Toxicity Assessment of a Biolubricant Exposed to Eisenia fetida
, Ludwi Rodríguez-Hernández 1, Mariana Valdespino-León 1, Adalberto Zenteno-Rojas 1, Rocío Meza-Gordillo 3, Abumalé Cruz-Salomón 2, Rocío del P. Serrano-Ramírez 3 and Rosa I. Cruz-Rodríguez 3Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
1. Line No. 305: Please rewrite the sentence.
2. In the part of “2. Methods”, please write histology content before Statistical analysis.
3. In the part of “4. Discussion”, please simplify, either you write in point wise or make a paragraph, don’t write in small paragraph.
4. In the part of “5. Conclusions”, please extend the conclusions and list out the others external factors. Add future path ahead content.
5. Please unify the format of references.
Author Response
Thank you for the observations made on the article, it is undoubtedly feedback on the work.
One by one the observations were attended to and are described in the attached file.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Dear Authors,
I congratulate you on your insightful and meticulously researched study, showcasing both depth and relevance of your findings. The comprehensive methodology and attention to detail are truly commendable.
The topic has definite significance, given the global movement towards sustainable alternatives and environmental concerns. Attached I propose some improvements for better clarity in certain sections.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
There are possible improvements regarding the sentence length that would enhance clarity. Please refer to the attached comments for specifics.
Author Response
Thank you for the observations made on the article, it is undoubtedly feedback on the work.
One by one the observations were attended to and are described in the attached file.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
