Next Article in Journal
Digital Transformation and Entrepreneurial Risk-Taking: Navigating Affordance and Apprehension in SME Intentions
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Calculation of Finite-Time Ruin Probabilities in the Dual Risk Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Advancing Credit Rating Prediction: The Role of Machine Learning in Corporate Credit Rating Assessment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Factor Structure of Green, Grey, and Red EU Securities

by
Ferdinantos Kottas
1,2,3
1
School of Business, National University of Ireland Maynooth, W23 F2H6 Maynooth, Ireland
2
Financial Mathematics & Computational Research Cluster, A94 XF34 Dublin, Ireland
3
Department of Computer Science, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
Risks 2025, 13(9), 176; https://doi.org/10.3390/risks13090176
Submission received: 4 August 2025 / Revised: 3 September 2025 / Accepted: 5 September 2025 / Published: 11 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Risk and Return Analysis in the Stock Market)

Abstract

This study examined the factor structure of Green, Grey, and Red EU securities using extended asset pricing models built on the Fama–French and Carhart frameworks. The findings show improved return predictability and consistently negative risk-adjusted alpha across categories post-Global Financial Crisis (GFC), suggesting systematic overestimation of expected returns. All environmental asset types are positively linked to the MKTRF, SMB, HML, and HMLDevil factors, indicating exposure to core risk premia. Green securities exhibit elevated currency risk and persistent negative momentum, while Red assets transition from positive to negative momentum. Green and Red securities show stronger gold associations post-GFC, signaling a hedging role. Grey assets shift away from safe-haven behavior, becoming more sensitive to volatility. FEAR factor exposure and QML results suggest evolving sensitivity and declining quality, particularly in Grey assets. These findings underscore the need for enriched asset pricing models to capture dynamic risk characteristics in environmental assets within the EU financial markets.
Keywords: asset pricing models; EU securities; environmental finance; factor analysis; systematic risk asset pricing models; EU securities; environmental finance; factor analysis; systematic risk

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kottas, F. Factor Structure of Green, Grey, and Red EU Securities. Risks 2025, 13, 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks13090176

AMA Style

Kottas F. Factor Structure of Green, Grey, and Red EU Securities. Risks. 2025; 13(9):176. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks13090176

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kottas, Ferdinantos. 2025. "Factor Structure of Green, Grey, and Red EU Securities" Risks 13, no. 9: 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks13090176

APA Style

Kottas, F. (2025). Factor Structure of Green, Grey, and Red EU Securities. Risks, 13(9), 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks13090176

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop