1. Introduction
Coalbed methane (CBM) is of significant strategic importance for optimizing the global energy structure, mitigating energy shortages, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions [
1,
2,
3,
4]. In recent years, as CBM exploration and development have progressively extended to greater depths, coal reservoirs have been found to exhibit characteristics of elevated geothermal temperature, high reservoir pressure, and increased in situ stress [
5,
6,
7]. Consequently, the occurrence and migration mechanisms of deep CBM differ markedly from those of shallow reservoirs, posing challenges to traditional understandings of CBM occurrence established under shallow-to-intermediate burial conditions.
CBM predominantly occurs in an adsorbed state within the micropores of the coal matrix, and adsorbed gas generally accounts for the dominant proportion of the total gas content in coal seams [
8,
9,
10]. Therefore, under the complex conditions simulating deep formations, accurately evaluating the methane adsorption capacity of coal and its controlling mechanisms is fundamental to deep CBM resource assessment, reserve estimation, and optimization of development strategies. In deep coal seams, reservoir pressure often exceeds 15 MPa, and methane exists under high-pressure or even near-supercritical thermodynamic conditions. Its density, compressibility, and intermolecular interaction characteristics change significantly, causing coal-methane adsorption behavior to exhibit responses distinct from those observed under low-pressure conditions.
Deep high-pressure or near-supercritical conditions alone cannot independently determine methane adsorption behavior; rather, their influence on adsorption characteristics is highly dependent on the intrinsic structural properties of the coal matrix. Coal rank, as an integrated indicator of coalification evolution, is a key factor controlling methane adsorption capacity in coal reservoirs [
11,
12,
13]. With increasing coal rank, the structural characteristics of coal macromolecules undergo pronounced differentiation: oxygen-containing functional groups (e.g., carboxyl and hydroxyl groups) are progressively eliminated [
14,
15], aliphatic side chains are shortened and cleaved [
16,
17], and condensed aromatic ring structures continuously expand and tend toward ordered stacking [
18,
19]. These evolutionary processes transform the coal molecular framework from a relatively flexible structure to a highly rigid configuration, thereby not only restructuring the pore system of the coal matrix but also profoundly influencing the intermolecular interactions between coal and methane molecules.
From the perspective of molecular-scale interaction mechanisms, an increase in the size of aromatic lamellae and their stacking density enhances the superposition effect of van der Waals potential energy between pore walls, thereby generating deeper potential wells and providing higher-energy adsorption sites [
20,
21,
22]. Under high-pressure or near-supercritical conditions, the density of methane molecules increases significantly, and both intermolecular interactions and molecule-pore wall interactions are further amplified, making the influence of coal macromolecular structural differences on adsorption behavior more pronounced [
23,
24]. Therefore, the variations observed among different coal ranks in terms of methane adsorption capacity, adsorption heat characteristics, and pressure sensitivity can essentially be attributed to systematic differences in the chemical composition and spatial geometric configurations of coal macromolecules.
However, due to the pronounced heterogeneity and multiscale complexity of coal structures, conventional experimental techniques have difficulty directly elucidating adsorption mechanisms at the molecular scale under deep high-pressure conditions. In recent years, X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Solid-state
13C nuclear magnetic resonance (
13C NMR), and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) have been widely applied in studies of coal macromolecular structures, providing important experimental constraints for quantitatively characterizing functional group distributions, aromaticity, and microstructural ordering parameters of coal [
25,
26,
27,
28,
29,
30,
31]. FTIR can qualitatively and semi-quantitatively analyze organic functional groups such as aliphatic, aromatic, and oxygen-containing groups; XPS accurately identifies the chemical states of C, O, N, and S heteroatoms on the coal surface; 13C NMR quantitatively characterizes the aromatic carbon, aliphatic carbon, and carbon skeleton structure, which can fully provide the core parameters for coal macromolecular model construction. In contrast, XRD is effective for analyzing the physical stacking parameters of microcrystallites; it provides limited information on specific chemical connectivity. On this basis, molecular simulation methods have gradually become important tools for investigating coal-methane interactions. Previous studies have shown that coal macromolecular models constructed under experimental data constraints can effectively compensate for the limitations of experimental approaches in terms of spatial scale and operating conditions. For example, Firouzi et al. employed the Voronoi method to construct porous carbon network structures to simulate gas adsorption behavior in microporous media [
32]. In contrast, Liu et al. established coal macromolecular models through geometric optimization and successfully predicted the adsorption characteristics of different gases [
33]. These studies provide an important methodological foundation for elucidating coalbed methane adsorption mechanisms at the molecular scale. Nevertheless, existing research has primarily focused on single coal ranks or low-to-moderate pressure conditions, and the understanding of high-pressure or even near-supercritical methane adsorption behavior in deep coal seams remains insufficient. Meanwhile, systematic comparative investigations across multiple coal ranks are relatively scarce, making it difficult to reveal the continuous control pattern of coal macromolecular structural evolution on adsorption mechanisms.
In view of this, three representative coal samples of different ranks are selected in this study. The coal macromolecular structures are comprehensively characterized using FTIR, XPS, and 13C NMR, and macromolecular models of different coal ranks are constructed under experimental constraints. Methane adsorption behavior under deep reservoir conditions is then systematically simulated. By comparing differences among models of various coal ranks in terms of molecular structural characteristics, pore structure evolution, methane adsorption capacity, and adsorption heat response, this study aims to elucidate the control mechanism of coal rank on high-pressure methane adsorption behavior in deep coal seams at the molecular scale, thereby providing a theoretical basis for the accurate evaluation and efficient development of deep CBM resources.
2. Samples and Experimental Methods
2.1. Basic Characteristics of Samples
Three coal samples with different metamorphic degrees were collected from the Qinshui Basin, Shanxi Province, China. The samples were obtained from the medium-rank Dongzhuang Mine (DZ), the high-rank Zhangcun Mine (ZC), and the high-rank Sihe Mine (SH). To ensure sample integrity, large blocks of freshly exposed coal were collected from newly exposed working faces and immediately sealed with multiple layers of plastic wrap to prevent oxidation and moisture loss.
According to ISO 7404-3-1994 and ISO 7404-5-1994 standards, the maximum vitrinite reflectance (
Ro,max) was determined using polished particulate coal sections (particle size ~1.18 mm) [
34,
35]. Proximate analysis was conducted on crushed powder samples (particle size < 0.25 mm) in accordance with the Chinese National Standard GB/T 212-2008 to determine moisture (
Mad), ash yield (
Ad), volatile matter (
Vdaf), and fixed carbon (
FCd) [
36]. Ultimate analysis (
C,
H,
N,
S) was performed following GB 476-1991 [
37], and the oxygen content was calculated by difference. The detailed results are presented in
Table 1. Notably, although the proximate and ultimate analysis results for DZ, ZC, and SH appear numerically similar, their fundamental differences are rooted in the progression of coal rank. DZ (
Ro,max = 1.63%) is a medium-rank coal with the highest volatile matter (
Vdaf =18.50%) and abundant aliphatic structures. ZC (
Ro,max = 2.29%) is a high-rank coal in the transitional stage of coalification, with moderate volatile matter and enhanced aromatic condensation. SH (
Ro,max = 3.18%) is an anthracite with the lowest volatile matter (
Vdaf = 8.66%), the highest fixed carbon (
FCd = 77.41%), and the most aromatized structure. These obvious gradient differences provide a solid foundation for the comparison and construction of molecular models with different coal ranks.
2.2. Experimental Methods
To accurately characterize the macromolecular chemical structures of coal and construct representative coal macromolecular models, FTIR, 13C NMR, and XPS were employed for combined analysis. All coal samples were ground into fine powders (particle size < 200 mesh) prior to testing to minimize particle size effects on the results. The samples were subsequently vacuum-dried at 378.15 K for 12 h to thoroughly remove free and adsorbed water, thereby avoiding interference from moisture in functional group identification and surface chemical state analysis.
- (1)
XPS
The surface elemental composition and chemical states of the coal samples were analyzed using XPS. During measurement, the beam spot size was 900 μm, and tests were conducted under standard ultra-high vacuum conditions (base pressure < 10−9 mbar to prevent signal attenuation). To improve the signal-to-noise ratio and measurement stability, 30 full-spectrum scans were performed for each sample to obtain elemental composition information. As coal is a non-conductive material, surface charging effects inevitably occurred during testing. To eliminate charging-induced shifts in binding energy determination, all spectra were calibrated using the main C1s peak at 284.8 eV as the reference, providing a strict binding energy measurement accuracy of ±0.1 eV. High-resolution scans and peak deconvolution of characteristic peaks such as C1s and O1s were conducted to semi-quantitatively determine the relative contents of different chemical bond types (e.g., C–C/C=C, C–O, C=O, and O–C=O), thereby providing constraint parameters for functional group construction in the coal macromolecular models.
- (2)
FTIR
The organic functional group structures in the coal samples were characterized using FTIR with a Bruker Vertex 80 spectrometer, Karlsruhe, Germany. Samples were prepared using the KBr pellet method, in which coal powder was uniformly mixed with KBr at a specified mass ratio and pressed under 20 MPa for 60 s to form transparent pellets. Spectra were recorded over a wavenumber range of 4000–400 cm−1 with a resolution of 4 cm−1. This high spectral resolution ensures the precise identification of adjacent absorption bands. Each sample was scanned 32 times to improve the signal-to-noise ratio and minimize background interference. By analyzing absorption peak distributions in different wavenumber regions, aliphatic C–H, aromatic C=C, and oxygen-containing functional groups (e.g., hydroxyl, carboxyl, and ether groups) were qualitatively and semi-quantitatively identified, providing experimental evidence for the types and relative abundances of functional groups in the coal macromolecules.
- (3)
Solid-state 13C NMR
The carbon skeleton structures of the coal samples were analyzed using a Bruker Avance III 600 MHz solid-state 13C NMR spectrometer, Karlsruhe, Germany, which provides exceptionally high magnetic field stability and chemical shift resolution. Measurements were conducted with a 4 mm magic-angle spinning (MAS) probe at a spinning rate of 10 kHz to effectively average anisotropic interactions and enhance spectral resolution. Cross-polarization/magic-angle spinning (CP/MAS) was employed with a contact time of 2 ms and a recycle delay of 3 s to balance signal intensity and experimental efficiency. Signals in different chemical shift regions were analyzed to distinguish aromatic carbon, aliphatic carbon, and oxygenated carbon species, and their relative proportions were calculated to quantitatively constrain aromaticity and carbon structure distribution in the coal macromolecular models.
- (4)
Spectral deconvolution and semi-quantitative analysis
To accurately identify and quantitatively characterize the chemical structural features of the coal samples, peak deconvolution was performed on FTIR, XPS, and
13C NMR spectra using PeakFit 4.1.2 software. During fitting, peak positions were reasonably constrained based on the published literature and standard spectral databases, and peak shape parameters were optimized using the least-squares method to ensure the physical and chemical reliability of the results. The integrated areas of characteristic peaks were used for semi-quantitative calculation of the relative abundances of different elements, chemical bonds, or functional groups [
31]. These results served as essential input parameters for coal macromolecular model construction, constraining functional group composition, aromatic/aliphatic carbon ratios, and overall chemical structural characteristics.
4. Discussion
4.1. Comparative Analysis of Pore Structure in the Models
As shown in
Figure 6, from the medium-rank coal DZ (
Ro = 1.63%) to the anthracite SH (
Ro = 3.18%), V
f decreases significantly from 5108.39 Å
3 to 3999.87 Å
3, indicating a pronounced decline in free volume with increasing coal rank. This trend confirms that the continuous growth and oriented stacking of aromatic layers during coalification produce a densification effect, physically compressing the primary pores within the coal matrix and resulting in a gradual reduction in total pore space.
Notably, the pore surface area does not decrease synchronously with pore volume but instead exhibits a trend of initial increase followed by a decline. The high-rank coal ZC (Ro = 2.29%) exhibits the largest internal surface area of 9476.65 Å2, exceeding that of DZ (8147.13 Å2) and SH (8666.67 Å2). This phenomenon suggests that during the transitional ZC stage, the extensive cleavage of aliphatic side chains and the partial, irregular condensation of aromatic rings create a highly fragmented and rough micro-pore network. This structural roughening maximizes the specific surface area available for gas adsorption, even as the total pore volume contracts. However, as coal rank further evolves to the anthracite stage (the SH sample), the structural evolution is dominated by the highly ordered alignment and parallel stacking of large polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (the tendency of graphitization). This extreme structural densification not only induces micropore collapse but also significantly smooths the internal pore walls, ultimately resulting in the simultaneous reduction in both volume and surface area.
Figure 7 visualizes this three-dimensional morphological pattern, where the blue regions represent methane-accessible free volume (pores) and the gray regions represent the Connolly surface area of the coal matrix. In DZ (
Figure 7a), the pore network is characterized by large and well-connected channels; in contrast, SH (
Figure 7c) exhibits a highly fragmented pore topology. For the anthracite SH, excessive structural densification leads to pore collapse, accompanied by decreases in both free volume and surface area. This morphological transition from a connected network to a fragmented structure confirms that high-rank coal possesses a denser and more closed matrix structure.
4.2. Evolution of High-Pressure Methane Adsorption Performance
This section focuses on the adsorption behavior of methane in coal matrix models with different ranks. The average number of methane molecules loaded in the three coal samples at different pressures obtained from the original simulations is shown in
Figure 8a. Within the pressure range of 0.001–20 MPa, the number of loaded molecules in all samples increases with pressure, and the growth gradually levels off after 16 MPa. At the saturation pressure of 20 MPa, the microscopic loading follows the trend ZC > SH > DZ, with ZC exhibiting the highest molecular loading (484.50 molecules/cell). This phenomenon indicates that, within simulation systems of identical volume, higher-rank coals (ZC and SH) exhibit stronger methane adsorption capacity due to their relatively denser skeletal structures.
To further evaluate the intrinsic adsorption performance of the coal matrix, the simulated microscopic loading must be converted into macroscopic adsorption capacity. It should be noted that the simulated output parameter,
, represents the total number of adsorbed methane molecules within a single unit cell at thermodynamic equilibrium, including those located in both the skeletal framework and the slit pore space. To eliminate the counting interference caused by methane adsorption in the slit pore space and to more accurately reflect the adsorption capacity per unit mass of coal, Equation (2) was incorporated, and an effective free-volume ratio (
) was introduced to correct the adsorption amount (Equation (2)). The corrected high-pressure adsorption isotherms are shown in
Figure 8b. For all samples, the methane adsorption capacity increases with pressure and approaches saturation near 20 MPa. The corrected macroscopic adsorption capacity exhibits a trend distinctly different from that of the original loading numbers: DZ > ZC > SH. At 20 MPa, the adsorption capacities of DZ, ZC, and SH are 14.91, 13.39, and 10.89 cm
3/g, respectively.
Note: is the adsorption capacity, cm3/g; is the number of adsorbed molecules within a single unit cell; is the molar volume of an ideal gas at standard conditions, 22.414 L/mol; is Avogadro’s constant, 6.02 × 1023 mol−1; is the mass of the unit cell, g/cell; is the ratio of the free volume within the unit cell to the total unit cell volume.
Figure 9a clearly illustrates the discrepancy between microscopic loading and macroscopic adsorption capacity, which fundamentally arises from the compressive effect of coal rank evolution on the available adsorption space. On the one hand, as the vitrinite reflectance increases from 1.63% to 3.18%, the densification degree of the coal macromolecular framework increases significantly, with the density rising from 1.47 g/cm
3 to 1.60 g/cm
3. This densification process directly compresses the intrinsic pore space within the coal matrix, resulting in a decrease in the effective free-volume ratio from 8.23% for DZ to 6.26% for SH. On the other hand, although the high-rank coal ZC possesses the largest specific surface area (see
Section 4.1), its corrected macroscopic adsorption capacity is lower than that of DZ. This phenomenon indicates that under the high-pressure condition of 20 MPa, methane occurrence in coal micropores no longer strictly follows a surface-area-dominated monolayer adsorption mechanism, but instead shifts to a pore-volume-controlled micropore filling mechanism. Under these conditions, methane molecules confined within the pores exhibit high-density quasi-liquid behavior, causing the effective
Vf to replace specific surface area as the primary factor controlling the upper adsorption limit. Although the DZ sample has a slightly lower surface area, its looser framework and more abundant effective adsorption space (
Figure 9a) enable it to achieve the highest mass-based adsorption percentage despite a lower molecular loading number. These results demonstrate that, in the dry basis model, effective free volume is the dominant factor governing macroscopic adsorption capacity.
Figure 9b calculates the isosteric heat of adsorption under different pressures. For all samples, the adsorption heat stabilizes within 2.6–3.0 kcal/mol in the high-pressure region, confirming that methane adsorption on the coal matrix is physical adsorption dominated by van der Waals interactions. The anthracite SH exhibits the highest adsorption heat, indicating the strongest energetic attraction between its pore surfaces and methane molecules. However, this stronger interaction energy does not compensate for the loss of free volume caused by matrix densification. To further quantify the trade-off between enhanced adsorption potential and reduced storage space, a simple adsorption capacity index can be defined as the product of the average isosteric heat of adsorption and the effective free volume fraction. Take the isosteric heat of adsorption at 20 MPa for DZ, ZC, and SH, which are 2.85, 2.67, and 2.90 kcal/mol, respectively (
Figure 9b); and multiplying by the corresponding effective free volume fractions (7.78%, ~7.33%, and 6.25%); the resulting indices are 22.21 (DZ), 19.56 (ZC), and 18.14 (SH), which is completely consistent with the macroscopic adsorption capacity order of DZ > ZC > SH. The quantitative trade-off calculation directly proves that the loss of effective free volume caused by coal matrix densification outweighs the enhancement of adsorption potential energy, which is the fundamental reason for the lowest adsorption capacity of SH with the highest adsorption heat. Therefore, methane occurrence in coal results from the combined effects of energetic attraction and spatial confinement. With increasing coal rank, matrix densification substantially reduces the effective storage space; even though the adsorption potential is enhanced, the macroscopic adsorption capacity still exhibits a decreasing trend.
Furthermore, it is also pertinent to consider the potential influence of reservoir temperature on the conclusions drawn from the simulations performed at 313.15 K. Deep coal reservoirs frequently exhibit temperatures in the range of 333–373 K, and adsorption is an exothermic process; consequently, absolute methane adsorption capacities are expected to decrease with increasing temperature due to enhanced molecular kinetic energy and reduced gas–solid affinity. However, the fundamental transition from surface-area-dominated to volume-dominated adsorption behavior is unlikely to be reversed, and may even be accentuated, at elevated temperatures. At higher thermal energy, methane molecules are less readily trapped in localized surface potential wells, thereby further diminishing the relative contribution of specific surface area to the total storage capacity. In contrast, the accessible free volume represents a rigid, temperature-independent geometric constraint of the coal matrix that dictates the maximum number of molecules that can be accommodated under high-pressure, supercritical-like conditions. Since the effective free volume fraction is an intrinsic structural property governed by coal rank and the degree of aromatic layer stacking, even under high-temperature deep reservoir conditions, the medium-rank coal (DZ) with its looser framework will retain a superior maximum adsorption capacity compared to the severely densified anthracite (SH).
4.3. High-Pressure Methane Adsorption Mechanism at Different Coal Ranks
By comparing differences in pore evolution, adsorption performance, and thermodynamic properties among coal rank models, the microscopic mechanism governing deep coalbed methane occurrence can be clarified: the control of coal rank on methane adsorption is essentially constrained by both adsorption space and potential energy strength. With increasing coal rank, the adsorption mechanism evolves from volume-filling dominance to surface potential-controlled behavior. As shown in
Figure 10, when the pressure increases from 0.001 MPa to 20 MPa, methane molecules (red) within each coal sample transition from sparse adsorption to high-density filling, exhibiting distinctly different spatial distribution characteristics under high-pressure conditions.
In the medium-rank DZ model (
Figure 10a), methane molecules display a typical volume-filling distribution pattern. The coal matrix framework is relatively loose, and the spacious, interconnected pore network provides abundant accessible free volume for methane. Methane molecules are uniformly and loosely distributed within the central regions of the wide pore channels, without exhibiting strong adhesion to the pore walls. This confirms that the relatively shallow potential wells in medium-rank coal primarily constrain methane molecules by the capacity of the adsorption space rather than by surface forces. In contrast, in the high-rank anthracite SH model (
Figure 10c), methane molecules clearly exhibit a pronounced wall-adhering effect. Although the effective pore space is extremely narrow, the red methane molecules are tightly confined near the blue pore surfaces, forming locally high-density adsorption layers and significantly increasing CH
4 adsorption intensity per unit volume. This observation is highly consistent with the thermodynamic calculations, indicating that the highly oriented stacking of aromatic lamellae in anthracite forms deep van der Waals potential wells, generating strong adsorption affinity for methane and forcing gas molecules to pack into microscopic folds and slits at higher densities under high pressure.
In summary, the high-density adsorption of methane molecules on the pore surfaces of high-rank coal confirms their strong adsorption affinity for methane. The increased degree of aromatization enhances the surface potential energy, thereby increasing the local adsorption density of methane from a chemical perspective. However, the overall decrease in methane adsorption capacity from DZ to SH indicates that the dense pore volume of deep coal reservoirs physically compresses the effective storage space for methane, thereby constraining the upper limit of adsorption capacity. Although high-rank coal theoretically has the thermodynamic potential to capture high-density methane, this advantage is constrained by the extremely low utilization efficiency of its effective free volume, significantly limiting the methane storage performance of high-rank coal reservoirs. This study elucidates the high-pressure methane adsorption characteristics of coal reservoirs with different ranks, effectively correcting the application bias of traditional adsorption models under deep conditions, and provides a critical theoretical basis for the accurate evaluation of deep coalbed methane in complex occurrence environments.