Next Article in Journal
Depression in Childhood Asthma vs. Adult-Onset Asthma: A Cross-Sectional Study from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)
Previous Article in Journal
Triage Grading and Correct Diagnosis Are Critical for the Emergency Treatment of Anaphylaxis
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Qualitative Study of the Pain Experiences of Children and Their Parents at a Canadian Children’s Hospital

Children 2022, 9(12), 1796; https://doi.org/10.3390/children9121796
by Elise Kammerer 1,2, Joshua Eszczuk 3, Katie Caldwell 4, Jacob Dunn 4, Sharon Appelman-Eszczuk 5, Jennifer Dunn 5, Megan MacNeil 2,6 and Samina Ali 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Children 2022, 9(12), 1796; https://doi.org/10.3390/children9121796
Submission received: 15 October 2022 / Revised: 15 November 2022 / Accepted: 18 November 2022 / Published: 23 November 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for submitting the manuscript. I have read your work with great interest. The topic addressed is important and of great interest to the readers. However, I am convinced that the manuscript should undergo a thorough revision to improve its quality and readability. I believe some revisions to your manuscript are needed.

1)      I would include in the title the name of the hospital in which to have conducted the study.

2)      In the introduction, the Painless Hospital Project, born in Canada, deserves to be mentioned. In particular, pediatric references are needed to better contextualise the study. I therefore ask you to expand the introduction which must appear less discursive and more scientific. In this regard, I ask you to read and use the following references: doi: 10.1155/2008/478102. doi: 10.7417/CT.2016.1948. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03319-w.

3)      Eliminate sentences in italics because they weigh down the reading. I recommend that you recall them with notes in the body of the text and insert them in an appendix.

4)      In the conclusions you should include what actions you intend to take to improve pain management in your center.

5)      It is not clear to me the choice not to ask for consent for patients under 7 years of age. Explain better.

I hope my comments are useful to you.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This study is important and interesting.

The sample size is small but considering the situation it can be acceptable. Besides, the authors have provided qualitative analysis.

One point to consider is if that would be possible to thematize the answers in such a way to report some cluster or themes that clinicians must be aware of in their setting to use. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for submitting the new version of the manuscript. I am satisfied with your reviews.

Kind Regards

Back to TopTop