema, C.H.; Hendrix, J.L.; Milosavljević, E.B.; Solujić, L.; Nelson, J.H. Photocatalytic oxidation of cyanide to nitrate at TiO2 particles. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 1992, 66, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Augugliaro, V.; Gálvez, J.B.; Vázquez, J.C.; López, E.G.; Loddo, V.; Muñoz, M.J.L.; Rodrĺguez, S.M.; Marcĺ, G.; Palmisano, L.; Schiavello, M.; et al. Photocatalytic oxidation of cyanide in aqueous TiO2 suspensions irradiated by sunlight in mild and strong oxidant conditions. Catal. Today 1999, 54, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Karunakaran, C.; Gomathisankar, P.; Manikandan, G. Preparation and characterization of antimicrobial Ce-doped ZnO nanoparticles for photocatalytic detoxification of cyanide. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2010, 123, 585–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Karunakaran, C.; Rajeswari, V.; Gomathisankar, P. Antibacterial and photocatalytic activities of sonochemically prepared ZnO and Ag–ZnO. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 508, 587–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Karunakaran, C.; Abiramasundari, G.; Gomathisankar, P.; Manikandan, G.; Anandi, V. Preparation and characterization of ZnO–TiO2 nanocomposite for photocatalytic disinfection of bacteria and detoxification of cyanide under visible light. Mater. Res. Bull. 2011, 46, 1586–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mohamed, R.M.; Baeissa, E.S. Preparation and characterisation of Pd–TiO2–hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for the photocatalytic degradation of cyanide under visible light. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2013, 464–465, 218–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kadi, M.W.; Mohamed, R.M. Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity of ZrO2-SiO2 Nanoparticles by Platinum Doping. Int. J. Photoenergy 2013, 2013, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Aazam, E.S.S. Environmental remediation of cyanide solutions by photocatalytic oxidation using Au/CdS nanoparticles. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014, 20, 2870–2875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Baeissa, E.S. Photocatalytic removal of cyanide by cobalt metal doped on TiO2-SiO2 nanoparticles by photo-assisted deposition and impregnation methods. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014, 20, 3761–3766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Salinas-Guzmán, R.R.; Guzmán-Mar, J.L.; Hinojosa-Reyes, L.; Peralta-Hernández, J.M.; Hernández-Ramírez, A. Enhancement of cyanide photocatalytic degradation using sol–gel ZnO sensitized with cobalt phthalocyanine. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2010, 54, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Van Grieken, R.; Aguado, J.; López-Muñoz, M.J.; Marugán, J. Synthesis of size-controlled silica-supported TiO2 photocatalysts. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2002, 148, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rader, W.S.; Solujic, L.; Milosavljevic, E.B.; Hendrix, J.L.; Nelson, J.H. Photocatalytic detoxification of cyanide and metal cyano-species from precious-metal mill effluents. Environ. Pollut. 1995, 90, 331–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Durán, A.; Monteagudo, J.M.; San Martín, I.; García-Peña, F.; Coca, P. Photocatalytic degradation of pollutants from Elcogas IGCC power station effluents. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 144, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Monteagudo, J.M.; Durán, A.; Guerra, J.; García-Peña, F.; Coca, P. Solar TiO2-assisted photocatalytic degradation of IGCC power station effluents using a Fresnel lens. Chemosphere 2008, 71, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Addamo, M.; Augugliaro, V.; Coluccia, S.; Faga, M.; Garcia-Lopez, E.; Loddo, V.; Marci, G.; Martra, G.; Palmisano, L. Photocatalytic oxidation of acetonitrile in gas–solid and liquid–solid regimes. J. Catal. 2005, 235, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Aguado, J.; van Grieken, R.; López-Muñoz, M.; Marugán, J. Removal of cyanides in wastewater by supported TiO2-based photocatalysts. Catal. Today 2002, 75, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Osathaphan, K.; Chucherdwatanasak, B.; Rachdawong, P.; Sharma, V.K. Photocatalytic oxidation of cyanide in aqueous titanium dioxide suspensions: Effect of ethylenediaminetetraacetate. Sol. Energy 2008, 82, 1031–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lee, S.G.; Lee, S.G.; Lee, H.-I. Photocatalytic production of hydrogen from aqueous solution containing CN−as a hole scavenger. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2001, 207, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hernández-Alonso, M.D.; Coronado, J.M.; Javier Maira, A.; Soria, J.; Loddo, V.; Augugliaro, V. Ozone enhanced activity of aqueous titanium dioxide suspensions for photocatalytic oxidation of free cyanide ions. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2002, 39, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Szpyrkowicz, L.; Ziliograndi, F.; Kaul, S.; Rigonistern, S. Electrochemical treatment of copper cyanide wastewaters using stainless steel electrodes. Water Sci. Technol. 1998, 38, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shinde, S.S.; Bhosale, C.H.; Rajpure, K.Y. Photocatalytic activity of sea water using TiO2 catalyst under solar light. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2011, 103, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Parga, J.R.; Vázquez, V.; Casillas, H.M.; Valenzuela, J.L.; Vázquez, V.; Casillas, H.M.; Valenzuela, J.L. Cyanide Detoxification of Mining Wastewaters with TiO2 Nanoparticles and Its Recovery by Electrocoagulation. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2009, 32, 1901–1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pedraza-Avella, J.A.; Acevedo-Peña, P.; Pedraza-Rosas, J.E. Photocatalytic oxidation of cyanide on TiO2: An electrochemical approach. Catal. Today 2008, 133–135, 611–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Durán, A.; Monteagudo, J.M.; San Martín, I.; Aguirre, M. Decontamination of industrial cyanide-containing water in a solar CPC pilot plant. Sol. Energy 2010, 84, 1193–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Durán, A.; Monteagudo, J.M.; San Martín, I.; Sánchez-Romero, R. Photocatalytic treatment of IGCC power station effluents in a UV-pilot plant. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 167, 885–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Mudliar, R.; Umare, S.S.; Ramteke, D.S.; Wate, S.R. Energy efficient--advanced oxidation process for treatment of cyanide containing automobile industry wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164, 1474–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Hernández-Alonso, M.D.; Coronado, J.M.; Soria, J.; Conesa, J.C.; Loddo, V.; Addamo, M.; Augugliaro, V. EPR and kinetic investigation of free cyanide oxidation by photocatalysis and ozonation. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2007, 33, 205–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Malato, S.; Blanco, J.; Vidal, A.; Richter, C. Photocatalysis with solar energy at a pilot-plant scale: an overview. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2002, 37, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chiang, K.; Amal, R.; Tran, T. Photocatalytic oxidation of cyanide: kinetic and mechanistic studies. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2003, 193, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kim, J.-H.; Lee, H.-I. Effect of surface hydroxyl groups of pure TiO2 and modified TiO2 on the photocatalytic oxidation of aqueous cyanide. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2004, 21, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Marugán, J.; van Grieken, R.; Cassano, A.E.; Alfano, O.M. Quantum efficiency of cyanide photooxidation with TiO2/SiO2 catalysts: Multivariate analysis by experimental design. Catal. Today 2007, 129, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Marugan, J.; Vangrieken, R.; Cassano, A.; Alfano, O. Intrinsic kinetic modeling with explicit radiation absorption effects of the photocatalytic oxidation of cyanide with TiO2 and silica-supported TiO2 suspensions. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2008, 85, 48–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Winkelmann, K.; Sharma, V.K.; Lin, Y.; Shreve, K.A.; Winkelmann, C.; Hoisington, L.J.; Yngard, R.A. Reduction of ferrate(VI) and oxidation of cyanate in a Fe(VI)–TiO2–UV–NCO− system. Chemosphere 2008, 72, 1694–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Marugán, J.; van Grieken, R.; Cassano, A.E.; Alfano, O.M. Scaling-up of slurry reactors for the photocatalytic oxidation of cyanide with TiO2 and silica-supported TiO2 suspensions. Catal. Today 2009, 144, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mohamed, R.M.; Mkhalid, I.A. Visible light photocatalytic degradation of cyanide using Au–TiO2/multi-walled carbon nanotube nanocomposites. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 22, 390–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Pala, A.; Politi, R.R.; Kurşun, G.; Erol, M.; Bakal, F.; Öner, G.; Çelik, E. Photocatalytic degradation of cyanide in wastewater using new generated nano-thin film photocatalyst. Surf. Coatings Technol. 2015, 271, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Baeissa, E.S. Synthesis and characterization of sulfur-titanium dioxide nanocomposites for photocatalytic oxidation of cyanide using visible light irradiation. Chinese J. Catal. 2015, 36, 698–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Barakat, M.A. Ag-Sm2O3 nanocomposite for environmental remediation of cyanide from aqueous solution. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2016, 65, 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kadi, M.W.; Hameed, A.; Mohamed, R.M.; Ismail, I.M.I.; Alangari, Y.; Cheng, H.-M. The effect of Pt nanoparticles distribution on the removal of cyanide by TiO2 coated Al-MCM-41 in blue light exposure. Arab. J. Chem. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Maya-Treviño, M.L.; Guzmán-Mar, J.L.; Hinojosa-Reyes, L.; Hernández-Ramírez, A. Synthesis and photocatalytic activity of ZnO-CuPc for methylene blue and potassium cyanide degradation. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2018, 77, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Guo, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, S.; Liu, Z.; Chang, H.; Zhao, X. Photocatalytic oxidation of free cyanide over graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets under visible light. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 369, 553–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Núñez-Salas, R.E.; Hernández-Ramírez, A.; Hinojosa-Reyes, L.; Guzmán-Mar, J.L.; Villanueva-Rodríguez, M.; de Lourdes Maya-Treviño, M. Cyanide degradation in aqueous solution by heterogeneous photocatalysis using boron-doped zinc oxide. Catal. Today 2019, 328, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Weinstein, J.A. Inorganic Photochemistry. In Applied Photochemistry; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 105–148. [Google Scholar]
  76. Kohtani, S.; Yoshioka, E.; Saito, K.; Kudo, A.; Miyabe, H. Photocatalytic hydrogenation of acetophenone derivatives and diaryl ketones on polycrystalline titanium dioxide. Catal. Commun. 2010, 11, 1049–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Guzmán-Mar, J.L.; Villanueva-Rodríguez, M.; Hinojosa-Reyes, L. Application of Semiconductor Photocatalytic Materials for the Removal of Inorganic Compounds from Wastewater. In Photocatalytic Semiconductors; Hernández-Ramírez, A., Medina-Ramírez, I., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 229–254. ISBN 978-3-319-10998-5. [Google Scholar]
  78. Rodríguez, J.; Candal, R.J.; Solís, J.; Estrada, W.; Blesa, M.A. El fotocatalizador: síntesis, propiedades y limitaciones. In Microbiologia del agua. Conceptos Básicos; Argentina, 2005; Available online: http://www.psa.es/es/projects/solarsafewater/documents/curso/dia_14/9.%20Juan%20Rodriguez.pdf (accessed on 6 March 2019).
  79. Gaya, U.I.; Abdullah, A.H. Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants over titanium dioxide: A review of fundamentals, progress and problems. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2008, 9, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  80. Parga, J.R.; Shukla, S.S.; Carrillo-Pedroza, F.R. Destruction of cyanide waste solutions using chlorine dioxide, ozone and titania sol. Waste Manag. 2003, 23, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Bozzi, A.; Guasaquillo, I.; Kiwi, J. Accelerated removal of cyanides from industrial effluents by supported TiO2 photo-catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2004, 51, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Barakat, M. Removal of toxic cyanide and Cu(II) Ions from water by illuminated TiO2 catalyst. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2004, 53, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Van Grieken, R.; Aguado, J.; López-Muñoz, M.-J.; Marugán, J. Photocatalytic gold recovery from spent cyanide plating bath solutions. Gold Bull. 2005, 38, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  84. Van Grieken, R.; Aguado, J.; López-Muñoz, M.-J.; Marugán, J. Photocatalytic degradation of iron–cyanocomplexes by TiO2 based catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2005, 55, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. López-Muñoz, M.-J.; Van Grieken, R.; Aguado, J.; Marugán, J. Role of the support on the activity of silica-supported TiO2 photocatalysts: Structure of the TiO2/SBA-15 photocatalysts. Catal. Today 2005, 101, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Osathaphan, K.; Ruengruehan, K.; Yngard, R.A.; Sharma, V.K. Photocatalytic Degradation of Ni(II)-Cyano and Co(III)-Cyano Complexes. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2013, 224, 1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Harraz, F.A.; Abdel-Salam, O.E.; Mostafa, A.A.; Mohamed, R.M.; Hanafy, M. Rapid synthesis of titania–silica nanoparticles photocatalyst by a modified sol–gel method for cyanide degradation and heavy metals removal. J. Alloys Compd. 2013, 551, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Betancourt-Buitrago, L.A.; Ossa-Echeverry, O.E.; Rodriguez-Vallejo, J.C.; Barraza, J.M.; Marriaga, N.; Machuca-Martínez, F. Anoxic photocatalytic treatment of synthetic mining wastewater using TiO2 and scavengers for complexed cyanide recovery. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2018, 18, 853–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Devia-Orjuela, J.S.; Betancourt-Buitrago, L.A.; Machuca-martinez, F. CFD modeling of a UV-A LED baffled flat-plate photoreactor for environment applications: a mining wastewater case. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 4510–4520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Vilhunen, S.; Sillanpää, M. Recent developments in photochemical and chemical AOPs in water treatment: A mini-review. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Petrik, N.G.; Kimmel, G.A. Probing the photochemistry of chemisorbed oxygen on TiO2 (110) with Kr and other co-adsorbates. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 2338–2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Song, S.; Hong, F.; He, Z.; Cai, Q.; Chen, J. AgIO3-modified AgI/TiO2 composites for photocatalytic degradation of p-chlorophenol under visible light irradiation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2012, 378, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Hirayama, J.; Kamiya, Y. Combining the Photocatalyst Pt/TiO2 and the Nonphotocatalyst SnPd/Al2O3 for Effective Photocatalytic Purification of Groundwater Polluted with Nitrate. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 2207–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Chen, G.; Sun, M.; Wei, Q.; Ma, Z.; Du, B. Efficient photocatalytic reduction of aqueous Cr(VI) over CaSb2O5(OH)2 nanocrystals under UV light illumination. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2012, 125, 282–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhang, L.S.; Wong, K.H.; Yip, H.Y.; Hu, C.; Yu, J.C.; Chan, C.Y.; Wong, P.K. Effective photocatalytic disinfection of E. coli K-12 using AgBr-Ag-Bi2WO6 nanojunction system irradiated by visible light: The role of diffusing hydroxyl radicals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 1392–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Liu, S.; Zhang, N.; Tang, Z.R.; Xu, Y.J. Synthesis of one-dimensional [email protected]2 core-shell nanocomposites photocatalyst for selective redox: The dual role of TiO2 shell. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 6378–6385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Cao, J.; Li, X.; Lin, H.; Chen, S.; Fu, X. In situ preparation of novel p–n junction photocatalyst BiOI/(BiO)2CO3 with enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 239–240, 316–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Dai, H.; Zhang, S.; Hong, Z.; Li, X.; Xu, G.; Lin, Y.; Chen, G. Enhanced photoelectrochemical activity of a hierarchical-ordered TiO2 mesocrystal and its sensing application on a carbon nanohorn support scaffold. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 6418–6424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Pastrana-Martínez, L.M.; Morales-Torres, S.; Kontos, A.G.; Moustakas, N.G.; Faria, J.L.; Doña-Rodríguez, J.M.; Falaras, P.; Silva, A.M.T. TiO2, surface modified TiO2 and graphene oxide-TiO2 photocatalysts for degradation of water pollutants under near-UV/Vis and visible light. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 224, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Yin, M.; Li, Z.; Kou, J.; Zou, Z. Mechanism investigation of visible light-induced degradation in a heterogeneous TiO2/eosin Y/rhodamine B system. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 8361–8366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Chen, Y.; Yang, S.; Wang, K.; Lou, L. Role of primary active species and TiO2 surface characteristic in UV-illuminated photodegradation of Acid Orange 7. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2005, 172, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Chen, M.; Chu, W. Degradation of antibiotic norfloxacin in aqueous solution by visible-light-mediated C-TiO2 photocatalysis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 219–220, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Pandikumar, A.; Ramaraj, R. Titanium dioxide-gold nanocomposite materials embedded in silicate sol-gel film catalyst for simultaneous photodegradation of hexavalent chromium and methylene blue. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 203–204, 244–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Zhao, C.; Krall, A.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Y. Ultrasonic spray pyrolysis synthesis of Ag/TiO2 nanocomposite photocatalysts for simultaneous H2 production and CO2 reduction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 9967–9976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Sheng, F.; Zhu, X.; Wang, W.; Bai, H.; Liu, J.; Wang, P.; Zhang, R.; Han, L.; Mu, J. Synthesis of novel polyoxometalate K6ZrW11O39Sn12H2O and photocatalytic degradation aqueous azo dye solutions with solar irradiation. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2014, 393, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Tian, L.; Ye, L.; Liu, J.; Zan, L. Solvothermal synthesis of CNTs–WO3 hybrid nanostructures with high photocatalytic activity under visible light. Catal. Commun. 2012, 17, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Villa, K.; Murcia-López, S.; Andreu, T.; Morante, J.R. Mesoporous WO3 photocatalyst for the partial oxidation of methane to methanol using electron scavengers. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 163, 150–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kowalska, E.; Rau, S. Photoreactors for Wastewater Treatment: A Review. Recent Patents Eng. 2010, 4, 242–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Yeh, N.; Yeh, P.; Shih, N.; Byadgi, O.; Cheng, T.C. Applications of light-emitting diodes in researches conducted in aquatic environment. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 32, 611–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Jo, W.; Tayade, R.J. New Generation Energy-Efficient Light Source for Photocatalysis: LEDs for Environmental Applications. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 2073–2084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Izadifard, M.; Achari, G.; Langford, C. Application of Photocatalysts and LED Light Sources in Drinking Water Treatment. Catalysts 2013, 3, 726–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  112. Chatterley, C. UV-LED irradiation technology for point-of-use water disinfection in developing communities. Master’s Thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  113. Vilhunen, S.; Puton, J.; Virkutyte, J.; Sillanpää, M. Efficiency of hydroxyl radical formation and phenol decomposition using UV light emitting diodes and H2O2. Environ. Technol. 2011, 32, 865–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Jamali, A.; Vanraes, R.; Hanselaer, P.; Van Gerven, T. A batch LED reactor for the photocatalytic degradation of phenol. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2013, 71, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Malkhasian, A.Y.S.; Izadifard, M.; Achari, G.; Langford, C.H. Photocatalytic degradation of agricultural antibiotics using a UV-LED light source. J. Environ. Sci. Heal. Part B Pestic. Food Contam. Agric. Wastes 2014, 49, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Abdollahi Kakroudi, M.; Kazemi, F.; Kaboudin, B. Highly efficient photodeoximation under green and blue LEDs catalyzed by mesoporous CN codoped nano TiO2. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2014, 392, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Liu, X.; Pan, L.; Lv, T.; Sun, Z. CdS sensitized TiO2 film for photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) by microwave-assisted chemical bath deposition method. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 583, 390–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Tokode, O.; Prabhu, R.; Lawton, L. a.; Robertson, P.K.J. Mathematical modelling of quantum yield enhancements of methyl orange photooxidation in aqueous TiO2 suspensions under controlled periodic UV LED illumination. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 156–157, 398–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Zand, Z.; Kazemi, F.; Hosseini, S. Development of chemoselective photoreduction of nitro compounds under solar light and blue LED irradiation. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014, 55, 338–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Eskandari, P.; Kazemi, F.; Zand, Z. Photocatalytic reduction of aromatic nitro compounds using CdS nanostructure under blue LED irradiation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2014, 274, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Jenny, R.M.; Simmons, O.D.; Shatalov, M.; Ducoste, J.J. Modeling a continuous flow ultraviolet Light Emitting Diode reactor using computational fluid dynamics. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2014, 116, 524–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Tokode, O.; Prabhu, R.; Lawton, L.A.; Robertson, P.K.J. The effect of pH on the photonic efficiency of the destruction of methyl orange under controlled periodic illumination with UV-LED sources. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 246, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  123. Doss, N.; Bernhardt, P.; Romero, T.; Masson, R.; Keller, V.; Keller, N. Photocatalytic degradation of butanone (methylethylketone) in a small-size TiO2/β-SiC alveolar foam LED reactor. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 154–155, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Dai, K.; Lu, L.; Liang, C.; Dai, J.; Zhu, G.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, Y. Graphene oxide modified ZnO nanorods hybrid with high reusable photocatalytic activity under UV-LED irradiation. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2014, 143, 1410–1416. [Google Scholar]
  125. Hossaini, H.; Moussavi, G.; Farrokhi, M. The investigation of the LED-activated FeFNS-TiO2 nanocatalyst for photocatalytic degradation and mineralization of organophosphate pesticides in water. Water Res. 2014, 59, 130–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Marugán, J.; van Grieken, R.; Pablos, C.; Satuf, M.L.; Cassano, A.E.; Alfano, O.M. Kinetic modelling of Escherichia coli inactivation in a photocatalytic wall reactor. Catal. Today 2015, 240, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Rasoulifard, M.H.; Fazli, M.; Eskandarian, M.R. Performance of the light-emitting-diodes in a continuous photoreactor for degradation of Direct Red 23 using UV-LED/S2O82− process. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 24, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Levchuk, I.; Rueda-Márquez, J.J.; Suihkonen, S.; Manzano, M. a.; Sillanpää, M. Application of UVA-LED based photocatalysis for plywood mill wastewater treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 143, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Betancourt-Buitrago, L.A.; Vásquez, C.; Veitia, L.; Ossa-Echeverry, O.; Rodriguez-Vallejo, J.; Barraza-Burgos, J.; Marriaga-Cabrales, N.; Machuca-Martínez, F. An approach to utilize the artificial high power LED UV-A radiation in photoreactors for the degradation of methylene blue. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2017, 16, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Keyword correlation map. Database: Web of Science. 464 documents. Date of consultation: 22 February 2018. Built with VOSViewer v1.6.7.
Figure 1. Keyword correlation map. Database: Web of Science. 464 documents. Date of consultation: 22 February 2018. Built with VOSViewer v1.6.7.
Processes 07 00225 g001
Figure 2. One electron reduction steps of oxygen to hydroxyl radical and two electron oxidation steps of water to H2O2. Adapted from Reference [32].
Figure 2. One electron reduction steps of oxygen to hydroxyl radical and two electron oxidation steps of water to H2O2. Adapted from Reference [32].
Processes 07 00225 g002
Figure 3. Photocatalytic scheme of free cyanide in a TiO2 particle. Adapted from Reference [21].
Figure 3. Photocatalytic scheme of free cyanide in a TiO2 particle. Adapted from Reference [21].
Processes 07 00225 g003
Figure 4. Relative position of the edges of the conduction and valence bands of some semiconductors. Adapted from References [78,79].
Figure 4. Relative position of the edges of the conduction and valence bands of some semiconductors. Adapted from References [78,79].
Processes 07 00225 g004
Table 1. Stability of cyano-metallic complexes [19].
Table 1. Stability of cyano-metallic complexes [19].
GroupSpeciesToxicity [20]Stability Constant (Log Kn)
Free cyanideCNHighn.a.
HCN(g) 9.2
Simpler compounds: Easily soluble NaCN, KCN, Ca(CN)2, Hg(CN)2, Zn(CN)2, CuCN, Ni(CN)2, AgCNHighn.d.
Weak complex (WAD—Weak Acid Dissociable) Cd ( CN ) 4 2 Intermediate17.9
Cd ( CN ) 3 n.d.
Zn ( CN ) 4 2 19.6
Ag ( CN ) 2 20.5
Ni ( CN ) 4 2 30.2
Cu ( CN ) 3 2 21.6
Cr ( CN ) 6 3 n.a.
Cr ( CN ) 6 3 n.a.
Strong complexes (SAD—Strong Acid Dissociable) Fe ( CN ) 6 4 35.4
Fe ( CN ) 6 3 Low43.6
Au ( CN ) 2 38.3
Co ( CN ) 6 3 High64.0
Unstable inorganic SCN, CNOHighn.d.
Aliphatic organicAcetonitrile, acrylonitrile, adiponitrile, propionitrile Intermediaten.d.
Table 2. Photocatalytic treatments applied to free cyanide matrices.
Table 2. Photocatalytic treatments applied to free cyanide matrices.
YearSubstance [C0]Source of LightWavelengthType of ReactorDegradation/Reaction TimeCatalyst Main Findings
1992KCN
[100 ppm]
14 W UV Hg Low Pressure360 nmCompact Square batch reactor 100%/60 minTiO2 P25Achieve total degradation to nitrates and cyanates. They find the CO2 in air bubbling as harmful for the photocatalytic mechanism [33]
1999NaCN, NaCNO [3.85 mM]Solar lightSolar spectrumCPC pilot scale100%/4.1 Einstein accumulatedTiO2 P25Total degradation with solar light, but kinetics is only related to accumulated energy [34]
2001NaCN
[666 ppm CN]
450 W, 700 W Hg high-pressure lamp UV-ALaboratory Batch 1.5 mmol/h H2 produced at 70 °C and 700 WNiO/TiO2The process produced hydrogen and cyanate from cyanide as a photocatalytic strategy of remediation [50]
2002Free Cyanide, phenol, atrazine, EPTC, dichloroacetic acid, and Cr(VI) among others.Solar Solar spectrumPilot-scale PSA–Solar platform of Almeria100%/N.D.photo Fenton and photocatalysis applications.Several experiments applied at a solar pilot plant in Almeria with successful results [60]
2002KCN
[100 ppm]
150W Hg medium pressure lamp>300 nmBatch cylindrical47%/2 h TiO2/SBA-15Supported TiO2 on SBA-15 and MCM-41Achieved geometry optimization using the support SBA. However, degradation resulted low [43]
2002NaCN
[100 ppm CN]
150W Hg Medium pressuren.a.Batch cylindrical50%/350 minTiO2 Sol-gel method on four different supportAchieved a low degradation of free cyanide exploring a novel geometry configuration on the TiO2 distribution [48]
2003NaCN
[3.85 mM]
n.a.n.a.n.a.100%/420 minTiO2 P25Although total degradation was achieved, authors argue the photonic efficiency is very low and radical recombination occurred. They propose a very detail degradation kinetic mechanism [61]
2004KCN
[50 ppm]
450 W High-pressure Hg lamp>300 nmbinaural pyrex batch with intern lampn.a.TPA/TiO2, Cs-TPA/TiO2They determine the interaction of CN− with holes and electrons photogenerated. The Cs resulted in photocatalytic inhibition [62].
2005CH3CN (gas and liquid)
[24 mM]
500 W Hg medium pressure lamp365 nmAnnular photoreactor steady state for liquid and gas phase21%/4 g gas phase
35%/5 g liquid phase
TiO2 anatase for gas, and TiO2 P25 for the liquid phasePhotocatalytic activity was low, and free cyanide ions remain in solution [47]
2007NH3, HCOOH, CN from Electric Power Plant wastewater
[10 ppm CN, 1700 HCOOH, 150 ppm NH3]
150 W Hg lamp190–280 nmBatch cylindrical100% CN
90% NH3
100% HCOOH/10 min
TiO2 P25 + H2O2Requires addition of H2O2 to enhance photocatalytic degradation [45]
2007KCN
[45 ppm CN]
400 W Hg UV Lamp>300 nmRecirculating cylindrical photoreactor5%/100 minSol-gel TiO2/SiO2 Apply an optimization methodology to optimize the photonic efficiency of the photoreactor. However, a very low photodegradation was evidenced [63]
2007KCN
[40 ppm CN]
400 W Hg medium pressure lamp>300 nmCylindrical with reflector95%/60 minThree photocatalysts were evaluated: TiO2 P25, DBH TiO2, nanometric TiO2.Evaluated the photocatalytic degradation with three photocatalysts and with the addition of O3. A good degradation was achieved but the addition of O3 instead O2 resulted in photocatalytic inhibition [59]
2008KCN
[3.85 nM]
80 W and 36 W Low-pressure lampUV-ACylindrical photoreactorn.a.TiO2 P25, TiO2/SiO2The authors proposed an intrinsic kinetic model of cyanide degradation with an accurate fitting of experimental data. The study was more kinetic than a photocatalytic evaluation [64]
2008NaCN, gasification plant wastewater
[10 ppm CN]
Solar light200 W/cm2 of solar spectrum concentrated with a Fresnel LensCylindrical photoreactor100%/90 minTiO2 P25. The evaluated the effect of solar light using a Fresnel lens to concentrate energy. They required the addition of H2O2 to achieve total mineralization of free cyanide [46]
2008KCNO, Fe+4
[1 mM CNO]
[1 mM Fe+4]
n.a.UV-ABorosilicate glass cylindrical80% cyanate degradation/120 minTIO2 P25The process reduced ferrate(VI) and oxidated cyanate in a Fe(VI)-TiO2-UV-NCO system. However, the role of the TiO2 in the degradation was not specified. The possible reduction-oxidation mechanism for Fe+4 reduction was not clarified [65]
2008KCN [100 ppm CN]15 W Hg low-pressure lampUV-ACylindrical batch100%/350 minTiO2 P25The degradation was done using 10.5 mM EDTA as a hole scavenger. Addition of EDTA evidenced an increase in the cyanide oxidation to CNO [49]
2009KCN [30 ppm CN]400 W and 36 W Blacklight lamp365 nmAnnular reactor100%/120 minTiO2/SiO2They evaluate and compared the scaling-up process from laboratory to pilot plant, using supported TiO2. Total elimination of cyanide was achieved in both systems. Propose a scaling up methodology for photoreactors [66]
2009NaCN
[400 ppm]
450 W Halide lampUV-ACylindrical glass batch 90%/30 min TiO2 nanoparticles coupled with an electrocoagulation recoveryIt is proposed a recovery technique using electrocoagulation after a typical photocatalytic cyanide degradation. A study of TiO2 reuse was also performed [54]
2010KCN [250 ppm]8 W Hg lamp 365 nmBatch cylindrical 40%/100 min Ce-ZnO sonochemical impregnationDoping relations of 2% Ce-ZnO calcined at 500 °C. This photocatalyst works better in the visible region. There is an excess of light applied to the system, which could mix the photocatalysis with the photolysis effect on CN degradation [35]
2010KCN
[11 mM CN]
8 W Hg Lamp 365 nmBatch cylindrical Reactor86%/90 min Ag-ZnO sonochemical impregnation synthesis Ag-ZnO was found to be three times better than ZnO pure [36]
2011KCN [10 mM]150 W halide and 8 W Hg UV lamp365 nm UVAnnular batch reactor 16%/150 minZnO-TiO2Photocatalytic activity was demonstrated but with important radiant field losses in the photoreactor [37]
2013KCN [100 ppm]150 W fluorescent lamp450 nmBatch cylindrical reactor 98%/60 minPt-TiO2- hydroxyapatite. Prepared by Sonic method. Hydroxyapatite enhanced the photocatalytic behavior of bare suspended TiO2 [38]
2013KCN [100 ppm]150 W fluorescent lamp450 nmBatch annular reactor 100%/20 min Pt/ZrO2-SiO2 prepared by a photo-assisted deposition method. Evaluated the effect of catalyst load on the reactor [39]
2014KCN
[100 ppm]
150 W fluorescent blue lamp450 nmBatch cylindrical reactor100%/360 min 96%/240 minCo-TiO2-SiO2 prepared by a photo-assisted method and impregnation.Obtained the best catalyst load obtained at 0.08 g/L and a decreased in the TiO2 band-gap with the total elimination of CN [41]
2015NaCN
[30 ppm]
UV-LED Not specified. UV-A UV-B UV-CSubmerged cylindrical LED photoreactor100%/>600 minTiO2 P25Demonstrated the possibility of using LED as a source of UV light in a photocatalytic treatment. The most efficient was UV-C, due to photolytic effect [21]
2015KCN
[100 ppm]
500 W Xe bulb lamp>420nmPyrex reaction cell100%/60 minMWCNT/Au-TiO2They found carbon nanotubes beneficial for photocatalytic degradation in the presence of oxygen and visible light [67]
2015KCN
[100 ppm]
700 W Xenon lampn.a.Pyrex reaction cell100%/5 hCeO2/KLTOCeO2/KLTO enhanced the photocatalytic activity compared to a photolytic effect at 750W/m2 [68]
2015KCN
[100 ppm]
150 W Blue fluorescent lamp>400 nmHorizontal cylinder annular batch reactor100%/30 minS-TiO2Photocatalytic activity resulted enhanced with the addition of S, being 0.3 wt %S-TiO2 the most efficient with visible light [69]
2016KCN
[150 ppm]
150 W Blue fluorescent lamp>400 nmPyrex cell reactor100%/60 minAg-Sm2O3The Ag was beneficial for the photocatalytic activity by 90% more than bare Sm2O3. The catalyst is useful up to 5 times cycles [70]
2016CN
[100 ppm]
150 W Blue fluorescent lampn.a.Pyrex glass cylindrical100%/70 minPt/Ti-Al-MCM-41The Pt addition to Ti-Al-MCM41 resulted in 10 times more efficient the suspended TiO2 photocatalytic activity [71]
2018KCN
[30 ppm]
25 W metal halide lamp, and UV Lamp365 nm and 400–700 nmPyrex glass cylindrical100%/350 minZnO-CuPc0.5wt%Zn-CuPc enhanced cyanide degradation. However, the TiO2 P25 still showed faster kinetic of degradation [72]
2019NaCN
[0.18 mM CN]
300 W Xe lamp>400 nmQuartz batch reactor90%/150 ming-C3N4NanosheetsNanotubes exhibited good photocatalytic activity, but it was the dissolved oxygen played the most important role in the oxidation of cyanide in visible light [73]
2019KCN [10 ppm]Xe lamp400–800 nmPyrex glass cylindrical89%/120 minB-ZnOB-ZnO enhanced photocatalytic activity compared to bare ZnO with visible light at low cyanide concentrations [74]
Table 3. Photocatalytic treatments of metallic cyano-complexes.
Table 3. Photocatalytic treatments of metallic cyano-complexes.
YearMatrixLight SourceWavelengthType of PhotoreactorRemoval/Reaction TimeCatalystMain Finding
1995Real mining wastewater Cu(CN)32– [22 mM]
Zn(CN)42– [300 mM]
Fe(CN)64– [5.2 mM]
Fe [29 mM]
Hg [11 mM]
As [16 mM]
Solar lightSolar spectrumDish PVC99% metal removals/17 daysTiO2 P25All metal was removed with the formation of metal-hydroxides and nitrate [44]
2002Fe(CN)63−
[0.64 mM]
150W Hg high pressure lamp>300 nmPyrex batch photoreactor50%/350 min for SBA-15/TiO2TiO2 MCA-41, SBA-15The photocatalytic activity was evaluated using two different support for TiO2. The porous SBA-15 resulted in better degradation of Fe(CN)63− but also for the free cyanide mineralization [48].
2003Fe(CN)63− [1 mM]4W Hg low mercury lamp and solar light>300 nmCylindrical batch100%/1.5 h solar radiation, 77%/6 h UV LampTiO2 sol-gelTiO2 resulted in a better way to destroy Fe(CN)63−, however resulting wastewater was rich in cyanate and incomplete oxidation was observed. Solar light exhibited better degradation rates [80].
2004CuCN [90 ppm CN]400 and 700 W halide lamp medium pressure HgUVBatch cylindrical reactor 100%/180 min TiO2 in Raschig rings supportEvaluated four different methods and the hydrothermal was the best [81].
2004NaCN, Cu(CN)32 [1 mM NaCN], [10 mM Cu(CN)32]100 W high pressure Hg lamp228–420 nmBatch annular reactor bench scale.100%/150 min TiO2 P25The ratio Cu:CN influences photocatalytic degradation. A 10:1 ratio was the best for the process [82]
2005AuCN2 [75 mg/L AuCN2]150 W medium pressure Hg lamp365 nmBeaker86%/240 min TiO2/LThe recovery of free cyanide is made adding methanol as OH acceptor. Thus, oxidation of CN to CNO is avoided. The cyano-complex AuCN2 is the electron acceptor and Au0 is deposited on the TiO2 particles [83]
2005[Fe(CN)6]3– and [Fe(CN)6]4– [100 ppm CN equivalent]150 W Hg medium pressure>320 nmBeaker70%/240 min TiO2 P25, TiO2/SiO2 prepared by sol-gel and hydrothermal method.The maximum degradation was about 70% of the cyano-complex. It requires additional treatment. Iron complexes contaminated the semiconductor [84]
2005KCN, K3(Fe(CN)6), KAu(CN)2 [3.85 mM KCN; 0.64 mM K3(Fe(CN)6); 0.38 mM KAu(CN)2]150 W Hg medium pressure 365 nmBeakern.d.TiO2/GrSiO2, TiO2/SBA-15.Different methods of support were evaluated, 60% of TiO2/SBA-15 performed better for iron-complex degradation [85]
2008CNO [0.5 mM] Fe(IV) [1 mM]Spectro line UV-A lamp 365 nmBeaker80%/120 minTiO2 P25 DegussaThere is an enhancement in the cyanate degradation related to the presence of ferrate [65]
2009Real Wastewater from Energy PlantUVA UVC200–280; 320–400 nmPilot photoreactor 100%/15 minFeSO4, H2O2Although the study demonstrates the ability of a pilot plant for cyanide degradation, it only is evaluated the degradation of free cyanide and not of its complexes [57]
2013KCN, Co(CN)63, Ni(CN)42 [100 µM]15 W Hg low-pressure lamp. n.d.Cylindrical borosilicate reactor Ni:90%/180 min, Co: 30%/180 minTiO2 P25 suspensionNickel removal was shown to be achievable by photocatalysis; however, cobalt removal is more challenging [86]
2013KCN, Co, Pb, Cr [100 ppm CN, Co, Pb, Cr]Blacklight lamp and blue light 365 nmAnnular photoreactor 100%/180 minTiO2/SiO2 sol-gel.Synthesized photocatalyst could degrade free cyanide and dissolved Co, Pb, Cr. However, the evaluation of metal photo-removal was not done in the presence of cyanide [87]
2018Fe(CN)63− [100 ppm]30 W UV-LED300–400 nmMini CPC UVLED photoreactor70%/20 minTiO2 P25Using UV-LED at 30W/m2 in a mini CPC resulted better for recovery of cyanide instead remediation [88]
2018Fe(CN)63− [100 ppm]5W UV-LED300–400 nmUV baffled flat plate reactor60%/90 minTiO2 P25Configuration resulted useful for light harvesting, but it is required more UV Power since the complex was not complete degraded [89]
Table 4. Several radical scavenger agents used in a typical photocatalytic degradation.
Table 4. Several radical scavenger agents used in a typical photocatalytic degradation.
ScavengersCompound
Holes (h+)Glucose [93]; formic acid, sulfuric acid [9,94]; sodium oxalate [95]; ammonium oxalate [96,97]; 4-methylimidozal [98]; EDTA [97,99,100]; KI [92,100,101]; NH4+ [102]; oxalic acid and methylene blue [103]
Hydroxyl radical (OH)t-butanol [92,96,99]; isopropyl alcohol [97]; methanol [100,104]; ethanol [101]; acetonitrile [101]; KBr [105]; terephthalic acid [106]
Electrons on the conduction band (e)Fe3+, Cu2+, Ag+ [106,107]; AgNO3 [96]; Cr6+ [95]; KIO3 [102], (S2O8)2− [92]
Superoxide radical (O2•−)Benzoquinone [96,97]
Table 5. LED emerging photoreactors.
Table 5. LED emerging photoreactors.
YearDescriptionMain Findings
2013Phenol photodegradation using batch UV LED at 375 nm.It is reported that UV LEDs at 800 mW are 100 times more efficient in comparison with 12 and 16 W fluorescent UV Lamps [114].
2013Drinking water potabilization using UV LED at 365 nmNatural organic matter and emerging pollutants were removed from drinking water. It is concluded that the photoreactor design with this type of light is more critical than the catalyst load [111].
2014Used in the dyes photodegradation, organic matter of air and water.Proved the capability of organic matter using this type of light, which is better in term of the photoreactor size, energy consumption [110].
2014Oxytetracycline and 17-α-etinil estradiol as agriculture antibiotic degradation using UV LED light.Reached a 100% degradation of total organic carbon with cumulative energy of about 12.5 kJ/L [115].
2014Acetonitrile degradation in Green blue and red LED photoreactor with C-N TiO2.Degradation of about 100% was achieved in 2 h using low power (3 W) LEDs [116].
2014Chromium photoreduction using CdS and TiO2 with white LED photoreactor.The removal of chromium was about 93% in 240 min of reaction [117].
2014Methyl orange degradation modeling applying Controlled Periodic Illumination in a UV LED photoreactor.It was found that Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetics do not describe well the photoreactor operating at Controlled Periodic Illumination. Novel mathematic modeling is required for pulsed photoreactors [118].
2014Selective photocatalytic reduction of nitrobenzene carried out by UV LED light.The transformation of nitrobenzene to aniline was achieved using ethanol as the electron donor with 100% of conversion [119].
2014Evaluation of nitro-aromatic compounds using CdS as the catalyst.The photoreactor uses a visible LED to enhance photoreduction of amines using methanol and isopropanol as electron donors (hole scavenger). The conversion was about 90% with a selectivity of about 71% [120].
2014A CFD simulation experimental and validation of a UV LED photoreactor for Escherichia coli disinfection.The CFD established the best amount of irradiation, flowrate and photoreactor dimension in which best photo absorption is achieved for E. coli disinfection [121].
2014Methyl orange degradation under Controlled Periodic Illumination with a UV LED. The Controlled Periodic Illumination demonstrated being more critical in the photonic efficiency when the ON-OFF period is closer to the characteristic time of the reaction. Also proposes photo-reductive degradation instead of a photooxidation mechanism [122].
2014Methyl ketone degradation using UV-vis LED with supported TiO2 in alveolar foam.The removal was 100% of methyl ketone in 600 min of reaction using 56 LEDs [123].
2014Photoreactor using graphene oxide ZnO for methylene blue degradation.Degradation of 100% of Methylene blue is achieved in 150 min using UV-A LEDs. Graphene oxide resulted in photocatalytic degradation enhancement than Degussa P25 [124].
2014Evaluation of FeFNS-TiO2 activated by LED in pesticides mineralization. Degradation of 90% achieved in 100 min of reaction [125]
2015E. coli disinfection modeling in a LED photoreactor Bacteria deactivation achieved in 120 min using TiO2 in an annular LED UV-A photoreactor [126].
2015Direct Red 23 degradation in a continuous UV LED photoreactor assisted with S2O82− Complete oxidation of Direct Red 23 is done in homogeneous photocatalysis and 72 UV-LED units [127].
2015Uses a photoreactor with UV-A LED for phenol and plywood mill wastewater treatment.Demonstrated a photocatalytic degradation of phenol about >90% in 13 min and total removal of tannic acid in plywood mill wastewater in 43 min [128].
2015Free cyanide degradation by the oxidative pathway in synthetic wastewater. Demonstrated the free cyanide degradation in more than 10 h, using LEDs at UVA, UVB, and UVC. The last one was the most effective in photooxidation [21].
2017Methylene blue degradation in a mini-CPC photoreactor.Evaluated two systems in a coupled mini CPC and a traditional beaker with external UV-A LED illumination. Demonstrated the capability of the mini CPC in harvesting LED Light in the degradation [129].
2018CFD simulation to enhance LED light utilization and evaluation in iron cyano-metalic complexes. Demonstrated the utilization of a baffled plat plate photoreactor is useful for UV-LED light harvesting [89].
2018Iron cyanocomplexes degraded in anoxic conditions using a mini-CPC UV LED photoreactorAchieved the photoreduction of iron and free cyanide liberation as a strategy of recovery instead remediation for this iron cyanocomplex [88].

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Betancourt-Buitrago, L.A.; Hernandez-Ramirez, A.; Colina-Marquez, J.A.; Bustillo-Lecompte, C.F.; Rehmann, L.; Machuca-Martinez, F. Recent Developments in the Photocatalytic Treatment of Cyanide Wastewater: An Approach to Remediation and Recovery of Metals. Processes 2019, 7, 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7040225

AMA Style

Betancourt-Buitrago LA, Hernandez-Ramirez A, Colina-Marquez JA, Bustillo-Lecompte CF, Rehmann L, Machuca-Martinez F. Recent Developments in the Photocatalytic Treatment of Cyanide Wastewater: An Approach to Remediation and Recovery of Metals. Processes. 2019; 7(4):225. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7040225

Chicago/Turabian Style

Betancourt-Buitrago, Luis Andrés, Aracely Hernandez-Ramirez, Jose Angel Colina-Marquez, Ciro Fernando Bustillo-Lecompte, Lars Rehmann, and Fiderman Machuca-Martinez. 2019. "Recent Developments in the Photocatalytic Treatment of Cyanide Wastewater: An Approach to Remediation and Recovery of Metals" Processes 7, no. 4: 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7040225

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop