A Morphology-Based Analysis of Crack Initiation, Propagation and Arrest Behaviors in Pre-Defected CO2 Pipelines
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Experimental Database and Morphology Analysis Method
2.1. Test Facility and Burst Procedure
2.2. Test Matrix and Limitations of the Conditions
3. Results
3.1. Common Feature: Initial Leakage Controlled by Prefabricated Defect
3.2. Classification Criteria for the Four Rupture Modes
- (1)
- Initial leakage location: whether the first visible leakage or local opening occurred in the middle region of the prefabricated axial defect;
- (2)
- Secondary crack initiation: whether additional cracks initiated from one or both tips of the prefabricated defect after initial leakage;
- (3)
- Dominant crack path: whether the subsequent tearing was mainly axial, circumferential, or axial followed by circumferential;
- (4)
- Axial crack-extension length: the measurable extension from the defect tips, when such extension could be identified from the recovered pipe;
- (5)
- Crack-arrest or instability behavior: whether the crack arrested after limited propagation or continued to full-bore fracture and structural instability;
- (6)
- Final macroscopic morphology: including plate-like unfolding, fish-mouth-shaped opening, and slit-like local opening.
3.3. Mode I: Circumferential Full-Bore Tearing
3.4. Mode II: Axial Running Followed by Circumferential Instability
3.5. Mode III: Arrested Axial Tearing
3.6. Mode IV: Leakage-Dominated Local Opening Without Crack Propagation
3.7. Summary of Rupture Morphology Classification
4. Discussion
4.1. A Morphology-Based Crack Evolution Framework
4.2. Interpretation of Different Rupture Modes
4.3. Implications for Fracture Control and Crack Arrest Design
5. Conclusions
- In all nine tests, initial leakage occurred in the middle of the prefabricated axial defect, after which the crack-evolution paths differed.
- Four morphology modes were identified: circumferential full-bore tearing (Mode I), sustained axial running followed by circumferential instability (Mode II), limited axial tearing followed by arrest (Mode III), and leakage-dominated local opening without observable secondary crack propagation (Mode IV).
- Mode II showed the strongest sustained axial propagation among the tested cases, with a total measurable extension of approximately 650 mm before circumferential instability. This specimen-specific result provides a conservative case for crack-arrest assessment but is not a full-scale propagation threshold.
- Fish-mouth morphology alone does not demonstrate axial propagation or arrest. In Mode III, it was accompanied by secondary defect-tip initiation and measurable axial extension; in Mode IV, the local fish-mouth-shaped or slit-like opening remained confined to the original defect.
- Because the test variables were coupled and only one specimen was tested per nominal condition, the identified modes are qualitative observations within the tested range rather than deterministic parameter–mode relationships. Repeated, independently controlled tests are required to assess reproducibility and individual parameter effects.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| DN | Diameter of nominal |
| NIST | National Institute of Standards and Technology |
| REFPROP | Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties Database |
| ASTM | International Association for Testing Materials |
References
- Liu, D.; Wang, S.; Liu, C.; Wang, W.; Chen, Z.; Chen, S.; Zhang, S.; Du, S.; Hong, B. Advancements in CO2 pipeline transportation technology: A bibliometric analysis and knowledge mapping study. Fuel 2026, 407, 137498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lu, H.; Ma, X.; Huang, K.; Fu, L.; Azimi, M. Carbon dioxide transport via pipelines: A systematic review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 266, 121994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Munkejord, S.T.; Hammer, M.; Løvseth, S.W. CO2 transport: Data and models—A review. Appl. Energy 2016, 169, 499–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- El-Kady, A.H.; Amin, M.T.; Khan, F. Analysis of CO2 pipeline regulations from a safety perspective for offshore carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS). J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 439, 140734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tan, J.; Xin, Y.; Liu, W.; Jing, Y.; Hu, H. Progress on the leakage and diffusion characteristics of CO2 pipeline. Fuel 2026, 425, 139474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Song, S.; Yu, J.; Li, Y.; Chen, H.; Liu, D.; Shan, X.; Chen, H.; Yao, H.; Shi, B.; Gong, J. Investigation of hydrate inhibitor tracking in oil-gas-water multiphase flow pipelines. Pet. Sci. 2026, 23, 3616–3633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hao, Y.; Song, S.; Guo, J.; Shan, L.; Chen, H.; Wei, S.; Jin, F.; Lu, Y.; Li, C.; Shi, B.; et al. Efficient and physically consistent transient modeling of gas flows in pipelines. Phys. Fluids 2026, 38, 076118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yu, X.; Liu, G.; Rao, S.; Fan, X.; Li, Y.; Hu, Q.; Wang, C.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Z. A critical review on corrosion challenges and prospects in supercritical offshore CO2 pipelines. J. Pipeline Sci. Eng. 2025, 2025, 100401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Hu, Q.; Zhao, X.; Meng, L.; Yin, B.; Zhang, L.; Li, Y. A novel numerical model for simulating dynamic pipeline fracture propagation in CO2 considering complex decompression behavior. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2025, 203, 107864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Botros, K.K.; Geerligs, J.; Rothwell, B.; Robinson, T. Measurements of decompression wave speed in binary mixtures of carbon dioxide and impurities. J. Press. Vessel Technol. 2017, 139, 021301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Botros, K.K.; Geerligs, J.; Rothwell, B.; Carlson, L.; Fletcher, L.; Venton, P. Transferability of decompression wave speed measured by a small-diameter shock tube to full size pipelines and implications for determining required fracture propagation resistance. Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. 2010, 87, 681–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Botros, K.K.; Geerligs, J.; Eiber, R.J. Measurement of decompression wave speed in rich gas mixtures at high pressures (370 bars) using a specialized rupture tube. J. Press. Vessel Technol. 2010, 132, 051303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gu, S.; Li, Y.; Teng, L.; Hu, Q.; Zhang, D.; Ye, X.; Wang, C.; Wang, J.; Iglauer, S. A new model for predicting the decompression behavior of CO2 mixtures in various phases. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2018, 120, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Botros, K.K.; Geerligs, J.; Rothwell, B.; Robinson, T. Measurements of decompression wave speed in pure carbon dioxide and comparison with predictions by equation of state. J. Press. Vessel Technol. 2016, 138, 031302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Aursand, E.; Aursand, P.; Hammer, M.; Lund, H. The influence of CO2 mixture composition and equations of state on simu-lations of transient pipeline decompression. Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Control 2016, 54, 599–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dall’Acqua, D.; Terenzi, A.; Leporini, M.; D’Alessandro, V.; Giacchetta, G.; Marchetti, B. A new tool for modelling the de-compression behaviour of CO2 with impurities using the Peng-Robinson equation of state. Appl. Energy 2017, 206, 1432–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bicelli, G.; Libero, G.; Picchi, D. Fracture susceptibility and depressurization dynamics in CO2 pipelines under uncertainty. Fuel 2026, 344, 140013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Elshahomi, A.; Lu, C.; Michal, G.; Liu, X.; Godbole, A.; Venton, P. Decompression wave speed in CO2 mixtures: CFD modelling with the GERG-2008 equation of state. Appl. Energy 2015, 140, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Qi, W.; Yu, T.; Li, L.; Chen, B.; Tang, C.; Xu, M.; Xiao, H. Research on ductile fracture arrest control of CO2 transportation pipelines in carbon capture, utilization and storage technology. Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. 2026, 222, 105840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Aursand, E.; Dumoulin, S.; Hammer, M.; Lange, H.I.; Morin, A.; Munkejord, S.T.; Nordhagen, H.O. Fracture propagation control in CO2 pipelines: Validation of a coupled fluid–structure model. Eng. Struct. 2016, 123, 192–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Nordhagen, H.O.; Munkejord, S.T.; Hammer, M.; Gruben, G.; Fourmeau, M.; Dumoulin, S. A fracture-propagation-control model for pipelines transporting CO2-rich mixtures including a new method for material-model calibration. Eng. Struct. 2017, 143, 245–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mokhtari, M.; Melchers, R.E. Next-generation fracture prediction models for pipes with localized corrosion defects. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2019, 105, 610–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, Y.; Hu, Q.; Yin, B.; Zhao, X.; Meng, L.; Zhu, J.; Ouyang, X.; Li, Y. Research progress on dynamic crack propagation and crack arrest models of supercritical and dense-phase CO2 pipelines. J. Pipeline Sci. Eng. 2025, 5, 100255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Skarsvag, H.L.; Hammer, M.; Munkejord, S.T.; Log, A.M.; Dumoulin, S.; Gruben, G. Towards an engineering tool for the prediction of running ductile fractures in CO2 pipelines. Process Saf. Environ. 2023, 171, 667–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Keim, V.; Paredes, M.; Nonn, A.; Munstermann, S. FSI-simulation of ductile fracture propagation and arrest in pipelines: Comparison with existing data of full-scale burst tests. Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. 2020, 182, 104067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, Z.; Qiao, F.; Yu, S.; Li, L.; Yan, X.; Yu, J.; Shi, L.; Wang, X.; Chen, L. Experimental investigation of fracture response and decompression behavior of DN150 X65 pipe subjected to near-critical CO2 release. Fuel 2027, 428, 140591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chen, L.; Yang, W.; Zhou, J.; Liu, Z.; Lv, Z.; Hu, Y.; Li, J.; Yan, X.; Yu, J.; Chen, S. Experimental investigation on full-scale fracture behavior and dynamic response of supercritical CO2 pipelines with N2 impurities. Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. 2026, 221, 105741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]



| Test Number | ① | ② | ③ | ④ | ⑤ | ⑥ | ⑦ | ⑧ | ⑨ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main pipe | Outer diameter Do/mm | 114.3 | 114.3 | 114.3 | 114.3 | 114.3 | 114.3 | 114.3 | 114.3 | 114.3 |
| Wall thickness δ/mm | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| Total length L/m | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 26.5 | 26.5 | 26.5 | |
| Medium | Pure CO2 | Pure CO2 | Pure CO2 | 98%CO2 +2%N2 | 97%CO2 +3%N2 | 96%CO2 +4%N2 | Pure CO2 | Pure CO2 | Pure CO2 | |
| Initial pressure P0/MPa | 8.8 | 9.3 | 10.9 | 11.6 | 10.6 | 9.8 | 8.2 | 8.4 | 9.7 | |
| Initial temperature T0 (1)/°C | 35.5 | 40.1 | 33 | 32 | 32 | 33 | 28.5 | 36.5 | 30 | |
| Initial density ρ0 (2)/(kg/m3) | 642.24 | 562.97 | 764.36 | 748.55 | 696.32 | 604.24 | 740.61 | 538.61 | 766.72 | |
| Initial mass m (3)/kg | 82.86 | 72.63 | 98.62 | 96.58 | 89.84 | 77.96 | 148.95 | 108.32 | 154.20 | |
| Test pipe | Outer diameter do/mm | 110.3 | 108.3 | 110.7 | 110.3 | 110.3 | 110.66 | 112.9 | 112.7 | 112.7 |
| Thickness t/mm | 4 | 3 | 4.2 | 4 | 4 | 4.18 | 5.3 | 5.2 | 5.2 | |
| Length l/m | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | |
| Material | 20# (4) | X52 | X52 | X52 | X52 | X52 | X65 | X65 | X65 | |
| Defect length ld/mm | 300 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 130 | 200 | |
| Defect width wd/mm | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| Defect depth hd/mm | 2.8 | 2.56 | 3.12 | 3.10 | 3.06 | 2.8 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 3.6 | |
| Residual thickness (t − hd)/mm | 1.2 | 0.44 | 1.08 | 0.9 | 0.94 | 1.38 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.6 | |
| Defect depth ratio hd/t | 0.700 | 0.853 | 0.743 | 0.775 | 0.765 | 0.670 | 0.906 | 0.923 | 0.692 | |
| Residual thickness ratio (t − hd)/t | 0.3 | 0.147 | 0.257 | 0.225 | 0.235 | 0.330 | 0.094 | 0.077 | 0.308 | |
| Nominal hoop stress σθ at wall thickness/MPa; σθ = P0·(d0 − t)/(2t) | 116.9 | 163.2 | 138.2 | 154.1 | 140.8 | 124.8 | 83.2 | 86.8 | 100.3 | |
| Morphology class and mode (5) | I | II | I | III | III | IV | I | IV | IV | |
| Test Number | Rupture Morphology |
|---|---|
| ① | ![]() |
| ③ | ![]() |
| ⑦ | ![]() |
| Test Number | Rupture Morphology |
|---|---|
| ② | ![]() |
| Test Number | Rupture Morphology |
|---|---|
| ④ | ![]() |
| ⑤ | ![]() |
| Test Number | Rupture Morphology |
|---|---|
| ⑥ | ![]() |
| ⑧ | ![]() |
| ⑨ | ![]() |
| Mode | Mode I | Mode II | Mode III | Mode IV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tests | ①, ③, ⑦ | ② | ④, ⑤ | ⑥, ⑧, ⑨ |
| Initial leakage location | Middle region of the prefabricated axial defect | Middle region of the prefabricated axial defect | Middle region of the prefabricated axial defect | Middle region of the prefabricated axial defect |
| Secondary crack initiation | Initiation from defect tips | Initiation from defect tips | Initiation from defect tips | No obvious secondary initiation from defect tips |
| Dominant crack path | Dominant circumferential tearing; no obvious long-distance axial propagation | Sustained bilateral axial propagation, followed by circumferential tearing | Limited axial propagation from the defect ends | No axial or circumferential crack propagation; failure confined to defect region |
| Crack arrest behavior | No arrest before full-bore fracture | No axial crack arrest before final instability | Axial cracks arrested after limited extension | Arrest at the initial/local opening stage |
| Final rupture morphology | Full-bore circumferential fracture with plate-like unfolding of the pipe wall | Long axial crack extension and final full-bore fracture | Fish-mouth-shaped opening accompanied by measurable axial crack extension and subsequent arrest | Local fish-mouth-shaped or slit-like opening confined to the defect region |
| Main implication | Strong circumferential instability after local leakage | Strongest sustained crack propagation capability in this test series | Limited axial tearing followed by crack arrest; interpretation supported by defect-tip crack extension | Leakage-dominated local opening; fish-mouth morphology alone does not indicate crack propagation or arrest |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Shi, L.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Yan, X.; Yu, J.; Chen, L. A Morphology-Based Analysis of Crack Initiation, Propagation and Arrest Behaviors in Pre-Defected CO2 Pipelines. Processes 2026, 14, 2830. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14172830
Shi L, Wang X, Wang Y, Liu Z, Yan X, Yu J, Chen L. A Morphology-Based Analysis of Crack Initiation, Propagation and Arrest Behaviors in Pre-Defected CO2 Pipelines. Processes. 2026; 14(17):2830. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14172830
Chicago/Turabian StyleShi, Lei, Xiaolin Wang, Yuxin Wang, Zhenxi Liu, Xingqing Yan, Jianliang Yu, and Lei Chen. 2026. "A Morphology-Based Analysis of Crack Initiation, Propagation and Arrest Behaviors in Pre-Defected CO2 Pipelines" Processes 14, no. 17: 2830. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14172830
APA StyleShi, L., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Liu, Z., Yan, X., Yu, J., & Chen, L. (2026). A Morphology-Based Analysis of Crack Initiation, Propagation and Arrest Behaviors in Pre-Defected CO2 Pipelines. Processes, 14(17), 2830. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14172830










