Next Article in Journal
Scheduling Control Considering Model Inconsistency of Membrane-Wing Aircraft
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainable Solar Desalination: Experimental Predictive Control with Integrated LCA and Techno-Economic Evaluation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Real-Time Prediction of Wear Morphology and Coefficient of Friction Using Acoustic Signals and Deep Neural Networks in a Tribological System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Analysis of Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Alumina Concentration Prediction

1
School of Information Engineering, Jingdezhen Ceramic University, Jingdezhen 333403, China
2
School of Information Engineering, Jingdezhen University, Jingdezhen 333000, China
3
School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2025, 13(8), 2365; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13082365
Submission received: 3 July 2025 / Revised: 20 July 2025 / Accepted: 23 July 2025 / Published: 25 July 2025

Abstract

In the aluminum electrolysis production process, the traditional cell control method based on cell voltage and series current can no longer meet the goals of energy conservation, consumption reduction, and digital-intelligent transformation. Therefore, a new digital cell control technology that is centrally dependent on various process parameters has become an urgent demand in the aluminum electrolysis industry. Among them, the real-time online measurement of alumina concentration is one of the key data points for implementing such technology. However, due to the harsh production environment and limitations of current sensor technologies, hardware-based detection of alumina concentration is difficult to achieve. To address this issue, this study proposes a soft-sensing model for alumina concentration based on a long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network optimized by a weighted average algorithm (WAA). The proposed method outperforms BiLSTM, CNN-LSTM, CNN-BiLSTM, CNN-LSTM-Attention, and CNN-BiLSTM-Attention models in terms of predictive accuracy. In comparison to LSTM models optimized using the Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO), Optuna, Tornado Optimization Algorithm (TOC), and Whale Migration Algorithm (WMA), the WAA-enhanced LSTM model consistently achieves significantly better performance. This superiority is evidenced by lower MAE and RMSE values, along with higher R2 and accuracy scores. The WAA-LSTM model remains stable throughout the training process and achieves the lowest final loss, further confirming the accuracy and superiority of the proposed approach.
Keywords: aluminum electrolysis; alumina concentration; long short-term memory; neural network; weighted average algorithm; the WAA-LSTM model aluminum electrolysis; alumina concentration; long short-term memory; neural network; weighted average algorithm; the WAA-LSTM model

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xia, X.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, J. Comparative Analysis of Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Alumina Concentration Prediction. Processes 2025, 13, 2365. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13082365

AMA Style

Xia X, Li X, Wang Y, Li J. Comparative Analysis of Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Alumina Concentration Prediction. Processes. 2025; 13(8):2365. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13082365

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xia, Xiang, Xiangquan Li, Yanhong Wang, and Jianheng Li. 2025. "Comparative Analysis of Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Alumina Concentration Prediction" Processes 13, no. 8: 2365. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13082365

APA Style

Xia, X., Li, X., Wang, Y., & Li, J. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Alumina Concentration Prediction. Processes, 13(8), 2365. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13082365

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop