Next Article in Journal
Connection between Social Relationships and Basic Motor Competencies in Early Childhood
Next Article in Special Issue
A Process Evaluation of A UK Classroom-Based Physical Activity Intervention—‘Busy Brain Breaks’
Previous Article in Journal
The Relationship between the Dominant Hand and the Occurrence of the Supracondylar Humerus Fracture in Pediatric Orthopedics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Linear and Nonlinear Pedagogy Physical Education Interventions on Children’s Physical Activity: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (SAMPLE-PE)
Review

Rapid Realist Review of School-Based Physical Activity Interventions in 7- to 11-Year-Old Children

1
Health and Social Sciences, Faculty of Sport, Southampton Solent University, Southampton SO14 0YN, UK
2
Resilience and Human Performance Research and Knowledge Exchange Group, Plymouth Marjon University, Plymouth PL6 8BH, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2021, 8(1), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/children8010052
Received: 27 November 2020 / Revised: 13 January 2021 / Accepted: 14 January 2021 / Published: 16 January 2021
Meta-analysis of physical activity interventions in school settings have revealed low efficacy and that there is a need to explore implementation fidelity. The aim of this rapid realist review was to determine, what physical activity interventions in school settings for children aged 7- to 11-years-old works, for whom, and in what circumstances. The realist synthesis was conducted following RAMESES guidelines. Relevant studies were identified following a systematic search process and data from 28 studies was extracted for evidence to form context-mechanism-outcome configurations that were clustered and refined. Using the five-level socioecological model, the program theories were classified into the levels of intrapersonal (child), interpersonal (teachers), institutional (program content, school administration, and school environment), community (home and neighborhood), and policy. The school level led to most context-mechanism-outcome configurations related to school leadership and policy, workforce structure, program characteristics, and school environment. At each level, we identified features of interventions, alongside implementation considerations that might work to promote efficacy and sustainability. The need to recognize the school environment as part of a complex system with multi-level interaction and influences was a key finding. In line with realist philosophy, the researchers encouraged primary research to confirm, refute, and refine the program theories presented. View Full-Text
Keywords: physical activity; school setting; socioecological model; intervention; realist synthesis physical activity; school setting; socioecological model; intervention; realist synthesis
MDPI and ACS Style

Defever, E.; Jones, M. Rapid Realist Review of School-Based Physical Activity Interventions in 7- to 11-Year-Old Children. Children 2021, 8, 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8010052

AMA Style

Defever E, Jones M. Rapid Realist Review of School-Based Physical Activity Interventions in 7- to 11-Year-Old Children. Children. 2021; 8(1):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8010052

Chicago/Turabian Style

Defever, Emmanuel, and Michelle Jones. 2021. "Rapid Realist Review of School-Based Physical Activity Interventions in 7- to 11-Year-Old Children" Children 8, no. 1: 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8010052

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop