Next Article in Journal
Pipeline Defect Detection Based on Improved YOLOv11
Previous Article in Journal
Robotic Sequential Ultrasonic Welding of Thermoplastic Composites: From Coupons to a Full-Scale Fuselage Demonstrator
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Bioactive Compounds and the Organoleptic Characteristics of Functional Foods: Mechanisms and Technological Innovations

1
Center for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), Institute for Innovation, Capacity Building and Sustainability of Agri-Food Production (Inov4Agro), University of Trás-of-Montes and Alto Douro, Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
2
Chemistry Research Centre-Vila Real (CQ-VR), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2026, 14(3), 529; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14030529
Submission received: 30 December 2025 / Revised: 26 January 2026 / Accepted: 27 January 2026 / Published: 3 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Food Process Engineering)

Abstract

Functional foods are designed to provide health benefits beyond basic nutrition; however, the incorporation of bioactive compounds often impacts flavor, stability, and consumer acceptance, making flavor science a critical challenge in product development. This review explores the biochemical and biotechnological mechanisms underlying the formation and modulation of flavor in functional foods. Advances in biotechnology, including microbial fermentation, enzyme engineering, biocatalyst immobilization, and metabolic optimization, have facilitated the sustainable production of natural flavor compounds with improved sensory profiles. Emerging technologies, including nanoencapsulation, ultrasound-assisted extraction, nanotechnology, artificial intelligence-driven flavor design, and 3D food printing, are also discussed for their roles in enhancing the stability, bioavailability, and controlled release of bioactive and flavor compounds. By integrating biotechnology and flavor science, these approaches offer promising strategies for developing clean-label, sensory-optimized functional foods that meet nutritional needs while satisfying consumer expectations, thereby driving innovation toward healthier and more sustainable food systems.

1. Introduction

Functional foods have emerged as a pivotal concept at the intersection of nutrition, health, and food science, providing benefits that extend beyond basic nutrition by positively influencing physiological functions and reducing the risk of chronic diseases [1,2]. These foods are typically classified into two categories: those naturally rich in bioactive compounds, such as fruits, vegetables, and whole grains, and those fortified with extracted or purified bioactive compounds, including carotenoid-enriched snacks and fortified beverages [3]. The incorporation of bioactive compounds, derived from plants or microorganisms recognized as generally regarded as safe (GRAS), aims to enhance the nutritional value and functional properties of food products [4,5].
Bioactive compounds, such as vitamins, polyphenols, flavonoids, carotenoids, peptides, and dietary fibers, contribute to the prevention and management of non-communicable diseases, including cardiovascular disorders, diabetes, and certain cancers [6,7]. Increasingly, research has focused on using food processing by-products, such as fruit peels, seeds, and pomace, as sustainable sources of bioactive compounds, providing opportunities for value addition and waste valorization [8,9].
Flavor is a key determinant of functional food acceptance and success, influencing consumer choice and compliance. Both volatile and non-volatile flavor compounds are formed through complex biochemical pathways [10,11], which are tightly regulated by genetic, enzymatic, and environmental factors. Advances in metabolic engineering, microbial fermentation, and enzyme optimization have enabled the enhanced production of diverse flavor compounds, supporting the development of functional foods with improved sensory attributes and health benefits [12,13].
Technological innovations, including enzyme immobilization, encapsulation, supercritical fluid extraction, ultrasound-assisted extraction, nanotechnology, and precision fermentation, have further enabled the stabilization, bioavailability, and controlled delivery of bioactive and flavor compounds, ensuring their effectiveness in complex food matrices [14,15,16,17]. Moreover, emerging digital tools, such as artificial intelligence (AI) and big data analytics, are transforming the optimization of flavor and bioactive compounds, offering tailored solutions that align with consumer preferences and sustainability goals [18,19].
Although the formation of bioactive compounds and flavor has been extensively studied, research rarely integrates mechanistic insights into flavor formation with emerging technological innovations. Studies often examine bioactive composition and sensory attributes separately, and the effects of advanced processing techniques, such as ultrasound, AI-driven formulation, 3D food printing, and nanotechnology, on organoleptic quality remain insufficiently explored. This review addresses these gaps by linking the molecular mechanisms underlying flavor formation with innovative strategies to preserve and enhance bioactive compounds, providing a coherent framework to guide the development of functional foods. Furthermore, it offers a comprehensive overview of functional foods, including their sources, biochemical pathways, and technological strategies for producing bioactive and flavor compounds, while highlighting recent advances in processing technologies that simultaneously enhance health benefits, sensory quality, and industrial applicability.

2. Bioactive Compounds in Functional Foods

Functional foods are commonly defined as whole, fortified, enriched, or enhanced foods that provide health benefits beyond basic nutrition when consumed regularly and in effective amounts as part of a balanced and varied diet [3,20]. Although fruits, vegetables, cereals, and legumes naturally contain a wide range of bioactive compounds, their endogenous concentrations are often insufficient to exert measurable physiological effects. This limitation has led to the incorporation of purified or concentrated bioactive compounds into food formulations [21]. However, such enrichment frequently alters the organoleptic properties of foods, making sensory quality a critical determinant of consumer acceptance and commercial success [22]. For example, the addition of functional ingredients can often result in bitter or astringent off-tastes [23].
Functional food science is an inherently interdisciplinary field focused on the development and application of bioactive compounds in food products [1,24]. These foods provide benefits beyond basic nutrition by exerting positive physiological effects on specific body functions, thereby contributing to disease prevention, improved quality of life, and reduced risk of chronic illnesses [2]. Beyond their biological activity, bioactive compounds can significantly influence taste, aroma, color, texture, and mouthfeel, thereby affecting overall product perception [25]. Consequently, the development of functional foods requires a careful balance between health-promoting potential and acceptable sensory characteristics, as unfavorable organoleptic attributes remain a major barriers to market uptake [26].
The concept of functional foods originated in Japan in the late 1980s, driven by increasing rates of non-communicable diseases among an aging population. This led to the introduction of the regulatory category “Foods for Specified Health Use” (FOSHU) in 1991 [27]. Since then, global interest in functional foods has expanded, and such products are now widely incorporated into daily diets.
Bioactive compounds comprise a diverse group of molecules derived from plant, animal, or microbial sources, many of which are classified as GRAS [4,5]. Among these, phytochemicals, such as polyphenols, carotenoids, and alkaloids, have attracted considerable attention due to their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, and cardioprotective properties [28,29]. However, these compounds are also strongly associated with sensory effects. For example, polyphenols are often associated with bitterness and astringency, largely because of their interactions with taste receptors and salivary proteins [30,31]. Carotenoids and anthocyanins play a major role in color development and stability, while omega-3 fatty acids are highly prone to oxidation, often resulting in undesirable off-flavors [32].
In recent years, food processing by-products have gained increasing attention as sustainable and cost-effective sources of bioactive compounds [33]. Seeds, peels, shells, bran, and pomace often contain higher concentrations of phenolic and dietary fibers than the edible portions of foods [8,34,35,36]. Examples include lycopene from tomato waste; phenolic compounds from apple pomace; polyphenols from grape by-products, and nutrients derived from avocado seeds and peels [9,35]. Growing research highlights the potential of these food processing residues as valuable sources of bioactive compounds for the development of functional foods [37]. Despite their functional potential, these materials present notable sensory challenges, including intense bitterness, astringency, dark coloration, and characteristic off-aromas [38]. As a result, technological interventions are often required to mitigate negative organoleptic impact while preserving bioactivity and safety.
Health and nutritional claims associated with functional foods must be supported by strong scientific evidence and are recognized only under specific, validated conditions. Their benefits are most effective when functional foods are consumed as part of a balanced dietary pattern, such as the Mediterranean diet [39].
Bioactive compounds in functional foods include prebiotics, probiotics, vitamins, phytochemicals, amino acids, peptides, omega-3 fatty acids, and antioxidants from diverse natural sources (Table 1) [40,41]. Notable examples include resveratrol from grapes and red wine, antioxidant compounds from green tea, quercetin and ellagic acid from fruits and nuts, and anthocyanins from berries and grapes, which exhibit antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and chemoprotective effects. These compounds are valued for their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, anticancer, antiviral, and antitumor properties, helping to protect cells from damage caused by free radicals and reactive oxygen species [42].
Dietary fibers represent another important class of bioactive compounds widely used in functional foods. In addition to their well-recognized physiological benefits, fibers exert significant technological effects by modifying viscosity, texture, and mouthfeel, and are frequently employed as fat replacers or stabilizing agents [59,60,61]. Nevertheless, excessive fiber enrichment may negatively affect sensory attributes, leading to gritty textures, reduced flavor intensity, or impaired palatability, necessitating careful formulation and optimization [62].
A major challenge in using bioactive compounds is maintaining their stability during food processing, storage (e.g., temperature, oxygen, and light exposure), and digestion (e.g., pH, and enzyme activity). Technological innovations play a central role in addressing the sensory and stability limitations associated with these compounds. Encapsulation strategies, including micro- and nanoencapsulation, have been extensively investigated to protect bioactives from degradation, enhance their stability during processing and storage, and control their release in the gastrointestinal tract [63,64,65,66]. Importantly, encapsulation can also mask undesirable tastes and aromas, reduce astringency, and improve flavor balance in fortified foods [67].
Furthermore, due to their limited solubility and stability, novel approaches such as nanotechnology are being developed to enhance the solubility and bioavailability, and efficacy of bioactive compounds [15,68]. Nanoemulsions and lipid-based delivery systems have been shown to enhance the solubility, bioavailability, and mouthfeel of lipophilic bioactive compounds such as carotenoids and omega-3 fatty acids [69,70].
Food processing techniques, including fermentation, enzymatic treatments, and controlled thermal processing, may further modulate the sensory and functional properties of bioactive-enriched foods [71]. Fermentation, in particular, has been reported to reduce bitterness and astringency by modifying of phenolic profiles, while simultaneously improving flavor complexity and bioavailability [72,73]. However, processing conditions must be carefully optimized, as excessive heat, oxygen exposure, or light can degrade sensitive bioactive compounds and adversely affect both functionality and sensory quality [74].
Research on bioactive-enriched foods is rapidly expanding, as the effectiveness of functional and nutraceutical products largely depends on the stability, bioactivity, and bioavailability of these compounds [67]. Food processing can either enhance or reduce the concentration of functional components, making it essential to understand their behavior during processing and within a complex food matrix [75].
Despite the growing body of scientific evidence supporting the health benefits of bioactive compounds, most studies have focused on their extraction and characterization rather than on practical applications. Their incorporation into functional foods is often limited by poor stability, low bioavailability, and reduced sensory acceptance. Moreover, relatively few investigations address real food matrices, long-term sensory stability, consumer perception, or industrial scalability. These challenges, combined with strict regulatory frameworks governing health claims, further hinder the translation of scientific findings into commercially viable products [76].
Examples of successful applications include biscuits enriched with up to 10% white grape pomace, which improved both fiber and phenolic content [77]; encapsulated pomegranate peel extract used to stabilize hazelnut paste [78]; and functional chocolate milk enriched with omega-3 and omega-6 using soy phosphatidylcholine, which maintained stability and consumer acceptance [79].

3. Flavor Compounds in Functional Foods

Flavor compounds play a crucial role in the sensory appeal and consumer acceptance of functional foods. Volatile compounds such as esters, phenols, alcohols, terpenes, and aldehydes contribute primarily to aroma and are often formed through enzymatic breakdown of precursors or via secondary metabolic pathways [10,11]. In contrast, non-volatile compounds such as amino acids, fatty acids, and carbohydrates influence taste attributes, including sweetness, bitterness, and astringency [11].
The formation of flavor compounds involves complex biochemical and chemical processes that occur during food fermentation, processing, and storage. A deeper understanding of how these compounds are generated and regulated is essential for developing functional foods that offer both desirable sensory characteristics and health benefits.
Many aroma compounds in foods also exhibit significant bioactive properties, particularly in herbs, spices, vegetables, teas, and fermented products. In vegetables and medicinal or aromatic plants, polyphenols and volatile terpenes play a dual role by shaping characteristic sensory attributes (e.g., herbal, floral, and spicy notes) while simultaneously exerting antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and cardioprotective effects [80,81,82,83,84,85].
Volatile phenolic compounds derived from phenylalanine metabolism, including benzenoids and phenylpropanoids, constitute key odor-active constituents of fruits, herbs, and spices and have been reported to function as antioxidants and antimicrobial agents [80]. Similarly, sulfur-containing volatile compounds, such as isothiocyanates, thiols, and sulfides, are responsible for the distinctive aromas of Allium and Brassica vegetables, as well as mushrooms, and are implicated in plant defense mechanisms and human health protection, including anticarcinogenic and antimicrobial activities [86].
Essential oils rich in terpenes and terpenoids (e.g., thymol, carvacrol, and limonene) impart intense aromatic profiles and exhibit a broad spectrum of biological activities, including antimicrobial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and, in some cases, anticancer effects. These properties support their application as natural preservatives in food systems [81,82,83,84].
Furthermore, microbial volatile compounds generated during fermentation contribute to characteristic sensory attributes and, in certain cases, are associated with probiotic functionality or other health-promoting effects, reinforcing the role of fermented products as functional foods [85].

3.1. Mechanisms of Flavor Compound Formation

3.1.1. Flavor Development in Non-Processed Foods

Plant-based foods are increasingly valued not only for their nutritional content but also for their richness in bioactive compounds. These bioactives, present in fruits, vegetables, grains, and other plant-derived sources, have been associated with a wide range of health benefits, including the prevention and management of chronic diseases.
Plant foods contain a diverse array of bioactive compounds, such as polyphenols (including flavonoids and phenolic acids), phytosterols, carotenoids, alkaloids, saponins, polysaccharides, and bioactive peptides [7,87,88]. In addition to insoluble and soluble dietary fiber, plant-based foods provide a wide spectrum of bioactives that may be crucial for disease prevention. Consequently, there is a growing trend toward incorporating plant-derived bioactives into functional food formulations to help prevent or manage non-communicable diseases [7,88,89].
Flavor compounds in plants are produced through complex biochemical pathways involving both primary and secondary metabolism. These pathways convert fatty acids, amino acids, and carbohydrates into a variety of volatile and nonvolatile compounds and are regulated by genetic, enzymatic, and environmental factors.
Many plant-derived flavor compounds originate from the metabolism of fatty acids, amino acids, and carbohydrates. Enzymatic reactions transform these precursors into volatile compounds such as alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, and ethers, as well as nitrogen- and sulfur-containing compounds [10,11]. Secondary metabolites, such as catechins, theanine, caffeine, and terpenes, are key contributors to the flavor of spices and tea. Their biosynthesis involves specific gene-encoded enzymes and is closely associated with plant taxonomy and organ development [11,13,90,91].
Gene-Encoded Enzymes Involved in Flavor Compound Synthesis
Terpene synthases
In kiwifruit, the enzyme AcTPS1 b, encoded by a terpene synthase gene cluster, produces 1,8-cineole, a major contributor to the fruit’s floral and eucalyptus-like aroma. Other genes within the same cluster encode enzymes responsible for the synthesis of sabinene, geraniol, and springer, each contributing distinct terpene compounds to the overall flavor profile [92].
In citrus fruits, the Cstps1 gene encodes a sesquiterpene synthase that converts farnesyl diphosphate into valencene, a key aroma compound. Expression of Cstps1 is developmentally regulated and responsive to ethylene, correlating with increased valencene levels during fruit ripening [93].
In Polygonum minus (generally known as ‘kesum’ in Malaysia), the PmSTPS1 and PmSTPS2 genes encode sesquiterpene synthases responsible for producing β-farnesene, α-farnesene, farnesol, and nerolidol, all of which are significant contributors to the plant’s aromatic profile [94].
Carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases
In tomato, the LeCCD1A and LeCCD1B genes encode carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases that generate flavor volatiles such as β-ionone, pseudoionone, and geranyl acetone by cleaving of carotenoid substrates. Silencing these genes leads to a significant reduction in these volatiles, confirming their role in flavor formation [95].
Enzymes involved in the synthesis of chiral flavor compounds
In tea flowers (Camellia sinensis), specific short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR) genes encode enzymes that convert acetophenone into the chiral flavor compounds (R)—and (S)—phenylethanol. The CsSPESs gene produces (S), phenylethanol, while the CsRPES gene produces (R), phenylethanol, both with high enantiomeric purity [96].
Glycosyltransferases involved in bitter flavonoid formation
The Cm1,2RhaT gene encodes a 1,2 rhamnosyltransferase, a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of bitter flavanone-7-O-neohesperidosides, which are responsible for the characteristic bitterness of certain citrus species [97].
In tea plants (Camellia sinensis), the CsUGT75L12 and CsUGT79B28 genes encode UDP-glycosyltransferases that sequentially glycosylate flavonoids, leading to the formation of bitter 7-O-neohesperidoside. These compounds contribute to both the bitterness and astringency of tea [98].
The expression of genes encoding these biosynthetic enzymes is a major determinant of plant flavor profiles. Advances in molecular biology have enabled the identification of many such genes, opening opportunities for metabolic engineering to enhance or modify flavor characteristics [10,13,90]. In tea plants, microRNAs (miRNAs) and plant hormones synergistically regulate the biosynthesis of key taste and aroma compounds by modulating gene expression networks [12,13,14,98].
Biosynthetic Pathways and Engineering
Many flavor compounds are derived from fatty acid, amino acid, and carbohydrate metabolic pathways, with genes encoding enzymes that catalyze key steps in their biosynthesis [10,90].
In fruits like mango, flavor compounds are synthesized via butanoate, phenylalanine, terpenoid, and fatty acid pathways. Metabolic flux through these pathways varies according to cultivar and developmental stage [11,98].
In grapes, terpenes (including monoterpenoids and sesquiterpenes) and norisoprenoids are major contributors to aroma. Terpene synthesis occurs early in berry development, often peaking before the onset of ripening (veraison). Norisoprenoids are derived from carotenoid cleavage, a process regulated by transcription factors such as VvWRKY70, which suppresses their formation by downregulating key biosynthetic genes [99,100,101].
Flavonols and anthocyanins, products of the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway, contribute to both flavor and color. Their accumulation is variety-dependent and influenced by environmental conditions and gene regulation [101,102]. Different grape varieties exhibit distinct volatile profiles, producing characteristic sensory notes such as fruity, floral, herbaceous, or muscat-like aromas. Specific compounds, such as linalool, α-pinene, and β-damascenone, are closely associated with these sensory attributes [102,103,104].
In addition to volatile compounds, grapes contain pools of non-volatile aroma precursors, including glycosides and amino acid conjugates. These precursors can be converted into volatile aroma compounds during fermentation, aging, or even oral consumption through enzymatic and chemical reactions [105,106].
Flavor compound formation is influenced by species, cultivar, climate, and agricultural practices. Postharvest handling, storage, and food processing techniques (e.g., fermentation and the Maillard reaction) also significantly affect the final flavor profile [11,13,107].
In functional foods, flavor compounds are often produced via microbial or plant biosynthetic pathways. Among the most significant are the Shikimate and Ehrlich pathways, which generate key aromatic compounds including 2-phenylethanol and various phenolic compounds that enhance both sensory properties and potential health benefits.
The Shikimate and Ehrlich Pathways
2-Phenylethanol, a rose-scented aromatic compound, is synthesized by various yeasts and bacteria through both the Shikimate and Ehrlich pathways. Microbial strains such as Kluyveromyces marxianus, Zygosaccharomyces rouxii, Starmerella bacillaris, and Yarrowia lipolytica have been engineered or identified for enhanced 2-phenylethanol production. Reported yields reached up to 1.94 g/L in engineered systems and 3.58 g/L under optimized fermentation conditions [108,109,110,111].
The Ehrlich pathway, which converts L-phenylalanine into 2-phenylethanol, is generally more efficient than the Shikimate pathway. This biosynthetic pathway comprises three sequential steps (reactions 1, 2, and 3, Figure 1, blue box). First, amino acids undergo deamination to yield the corresponding α-ketoacids, a reaction catalyzed by transaminases. Second, α-ketoacids are decarboxylated to their corresponding aldehydes by specific decarboxylases. Finally, alcohol dehydrogenases (specifically Adh1p-Adh6p and Sfa1p) reduce these aldehydes to form higher alcohols (Figure 1, blue box). When phenylalanine serves as the substrate, the aromatic compound 2-phenylethanol is formed (Figure 1, rose box) [111].
The Shikimate pathway (Figure 2) is crucial for the biosynthesis of the aromatic amino acids (phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan), which serve as precursors for a wide range of volatile phenols, phenylpropanoids, and benzenoid compounds. These metabolites are major contributors to the aroma and flavor of plant-based foods and are often stored as glycosides, from which aroma compounds are released during processing [112,113].
CRISPR-mediated multigene integration and metabolic engineering strategies have been applied to optimize the Shikimate and Ehrlich pathways in yeast, significantly enhancing the production of target flavor compounds such as 2-phenylethanol, mandelic acid, and vanillin [110,115,116]. Overexpression of key pathway genes, combined with the disruption of competing metabolic routes, can further increase production yields [110,115].
Flavor compound biosynthesis in functional foods is driven by both microbial fermentation (using yeasts and lactic acid bacteria) and plant metabolic pathways. During fermentation, lactic acid bacteria can produce flavor-active compounds, including aldehydes, esters, and alcohols, through the Ehrlich and Shikimate pathways [117]. In plants, the expression levels of Shikimate pathway genes correlate with the accumulation of phenolic compounds, thereby influencing fruit flavor and overall quality [113].
The ability to biosynthesize and regulate flavor compound production via these pathways provides valuable tools for developing functional foods with improved sensory properties and health benefits. Engineered microbes’ systems and optimized fermentation strategies offer a promising, sustainable, and scalable solution for the production of natural flavor compounds [108,109,110,111,115,116,117].

3.1.2. Flavor Development in Processed Foods

In processed foods, lipids are major contributors to flavor. Their degradation via autoxidation, photooxidation, and enzymatic oxidation results in the formation of volatile compounds such as aldehydes, alcohols, and ketones, which are central to flavor profiles. In particular, the oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids generates hydroperoxides that subsequently decompose into odor-active volatile compounds.
Lipids and lipid-derived oxidation products interact with other food components through Maillard and Strecker reactions during processing, cooking, and storage, thereby further diversifying the flavor profile [118,119,120]. These reactions between amino acids and reducing sugars at elevated temperatures produce a wide range of flavor active compounds, including branched-chain aldehydes and other volatiles. Such chemical pathways are highly relevant in both traditional and functional foods, as they play a critical role in shaping final sensory characteristics [107,118,119,121].
Microbial Contributions to Flavor
Microorganisms play a vital role in flavor development, especially in fermented functional foods. Through microbial metabolism, a wide range of aroma and flavor active compounds is produced, including organic acids, amino acids, and volatile compounds. Species such as Lactobacillus sp., Leuconostoc sp., and Pediococcus sp. are closely associated with the development of desirable flavor in fermented products [122,123,124].
Key volatile compounds generated through microbial activity, lipid oxidation, and Maillard reactions include aldehydes, alcohols, ketones, terpenoids, and phenolics. Among these, branched-chain aldehydes, are especially important in both fermented and heat-treated foods [107,120,121,125].
Microbial flavor formation is driven by coordinated carbohydrate, protein, and lipid metabolism. Fermentative carbohydrate pathways, primarily glycolysis followed by the production of lactic, acetic, propionic, and butanoic acids as well as ethanol, generate organic acids, alcohols, and esters that impart sour, fruity, and alcoholic notes [123,126,127,128]. Concurrently, proteolysis releases peptides and free amino acids, which are further catabolized into diverse volatile compounds, including aldehydes, acids, alcohols, and sulfur- and nitrogen-containing molecules. These compounds are central to flavor development in fermented dairy, meat, soy, and fish products [126,129].
Lipolysis and subsequent lipid oxidation generate free fatty acids and their derivatives, such as ketones, aldehydes, and lactones, which contribute critically to the characteristic sensory profiles of dairy and fish fermentations [126,130]. These processes are further refined by enzyme-mediated tailoring reactions, in which oxidoreductases, transferases, and hydrolases catalyze ester formation, protein modification (e.g., transglutaminase-mediated enhancement of umami), and the release of low-molecular-weight aroma compounds. Collectively, these reactions shape the final flavor profile of fermented foods [126,130,131].
Table 2 summarizes representative microorganisms and metabolic pathways that contribute to flavor development in foods.
Flavor is also influenced by “community succession” and microbial interactions (fungus–bacterium cooperation, quorum sensing), with early colonizers often setting pH and redox conditions that select later flavor-forming taxa [126,127,132,137]. Geography and the composition of the initial microbiota lead to region-specific flavor profiles (e.g., baijiu) [137].
In addition to volatile compounds, non-volatile constituents such as phenolics, saponins, peptides, and alkaloids contribute to taste and may offer health-promoting properties, including antioxidant and antimicrobial activities [107,125].
Microbial Succession and Biocatalysis
The succession of microbial communities and their metabolic activity significantly influence the accumulation of key volatile compounds, thereby helping to define the distinctive flavors of traditional fermented foods [122,126].
Microbial and enzymatic strategies are also used to produce non-volatile flavor compounds, such as umami and kokumi substances, which enhance depth and richness in flavor perception [139].
Biocatalysts (purified enzymes) and microbial fermentation are increasingly used for the sustainable controlled production of natural flavor compounds. Advances in enzyme engineering and bioprocess optimization have improved the specificity and efficiency of flavor compound synthesis, supporting the development of functional foods with tailored sensory profiles [122,124,140].
Challenges and Off-Flavor Mitigation
A persistent challenge in plant-based functional foods is the presence of off-flavors, such as “beany” notes. Strategies to reduce or eliminate these undesirable flavors include genome editing, antioxidant supplementation, enzyme treatments, and fermentation, all of which can modify, neutralize, or mask off-flavor compounds [107,124].

3.2. Technological Advances in Flavor Compound Production

3.2.1. Biocatalyst Encapsulation and Stabilization

Biocatalysts, including purified enzymes and engineered microorganisms, are increasingly used to sustainably and efficiently synthesize natural flavor compounds. These systems offer improved stereospecificity and environmental benefits, supporting the food industry’s shift toward greener and more sustainable production processes [122,139,140].
Encapsulation technologies using micro- and nanoscale carriers play a critical role in protecting volatile flavor compounds from degradation during food processing and storage. In particular, nanoencapsulation enhances the stability, bioavailability, and targeted delivery of flavor compounds, thereby broadening their application in food systems [141].
Among the most promising materials are sol–gel matrices, especially those formulated with organically modified silanes containing epoxy groups. These matrices effectively entrap enzymes such as lipases, significantly increasing both their operational and thermal stability. Lipases immobilized in these systems can retain up to 99% of their catalytic activity across multiple reaction cycles in flavor ester synthesis, enabling robust and scalable production [142].
Immobilization on biocompatible supports such as hydroxyapatite also provides excellent enzyme stabilization and retention of activity, even under harsh conditions, including elevated temperatures and exposure to organic solvents [143]. Additionally, mesoporous silica supports derived from biomass enhance enzyme selectivity and catalytic efficiency, thereby facilitating the mild, high-yield production of flavor esters [144].
Advanced systems, such as magnetic core–shell biocatalysts that combine covalent binding with sol–gel immobilization, offer improved operational stability and efficient enzyme recovery and reuse. These catalysts demonstrate high activity in the solventless synthesis of natural flavor esters across multiple production cycles [145].
The encapsulation of flavor compounds (e.g., limonene and α-terpineol) in oil-in-water nanoemulsions further enhances shelf life and maintains both physical and chemical stability, particularly under cool storage conditions. However, encapsulation stability tends to decrease at higher temperatures, highlighting the importance of optimized storage conditions [146]. Overall, nanoencapsulation provides superior encapsulation efficiency, stability, and controlled release compared to microencapsulation techniques. Novel technologies, including spray chilling, spray freeze drying, and electrospraying, further improve the encapsulation of heat-sensitive flavor compounds [147].
By enabling the production of natural, non-toxic, and environmentally friendly flavor compounds, immobilized and encapsulated biocatalysts support process optimization, scalability, and cost-effectiveness, key requirements for industrial application in the food sector [140,148,149]. Additionally, these technologies protect volatile and labile aroma compounds, enhancing their functionality and performance in complex food systems [147].
Nevertheless, several challenges remain, including optimizing process parameters (enzyme loading, support material, and reaction conditions) and gaining a deeper understanding of release mechanisms in real food matrices. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of encapsulated flavor compounds in both food products and gastrointestinal environments [147,148].

3.2.2. Flavor Recovery

Flavor recovery is a critical aspect of food flavor production, ensuring that valuable volatile aroma and taste compounds are efficiently captured, concentrated, and reused. This process not only enhances the sensory quality of food products but also promotes sustainability and cost-effectiveness in food manufacturing.
To recover and preserve volatile flavor compounds during liquid food processing, several advanced technologies are employed, including distillation, pervaporation, supercritical fluid extraction, and adsorption. These methods aim to minimize flavor losses while improving the final product quality [150]. Table 3 summarizes various techniques used in food flavor recovery.
Traditional methods, such as distillation and stripping, are commonly applied to recover volatile compounds from liquid food streams. Flash distillation, in particular, is used to isolate natural flavor compounds; however, it is often energy-intensive and may degrade thermally sensitive molecules [150,151].
Pervaporation utilizes selective membranes to separate and concentrate volatile flavor compounds from aqueous solutions. It is especially effective for recovering key aroma components from complex flavor systems, including apple essence, orange aroma, and black tea distillate. Pervaporation can achieve high concentration ratios for low-boiling-point volatiles, but process optimization (e.g., improved membrane sealing) is necessary to minimize flavor losses during scale-up operations [150,152].
Supercritical fluid extraction, particularly using carbon dioxide (CO2), offers high selectivity and uses natural, non-toxic solvents, making it suitable for delicate matrices such as fruit juices. This method is particularly effective in preserving thermolabile flavor compounds.
Adsorption techniques, including solid-phase extraction (SPE), can be used alone or in combination with thermal processing to selectively recover and purify flavor compounds. These methods are especially valuable for recovering low-concentration or matrix-bound volatiles, which are often difficult to extract using conventional techniques [150,151,153].
Table 3. Techniques for Recovering Food Flavor.
Table 3. Techniques for Recovering Food Flavor.
TechniquePrinciple/MethodKey AdvantagesLimitations/ConsiderationsReferences
Distillation/StrippingSeparation of volatiles by heating and condensationWidely used, effective for many volatilesCan be energy-intensive, may degrade sensitive flavors[150,151,154]
PervaporationThe selective membrane separates and concentrates volatiles from liquidsHigh selectivity, effective for low-boiling-point compoundsFlavor loss is possible due to leakage, and needs optimization[150,151,152]
Supercritical Fluid ExtractionUses supercritical CO2 or other fluids to extract flavorsHigh selectivity, uses natural solvents, suitable for sensitive matricesLess commonly applied, needs further research[150,151]
Adsorption (Solid-Phase Extraction, SPE)Volatiles are adsorbed onto solid sorbents, then desorbed for analysis/recovery.Can be tailored for specific compounds, good for complex matricesRequires careful selection of sorbents and conditions[150,151,153,155]
Solvent-Assisted Flavor Evaporation (SAFE)Uses solvents to assist in evaporating and recovering volatilesEffective for a wide range of volatilesFat content reduces the recovery of high-boiling volatiles[155,156]
Salting-Out Re-distillation (SRD)Uses salt to enhance the separation and recovery of odor-active compoundsHigh recovery rates improve flavor qualityRequires optimization of salt and process parameters[154]
Headspace Techniques (SPME, HSSE, DTD)Volatiles were collected from the headspace above samples using various sorbents.Non-destructive, suitable for screening and analysisMay not recover all compound types equally[156]
Flash DistillationRapid distillation under reduced pressureSuitable for heat-sensitive flavorsHigh energy consumption, possible degradation[151]
The presence of fat in food matrices significantly affects the recovery of high-boiling-point volatile compounds during solvent-assisted flavor evaporation (SAFE). Elevated fat levels can hinder the release of these volatiles, whereas low fat content may reduce overall recovery yields. Maintaining a consistent fat concentration or diluting extracts can therefore improve recovery efficiency [155].
The effectiveness of flavor compound recovery also depends on the careful selection of extraction techniques and the optimization of process parameters. For example, the sequential application of different solid-phase extraction (SPE) phases can increase selectivity for specific flavor classes. This approach is particularly useful in complex food matrices, such as coffee, where it enhances the isolation of compounds like organosulfur volatiles [153].
From a sustainability perspective, sequential hydrolysis represents a promising strategy for recovering flavor compounds from food processing by-products, such as vanilla bagasse. This technique enables the extraction of high-value molecules such as vanillin, thereby supporting waste valorization and contributing to more sustainable production practices [157,158].
Combining biocatalytic steps (fermentation or enzymatic hydrolysis) with mild thermal processing can further facilitate the generation and recovery of natural flavors under nature-inspired conditions, aligning with the growing consumer demand for clean-label products [158,159].
In terms of innovation, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and big data analytics are increasingly applied to analyze flavor molecules, optimize formulations, and accelerate the discovery of novel flavor compounds. This digital approach is transforming the field, enabling faster, more efficient, and targeted flavor development [18].

3.3. Knowledge Gaps, Innovation Needs, Challenges, and Future Directions

Despite considerable progress, many enzymes and genes involved in flavor biosynthesis remain unidentified, limiting the potential of genetic engineering approaches to enhance flavor production [10]. Continued research is needed to optimize recovery, stabilization, and analytical methods, while also addressing regulatory, economic, and environmental challenges [124,140,141,160].
There is also a limited understanding of how flavor compounds are released from complex food matrices and perceived by consumers, especially in protein-rich and multifunctional foods [161]. Advancements in sensory evaluation techniques, biosensors, and neuroimaging tools are needed to better understand and optimize flavor perception and interactions in such products [18,162].
Further research is essential to refine the integration of biocatalytic, enzymatic, and thermal processing technologies for scalable, cost-effective, and sustainable production of flavor compounds [140,159,163].
The adoption of emerging technologies, particularly AI-driven analytics and advanced bioprocessing techniques, must be accompanied by comprehensive safety assessments and clear regulatory frameworks to ensure consumer protection and market acceptance [18,140].
Growing consumer demand for “clean-label”, natural, and minimally processed flavor solutions is driving innovation in biomediated production pathways [158,162,163]. Developing greener, more sustainable production methods remains a key priority for both the food industry and health-conscious consumers [122,140,163].

4. Advances in Food Biochemistry Technologies

The intersection of bioactive and flavor compounds in functional foods represents a rapidly evolving area of food science, driven by significant advancements in food biochemistry technologies. Recent research has highlighted how these compounds contribute not only to health benefits but also to the enhancement of sensory attributes in functional food products.
Food biochemistry technologies are transforming the stabilization, delivery, and controlled release of both bioactive and flavor compounds [164]. At the same time, consumer demand is shifting toward healthier, more aromatic, and flavorful products, motivating the food processing industry to develop innovative solutions [165].
Sustainability in the production of bioactive compounds has also become a major concern, for both consumers and the food industry, largely due to the environmental impact of waste generated during food processing [166,167].

4.1. Innovative Technologies Applied to Bioactive Compounds Extracted from Algae

In recent years, certain biological matrices, particularly algae and microalgae, have gained prominence as valuable sources of bioactive compounds for a wide range of applications [165]. Rich in nutritional constituents, including carotenoids, lipids, proteins, polysaccharides, dietary fiber, vitamins, and phenolic compounds, algae and microalgae hold significant potential as functional ingredients in the food sector [168].
Bioactive compounds derived from algae offer notable health benefits when incorporated into functional foods [169]. Consequently, several cutting-edge technologies have emerged to support the safer and effective applications of algae-derived bioactive compounds [170]. These innovations have the potential to transform both research and industrial applications of such compounds in food systems:
Precision fermentation employs genetically optimized microorganisms to produce specific bioactive compounds with enhanced efficiency and consistency. Encapsulation technologies protect sensitive bioactive compounds, improving their stability, bioavailability and long-term efficacy. In the food industry, encapsulation is particularly promising because it enables the controlled release of functional ingredients during specific phases of digestion [171,172].
Cold plasma, a non-thermal technology, can alter the composition of bioactive compounds without compromising their nutritional properties and, in some cases, may even enhance them [173,174]. It has also demonstrated effectiveness in removing undesirable contaminants, such as mycotoxins, thereby improving food safety and quality [175].
Similarly, pulsed electric field processing is a non-thermal technique that facilitates the efficient release of bioactive constituents from algae biomass by increasing cell membrane permeability. This enhances the separation of target compounds from the biological matrix and substantially enhancing their bioactivity and bioavailability [176,177].
High pressure processing is another non-thermal method that effectively preserves the nutritional and functional integrity of algae-derived bioactive compounds, ensuring that sensitive molecules remain active and beneficial after ingestion [178].
Finally, subcritical water extraction is a sustainable technology that operates at temperatures between 100 and 374 °C and pressures up to 22 MPa. This method preserves the nutritional and biological functionality of extracted compounds [179] while promoting the catalytic breakdown of complex macromolecules. These processes include the depolymerisation of polysaccharides into oligomers and monomers, and the fragmentation of proteins into peptides and amino acids, thereby improving digestibility and functional value [180].
The application of these advanced technologies to algae-derived nutrients and bioactive compounds, along with their associated health benefits, is summarized in Table 4.
These techniques hold considerable potential to enhance both the extraction efficiency and the biological activity of algae-derived compounds. To fully realize their benefits, further research is needed on pre- and post-treatment processes, including the optimization and standardization of protocols. Key parameters, such as treatment duration, application intensity, and environmental conditions, should be carefully optimized, particularly when applied to different algal species [177].

4.2. Emerging Techniques in Functional Food and Bioactive Compound Processing

4.2.1. Ultrasound

Emerging extraction methods, particularly ultrasound-assisted extraction, have significantly improved the efficiency of isolating bioactive compounds from various sources. This innovative technique aligns well with the principles of sustainable chemistry, as it is cost-effective, requires smaller volumes of solvents, and consumes less energy, while preserving the natural integrity of target compounds [17,188].
Ultrasound-assisted extraction operates by applying high-frequency sound waves that disrupt cellular structures, thereby facilitating faster solvent penetration and promoting the rapid release of bioactive compounds [189]. It is widely used to extract compounds such as polysaccharides (e.g., alginate and carrageenans), pigments (including β-carotene, fucoxanthin, and chlorophylls) and phenolic compounds [17].
Beyond conventional extraction, ultrasound technology also enables advanced applications, such as the production of multiphase colloidal nanoemulsions with particle sizes ranging from 10 to 100 nanometers. These nanoemulsions offer enhanced physicochemical stability, improved bioavailability, and targeted delivery of bioactive compounds within the human body [190].
However, as noted by Kumar et al. [189], some limitations remain, particularly regarding the extraction of bioactive compounds from fruit and vegetable by-products. A key challenge is the complete removal of chemical solvents used during processing. Further research is therefore needed to develop extraction systems that prevent direct contact between ultrasonic probes and plant materials, thereby improving both the safety and effectiveness of the technique.

4.2.2. Artificial Intelligence and Big Data

Advances in flavor science are increasingly enhancing the sensory profiles of foods through the integration of artificial intelligence (AI). AI-based flavor design platforms, such as TastePepAI, are being developed to create flavor peptides with targeted sensory attributes, including sweetness, saltiness, and umami, while ensuring both safety and efficacy [19]. To support this effort, the authors also introduced a toxicity prediction algorithm, SpepToxPred, which is integrated into the platform to ensure rigorous safety assessment of the obtained peptides. These bioactive peptides offer significant health benefits by reducing the need for sodium chloride, sucrose, and monosodium glutamate, while preserving desirable sensory qualities.
The exponential growth of data and advances in information technologies have led to substantial improvements in food ingredient and flavor databases [18]. These developments have transformed multiple aspects of the food industry, including supply chain optimization and food safety [191], as well as consumer perception, sustainability, and product innovation [192].
The application of big data analytics has also enabled the development of tools such as the nutritional assessment system proposed by Kalra et al. [193], which assists consumers in evaluating the nutritional quality of meals by calculating nutritional values directly from recipe analysis. Furthermore, the increasing adoption of AI and big data technologies across the food sector is expected to further enhance product sensory profiles and enable the creation of personalized flavors through predictive algorithms. These innovations are likely to play a decisive role in developing smarter, safer, and more sustainable food solutions that align with consumer expectations and public health objectives [192].

4.2.3. 3D Food Printing/Additive Manufacturing

Recent technological innovations are significantly transforming the development of functional foods by enabling more effective dispersion and enhanced stability of bioactive compounds and flavorings. One of the most promising advances in this field is 3D food printing, also known as Additive Manufacturing. This emerging technology represents a major innovation with substantial potential to impact the food sector. When applied to functional foods formulation, it enables the customization of sensory and nutritional characteristics meet individual consumer needs [194,195,196].
3D food printing operates similarly to conventional 3D printing for plastics and metals, constructing objects layer by layer from computer-aided design (CAD) models. However, instead of synthetic materials, edible ingredients are used as the printing substrates [196]. These materials can include a wide range of food matrices, such as vegetable or fruit purées, starch-based doughs or pasta, cheese, and meat products [189,197].
This technology enables the incorporation of bioactive compounds into foods specifically designed to meet individual nutritional requirements. It allows precise adjustment of key components, including proteins, dietary fibers, vitamins and minerals. In addition, 3D food printing can exclude allergenic substances, making the resulting products safer and more suitable for individuals with specific dietary restrictions [196,198].
Thus, additive manufacturing techniques such as 3D food printing provide precise control over the spatial distribution of bioactive compounds, thereby optimizing their stability and bioactivity in the final product.

4.2.4. Nanotechnology

The limitations of conventional techniques in preserving the functional properties of bioactive compounds have driven researchers to explore alternative technological approaches. Among these, nanotechnology has emerged as a promising strategy, as it can significantly enhance the bioaccessibility and bioavailability of bioactive compounds in the human diet [16]. A central advantage of this approach is that, when appropriately engineered, nanoparticles may exhibit low or even negligible toxicity to the human body. However, their safety depends heavily on factors such as material composition, particle size, dose, and exposure level; and therefore rigorous toxicological evaluation remains essential [199].
A wide range of micro- and nanoencapsulation techniques has been extensively described and applied in the food industry [200]. Owing to their extremely small size, bioactive compounds delivered by polymeric nanoparticles can penetrate biological barriers, including fine capillaries. This facilitates more efficient distribution and increased bioavailability in targeted tissues [201].
A notable example is lycopene, a naturally water-insoluble compound with limited intestinal absorption. When encapsulated in biodegradable nanoparticles, lycopene has demonstrated significantly improved uptake by intestinal cells, thereby enhancing its biological efficacy [16].
The application of nanotechnology in the food sector has also led to substantial improvements in sensory quality, facilitating industrial processing, and extending product shelf life. Most importantly, it has increased the functionality and performance of innovative food products [202].
Together, these technological advancements support the development of functional foods that effectively deliver health-promoting compounds, without compromising the sensory attributes valued by consumers.

5. Regulatory Framework for Novel Foods, Nanomaterials, and Health Claims

In the European Union (EU), foods that were not consumed to a significant extent prior to May 1997 are regulated under Regulation (EU) 2015/2283, which establishes a harmonized pre-market authorization procedure [203]. This regulation covers foods consisting of, isolated from, or produced using engineered nanomaterials, which are therefore subject to safety assessment prior to authorization. Scientific risk assessment of such applications is conducted by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), in accordance with guidance documents specifying the technical and scientific data requirements for novel foods and materials containing particles at the nanoscale [204,205].
The use of nutrition and health claims in the EU is regulated under Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. Under this framework, health claims are evaluated by EFSA for scientific substantiation and are authorized only if the available evidence meets established criteria. Approved claims are subsequently included in the EU Register and are subject to specific conditions concerning wording, context of use, and target population. These requirements apply to both conventional and novel foods including those incorporating nanomaterials [206].
In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not maintain a regulatory category directly equivalent to the EU concept of novel foods or engineered nanomaterials. Instead, products involving nanotechnology are regulated under the general framework for foods and food additives, with safety considerations assessed on a case-by-case basis [207]. Substances that are not generally recognized as safe (GRAS) may be subjected to pre-market review, regardless of the scale or structure of their constituent materials. Health claims in the US that relate to disease risk reduction require FDA authorization based on the available scientific evidence, whereas other claims, including structure/function claims, are subject to requirements concerning truthfulness and labelling [208,209].
Overall, while both the EU and US regulatory approaches share the objective of ensuring consumer protection and the integrity of scientific evaluation, while differing in their mechanisms: the EU employs a centralized pre-market assessment, particularly for novel foods and nanomaterials, whereas the US system relies on existing statutory provisions combined with guidance-driven, case-specific oversight [207,209].

6. Final Remarks

This review examines the convergence of nutrition, flavor science, and biotechnology in the development of functional foods, with the goal of understanding how flavor compounds can simultaneously provide desirable sensory properties and health-promoting benefits. The formation of these flavor compounds in plant-based and functional foods is driven by complex biochemical pathways, which are regulated by genetic, enzymatic, and environmental factors. Enzymes such as terpene synthases and glycosyltransferases play central roles in determining flavor profiles. Many aroma compounds, including terpenes, volatile phenols, sulfur-containing compounds, and polyphenols, also act as bioactive molecules, offering antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory properties.
Advances in metabolic engineering, microbial fermentation, enzyme optimization, and processing techniques such as encapsulation and supercritical fluid extraction have enhanced the yield, stability, and sensory quality of these compounds. Future research should focus on integrated approaches that simultaneously address bioactivity, sensory quality, and technological feasibility. Such efforts should be supported by standardized sensory evaluation methods and in vivo validation, to bridge the gap between laboratory findings and the development of commercially viable functional foods.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.P., A.V. and F.C., validation, T.P., A.V. and F.C.; writing—original draft preparation, T.P., A.V. and F.C.; writing—review and editing, T.P., A.V. and F.C.; funding acquisition, T.P., A.V. and F.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We appreciate the financial support provided to CQ-VR—Chemistry Research Centre—Vila Real (UID/00616/2025, https://doi.org/10.54499/UID/00616/2025) by FCT—Portugal and COMPETE, and through the projects UID/04033/2025: Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences, and LA/P/0126/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/LA/P/0126/2020).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Martirosyan, D.; Kanya, H.; Nadalet, C. Can functional foods reduce the risk of disease? Advancement of functional food definition and steps to create functional food products. Funct. Foods Health Dis. 2021, 11, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Perez-Gregorio, R.; Simal-Gandara, J. A critical review of bioactive food components and their functional mechanisms, biological effects, and health outcomes. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2017, 23, 2731–2741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. McClements, D.J. Future Foods: How Modern Science Is Transforming the Way We Eat; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 1–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Guaadaoui, A.; Benaicha, S.; Elmajdoub, N.; Bellaoui, M.; Hamal, A. What is a bioactive compound? A combined definition for a preliminary consensus. Int. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2014, 3, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shetty, K.; Sarkar, D. Introduction: Metabolic-driven ecological rationale to advance biotechnological approaches for functional foods. In Functional Foods and Biotechnology: Biotransformation and Analysis of Functional Foods and Ingredients; Shetty, K., Sarkar, D., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; p. 454. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rivero-Montejo, S.J.; Vargas-Hernandez, M.; Torres-Pacheco, I. Nanoparticles as novel elicitors to improve bioactive compounds in plants. Agriculture 2021, 11, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Samtiya, M.; Aluko, R.; Dhewa, T.; Moreno-Rojas, J. Potential health benefits of plant food-derived bioactive components: An overview. Foods 2021, 10, 839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rodríguez-Meizoso, I.; Jaime, L.; Santoyo, S.; Señoráns, F.J.; Cifuentes, A.; Ibáñez, E. Subcritical water extraction and characterization of bioactive compounds from Haematococcus pluvialis microalga. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2010, 51, 456–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Salazar-López, N.J.; Domínguez-Avila, J.A.; Yahia, E.M.; Belmonte-Herrera, B.H.; Wall-Medrano, A.; Montalvo-González, E.; González-Aguilar, G.A. Avocado fruit and by-products as potential sources of bioactive compounds. Food Res. Int. 2020, 138, 109774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schwab, W.; Davidovich-Rikanati, R.; Lewinsohn, E. Biosynthesis of plant-derived flavor compounds. Plant J. 2008, 54, 712–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xu, L.; Zang, E.; Sun, S.; Li, M. Main flavor compounds and molecular regulation mechanisms in fruits and vegetables. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 11859–11879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, H.; Lin, Q.; Yan, M.; Wang, M.; Wang, P.; Zhao, H.; Wang, Y.; Ni, D.; Guo, F. Relationship between secondary metabolism and miRNA for important flavor compounds in different tissues of tea plant (Camellia sinensis) revealed by genome-wide miRNA analysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 2001–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhao, S.; Cheng, H.; Xu, P.; Wang, Y. Regulation of biosynthesis of the main flavor-contributing metabolites in tea plant (Camellia sinensis): A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 10520–10535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhao, S.; Mi, X.; Guo, R.; Xia, X.; Liu, L.; An, Y.; Yan, X.; Wang, S.; Guo, L.; Wei, C. The biosynthesis of main taste compounds is coordinately regulated by miRNAs and phytohormones in tea plant (Camellia sinensis). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 6221–6236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Recharla, N.; Riaz, M.; Ko, S.; Park, S. Novel technologies to enhance solubility of food-derived bioactive compounds: A review. J. Funct. Foods 2017, 39, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Alam, A.U.M.; Khatun, M.; Alam, M.A.U. Recent trends in nanotechnology applications to improve bioaccessibility of lycopene by nanocarriers: A review. J. Food Chem. Nanotechnol. 2022, 8, 162–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Carreira-Casais, A.; Otero, P.; Garcia-Perez, P.; Garcia-Oliveira, P.; Pereira, A.G.; Carpena, M.; Soria-Lopez, A.; Simal-Gandara, J.; Prieto, M.A. Benefits and drawbacks of ultrasound-assisted extraction for the recovery of bioactive compounds from marine algae. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 9153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Cui, Z.; Qi, C.; Zhou, T.; Yu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, W.; Liu, Y. Artificial intelligence and food flavor: How AI models are shaping the future and revolutionary technologies for flavor food development. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2025, 24, e70068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yue, J.; Li, T.; Ouyang, J.; Xu, J.; Tan, H.; Chen, Z.; Han, C.; Li, H.; Liang, S.; Liu, Z.; et al. TastePepAI: An artificial intelligence platform for taste peptide de novo design. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2025, 21, e1013602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hasler, C.M. Functional foods: Benefits, concerns and challenges—A position paper from the American Council on Science and Health. J. Nutr. 2002, 132, 3772–3781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Granato, D.; Branco, G.F.; Nazzaro, F.; Cruz, A.G.; Faria, J.A.F. Functional foods and nondairy probiotic food development: Trends, concepts, and products. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2010, 9, 292–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tuorila, H.; Cardello, A.V. Consumer responses to an off-flavour in juice in the presence of specific health claims. Food Qual. Prefer. 2002, 13, 561–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Drewnowski, A.; Gomez-Carneros, C. Bitter taste, phytonutrients, and the consumer: A review. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000, 72, 1424–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bigliardi, B.; Galati, F. Innovation trends in the food industry: The case of functional foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 31, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jaeger, S.R.; MacFie, H.J.H. The effect of advertising format and means–end information on consumer expectations for apples. Food Qual. Prefer. 2001, 12, 189–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Verbeke, W. Consumer acceptance of functional foods: Socio-demographic, cognitive and attitudinal determinants. Food Qual. Prefer. 2005, 16, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. European Commission. Functional Foods; Food, Agriculture & Fisheries & Biotechnology: Brussels, Belgium, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  28. Shahidi, F.; Ambigaipalan, P. Phenolics and polyphenolics in foods, beverages and spices: Antioxidant activity and health effects—A review. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 18, 820–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Scalbert, A.; Johnson, I.T.; Saltmarsh, M. Polyphenols: Antioxidants and beyond. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 81, 215S–217S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lesschaeve, I.; Noble, A.C. Polyphenols: Factors influencing their sensory properties and their effects on food and beverage preferences. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 81, 330S–335S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Soares, S.; Brandão, E.; Mateus, N.; de Freitas, V. Sensorial properties of red wine polyphenols: Astringency and bitterness. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 937–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Delgado-Vargas, F.; Jiménez, A.R.; Paredes-López, O. Natural pigments: Carotenoids, anthocyanins, and betalains. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2000, 40, 173–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Galanakis, C.M. Recovery of high added-value components from food wastes: Conventional, emerging technologies and commercialized applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 26, 68–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Prakash, B.; Kujur, A.; Singh, P.P.; Kumar, A.; Yadav, A. Plant-derived bioactive compounds as functional food ingredients and food preservatives. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2017, 2, 100005. [Google Scholar]
  35. Helkar, P.B.; Sahoo, A.K.; Patil, N.J. Review: Food industry by-products used as a functional food ingredients. Int. J. Waste Resour. 2016, 6, 1000248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gómez-Mejía, E.; Rosales-Conrado, N.; León-González, M.E.; Madrid, Y. Citrus peels waste as a source of value-added compounds: Extraction and quantification of bioactive polyphenols. Food Chem. 2019, 295, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Martirosyan, D.; Singh, J. A new definition of functional food by FFC: What makes a new definition unique? Funct. Foods Health Dis. 2015, 5, 209–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tolve, R.; Simonato, B.; Rainero, G.; Bianchi, F.; Rizzi, C.; Cervini, M.; Giuberti, G. Wheat bread fortification by grape pomace powder: Nutritional, technological, antioxidant, and sensory properties. Foods 2021, 10, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Elmaliklis, I.N.; Liveri, A.; Ntelis, B.; Paraskeva, K.; Goulis, I.; Koutelidakis, A. Increased functional foods’ consumption and Mediterranean diet adherence may have a protective effect in the appearance of gastrointestinal diseases: A case–control study. Medicines 2019, 6, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Suleria, H.A.R.; Osborne, S.; Masci, P.; Gobe, G. Marine-based nutraceuticals: An innovative trend in the food and supplement industries. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 6336–6351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Karasawa, M.G.; Mohan, C. Fruits as prospective reserves of bioactive compounds: A review. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 2018, 8, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cianciosi, D.; Valera-Lopez, A.; Forbes-Hernandez, T.Y.; Gasparrini, M.; Afrin, S.; Reboredo-Rodriguez, P.; Zhang, J.; Quiles, J.L.; Nabavi, S.F.; Battino, M.; et al. Targeting molecular pathways in cancer stem cells by natural bioactive compounds. Pharmacol. Res. 2018, 135, 150–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nuhu, A.A. Bioactive micronutrients in coffee: Recent analytical approaches for characterization and quantification. ISRN Nutr. 2014, 2014, 384230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jeszka-Skowron, M.; Sentkowska, A.; Pyrzyńska, K.; Paz De Peña, M. Chlorogenic acids, caffeine content and antioxidant properties of green coffee extracts: Influence of green coffee bean preparation. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2016, 242, 1403–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Koutelidakis, A.; Kapsokefalou, M. Holistic approaches of tea bioactivity: Interactions of tea and meal components studied in vitro and in vivo. In Tea in Health and Disease Prevention; Preedy, V., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 36–42. [Google Scholar]
  46. Kongpichitchoke, T.; Chiu, M.T.; Huang, T.C.; Hsu, J.L. Gallic acid content in Taiwanese teas at different degrees of fermentation and its antioxidant activity by inhibiting PKC activation: In vitro and in silico studies. Molecules 2016, 21, 1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kowalska, K.; Olejnik, A. Current evidence on the health-beneficial effects of berry fruits in the prevention and treatment of metabolic syndrome. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2016, 19, 446–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Konstantinidi, M.; Koutelidakis, A.E. Functional foods and bioactive compounds: A review of their possible role on weight management and obesity’s metabolic consequences. Medicines 2019, 6, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Del Rio, D.; Borges, G.; Crozier, A. Berry flavonoids and phenolics: Bioavailability and evidence of protective effects. Br. J. Nutr. 2010, 104, S67–S90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nile, S.H.; Park, S.W. Edible berries: Bioactive components and their effect on human health. Nutrition 2014, 30, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ambigaipalan, P.; de Camargo, A.C.; Shahidi, F. Identification of phenolic antioxidants and bioactives of pomegranate seeds following juice extraction using HPLC-DAD-ESI-MSn. Food Chem. 2017, 221, 1883–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Singh, B.; Singh, J.P.; Kaur, A.; Singh, N. Phenolic compounds as beneficial phytochemicals in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peel: A review. Food Chem. 2018, 261, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fischer, U.A.; Carle, R.; Kammerer, D.R. Identification and quantification of phenolic compounds from pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peel, mesocarp, aril, and differently produced juices by HPLC-DAD-ESI/MSn. Food Chem. 2011, 127, 807–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Akhavan, H.; Barzegar, M.; Weidlich, H.; Zimmermann, B.F. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of juices from ten Iranian pomegranate cultivars depend on extraction. J. Chem. 2015, 2015, 907101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Martin-Pelaez, S.; Covas, M.I.; Fito, M.; Kusar, A.; Pravst, I. Health effects of olive oil polyphenols: Recent advances and possibilities for the use of health claims. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2013, 57, 760–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Coni, E.; Di Benedetto, R.; Di Pasquale, M.; Masella, R.; Modesti, D.; Mattei, R.; Carlini, E.A. Protective effect of oleuropein, an olive oil biophenol, on low density lipoprotein oxidizability in rabbits. Lipids 2000, 35, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Mahmoud, R.H.; Elnour, W.A. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of ginger and orlistat on obesity management, pancreatic lipase, and liver peroxisomal catalase enzyme in male albino rats. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2013, 17, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Maghraby, Y.R.; Labib, R.M.; Sobeh, M.; Farag, M.A. Gingerols and shogaols: A multi-faceted review of their extraction, formulation, and analysis in drugs and biofluids to maximize their nutraceutical and pharmaceutical applications. Food Chem. X 2023, 20, 100947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Adesulu-Dahunsi, A.T.; Sanni, A.I.; Jeyaram, K. Production, characterization, and in vitro antioxidant activities of exopolysaccharide from Weissella cibaria GA44. LWT–Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 87, 432–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. O’Shea, N.; Arendt, E.K.; Gallagher, E. Dietary fibre and phytochemical characteristics of fruit and vegetable by-products and their recent applications as novel ingredients in food products. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2012, 16, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Elleuch, M.; Bedigian, D.; Roiseux, O.; Besbes, S.; Blecker, C.; Attia, H. Dietary fibre and fibre-rich by-products of food processing: Characterisation, technological functionality and commercial applications: A review. Food Chem. 2011, 124, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Rosell, C.M.; Santos, E.; Collar, C. Physico-chemical properties of commercial fibres from different sources: A comparative approach. Food Res. Int. 2009, 42, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. McClements, D.J. Encapsulation, protection, and delivery of bioactive proteins and peptides using nanoparticle and microparticle systems: A review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 253, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. McClements, D.J.; Decker, E.A.; Park, Y.; Weiss, J. Structural design principles for delivery of bioactive components in nutraceuticals and functional foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2009, 49, 577–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Desai, K.G.H.; Park, H.J. Recent developments in microencapsulation of food ingredients. Dry. Technol. 2005, 23, 1361–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gouin, S. Microencapsulation: Industrial appraisal of existing technologies and trends. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2004, 15, 330–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Fang, Z.; Bhandari, B. Encapsulation of polyphenols: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 21, 510–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. de Vos, P.; Faas, M.M.; Spasojevic, M.; Sikkema, J. Encapsulation for preservation of functionality and targeted delivery of bioactive food components. Int. Dairy J. 2010, 20, 292–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Salvia-Trujillo, L.; Soliva-Fortuny, R.; Rojas-Graü, M.A.; McClements, D.J.; Martín-Belloso, O. Edible Nanoemulsions as Carriers of Active Ingredients: A Review. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 8, 439–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. McClements, D.J.; Rao, J. Food-grade nanoemulsions: Formulation, fabrication, properties, performance, biological fate, and potential toxicity. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011, 51, 285–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Van Boekel, M.; Fogliano, V.; Pellegrini, N.; Stanton, C.; Scholz, G.; Lalljie, S.; Somoza, V.; Knorr, D.; Jasti, P.R.; Eisenbrand, G. A review on the beneficial aspects of food processing. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2010, 54, 1215–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Liang, Z.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, P.; Fang, Z. Impact of fermentation on the structure and antioxidant activity of selective phenolic compounds. Food Biosci. 2023, 56, 103147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kanimozhi, N.V.; Sukumar, M. Harnessing probiotic fermentation to enhance the bioavailability and health impact of dietary phytochemicals. Food Wellness 2025, 1, 100018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Nicoli, M.C.; Anese, M.; Parpinel, M. Influence of processing on the antioxidant properties of fruit and vegetables. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1999, 10, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Abuajah, C.I.; Ogbonna, A.C.; Osuji, C.M. Functional components and medicinal properties of food: A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 2522–2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Granato, D.; Barba, F.J.; Bursać Kovačević, D.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Cruz, A.G.; Putnik, P. Functional foods: Product development, technological trends, efficacy testing, and safety. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 11, 93–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Mildner-Szkudlarz, S.; Bajerska, J.; Zawirska-Wojtasiak, R.; Górecka, D. White grape pomace as a source of dietary fibre and polyphenols and its effect on physical and nutraceutical characteristics of wheat biscuits. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Kaderides, K.; Goula, A.M.; Adamopoulos, K.G. A process for turning pomegranate peels into a valuable food ingredient using ultrasound-assisted extraction and encapsulation. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2015, 31, 204–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Marsanasco, M.; Márquez, A.L.; Wagner, J.R.; Chiaramoni, N.S.; Alonso, S.V. Bioactive compounds as functional food ingredients: Characterization in a model system and sensory evaluation in chocolate milk. J. Food Eng. 2015, 166, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Pinto, T.; Aires, A.; Cosme, F.; Bacelar, E.; Morais, M.; Oliveira, I.; Ferreira-Cardoso, J.; Anjos, R.; Vilela, A.; Gonçalves, B. Bioactive (poly)phenols and volatile compounds from vegetables, medicinal and aromatic plants. Foods 2021, 10, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Grigore-Gurgu, L.; Dumitrașcu, L.; Aprodu, I. Aromatic herbs as a source of bioactive compounds: An overview of their antioxidant capacity, antimicrobial activity, and major applications. Molecules 2025, 30, 1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Masyita, A.; Sari, R.M.; Astuti, A.D.; Yasir, B.; Rumata, N.R.; Emran, T.B.; Nainu, F.; Simal-Gándara, J. Terpenes and terpenoids as main bioactive compounds of essential oils: Their roles in human health and potential application as natural food preservatives. Food Chem. X 2022, 13, 100217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Christaki, E.; Bonos, E.; Giannenas, I.; Florou-Paneri, P. Aromatic plants as a source of bioactive compounds. Agriculture 2012, 2, 228–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Duque-Soto, C.; Ruiz-Vargas, A.; Rueda-Robles, A.; Quirantes-Piné, R.; Borrás-Linares, I.; Lozano-Sánchez, J. Bioactive potential of aqueous phenolic extracts of spices for their use in the food industry—A systematic review. Foods 2023, 12, 3031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Fabela-Morón, M. Bioactive compounds, sensory attributes, and flavor perceptions involved in taste-active molecules in fruits and vegetables. Front. Nutr. 2024, 11, 1427857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Marcinkowska, M.; Jeleń, H. Role of sulfur compounds in vegetable and mushroom aroma. Molecules 2022, 27, 6116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Jiang, L.; Gong, X.; Ji, M.; Wang, C.; Wang, J.; Li, M. Bioactive compounds from plant-based functional foods: A promising choice for the prevention and management of hyperuricemia. Foods 2020, 9, 973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Görgüç, A.; Gençdağ, E.; Yılmaz, F. Bioactive peptides derived from plant-origin by-products: Biological activities and techno-functional utilizations in food development—A review. Food Res. Int. 2020, 136, 109504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Direito, R.; Barbalho, S.; Sepodes, B.; Figueira, M. Plant-derived bioactive compounds: Exploring neuroprotective, metabolic, and hepatoprotective effects for health promotion and disease prevention. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Huang, L.; Ho, C.T.; Wang, Y. Biosynthetic pathways and metabolic engineering of spice flavors. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 2047–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Vilela, A.; Pinto, T. Grape infusions: Between nutraceutical and green chemistry. Sustain. Chem. 2021, 2, 441–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zeng, Y.; Wang, M.; Hunter, D.; Matich, A.; McAtee, P.; Knäbel, M.; Hamiaux, C.; Popowski, E.; Jaeger, S.; Nieuwenhuizen, N.; et al. Sensory-directed genetic and biochemical characterization of volatile terpene production in kiwifruit. Plant Physiol. 2020, 183, 51–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sharon-Asa, L.; Shalit, M.; Frydman, A.; Bar, E.; Holland, D.; Or, E.; Lavi, U.; Lewinsohn, E.; Eyal, Y. Citrus fruit flavor and aroma biosynthesis: Isolation, functional characterization, and developmental regulation of Cstps1, a key gene in the production of the sesquiterpene aroma compound valencene. Plant J. 2003, 36, 664–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Rusdi, N.A.; Goh, H.-H.; Sabri, S.; Ramzi, A.B.; Mohd Noor, N.; Baharum, S.N. Functional characterisation of a new sesquiterpene synthase from the Malaysian herbal plant Polygonum minus. Molecules 2018, 23, 1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Simkin, A.J.; Schwartz, S.H.; Auldridge, M.; Taylor, M.G.; Klee, H.J. The tomato carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 1 genes contribute to the formation of the flavor volatiles β-ionone, pseudoionone, and geranylacetone. Plant J. 2004, 40, 882–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Zhou, Y.; Peng, Q.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, S.; Zeng, L.; Dong, F.; Yang, Z. Characterization of enzymes specifically producing chiral flavor compounds (R)- and (S)-1-phenylethanol from tea (Camellia sinensis) flowers. Food Chem. 2019, 280, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Frydman, A.; Weisshaus, O.; Bar-Peled, M.; Huhman, D.; Sumner, L.; Marín, F.; Lewinsohn, E.; Fluhr, R.; Gressel, J.; Eyal, Y. Citrus fruit bitter flavors: Isolation and functional characterization of the gene Cm1,2RhaT encoding a 1,2-rhamnosyltransferase, a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of bitter flavonoids of citrus. Plant J. 2004, 40, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Dai, X.; Shi, X.; Yang, C.; Zhao, X.; Zhuang, J.; Liu, Y.; Gao, L.; Xia, T. Two UDP-glycosyltransferases catalyze the biosynthesis of bitter flavonoid 7-O-neohesperidoside through sequential glycosylation in tea plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 2354–2365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Suh, J.; Madden, R.; Sung, J.; Chambers, A.; Crane, J.; Wang, Y. Pathway-based metabolomics analysis reveals biosynthesis of key flavor compounds in mango. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 10389–10399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhang, P.; Fuentes, S.; Siebert, T.; Krstic, M.; Herderich, M.; Barlow, E.W.R.; Howell, K. Terpene evolution during the development of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz grapes. Food Chem. 2016, 204, 463–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wei, Y.; Meng, N.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, J.; Duan, C.; Pan, Q. Transcription factor VvWRKY70 inhibits both norisoprenoid and flavonol biosynthesis in grape. Plant Physiol. 2023, 193, 2055–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Shi, N.; Pei, X.; Li, M.; Chen, W.; Li, H.; Yang, G.; Duan, C.; Wang, J. Metabolomics of Vitis davidii Foëx grapes from southern China: Flavonoids and volatiles reveal the flavor profiles of five spine grape varieties. Food Chem. 2024, 454, 139732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Maoz, I.; Kaplunov, T.; Raban, E.; Dynkin, I.; Degani, O.; Lewinsohn, E.; Lichter, A. Insights into the chemosensory basis of flavor in table grapes. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 1405–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Moriyama, K.; Kono, A.; Matsuzaki, R.; Azuma, A.; Onoue, N.; Sekozawa, Y.; Sato, A.; Sugaya, S. Diversity of flavour characteristics of table grapes and their contributing volatile compounds analysed by the solvent-assisted flavour evaporation method. Hortic. Res. 2024, 11, uhae048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Parker, M.; Capone, D.; Francis, I.L.; Herderich, M. Aroma precursors in grapes and wine: Flavor release during wine production and consumption. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 2281–2286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Ferreira, V.; Lopez, R. The actual and potential aroma of winemaking grapes. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Leonard, W.; Zhang, P.; Ying, D.; Fang, Z. Surmounting the off-flavor challenge in plant-based foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 10585–10606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Dai, J.; Li, K.; Song, N.; Yao, W.; Xia, H.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Wang, Z.; Yao, L.; et al. Zygosaccharomyces rouxii, an aromatic yeast isolated from chili sauce, is able to biosynthesize 2-phenylethanol via the shikimate or Ehrlich pathways. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 597454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Larroudé, M.; Nicaud, J.-M.; Rossignol, T. Yarrowia lipolytica chassis strains engineered to produce aromatic amino acids via the shikimate pathway. Microb. Biotechnol. 2021, 14, 2420–2434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Li, M.; Lang, X.; Cabrera, M.; De Keyser, S.; Sun, X.; da Silva, N.A.; Wheeldon, I. CRISPR-mediated multigene integration enables shikimate pathway refactoring for enhanced 2-phenylethanol biosynthesis in Kluyveromyces marxianus. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2021, 14, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zhou, R.; Song, Q.; Xia, H.; Song, N.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Yao, L.; Yang, S.; Dai, J.; Chen, X. Isolation and identification of non-Saccharomyces yeast producing 2-phenylethanol and study of the Ehrlich and shikimate pathways. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Schieber, A.; Wüst, M. Volatile phenols—Important contributors to the aroma of plant-derived foods. Molecules 2020, 25, 4529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Cai, J.; Wang, N.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, R.; Fu, F.; Pan, T.; Yu, Y.; Guo, Z.; She, W. Accumulation of polyphenolics and differential expression of genes related to the shikimate pathway during fruit development and maturation of Chinese olive (Canarium album). Agronomy 2023, 13, 895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Maeda, H.; Dudareva, N. The shikimate pathway and aromatic amino acid biosynthesis in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63, 73–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Reifenrath, M.; Boles, E. Engineering of hydroxymandelate synthases and the aromatic amino acid pathway enables de novo biosynthesis of mandelic and 4-hydroxymandelic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab. Eng. 2018, 45, 246–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Dong, P.; Fan, Y.; Huo, Y.; Sun, L.; Guo, S. Pathway-adapted biosensor for high-throughput screening of O-methyltransferase and its application in vanillin synthesis. ACS Synth. Biol. 2024, 13, 2873–2886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Zhang, S.; Shang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Hu, X.; Yi, J. Flavor production in fermented chayote inoculated with lactic acid bacteria strains: Genomics- and metabolomics-based analysis. Food Res. Int. 2022, 163, 112224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Shahidi, F.; Oh, W. Lipid-derived flavor and off-flavor of traditional and functional foods: An overview. J. Food Bioact. 2020, 10, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Shahidi, F.; Hossain, A. Role of lipids in food flavor generation. Molecules 2022, 27, 5014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Wang, B.; Wang, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Lin, X.; Xu, X.; Ji, C.; Liang, H.; Dong, L. Deep exploration of lipid oxidation into flavor compounds: A density functional theory study on (E)-2-decenal thermal oxidative reaction. Food Chem. 2023, 428, 136725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Smit, B.A.; Engels, W.J.M.; Smit, G. Branched-chain aldehydes: Production and breakdown pathways and relevance for flavour in foods. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 81, 987–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Kumar Verma, D.; Al-Sahlany, S.T.G.; Kareem Niamah, A.; Thakur, M.; Shah, N.; Singh, S.; Baranwal, D.; Patel, A.R.; Lara Utama, G.; Noe Aguilar, C. Recent trends in microbial flavour compounds: A review on chemistry, synthesis mechanisms, and applications in food. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 1565–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Xiao, Y.; Xiong, T.; Peng, Z.; Liu, C.; Huang, T.; Yu, H.; Xie, M. Correlation between microbiota and flavours in fermentation of Chinese Sichuan Paocai. Food Res. Int. 2018, 114, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Xiang, L.; Jiang, B.; Xiong, Y.; Zhou, L.; Zhong, F.; Zhang, R.; Tahir, A.; Xiao, Z. Beany flavor in pea protein: Recent advances in formation mechanisms, analytical techniques, and microbial fermentation mitigation strategies. Food Biosci. 2023, 56, 103166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Ayseli, M.T.; Ayseli, Y.I. Flavors of the future: Health benefits of flavor precursors and volatile compounds in plant foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 48, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Zhang, K.; Zhang, T.; Guo, R.; Ye, Q.; Zhao, H.; Huang, X. Regulation of key flavors in traditional fermented foods by microbial metabolism: A review. Food Chem. X 2023, 19, 100871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Miao, Y.; Sun, M.; Huo, R.; Chen, Y.; Xie, J.; Dong, T.; Zhang, M. Metagenomics and volatile metabolomics reveal microbial succession and flavor formation mechanisms during fermentation of novel pasture-style Laozao. Food Chem. X 2025, 28, 102598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Bai, C.; Fan, B.; Hao, J.; Yao, Y.; Ran, S.; Wang, H.; Li, H.; Wei, R. Changes in microbial community diversity and the formation mechanism of flavor metabolites in industrial-scale spontaneous fermentation of Cabernet Sauvignon wines. Foods 2025, 14, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. An, F.; Wu, J.; Feng, Y.; Pan, G.; Ma, Y.; Jiang, J.; Yang, X.; Xue, R.; Wu, R.; Zhao, M. A systematic review on the flavor of soy-based fermented foods: Core fermentation microbiome, multisensory flavor substances, key enzymes, and metabolic pathways. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2023, 22, 2773–2801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Liang, T.; Jiang, T.; Liang, Z.; Zhang, N.; Dong, B.; Wu, Q.; Gu, B. Carbohydrate-active enzyme profiles of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strain 84-3 contribute to flavor formation in fermented dairy and vegetable products. Food Chem. X 2023, 20, 101036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Wang, F.; Wang, M.; Xu, L.; Qian, J.; Xu, B.; Gao, X.; Ding, Z.; Cui, K. Application and possible mechanism of microbial fermentation and enzyme catalysis in regulation of food flavour. Foods 2025, 14, 1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Xiong, S.; Xu, X.; Zhang, L.; Du, T.; Huang, T.; Huang, J.; Ren, H.; Xiong, T.; Xie, M. Integrated metatranscriptomics and metabolomics reveal microbial succession and flavor formation mechanisms during the spontaneous fermentation of Laotan Suancai. Food Res. Int. 2024, 177, 113865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Chen, J.; Huang, Y.; Wang, X.; He, J.; Li, W.; Lu, M.; Sun, X.; Yin, Y. Revealing core functional microorganisms in the fermentation process of Qicaipaojiao (Capsicum annuum L.) based on microbial metabolic network. Food Res. Int. 2024, 187, 114315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Liu, L.; Liu, T.; Wang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, X.; Zeng, M. Identification and validation of core microbes for the formation of the characteristic flavor of fermented oysters (Crassostrea gigas). Food Chem. 2024, 449, 138970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Shen, Y.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, L.; Li, C.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, S. Contribution of autochthonous microbiota succession to flavor formation during Chinese fermented mandarin fish (Siniperca chuatsi). Food Chem. 2021, 348, 129107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Liu, S.; Chen, Q.; Zou, H.; Yu, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Mao, J.; Zhang, S. A metagenomic analysis of the relationship between microorganisms and flavor development in Shaoxing mechanized Huangjiu fermentation mashes. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 303, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Tan, Y.; Du, H.; Zhang, H.; Fang, C.; Jin, G.; Chen, S.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Xu, Y. Geographically associated fungus–bacterium interactions contribute to the formation of geography-dependent flavor during high-complexity spontaneous fermentation. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e01844-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Sun, X.; Yu, L.; Xiao, M.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, J.; Narbad, A.; Chen, W.; Zhai, Q.; Tian, F. Exploring core fermentation microorganisms, flavor compounds, and metabolic pathways in fermented rice and wheat foods. Food Chem. 2025, 463, 141019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Paulino, B.N.; Sales, A.; Felipe, L.; Pastore, G.M.; Molina, G.; Bicas, J.L. Biotechnological production of non-volatile flavor compounds. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2021, 41, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Singh, S.; Sharma, P.; Chaturvedi, S.; Kumar, P.; Nannaware, A.D.; Kalra, A.; Rout, P.K. Biocatalysts for the synthesis of natural flavouring compounds as food additives: Bridging the gap toward a more sustainable industrial future. Food Chem. 2024, 435, 137217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. English, M.; Okagu, O.D.; Stephens, K.; Goertzen, A.; Udenigwe, C.C. Flavour encapsulation: A comparative analysis of relevant techniques, physicochemical characterization, stability, and food applications. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1019211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Vasilescu, C.; Paul, C.; Marc, S.; Hulka, I.; Péter, F. Development of a tailored sol–gel immobilized biocatalyst for sustainable synthesis of the food aroma ester n-amyl caproate in a continuous solventless system. Foods 2022, 11, 2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Trbojević Ivić, J.; Veličković, D.; Dimitrijević, A.; Bezbradica, D.; Dragačević, V.; Gavrović-Jankulović, M.; Milosavić, N. Design of a biocompatible immobilized Candida rugosa lipase with potential application in the food industry. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 4281–4287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Carrillo, G.; Vaschetto, E.; Ferrero, G.; Eimer, G. Development of mesoporous biocatalysts synthesized from a biomass surfactant for flavorings production. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2025, 387, 113536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Vasilescu, C.; Todea, A.; Nan, A.; Cîrcu, M.; Turcu, R.; Benea, I.; Péter, F. Enzymatic synthesis of short-chain flavor esters from natural sources using tailored magnetic biocatalysts. Food Chem. 2019, 296, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Felipe, L.O.; Bicas, J.L.; Changwatchai, T.; Nakajima, M.; Neves, M.A. Oil-in-water nanoemulsion loaded with a biotransformation product containing limonene and α-terpineol stabilized with Tween® 20: Formation and physicochemical stability over time. Food Biosci. 2023, 55, 102989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Saifullah, M.; Shishir, M.R.I.; Ferdowsi, R.; Rahman, M.R.T.; Van Vuong, Q. Micro- and nano-encapsulation, retention, and controlled release of flavor and aroma compounds: A critical review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 86, 230–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Sá, A.G.A.; Meneses, A.C.; Araújo, P.H.H.; Oliveira, D. A review on enzymatic synthesis of aromatic esters used as flavor ingredients for food, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical industries. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 69, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Dias, A.; Santos, P.; Martínez, J. Supercritical CO2 technology applied to the production of flavor ester compounds through lipase-catalyzed reactions: A review. J. CO2 Util. 2018, 23, 159–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Saffarionpour, S.; Ottens, M. Recent advances in techniques for flavor recovery in liquid food processing. Food Eng. Rev. 2018, 10, 81–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Junaidi, L. Natural flavor: Production, sources, isolation, and recovery techniques. Indones. J. Ind. Res. 2008, 25, 45–58. [Google Scholar]
  152. She, M.; Hwang, S.-T. Recovery of key components from real flavor concentrates by pervaporation. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 279, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Pua, A.; Yeam, C.; Huang, Y.; Goh, R.; Ee, K.; Lassabliere, B.; Liu, S.; Yu, B. Sequential combination of solid-phase sorbents to enhance the selectivity of organosulfur compounds for flavour analysis. Talanta 2022, 241, 123234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Wang, C.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, X.; He, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Li, Q.; Huang, J.; Liu, Z. Salting-out redistillation combined with sensory-directed analysis to recover odor-active compounds for improving the flavor quality of instant Pu-erh tea. Food Chem. X 2022, 14, 100310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Sullivan, R.; Fagan, C.; Parker, J. Improved recovery of higher boiling point volatiles during solvent-assisted flavour evaporation. Food Anal. Methods 2021, 14, 2486–2493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Zhang, Y.; Stöppelmann, F.; Zhu, L.; Liang, J.; Rigling, M.; Wang, X.; Jin, Q.; Zhang, Y. A comparative study on flavor trapping techniques from the viewpoint of odorants of hot-pressed rapeseed oil. Food Chem. 2023, 426, 136617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Oliveira, J.; Gomes, S.; Ladeira, K.; Cameron, L.; Macedo, A.; Koblitz, M. Recovery of flavor compounds from vanilla bagasse by hydrolysis and identification through UPLC–MSE. Food Res. Int. 2023, 168, 112739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Sharma, A.; Sharma, P.; Singh, J.; Singh, S.; Nain, L. Prospecting the potential of agro-residues as substrates for microbial flavor production. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2020, 4, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Bel-Rhlid, R.; Berger, R.G.; Blank, I. Bio-mediated generation of food flavors—Towards sustainable flavor production inspired by nature. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 78, 134–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Tian, X.; Zheng, X.; Chen, L.; Wang, Z.; Liu, B.; Bi, Y.; Li, L.; Shi, H.; Li, S.; Li, C.; et al. Recent advances in photoluminescent fluorescent probe technology for food flavor compound analysis. Food Chem. 2024, 459, 140455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Qian, R.; Sun, C.; Bai, T.; Yan, J.; Cheng, J.; Zhang, J. Recent advances and challenges in the interaction between myofibrillar proteins and flavor substances. Front. Nutr. 2024, 11, 1378884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Hu, Y.; Badar, I.; Zhang, L.; Yang, L.; Xu, B. Odor and taste characteristics, transduction mechanisms, and perceptual interactions in fermented foods: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2025, 65, 3947–3965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Berger, R.G. Biotechnology of flavours—The next generation. Biotechnol. Lett. 2009, 31, 1651–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Rezagholizadeh-Shirvan, A.; Soltani, M.; Shokri, S.; Radfar, R.; Arab, M.; Shamloo, E. Bioactive compound encapsulation: Characteristics, applications in food systems, and implications for human health. Food Chem. X 2024, 24, 101953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Donn, P.; Prieto, M.A.; Mejuto, J.C.; Cao, H.; Simal-Gandara, J. Functional foods based on the recovery of bioactive ingredients from food and algae by-products using emerging extraction technologies and 3D printing. Food Biosci. 2022, 49, 101853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Otero, P.; Carpena, M.; Fraga-Corral, M.; Garcia-Oliveira, P.; Soria-Lopez, A.; Barba, F.J.; Xiao, J.; Simal-Gandara, J.; Prieto, M. Aquaculture and agriculture by-products as sustainable sources of omega-3 fatty acids for the food industry. eFood 2021, 2, 209–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Usman, I.; Hussain, M.; Imran, A.; Afzaal, M.; Saeed, F.; Javed, M.; Afzal, A.; Ashfaq, I.; Al Jbawi, E.; Saewan, S.A. Traditional and innovative approaches for the extraction of bioactive compounds. Int. J. Food Prop. 2022, 25, 1215–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Yang, Y.; Hassan, S.H.A.; Awasthi, M.K.; Gajendran, B.; Sharma, M.; Ji, M.-K.; Salama, E.-S. Recent progress on bioactive compounds from algal biomass for human health applications. Food Biosci. 2022, 51, 102267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Monroy-García, I.N.; Torres-Romero, S.; Castro-Ochoa, L.D.; Mendoza-Acosta, A.; Viveros-Valdez, E.; Ayala-Zavala, F.J. Bioactive compounds from marine macroalgae: A natural defense against oxidative stress-related diseases. Stresses 2025, 5, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Zhang, S.; Sun, L.; Ju, H.; Bao, Z.; Zeng, X.-A.; Lin, S. Research advances and applications of pulsed electric fields on proteins and peptides in food. Food Res. Int. 2021, 139, 109914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Cai, Y.; Lim, H.R.; Khoo, K.S.; Ng, H.-S.; Wang, J.; Chan, A.-T.-Y.; Show, P.L. An integrated study of microalgae bioactive retention: From microalgal biomass to bioactive nanoparticles. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2021, 158, 112607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Shaghaghian, S.; McClements, D.J.; Khalesi, M.; Garcia-Vaquero, M.; Mirzapour-Kouhdasht, A. Digestibility and bioavailability of plant-based proteins intended for use in meat analogues: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 129, 646–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Pankaj, S.K.; Keener, K.M. Cold plasma: Background, applications, and current trends. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2017, 16, 49–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Noore, S.; Tiwari, B.K.; Jambrak, A.R.; Dukić, J.; Wanigasekara, J.; Curtin, J.F.; Fuentes-Grünewald, C.; O’Donnell, C. Extraction yield and biological activity of phycobiliproteins from Porphyridium purpureum using atmospheric cold plasma discharge and jet systems. LWT 2023, 187, 115204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Ekezie, F.-G.C.; Cheng, J.-H.; Sun, D.-W. Effects of nonthermal food processing technologies on food allergens: A review of recent research advances. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 74, 12–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Zhou, J.; Wang, M.; Berrada, H.; Zhu, Z.; Grimi, N.; Barba, F.J. Pulsed electric fields, pressurized liquid extraction, and combined PEF–PLE processes: Effects on Spirulina microstructure, biomolecule recovery, and polyphenol composition. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2022, 77, 102989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Mirzapour-Kouhdasht, A.; Garcia-Vaquero, M.; Huang, J.-Y. Algae-derived compounds: Bioactivity, allergenicity, and technologies enhancing their value. Bioresour. Technol. 2024, 406, 130963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Hossain, A.; Yeo, J.; Dave, D.; Shahidi, F. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity of sea cucumber (Cucumaria frondosa) processing discards as affected by high-pressure processing. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. O’Connor, J.; Garcia-Vaquero, M.; Meaney, S.; Tiwari, B.K. Bioactive peptides from algae: Traditional and novel generation strategies, structure–function relationships, and bioinformatics as predictive tools for bioactivity. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Álvarez-Viñas, M.; Rodríguez-Seoane, P.; Flórez-Fernández, N.; Torres, M.D.; Díaz-Reinoso, B.; Moure, A.; Domínguez, H. Subcritical water extraction and hydrolysis of proteins and other fractions from agro-food wastes and algae: A review. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2021, 14, 373–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Yay, C.; Cinar, Z.O.; Donmez, S.; Tumer, T.B.; Guneser, O.; Hosoglu, M.I. Optimizing bioreactor conditions for Spirulina fermentation by Lactobacillus helveticus and Kluyveromyces marxianus: Impact on chemical and bioactive properties. Bioresour. Technol. 2024, 403, 130832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Wang, X.; Zhang, X. Separation, antitumor activities, and encapsulation of polypeptides from Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Biotechnol. Prog. 2013, 29, 681–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Castejón, N.; Luna, P.; Señoráns, F.J. Microencapsulation by spray drying of omega-3 lipids extracted from oilseeds and microalgae: Effect on polyunsaturated fatty acid composition. LWT 2021, 148, 111789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Meng, W.; Sun, H.; Mu, T.; Garcia-Vaquero, M. Spray drying and rehydration of β-carotene-encapsulated Pickering emulsions stabilized with chitosan and seaweed polyphenols. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 268, 131654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Beyrer, M.; Pina-Perez, M.C.; Martinet, D.; Andlauer, W. Cold plasma processing of powdered Spirulina algae for spore inactivation and preservation of bioactive compounds. Food Control 2020, 118, 107378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Li, L.; Chen, Z.; Acheampong, A.; Huang, Q. Low-temperature plasma promotes growth of Haematococcus pluvialis and astaxanthin accumulation by regulating histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 343, 126095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Nkurunziza, D.; Sivagnanam, S.P.; Park, J.-S.; Cho, Y.-J.; Chun, B.S. Effect of wall materials on spray-drying encapsulation of brown seaweed bioactive compounds obtained by subcritical water extraction. Algal Res. 2021, 58, 102381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Rodríguez García, S.L.; Raghavan, V. Green extraction techniques from fruit and vegetable waste to obtain bioactive compounds: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 6446–6466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Kumar, K.; Srivastav, S.; Sharanagat, V.S. Ultrasound-assisted extraction of bioactive compounds from fruit and vegetable processing by-products: A review. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2021, 70, 105325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Galanakis, C.M. Functionality of food components and emerging technologies. Foods 2021, 10, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Marvin, H.J.P.; Janssen, E.M.; Bouzembrak, Y.; Hendriksen, P.J.M.; Staats, M. Big data in food safety: An overview. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 2286–2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Ding, H.; Tian, J.; Yu, W.; Wilson, D.I.; Young, B.R.; Cui, X.; Xin, X.; Wang, Z.; Li, W. Applications of artificial intelligence and big data in the food industry. Foods 2023, 12, 4511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Kalra, J.; Batra, D.; Diwan, N.; Bagler, G. Nutritional profile estimation in cooking recipes. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 36th International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Tran, J.L. 3D-printed food. Minn. J. Law Sci. Technol. 2016, 17, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Dankar, I.; Haddarah, A.; El Omar, F.; Sepulcre, F.; Pujolà, M. 3D printing technology: The new era for food customization and elaboration. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 75, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Eswaran, H.; Ponnuswamy, R.D.; Kannapan, R.P. Perspective approaches of 3D-printed foods for personalized nutrition: A comprehensive review. Ann. 3D Print. Med. 2023, 12, 100125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Le-Bail, A.; Maniglia, B.C.; Le-Bail, P. Recent advances and future perspectives in additive manufacturing of foods based on 3D printing. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2020, 35, 54–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Nachal, N.; Moses, J.A.; Karthik, P.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. Applications of 3D printing in food processing. Food Eng. Rev. 2019, 11, 123–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Calzoni, E.; Cesaretti, A.; Polchi, A.; Di Michele, A.; Tancini, B.; Emiliani, C. Biocompatible polymer nanoparticles for drug delivery applications in cancer and neurodegenerative disorders. J. Funct. Biomater. 2019, 10, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Kasote, D.; Tiozon, R.N., Jr.; Sartagoda, K.J.D.; Itagi, H.; Roy, P.; Kohli, A.; Regina, A.; Sreenivasulu, N. Food processing technologies to develop functional foods with enriched bioactive phenolic compounds in cereals. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 771276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Srivastava, S. Lycopene: Metabolism and functional aspects. In Bioactive Molecules in Food; Mérillon, J.-M., Ramawat, K.G., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 903–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Gupta, R.K.; Gawad, F.A.E.; Ali, E.A.E.; Karunanithi, S.; Yugiani, P.; Srivastav, P.P. Nanotechnology: Current applications and future scope in food packaging systems. Meas. Food 2024, 13, 100131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on novel foods, amending Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Regulation (EC) No 258/97 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1852/2001. Off. J. Eur. Union 2015, L327, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  204. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Guidance on the scientific requirements for an application for authorisation of a novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. EFSA J. 2024, 22, e08961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Guidance on technical requirements for regulated food and feed product applications to establish the presence of small particles, including nanoparticles. EFSA J. 2021, 19, e06769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods. Off. J. Eur. Union 2006, L404, 9–25. [Google Scholar]
  207. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Guidance for Industry: Considering Whether an FDA-Regulated Product Involves the Application of Nanotechnology; FDA: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2014. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/considering-whether-fda-regulated-product-involves-application-nanotechnology (accessed on 18 January 2026).
  208. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Authorized Health Claims That Meet the Significant Scientific Agreement (SSA) Standard; FDA: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2024. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/food/nutrition-food-labeling-and-critical-foods/authorized-health-claims-meet-significant-scientific-agreement-ssa-standard (accessed on 18 January 2026).
  209. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Section 101.14: Health Claims—General Requirements; FDA: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2023. Available online: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-101/subpart-A/section-101.14 (accessed on 18 January 2026).
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the Ehrlich pathway involved in the catabolism of the aromatic amino acid, phenylalanine, leading to the formation of 2-phenylethanol.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the Ehrlich pathway involved in the catabolism of the aromatic amino acid, phenylalanine, leading to the formation of 2-phenylethanol.
Processes 14 00529 g001
Figure 2. Aromatic amino acid biosynthetic pathways supporting the formation of numerous natural products in plants. The shikimate pathway (shown in green) produces chorismate, a common precursor for the tryptophan (Trp) pathway (blue), the phenylalanine/tyrosine (Phe/Tyr) pathways (red), and the pathways leading to folate, phylloquinone, and salicylate. ADCS, aminodeoxychorismate synthase; AS, anthranilate synthase; CM, chorismate mutase; ICS, isochorismate synthase. Adapted from Maeda and Dudareva [114].
Figure 2. Aromatic amino acid biosynthetic pathways supporting the formation of numerous natural products in plants. The shikimate pathway (shown in green) produces chorismate, a common precursor for the tryptophan (Trp) pathway (blue), the phenylalanine/tyrosine (Phe/Tyr) pathways (red), and the pathways leading to folate, phylloquinone, and salicylate. ADCS, aminodeoxychorismate synthase; AS, anthranilate synthase; CM, chorismate mutase; ICS, isochorismate synthase. Adapted from Maeda and Dudareva [114].
Processes 14 00529 g002
Table 1. Selected Bioactive Compounds in Foods and Beverages: Typical Concentration Ranges, Stability Considerations, and Main Analytical Methods. * Concentration ranges are indicative and depend on cultivar, processing, extraction method, and storage conditions.
Table 1. Selected Bioactive Compounds in Foods and Beverages: Typical Concentration Ranges, Stability Considerations, and Main Analytical Methods. * Concentration ranges are indicative and depend on cultivar, processing, extraction method, and storage conditions.
Food/BeverageKey Bioactive CompoundsTypical Concentration Ranges *Stability ConsiderationsMain Analytical MethodsReferences
Coffee (Green & Roasted)Caffeine, Chlorogenic acids, Trigonelline Caffeine: 34–81 g/kg dry mass of extract; chlorogenic acids: 130–221 g/kg dry mass of lyophilized brews of coffee extracts (green beans)Thermal degradation; oxidationHPLC-DAD; HPLC-MS/MS[43,44]
TeaEpigallocatechin gallate, Catechin, Epicatechin, Galactatechin, Epigallocatechin, Galactoatechin gallate, Gallic acidGallic acid: 1.67–21.98 mg/g; epigallocatechins: 0.02–3.46 mg/g; catechin: 0.50–2.20 mg/g; epigallocatechin gallate: 13.34–14.03 mg/g; epicatechin: 0.95–8.86 mg/g; gallocatechin gallate: 0.49–1.21 mg/g; epicatechin gallate: 0.22–2.42 mg/gOxidation; heat sensitivityHPLC-DAD; HPLC-MS/MS[45,46]
Berries (e.g., Blueberry, Strawberry; Bilberry; Black currant)Anthocyanins, Catechins, Epicatechin, Quercetin, Proanthocyanidins, Ellagitannins, Phenolic acidsQuercetin: 17–122 mg/kg; myricetin: 89–203 mg/kg; ellagitannins: 77.1–315.1 mg/100 g of fwSensitivity to oxygen; enzymatic activity; temperature; light exposure; pHHPLC-DAD; HPLC-MS/MS[47,48,49,50]
Pomegranate (Fruit, Juice, Peel)Ellagitannins (punicalagins, granatins), Anthocyanins, Catechins, Epicatechin, Quercetin, Ellagic acid, Gallic acidTotal phenolic compounds: 1.03–3.39 mg GAE/g and 1562–2342 mg GAE/L (juice); Punicalagin A: 5.40–285 mg/L (juice), Punicalagin B: 25.9–884 mg/L (juice), Ellagic acid: 17.4–928 mg/L (juice), total anthocyanins: 2.1–168.5 mg/L (juice) Light and oxygen sensitivity; thermal degradation; hydrolysisHPLC; HPLC-DAD-ESI-MSn[48,51,52,53,54]
Olive OilOleic acid, Oleuropein, Polyphenols, TocopherolsPolyphenols: 50–800 mg/L, Oleuropein: 2.04 mg/L, Total tocopherols: 238 mg/LOxidation; light exposure; thermal degradationHPLC-DAD, HPLC-MS/MS[48,55,56]
GingerGingerols, ShogaolsGingerols: 2.1–22 mg/g dry weight depending on the extraction methodThermal conversion (gingerols to shogaols); oxidationHPTLC, GC, GC/MS, HPLC, LC-MS[48,57,58]
Table 2. Representative microbial groups and their roles in food flavor development.
Table 2. Representative microbial groups and their roles in food flavor development.
Food Type/SystemKey Microbes Driving FlavorMain ContributionsReferences
Vegetables (Paocai, Suancai, peppers)Lactobacillus, Leuconostoc, Weissella, Companilactobacillus, PichiaOrganic acids, esters, sulfides, terpenes; sourness, fruity, complex aroma[123,127,132,133]
Soy-based foodsAspergillus, Bacillus, LAB, yeastsStrong proteolysis, amino acid and lipid metabolism; umami, roasted, savory[126,129]
Meat & fish (sour meat, fish, oysters)Lactobacillus, Weissella, Staphylococcus, Psychrilyobacter, Fusobacterium, SaccharomycesAlcohols, esters, nitrogen compounds, marine, and meaty notes[134,135]
Cereals & alcoholic drinks (rice/wheat foods, baijiu, wine, huangjiu)Saccharomyces, non-Saccharomyces yeasts, LAB, Bacillus, filamentous fungiEthanol, higher alcohols, esters, organic acids, heterocyclics[127,128,136,137,138]
Table 4. Advanced technologies for algae-derived nutrients and bioactive compounds and their associated health benefits.
Table 4. Advanced technologies for algae-derived nutrients and bioactive compounds and their associated health benefits.
Algae SpeciesBioactive CompoundTechnologyBeneficial EffectsReferences
Arthrospira platensisProtein, phenolic compounds, and volatile organic compoundsPrecision fermentation by Lactobacillus helveticus (B-4526) and Kluyveromyces marxianus (Y-329)Enriched essential amino acids, cardioprotective, anticarcinogenic, and antioxidant activity[181]
Chlorella pyrenoidosaBioactive peptidesEncapsulationPotentiates bioavailability in the intestinal tract[182]
Nannochloropsis gaditanaLipids (rich in ω-3 FA)EncapsulationEnhanced bioavailability[183]
Saccharina jaonicaPolyphenolsEncapsulationEnhanced bioavailability[184]
Arthrospira platensisProtein, phenolic compoundsCold plasmaPotentiates antioxidant activity[185]
Haematococcus pluvialisAstaxanthinCold plasmaPotentiates antioxidant activity[186]
Chlorella pyrenoidosaProtein, polyphenol, pigments, and mineralsPulsed electric fieldPotentiates antioxidant activity[120]
Saccharina japonicaPhenolic compoundsSubcritical water extractionPotentiates antioxidant activity[187]
Haematococcus pluvialisPhenolic compoundsSubcritical water extractionPotentiates antioxidant activity[8]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pinto, T.; Vilela, A.; Cosme, F. Bioactive Compounds and the Organoleptic Characteristics of Functional Foods: Mechanisms and Technological Innovations. Processes 2026, 14, 529. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14030529

AMA Style

Pinto T, Vilela A, Cosme F. Bioactive Compounds and the Organoleptic Characteristics of Functional Foods: Mechanisms and Technological Innovations. Processes. 2026; 14(3):529. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14030529

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pinto, Teresa, Alice Vilela, and Fernanda Cosme. 2026. "Bioactive Compounds and the Organoleptic Characteristics of Functional Foods: Mechanisms and Technological Innovations" Processes 14, no. 3: 529. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14030529

APA Style

Pinto, T., Vilela, A., & Cosme, F. (2026). Bioactive Compounds and the Organoleptic Characteristics of Functional Foods: Mechanisms and Technological Innovations. Processes, 14(3), 529. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14030529

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop