Next Article in Journal
Phase Change Materials for Photovoltaic Thermal Management: A Comprehensive Review of Material Innovations and Hybrid Architectures
Previous Article in Journal
Study on the Arresting Performance and Efficiency Prediction of Arrestors for Sandwich Pipes with Corrosion Defects
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fracture Propagation Laws in Lamina-Developed Shale Based on the Discrete Element Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Editorial for the Special Issue “Environmentally Friendly Production of Energy from Natural Gas Hydrates”

1
School of Energy Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China
2
School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China
3
Faculty of Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay, Karamay 834000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2026, 14(12), 1911; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14121911
Submission received: 25 May 2026 / Accepted: 8 June 2026 / Published: 12 June 2026

1. Introduction

Natural gas hydrates—ice-like crystalline compounds which form under low-temperature and high-pressure conditions—are widely distributed in deep marine sediments and permafrost regions worldwide [1,2]. Due to their immense resource potential, high energy density, and relatively clean combustion behavior, natural gas hydrates are viewed as one of the most promising unconventional energy resources to consider in the coming decades [3,4,5]. Over the past few decades, significant advances have been made in hydrate exploration, laboratory synthesis, numerical simulation, and offshore production testing [6,7,8,9]. In particular, substantial progress has been achieved in strategically important regions such as the South China Sea and the Nankai Trough [10,11,12]. However, despite these advances, the safe, efficient, and environmentally sustainable exploitation of hydrate resources remains a major scientific and engineering challenge.
Hydrate-bearing sediments are generally characterized by low permeability, weak cementation, and high sensitivity to thermal and mechanical disturbances [13]. During hydrate dissociation and subsequent gas recovery, complex coupled thermal–hydraulic–mechanical–chemical (THMC) processes can trigger a cascade of engineering and environmental hazards [14], including reservoir deformation, wellbore instability, sand production, methane leakage, and seafloor subsidence [15,16,17]. Concurrently, modern hydrate extraction technologies are evolving toward deeper waters, more complex geological settings, higher recovery efficiency, and minimal environmental footprints [18,19]. This paradigm shift imposes increasingly stringent requirements on reservoir stability analysis, intelligent forecasting, eco-friendly drilling and stimulation, and multi-physics numerical simulations. Consequently, innovative production strategies, advanced environmental mitigation methods, and intelligent reservoir management frameworks are indispensable to fostering the sustainable development of natural gas hydrates and associated unconventional energy systems.
This Special Issue, “Environmentally Friendly Production of Energy from Natural Gas Hydrates,” comprises 25 high-quality papers spanning a comprehensive spectrum of research topics. The published investigations range from fundamental investigations exploring multi-physics coupling behavior, reservoir deformation [13], and wellbore integrity [20] in hydrate-bearing formations, to applied technologies such as green drilling and fracturing fluids [21], CO2-enhanced gas recovery [22], hydrate transportation safety [23,24], machine learning-driven predictions [25], and ecological protection strategies [26].
The Special Issue can be accessed online via the following link: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/processes/special_issues/G57549I908 (accessed on 20 May 2026). See below for a concise summary of the key contributions.

2. Key Contributions and Findings of the Published Papers

The 25 published articles can be broadly categorized into four interconnected thematic pillars that collectively redefine our approach to sustainable hydrate exploitation.
(1) 
Theme A: Multi-Field Coupled Simulation and Reservoir Micro-Mechanics
Understanding the complex interplay between thermal, hydraulic, mechanical, and chemical (THMC) processes during hydrate dissociation is critical for predicting long-term reservoir performance [1,27,28]. The contributions in this category advanced state-of-the-art numerical modeling to investigate sediment behavior under variable production scenarios.
  • Several studies utilized advanced numerical platforms (such as modified finite element and discrete element methods) to simulate the structural degradation of hydrate-bearing sediments, with a particular focus on comparing uniform versus non-uniform hydrate distribution scenarios. The research quantitatively demonstrated how spatial heterogeneity directly dictates localized shear stress concentration, thereby altering macroscopic reservoir settlement and gas production profiles.
  • Pore-scale visualization and advanced flow simulations provided a fundamental insight into the phase behavior of methane within water-cage structures. These insights showed how localized fluid flow alters macroscopic sediment permeability in microscopic clarity, helping engineers to more accurately predict dynamic permeability evolution during long-term depressurization.
(2) 
Theme B: Geomechanical Integrity, Wellbore Stability, and Sand Control
One of the key challenges that arises during commercial gas hydrate extraction is maintaining the structural integrity of engineering systems throughout production [29,30,31]. The papers in this section addressed critical safety challenges under dynamic loading conditions, with particular emphasis on the marine environments of the South China Sea.
  • A prominent research topic is the stability of subsea wellheads and the integrity of casing systems. Systematic sensitivity analyses enabled researchers to characterize the temporal profile of wellhead sinking and to define operational boundary conditions, such as constraining thermal stimulation increments, in order to balance gas production with seabed settlement.
  • Advanced studies explored the contact mechanics between engineering casings and surrounding sediments, investigating how interface friction coefficients fluctuate using Coulomb friction theory as a function of hydrate saturation. This provided valuable parameters for mitigating shear failures along the wellbore wall.
  • Innovative sand-control designs and screen pipe optimization models were introduced to mitigate the severe blockage issues encountered during multiphase fluid extraction. By modeling particle migration and deposition, these papers offered practical guidelines for extending the lifespan of downhole sand screens.
(3) 
Theme C: Green Chemicals and Environmentally Friendly Additives
The development of sustainable, low-dosage chemicals is critical, as they will supersede traditional toxic kinetic and thermodynamic inhibitors, which have a negative environmental impact due to their effects on marine biology.
  • The authors that contributed to this Special Issue unveiled a new generation of biodegradable, bio-inspired kinetic inhibitors (KHIs) and thermodynamic promoters. These green alternatives are designed to maintain wellbore stability or enhance flow efficiency without introducing non-degradable pollutants into pore fluids.
  • In the realm of flow assurance, innovative green surfactants, compounding scale inhibitors, and plug-removal agents were formulated and tested under multiphase flow conditions. These eco-friendly additives successfully demonstrated high-scale inhibition efficiency and low toxicity, ensuring safe pipeline transport of gas–water mixtures under extreme deep sea temperatures.
(4) 
Theme D: Low-Quality Energy Integration and CCUS Strategies
Maximizing net energy efficiency while achieving carbon neutrality is the pinnacle of modern hydrate research.
  • Multiple contributors explored the synergy between hydrate extraction and Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) [32,33,34]. By optimizing the thermo-chemical exchange mechanism of injecting industrial CO2 or flue gas mixtures into hydrate reservoirs, these studies demonstrated methods to trap greenhouse gases as stable CO2 hydrates while simultaneously recovering clean methane gas [35,36].
  • Complementary research investigated utilizing low-quality external energy, such as geothermal heat or industrial waste heat, to drive thermal stimulation [37,38,39]. This drastically reduces the net carbon footprint of the production cycle and enhances the economic viability of thermal methods.

3. Addressing the Gaps in Current Knowledge

While historical research has focused predominantly on maximizing short-term gas production rates, this Special Issue marks a distinct shift toward quantifying the ecological and structural costs of production. The collected contributions systematically address several key knowledge gaps:
(1) From Homogeneous Assumptions to Heterogeneous Realities: Early reservoir models assumed that sediment properties were uniform. The presented papers prove that non-uniform distribution leads to completely different localized failure mechanisms, allowing for more realistic risk forecasting [40,41].
(2) From Single-Physics to Fully Coupled Systems: By validating multi-field THMC coupled workflows, the published research moves beyond isolated flow or mechanical models, capturing the true cascading effects of hydrate dissociation on structural stability [42,43].
(3) Mitigating Chemical Secondary Pollution: The successful testing of organic, green, and low-dosage additives suggests that they are a viable alternative to environmentally hazardous industrial salts and traditional volatile alcohols.

4. Horizons for Future Research

Despite the excellent breakthroughs documented in this Special Issue, several hurdles must be addressed prior to the implementation of large-scale, green commercialization. Future research should prioritize the following topics:
  • Long-Term Field Scale Validation: The majority of the current findings rely on short-term production tests, laboratory core experiments, and mathematical models. There remains a critical need for long-term field data (spanning multiple years) that can accurately assess the cumulative environmental impacts of seabed subsidence, ecosystem disturbance, and structural fatigue.
  • Intelligent and Autonomous Monitoring: Integrating fiber-optic sensing, deep sea remote operating vehicles (ROVs), and real-time machine learning algorithms will be vital. These technologies can dynamically track methane leakage, micro-seismic activity, and wellhead tilt, serving as early-warning systems during production.
  • Optimization of Large-Scale CO2 Replacement Kinetics: While CO2 substitution is ideal for maintaining structural integrity and storing carbon, its slow reaction kinetics limit its economic viability. Future research must focus on identifying green catalytic agents that can accelerate the exchange process at scale.
  • Unified Economic–Environmental Evaluation Frameworks: Academic and industrial sectors require standardized lifecycle assessment (LCA) tools that can concurrently evaluate the technical, economic, and environmental indicators of hydrate projects, ensuring that “green production” is commercially sustainable.

5. Conclusions

The 25 papers published within this Special Issue significantly advance our collective understanding of how to responsibly extract natural gas hydrates. By offering multi-disciplinary solutions that balance production efficiency with mechanical safety and environmental preservation, the contributing authors have laid a robust foundation for the next chapter of unconventional gas exploitation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.L. (Qingchao Li) and Q.L. (Qiang Li); writing—original draft preparation, Q.L. (Qingchao Li) and Q.L. (Qiang Li); writing—review and editing, Q.L. (Qingchao Li) and Q.L. (Qiang Li); supervision, Q.L. (Qingchao Li) and Q.L. (Qiang Li); funding acquisition, Q.L. (Qingchao Li). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Universities of Henan Province (NSFRF240616), Henan Provincial Science and Technology Research Project (232102321128, 242102320342) and the Postdoctoral Program of Henan Polytechnic University (Grant No. 712108/210).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

As the Guest Editor, I extend my deepest gratitude to all the authors for choosing this platform to share their groundbreaking work, and to the expert reviewers whose rigorous feedback ensured the highest standard of scientific integrity. Special thanks are also due to the entire editorial office of Processes for their unwavering professional management and support throughout the publication process. We hope that this Special Issue will stimulate continued curiosity, cross-disciplinary innovation, and global collaboration, moving humanity one step closer to a cleaner, safer, and more sustainable energy future.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Li, Q.C.; Liu, J.; Wang, S.; Guo, Y.; Han, X.Y.; Li, Q.; Cheng, Y.F.; Dong, Z.; Li, X.Z.; Zhang, X.D. Numerical insights into factors affecting collapse behavior of horizontal wellbore in clayey silt hydrate-bearing sediments and the accompanying control strategy. Ocean Eng. 2024, 297, 117029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mohamed, A.H.; Sulaimon, A.A.; Tsegab, H.; Lal, B.; Iglauer, S.; Ali, M. Natural gas hydrate production and CO2 storage via clathrate hydrates: Challenges and opportunities. Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol. 2026, 13, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Krishna, S.; Robustillo, M.D.; Bu, Y.H.; Chen, G.J.; Heydari, A.; Sun, C.Y.; Wilson, I.; Pandey, J.S. Advancements in key imaging techniques for gas hydrate research to accelerate decarbonization efforts. Energy Fuels 2025, 39, 9668–9725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhao, Q.; Li, X.S.; Chen, Z.Y.; Li, Q.P.; He, J. Dynamic competitive co-production behaviors between natural gas hydrate and higher-pressure shallow gas under wellbore interference: An experimental study. Appl. Energy 2025, 384, 125474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bai, Y.; Hou, J.; Liu, Y.; Clarke, M.A. Optimization study of Class I gas hydrate reservoir stimulation assisted depressurization based on particle swarm optimization algorithm. Geoenergy Sci. Eng. 2025, 253, 213963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, B.; Li, Y.L.; Liu, X.M.; Zhang, T.T.; Wan, Q.C.; Li, G.C. Rapid formation of high-energy-density methane hydrates promoted by L-cysteine: A promising approach for solidified natural gas. Gas Sci. Eng. 2025, 139, 205638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, L.M.; Zhong, D.L.; Linga, P.; Yan, J.; Li, F.H.; Ma, Y.Y.; Tang, R.X. Investigation of CO2-CH4 hydrate replacement using continuous CO2 injection in a dual-well injection-production mode. Energy 2025, 336, 138450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Q.C.; Wu, J.J.; Li, Q.; Wang, F.L.; Cheng, Y.F. Sediment Instability Caused by Gas Production from Hydrate-Bearing Sediment in Northern South China Sea by Horizontal Wellbore: Sensitivity Analysis. Nat. Resour. Res. 2025, 34, 1667–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abdulhadi, D.; Ali, J.A.; Hama, S.M. Advanced techniques for improving the production of natural resources from unconventional reservoirs: A state-of-the-art review. Energy Fuels 2025, 39, 10853–10876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, H.; Chen, J.; Yang, X.; Ranjith, P.G.; Song, Y.C.; Chen, B.B.; Yang, M.J. Characterizing methane hydrate phase transitions and multiphase flow behavior in porous media: Insights from low-field nuclear magnetic resonance measurements. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2025, 253, 127542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Okeke, N.J.; Asante-Okyere, S.; Mensah, A.O.; Iyiola, Z.O.; Boye, J.N.B. Simulation of CO2 and steam injection to optimise the recovery of gas from hydrate formation. Unconv. Resour. 2025, 7, 100203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tepecik, I.; Seol, Y.; Waite, W.F.; Dai, S.C. Consolidation and permeability of the B1 and D1 gas hydrate bearing sands and associated seal sediments of the extended-duration gas production test site on the Alaska North Slope. Energy Fuels 2026, 40, 10854–10865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, Q.C.; Li, Q.; Wu, J.; He, K.G.; Xia, Y.F.; Liu, J.Y.; Wang, F.L.; Cheng, Y.F. Wellhead Stability During Development Process of Hydrate Reservoir in the Northern South China Sea: Sensitivity Analysis. Processes 2025, 13, 1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, L.; Song, W.; Huang, F.; Chen, B.B.; Sun, H.R.; Yang, M.J. Hydrate stability assessment in marine environments: Implications for CO2 sequestration site optimization. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2026, 14, 121641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sambo, C.; Gupta, I. Numerical simulation for subsidence control in CO2 storage and methane hydrate extraction. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2025, 171, 107160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xin, X.; Liu, X.; Xu, T.; Xu, H.Y.; Yuan, Y.L.; Zhu, H.X.; Li, Y.B. Mechanical Response of Sandy and Clayey-Silty Hydrate-Bearing Sediments in Horizontal Depressurization Production. Energy Fuels 2026, 40, 3621–3636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Q.; Han, Y.; Liu, X.; Ansari, U.; Cheng, Y.F.; Yan, C.L. Hydrate as a by-product in CO2 leakage during the long-term sub-seabed sequestration and its role in preventing further leakage. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 77737–77754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yao, Y.; Niu, M.; Zi, M.; Sun, Y.F.; Chen, D.Y. Coupling depressurization and flue gas flooding to enhance CH4 recovery and CO2 sequestration in hydrate-bearing sediments: Pilot-scale experimental evaluation at marine conditions. Energy 2025, 333, 137328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, X.; Guan, Y.; Yue, C.; Sun, Z.G.; Guo, H.Y.; Zhang, Y.K.; Wang, D.S.; Wang, Y.D. Multiphysics modeling of synergistic microwave heating and nitrogen injection for methane hydrate recovery. Fuel 2026, 410, 137880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cao, G.; Zhang, C.; Li, Z.; Ma, H.L.; Cai, D.S.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, X.C.; Bai, L.; Zhang, P.; Zhao, J.J. Design and Evaluation of Drilling Fluid Systems for Wellbore Stabilization During Drilling in Deep Coalbed Gas Reservoirs in the Ordos Basin. Processes 2025, 13, 3150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, K.; Guo, C.; Gong, Q.; Li, G.; Zhang, C.L.; Jiang, T. Performance and Characteristics of Low-Molecular-Weight Cross-Linked Grafting Terpolymers as Thickening Agents in Reservoir Fracturing Processes. Processes 2025, 13, 3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, Q.; Li, Q.; Wang, F.; Wu, J.J.; Wang, Y.L. The carrying behavior of water-based fracturing fluid in shale reservoir fractures and molecular dynamics of sand-carrying mechanism. Processes 2024, 12, 2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rao, Y.; Zheng, L.; Wang, S.; Wu, W.J.; Gong, Z.J.; Zhou, S.D.; Wen, C. Two-phase swirling flow and gas hydrate particle deposition behavior in bending pipelines. Processes 2025, 13, 725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rao, Y.; Gong, Z.; Wang, S.; Zhang, C.L.; Wang, Y.X.; Wen, C. Effect of Twisted Tapes on Swirling Flow Dynamics in Gas–Solid Two-Phase Flows for Natural Gas Hydrate Transportation. Processes 2025, 13, 781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mao, X.; Gan, R.; Wang, X.; Cheng, Z.G.; Yu, P.R.; Zheng, W.; Song, X.Y.; Xiao, Y.J. Prediction of three pressures and wellbore stability evaluation based on seismic inversion for well huqian-1. Processes 2025, 13, 2772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, Z.; Xu, X.; Jian, K.; Xu, L.W.; Li, J.; Zhao, D.Y.; Xue, Z.Z.; Xin, Y. Experimental Study on the Stress Sensitivity Characteristics of Wave Velocities and Anisotropy in Coal-Bearing Reservoir Rocks. Processes 2024, 12, 2819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sun, X.; Luo, H.; Soga, K. A coupled thermal–hydraulic–mechanical–chemical (THMC) model for methane hydrate bearing sediments using COMSOL Multiphysics. J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. A 2018, 19, 600–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, P.; Fan, Z.; Zhao, L.; Li, M.X.; Yang, C.L.; He, K.; Wang, D.Y. Mechanistic understanding of sand production in marine hydrate exploitation: Insights from field tests and THMC simulations. Energy Fuels 2024, 38, 12730–12740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wu, J.; Ansari, U. From CO2 Sequestration to Hydrogen Storage: Further Utilization of Depleted Gas Reservoirs. Reserv. Sci. 2025, 1, 19–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, L.; Yu, W.; Zhang, K.; Liu, Z.H.; Wu, Z.R.; Liu, Z.X.; Ma, S.H.; Li, Y.H. Strength characteristics of fractured methane hydrate-bearing sediments. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2025, 319, 110986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, Q.; Xiao, B.; Zhuang, G.; Li, Y.; Li, Q. Instability mechanisms and Wellbore-Stabilizing drilling fluids for marine gas hydrate reservoirs: A review. Energies 2025, 18, 4392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Anipeddi, M.; Lal, B.; Singh, B. Recent Advances in Hydrate-Based CO2 Capture: Energy Consumption, Cost Analysis, Policy Perspectives, and Machine Learning-Driven Simulation of CO2 Hydrate Formation. ACS Omega 2025, 10, 52145–52163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Babu, P.; Zheng, J.; Linga, P.; Linga, P.; Kumar, R.; Daraboina, N. A Perspective on the Role of Gas Hydrates in Carbon Capture, Transport, and Sequestration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2026, 60, 13759–13781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, Q.; Li, Q.; Wang, F.; Xu, N.; Wang, Y.L.; Bai, B.J. Settling behavior and mechanism analysis of kaolinite as a fracture proppant of hydrocarbon reservoirs in CO2 fracturing fluid. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2025, 724, 137463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kumar, Y.; Sangwai, J. Direct Flue Gas and CO2 Injection for Simultaneous Energy Recovery and CO2 Sequestration in Ocean: Feasibility Analysis and Perspective. Energy Fuels 2025, 39, 5007–5033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Luo, T.; Ma, C.; Dong, Z.; Ma, C.Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, A.W.; Yang, W.H.; Li, Y.H.; Song, Y.C. Morphologies and Distribution Characteristics of CO2 Hydrate in Porous Media Based on Microfluidic Technology. Energy Fuels 2026, 40, 10040–10051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pandey, J.S.; Tariq, M.; Krishna, S.; Heydari, A.; Bu, Y.H.; Chen, G.J.; Sun, C.Y. Advances in Spectroscopic Methods for Gas Hydrate: A Review and Perspectives for Low-Carbon Energy Solutions and Applications. Energy Fuels 2025, 39, 19998–20055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mok, J.; Lee, J.; Choi, W.; Seo, Y. Complementary and competitive dynamics of CO2 and N2 in CH4–Flue gas replacement within natural gas hydrates. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2025, 207, 114971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhou, X.; Yang, F.; Chen, Z.; Su, Y.N. Mechanistic Insights and Engineering Strategies for Wellbore Integrity Control in Polar Permafrost Reservoirs. Reserv. Sci. 2026, 2, 126–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. He, Y.; Liu, Y.; Kim, M.; Huang, H.Y.; Lu, C.H.; Hou, D.Y.; Luo, J. Multiphysics modeling investigation of casing storage, wellbore transport, and formation heterogeneity effects on groundwater sampling. Water Resour. Res. 2025, 61, e2025WR040882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Xiang, Z.; Liang, H.B. A semi-analytical production prediction model of multi-stage fractured horizontal well rectangular heterogeneity gas reservoirs. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2025, 236, 126238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gan, B.; Li, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Huo, W.X.; Li, Z.; Xu, Y.Q.; Li, Y.H. Optimizing hydrate extraction: Balancing stability and production efficiency. Fuel 2025, 384, 134088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Song, Q.; Chen, H.; Wei, S.; Yang, J.Y.; Wang, Y.Z. Numerical Investigation of Reinforcement Effects on Gas Hydrate Reservoir Stability and Production Efficiency. Energy Fuels 2026, 40, 2617–2632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Q.; Li, Q. Editorial for the Special Issue “Environmentally Friendly Production of Energy from Natural Gas Hydrates”. Processes 2026, 14, 1911. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14121911

AMA Style

Li Q, Li Q. Editorial for the Special Issue “Environmentally Friendly Production of Energy from Natural Gas Hydrates”. Processes. 2026; 14(12):1911. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14121911

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Qingchao, and Qiang Li. 2026. "Editorial for the Special Issue “Environmentally Friendly Production of Energy from Natural Gas Hydrates”" Processes 14, no. 12: 1911. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14121911

APA Style

Li, Q., & Li, Q. (2026). Editorial for the Special Issue “Environmentally Friendly Production of Energy from Natural Gas Hydrates”. Processes, 14(12), 1911. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14121911

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop