Next Article in Journal
Macro vs. Micro Methods in Non-Life Claims Reserving (an Econometric Perspective)
Previous Article in Journal
Participating Life Insurance Products with Alternative Guarantees: Reconciling Policyholders’ and Insurers’ Interests
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Reinsurance Strategies on Capital Requirements for Premium Risk in Insurance
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Risks 2016, 4(2), 13;

Community Analysis of Global Financial Markets

Center for Polymer Studies and Department of Physics, Boston University, 590 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA
Administrative Sciences Department, Metropolitan College, Boston University, 808 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA
Department of Physics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Weidong Tian
Received: 9 February 2016 / Revised: 15 April 2016 / Accepted: 6 May 2016 / Published: 13 May 2016
(This article belongs to the Collection Systemic Risk and Reinsurance)
Full-Text   |   PDF [727 KB, uploaded 13 May 2016]   |  


We analyze the daily returns of stock market indices and currencies of 56 countries over the period of 2002–2012. We build a network model consisting of two layers, one being the stock market indices and the other the foreign exchange markets. Synchronous and lagged correlations are used as measures of connectivity and causality among different parts of the global economic system for two different time intervals: non-crisis (2002–2006) and crisis (2007–2012) periods. We study community formations within the network to understand the influences and vulnerabilities of specific countries or groups of countries. We observe different behavior of the cross correlations and communities for crisis vs. non-crisis periods. For example, the overall correlation of stock markets increases during crisis while the overall correlation in the foreign exchange market and the correlation between stock and foreign exchange markets decrease, which leads to different community structures. We observe that the euro, while being central during the relatively calm period, loses its dominant role during crisis. Furthermore we discover that the troubled Eurozone countries, Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain, form their own cluster during the crisis period. View Full-Text
Keywords: community structure; complex networks; financial markets community structure; complex networks; financial markets

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Vodenska, I.; Becker, A.P.; Zhou, D.; Kenett, D.Y.; Stanley, H.E.; Havlin, S. Community Analysis of Global Financial Markets. Risks 2016, 4, 13.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Risks EISSN 2227-9091 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top