Next Article in Journal
Pilot-Scale Experimental Study of a New High-Loading Absorbent for Capturing CO2 from Flue Gas
Previous Article in Journal
Systematic Literature Review on Remanufacturing Trade Based on Bibliometric Analysis
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Origin of Steam Contaminants and Degradation of Solid-Oxide Electrolysis Stacks

Processes 2022, 10(3), 598; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10030598
by Dominik Schäfer 1,*, Larissa Queda 2, Volker Nischwitz 3, Qingping Fang 1 and Ludger Blum 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Processes 2022, 10(3), 598; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10030598
Submission received: 25 February 2022 / Revised: 15 March 2022 / Accepted: 16 March 2022 / Published: 19 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Systems)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Very important for the SOC-community.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

thank you for your positive assessment of our publication draft.

We performed a final spellcheck and MDPI will provide final checks as well.

Best regards,

Dominik Schäfer

Reviewer 2 Report

Two “once-through steam generators” and a “combination of a steam generator and a gas preheater” for supplying feed gases to “solid-oxide electrolysis stacks” were evaluated for their carryover characteristics of contaminants from the feed-water into the steam phase. The concentrations of various trace impurities (i.e., As, Bi, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Mo, Ni, Sb, W, Zn, As, Bi, Al, B, Ba, Ca, K, Mg, Na, Si etc.) in the steam were determined by sampling the steam condensates. The post-test chemical analysis of cell samples revealed significant concentrations of silicon in the samples. The authors regarded Si as primary cause for cell degradation and they attributed the performance degradation during electrolysis to the silicon contamination in the feed gases. The study results are interesting and are valuable. It can be published with small corrections

 

Corrections

[1] line 27-- “….. a system-supporting operation of an SOC stack….” What is “SOC”?

[2] line 148--- “…. with a commercial SOFC/SOEC test…..”  What is “SOFC/SOEC”?

 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

thank you for your positive assessment of our publication draft.

We exchanged "SOC cells" by "solid-oxide cells" in line 27 and replaced "SOFC/SOEC test rig" by "solid-oxide cell test rig". Thank you for noticing!

Best regards,

Dominik Schäfer

Reviewer 3 Report

Very detailed research applying a lot of devices and techniques, discussion is sound, conclusions  justified. So paper can be accepted for publication. Some misprints can be corrected at proofsreading stage.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

thank you for your positive assessment of our publication draft.

We performed a final spellcheck and MDPI will provide final stylistic checks and spellcheck as well during the publication process.

Best regards,

Dominik Schäfer

Back to TopTop