Editorial for the Special Issue “Environmentally Friendly Production of Energy from Natural Gas Hydrates”
1. Introduction
2. Key Contributions and Findings of the Published Papers
- (1)
- Theme A: Multi-Field Coupled Simulation and Reservoir Micro-Mechanics
- Several studies utilized advanced numerical platforms (such as modified finite element and discrete element methods) to simulate the structural degradation of hydrate-bearing sediments, with a particular focus on comparing uniform versus non-uniform hydrate distribution scenarios. The research quantitatively demonstrated how spatial heterogeneity directly dictates localized shear stress concentration, thereby altering macroscopic reservoir settlement and gas production profiles.
- Pore-scale visualization and advanced flow simulations provided a fundamental insight into the phase behavior of methane within water-cage structures. These insights showed how localized fluid flow alters macroscopic sediment permeability in microscopic clarity, helping engineers to more accurately predict dynamic permeability evolution during long-term depressurization.
- (2)
- Theme B: Geomechanical Integrity, Wellbore Stability, and Sand Control
- A prominent research topic is the stability of subsea wellheads and the integrity of casing systems. Systematic sensitivity analyses enabled researchers to characterize the temporal profile of wellhead sinking and to define operational boundary conditions, such as constraining thermal stimulation increments, in order to balance gas production with seabed settlement.
- Advanced studies explored the contact mechanics between engineering casings and surrounding sediments, investigating how interface friction coefficients fluctuate using Coulomb friction theory as a function of hydrate saturation. This provided valuable parameters for mitigating shear failures along the wellbore wall.
- Innovative sand-control designs and screen pipe optimization models were introduced to mitigate the severe blockage issues encountered during multiphase fluid extraction. By modeling particle migration and deposition, these papers offered practical guidelines for extending the lifespan of downhole sand screens.
- (3)
- Theme C: Green Chemicals and Environmentally Friendly Additives
- The authors that contributed to this Special Issue unveiled a new generation of biodegradable, bio-inspired kinetic inhibitors (KHIs) and thermodynamic promoters. These green alternatives are designed to maintain wellbore stability or enhance flow efficiency without introducing non-degradable pollutants into pore fluids.
- In the realm of flow assurance, innovative green surfactants, compounding scale inhibitors, and plug-removal agents were formulated and tested under multiphase flow conditions. These eco-friendly additives successfully demonstrated high-scale inhibition efficiency and low toxicity, ensuring safe pipeline transport of gas–water mixtures under extreme deep sea temperatures.
- (4)
- Theme D: Low-Quality Energy Integration and CCUS Strategies
- Multiple contributors explored the synergy between hydrate extraction and Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) [32,33,34]. By optimizing the thermo-chemical exchange mechanism of injecting industrial CO2 or flue gas mixtures into hydrate reservoirs, these studies demonstrated methods to trap greenhouse gases as stable CO2 hydrates while simultaneously recovering clean methane gas [35,36].
3. Addressing the Gaps in Current Knowledge
4. Horizons for Future Research
- Long-Term Field Scale Validation: The majority of the current findings rely on short-term production tests, laboratory core experiments, and mathematical models. There remains a critical need for long-term field data (spanning multiple years) that can accurately assess the cumulative environmental impacts of seabed subsidence, ecosystem disturbance, and structural fatigue.
- Intelligent and Autonomous Monitoring: Integrating fiber-optic sensing, deep sea remote operating vehicles (ROVs), and real-time machine learning algorithms will be vital. These technologies can dynamically track methane leakage, micro-seismic activity, and wellhead tilt, serving as early-warning systems during production.
- Optimization of Large-Scale CO2 Replacement Kinetics: While CO2 substitution is ideal for maintaining structural integrity and storing carbon, its slow reaction kinetics limit its economic viability. Future research must focus on identifying green catalytic agents that can accelerate the exchange process at scale.
- Unified Economic–Environmental Evaluation Frameworks: Academic and industrial sectors require standardized lifecycle assessment (LCA) tools that can concurrently evaluate the technical, economic, and environmental indicators of hydrate projects, ensuring that “green production” is commercially sustainable.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Li, Q.C.; Liu, J.; Wang, S.; Guo, Y.; Han, X.Y.; Li, Q.; Cheng, Y.F.; Dong, Z.; Li, X.Z.; Zhang, X.D. Numerical insights into factors affecting collapse behavior of horizontal wellbore in clayey silt hydrate-bearing sediments and the accompanying control strategy. Ocean Eng. 2024, 297, 117029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamed, A.H.; Sulaimon, A.A.; Tsegab, H.; Lal, B.; Iglauer, S.; Ali, M. Natural gas hydrate production and CO2 storage via clathrate hydrates: Challenges and opportunities. Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol. 2026, 13, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishna, S.; Robustillo, M.D.; Bu, Y.H.; Chen, G.J.; Heydari, A.; Sun, C.Y.; Wilson, I.; Pandey, J.S. Advancements in key imaging techniques for gas hydrate research to accelerate decarbonization efforts. Energy Fuels 2025, 39, 9668–9725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Q.; Li, X.S.; Chen, Z.Y.; Li, Q.P.; He, J. Dynamic competitive co-production behaviors between natural gas hydrate and higher-pressure shallow gas under wellbore interference: An experimental study. Appl. Energy 2025, 384, 125474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, Y.; Hou, J.; Liu, Y.; Clarke, M.A. Optimization study of Class I gas hydrate reservoir stimulation assisted depressurization based on particle swarm optimization algorithm. Geoenergy Sci. Eng. 2025, 253, 213963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, B.; Li, Y.L.; Liu, X.M.; Zhang, T.T.; Wan, Q.C.; Li, G.C. Rapid formation of high-energy-density methane hydrates promoted by L-cysteine: A promising approach for solidified natural gas. Gas Sci. Eng. 2025, 139, 205638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, L.M.; Zhong, D.L.; Linga, P.; Yan, J.; Li, F.H.; Ma, Y.Y.; Tang, R.X. Investigation of CO2-CH4 hydrate replacement using continuous CO2 injection in a dual-well injection-production mode. Energy 2025, 336, 138450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.C.; Wu, J.J.; Li, Q.; Wang, F.L.; Cheng, Y.F. Sediment Instability Caused by Gas Production from Hydrate-Bearing Sediment in Northern South China Sea by Horizontal Wellbore: Sensitivity Analysis. Nat. Resour. Res. 2025, 34, 1667–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdulhadi, D.; Ali, J.A.; Hama, S.M. Advanced techniques for improving the production of natural resources from unconventional reservoirs: A state-of-the-art review. Energy Fuels 2025, 39, 10853–10876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, H.; Chen, J.; Yang, X.; Ranjith, P.G.; Song, Y.C.; Chen, B.B.; Yang, M.J. Characterizing methane hydrate phase transitions and multiphase flow behavior in porous media: Insights from low-field nuclear magnetic resonance measurements. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2025, 253, 127542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okeke, N.J.; Asante-Okyere, S.; Mensah, A.O.; Iyiola, Z.O.; Boye, J.N.B. Simulation of CO2 and steam injection to optimise the recovery of gas from hydrate formation. Unconv. Resour. 2025, 7, 100203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tepecik, I.; Seol, Y.; Waite, W.F.; Dai, S.C. Consolidation and permeability of the B1 and D1 gas hydrate bearing sands and associated seal sediments of the extended-duration gas production test site on the Alaska North Slope. Energy Fuels 2026, 40, 10854–10865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Q.C.; Li, Q.; Wu, J.; He, K.G.; Xia, Y.F.; Liu, J.Y.; Wang, F.L.; Cheng, Y.F. Wellhead Stability During Development Process of Hydrate Reservoir in the Northern South China Sea: Sensitivity Analysis. Processes 2025, 13, 1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Song, W.; Huang, F.; Chen, B.B.; Sun, H.R.; Yang, M.J. Hydrate stability assessment in marine environments: Implications for CO2 sequestration site optimization. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2026, 14, 121641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sambo, C.; Gupta, I. Numerical simulation for subsidence control in CO2 storage and methane hydrate extraction. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2025, 171, 107160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xin, X.; Liu, X.; Xu, T.; Xu, H.Y.; Yuan, Y.L.; Zhu, H.X.; Li, Y.B. Mechanical Response of Sandy and Clayey-Silty Hydrate-Bearing Sediments in Horizontal Depressurization Production. Energy Fuels 2026, 40, 3621–3636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Han, Y.; Liu, X.; Ansari, U.; Cheng, Y.F.; Yan, C.L. Hydrate as a by-product in CO2 leakage during the long-term sub-seabed sequestration and its role in preventing further leakage. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 77737–77754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, Y.; Niu, M.; Zi, M.; Sun, Y.F.; Chen, D.Y. Coupling depressurization and flue gas flooding to enhance CH4 recovery and CO2 sequestration in hydrate-bearing sediments: Pilot-scale experimental evaluation at marine conditions. Energy 2025, 333, 137328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Guan, Y.; Yue, C.; Sun, Z.G.; Guo, H.Y.; Zhang, Y.K.; Wang, D.S.; Wang, Y.D. Multiphysics modeling of synergistic microwave heating and nitrogen injection for methane hydrate recovery. Fuel 2026, 410, 137880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, G.; Zhang, C.; Li, Z.; Ma, H.L.; Cai, D.S.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, X.C.; Bai, L.; Zhang, P.; Zhao, J.J. Design and Evaluation of Drilling Fluid Systems for Wellbore Stabilization During Drilling in Deep Coalbed Gas Reservoirs in the Ordos Basin. Processes 2025, 13, 3150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.; Guo, C.; Gong, Q.; Li, G.; Zhang, C.L.; Jiang, T. Performance and Characteristics of Low-Molecular-Weight Cross-Linked Grafting Terpolymers as Thickening Agents in Reservoir Fracturing Processes. Processes 2025, 13, 3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Li, Q.; Wang, F.; Wu, J.J.; Wang, Y.L. The carrying behavior of water-based fracturing fluid in shale reservoir fractures and molecular dynamics of sand-carrying mechanism. Processes 2024, 12, 2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rao, Y.; Zheng, L.; Wang, S.; Wu, W.J.; Gong, Z.J.; Zhou, S.D.; Wen, C. Two-phase swirling flow and gas hydrate particle deposition behavior in bending pipelines. Processes 2025, 13, 725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rao, Y.; Gong, Z.; Wang, S.; Zhang, C.L.; Wang, Y.X.; Wen, C. Effect of Twisted Tapes on Swirling Flow Dynamics in Gas–Solid Two-Phase Flows for Natural Gas Hydrate Transportation. Processes 2025, 13, 781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, X.; Gan, R.; Wang, X.; Cheng, Z.G.; Yu, P.R.; Zheng, W.; Song, X.Y.; Xiao, Y.J. Prediction of three pressures and wellbore stability evaluation based on seismic inversion for well huqian-1. Processes 2025, 13, 2772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Xu, X.; Jian, K.; Xu, L.W.; Li, J.; Zhao, D.Y.; Xue, Z.Z.; Xin, Y. Experimental Study on the Stress Sensitivity Characteristics of Wave Velocities and Anisotropy in Coal-Bearing Reservoir Rocks. Processes 2024, 12, 2819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, X.; Luo, H.; Soga, K. A coupled thermal–hydraulic–mechanical–chemical (THMC) model for methane hydrate bearing sediments using COMSOL Multiphysics. J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. A 2018, 19, 600–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, P.; Fan, Z.; Zhao, L.; Li, M.X.; Yang, C.L.; He, K.; Wang, D.Y. Mechanistic understanding of sand production in marine hydrate exploitation: Insights from field tests and THMC simulations. Energy Fuels 2024, 38, 12730–12740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Ansari, U. From CO2 Sequestration to Hydrogen Storage: Further Utilization of Depleted Gas Reservoirs. Reserv. Sci. 2025, 1, 19–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Yu, W.; Zhang, K.; Liu, Z.H.; Wu, Z.R.; Liu, Z.X.; Ma, S.H.; Li, Y.H. Strength characteristics of fractured methane hydrate-bearing sediments. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2025, 319, 110986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Xiao, B.; Zhuang, G.; Li, Y.; Li, Q. Instability mechanisms and Wellbore-Stabilizing drilling fluids for marine gas hydrate reservoirs: A review. Energies 2025, 18, 4392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anipeddi, M.; Lal, B.; Singh, B. Recent Advances in Hydrate-Based CO2 Capture: Energy Consumption, Cost Analysis, Policy Perspectives, and Machine Learning-Driven Simulation of CO2 Hydrate Formation. ACS Omega 2025, 10, 52145–52163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Babu, P.; Zheng, J.; Linga, P.; Linga, P.; Kumar, R.; Daraboina, N. A Perspective on the Role of Gas Hydrates in Carbon Capture, Transport, and Sequestration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2026, 60, 13759–13781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Li, Q.; Wang, F.; Xu, N.; Wang, Y.L.; Bai, B.J. Settling behavior and mechanism analysis of kaolinite as a fracture proppant of hydrocarbon reservoirs in CO2 fracturing fluid. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2025, 724, 137463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, Y.; Sangwai, J. Direct Flue Gas and CO2 Injection for Simultaneous Energy Recovery and CO2 Sequestration in Ocean: Feasibility Analysis and Perspective. Energy Fuels 2025, 39, 5007–5033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, T.; Ma, C.; Dong, Z.; Ma, C.Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, A.W.; Yang, W.H.; Li, Y.H.; Song, Y.C. Morphologies and Distribution Characteristics of CO2 Hydrate in Porous Media Based on Microfluidic Technology. Energy Fuels 2026, 40, 10040–10051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandey, J.S.; Tariq, M.; Krishna, S.; Heydari, A.; Bu, Y.H.; Chen, G.J.; Sun, C.Y. Advances in Spectroscopic Methods for Gas Hydrate: A Review and Perspectives for Low-Carbon Energy Solutions and Applications. Energy Fuels 2025, 39, 19998–20055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mok, J.; Lee, J.; Choi, W.; Seo, Y. Complementary and competitive dynamics of CO2 and N2 in CH4–Flue gas replacement within natural gas hydrates. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2025, 207, 114971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, X.; Yang, F.; Chen, Z.; Su, Y.N. Mechanistic Insights and Engineering Strategies for Wellbore Integrity Control in Polar Permafrost Reservoirs. Reserv. Sci. 2026, 2, 126–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Y.; Liu, Y.; Kim, M.; Huang, H.Y.; Lu, C.H.; Hou, D.Y.; Luo, J. Multiphysics modeling investigation of casing storage, wellbore transport, and formation heterogeneity effects on groundwater sampling. Water Resour. Res. 2025, 61, e2025WR040882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Xiang, Z.; Liang, H.B. A semi-analytical production prediction model of multi-stage fractured horizontal well rectangular heterogeneity gas reservoirs. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2025, 236, 126238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gan, B.; Li, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Huo, W.X.; Li, Z.; Xu, Y.Q.; Li, Y.H. Optimizing hydrate extraction: Balancing stability and production efficiency. Fuel 2025, 384, 134088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Q.; Chen, H.; Wei, S.; Yang, J.Y.; Wang, Y.Z. Numerical Investigation of Reinforcement Effects on Gas Hydrate Reservoir Stability and Production Efficiency. Energy Fuels 2026, 40, 2617–2632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Li, Q.; Li, Q. Editorial for the Special Issue “Environmentally Friendly Production of Energy from Natural Gas Hydrates”. Processes 2026, 14, 1911. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14121911
Li Q, Li Q. Editorial for the Special Issue “Environmentally Friendly Production of Energy from Natural Gas Hydrates”. Processes. 2026; 14(12):1911. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14121911
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Qingchao, and Qiang Li. 2026. "Editorial for the Special Issue “Environmentally Friendly Production of Energy from Natural Gas Hydrates”" Processes 14, no. 12: 1911. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14121911
APA StyleLi, Q., & Li, Q. (2026). Editorial for the Special Issue “Environmentally Friendly Production of Energy from Natural Gas Hydrates”. Processes, 14(12), 1911. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14121911
