Next Article in Journal
Erosion Wear Characteristics of V-Shaped Elbow in Blooey Line
Previous Article in Journal
Energy Management for Integrated Energy System Based on Coordinated Optimization of Electric–Thermal Multi-Energy Retention and Reinforcement Learning
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Degradation of Acetaminophen by a Solar-Powered Electro-Fenton Process: A Green and Energy-Efficient Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

A Comprehensive Study of Machine Learning for Waste-to-Energy Process Modeling and Optimization

1
Research Institute for Advanced Manufacturing, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
2
Research Center for Resources Engineering Towards Carbon Neutrality, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
3
School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2025, 13(9), 2691; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13092691
Submission received: 17 July 2025 / Revised: 20 August 2025 / Accepted: 22 August 2025 / Published: 24 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modeling and Optimization for Multi-scale Integration)

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive study integrating machine learning, life cycle assessment (LCA) and heuristic optimization to achieve a low-carbon medical waste (MW)-to fuel process. A detailed process simulation coupled with cradle to gate LCA is employed to generate a dataset covering diverse process operation conditions, embodied carbon of supplying H2 and the associated carbon emission factor of MW treatment (CEF). Four machine learning techniques, including support vector machine, artificial neural network, Gaussian process regression, and XGBoost, are trained, each achieving test R2 close to 0.90 and RMSE of ~0.26. These models are integrated with heuristic algorithms to optimize operating parameters under various green hydrogen mixes (20–80%). Our results show that machine learning models outperform the detailed process model (DPM), achieving a minimum CEF of ~1.3 to ~1.1 kg CO2-eq/kg MW with higher computational stabilities. Importantly, the optimization times dropped from hours (DPM) to seconds (machine learning models) and the combination of Gaussian process regression and particle swarm optimization is highlighted, with an optimization time under one second. The optimized process holds promise in carbon reduction compared to traditional MW disposal methods. These findings show machine learning can achieve high predictive accuracy while dramatically enhancing optimization speed and stability, providing a scalable framework for extensive scenario analysis during waste-to-energy process design and further real-time optimization application.
Keywords: waste-to-energy; machine learning; life cycle assessment; process modeling and optimization waste-to-energy; machine learning; life cycle assessment; process modeling and optimization

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, J.; Liu, J.; Ren, J.; He, C. A Comprehensive Study of Machine Learning for Waste-to-Energy Process Modeling and Optimization. Processes 2025, 13, 2691. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13092691

AMA Style

Zhou J, Liu J, Ren J, He C. A Comprehensive Study of Machine Learning for Waste-to-Energy Process Modeling and Optimization. Processes. 2025; 13(9):2691. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13092691

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Jianzhao, Jingyuan Liu, Jingzheng Ren, and Chang He. 2025. "A Comprehensive Study of Machine Learning for Waste-to-Energy Process Modeling and Optimization" Processes 13, no. 9: 2691. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13092691

APA Style

Zhou, J., Liu, J., Ren, J., & He, C. (2025). A Comprehensive Study of Machine Learning for Waste-to-Energy Process Modeling and Optimization. Processes, 13(9), 2691. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13092691

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop