Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Ureteroureterostomy for Duplicated Kidney Malformations in Infants: A Comparative Cohort Study
Highlights
- Both robotic and laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy achieved favorable safety and efficacy outcomes in infants with duplicated kidney malformations.
- Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy reduced operative time, while postoperative recovery and follow-up outcomes were comparable between the two approaches.
- This study provides direct clinical evidence for surgical decision-making between robot-assisted and laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy in infants with duplicated kidney malformations.
- These findings provide a basis for future multicenter prospective studies aimed at optimizing surgical selection and clinical management strategies.
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
2.2. Surgical Technique
2.3. Data Comparison and Follow-Up
2.4. Statistical Methods
3. Results
3.1. Patient Characteristics
3.2. Intraoperative Outcomes
3.3. Postoperative Recovery and Complications
3.4. Follow-Up Outcomes
4. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sheth, K.R.; White, J.T.; Janzen, N.; Koh, C.J.; Austin, P.F.; Roth, D.R.; Tu, D.D.; Mittal, A.; Wang, M.-H.; Gonzales, E.T.; et al. Evaluating Outcomes of Differential Surgical Management of Nonfunctioning Upper Pole Renal Moieties in Duplex Collecting Systems. Urology 2019, 123, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wong, N.C.; Braga, L.H. Open ureteroureterostomy for repair of upper-pole ectopic ureters in children with duplex systems: Is stenting really necessary? J. Pediatr. Urol. 2019, 15, 72.e1–72.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Braga, L.H. How I do it open distal ureteroureterostomy for ectopic ureters in infants with duplex systems and no vesicoureteral reflux under 6 months of age. Int. Braz. J. Urol. 2021, 47, 610–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rodriguez, M.V.; Pena, P.; Vargas, E.; Yankovic, F.; Reed, F.; Ovalle, J.R.; Lopez, P.J.; Braga, L.H.; Prieto, J.C. Open distal ureteroureterostomy for non-refluxing duplicated collecting system in children: Multicentric study and mid-term outcomes. J. Pediatr. Urol. 2024, 20, 1166–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tao, C.; Mao, C.; Cao, Y. Comparative analysis of laparoscopic and open ureteroureterostomy for the treatment of pediatric duplicated kidneys: A clinical efficacy and safety study. Transl. Pediatr. 2024, 13, 738–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yassegoungbe, M.G.; Bensaid, R.; Montalva, L.; Lecompte, J.-F.; Glatz, G.; Gerstner, A.; Mamane, B.O.; Faure, A.; Breaud, J. Results of uretero-ureteral anastomosis in pathological duplex kidney. J. Pediatr. Urol. 2024, 20, 485.e1–485.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bian, Z.; Xiong, G.; Liu, T.; Zhi, Y.; Liu, M. Curative effect of laparoscopic ureteral end-to-side anastomosis at the pelvic level for a duplex kidney in children. Front. Pediatr. 2025, 13, 1509039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gerwinn, T.; Gnannt, R.; Weber, D.M.; Gobet, R.; Mazzone, L. Laparoscopic Ureteroureterostomy vs. Common Sheath Ureteral Reimplantation in Children With Duplex Kidney Anomalies. Front. Pediatr. 2021, 9, 637544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eftekharzadeh, S.; Aghababian, A.; Abdulfattah, S.; Kye, N.J.; Mittal, S.; Long, C.J.; Weiss, D.; Srinivasan, A.K.; Shukla, A.R. Ureteroureterostomy as Definitive Intervention for Duplex Anomalies: A Mid-Term Analysis. Urology 2025, 204, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Keleş, M.; Harun Kinik, A.; Selçuk Silay, M. Uretero-ureterostomy methods in ureteral duplication: Narrative review of the literature. Actas Urol. Esp. (Engl. Ed.) 2025, 49, 501817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chertin, L.; Neeman, B.B.; Stav, K.; Noh, P.H.; Koucherov, S.; Gaber, J.; Zisman, A.; Chertin, B.; Dubrov, V.; Bondarenko, S.; et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic ipsilateral uretero-ureterostomy for upper urinary tract duplications in the pediatric population: A multi-institutional review of outcomes and complications. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2021, 56, 2377–2380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yu, B.; Li, L.; Fan, Y. The efficacy analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic ipsilateral uretero-ureterostomy for upper urinary tract duplications in pediatric population. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2025, 41, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Suarez Arbelaez, M.C.; Ghattas, Y.; Raymo, A.; Isern, S.; Alam, A.; Nassau, D.E.; Castellan, M. Safety and feasibility of performing robotic ureteroureterostomy and robotic pyeloplasty in infants. Front. Urol. 2022, 2, 1001054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Villanueva, C.A. Open vs robotic infant ureteroureterostomy. J. Pediatr. Urol. 2019, 15, 390.e1–390.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shu, B.; Zhang, S.; Gao, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, S.; Shi, R.; Wang, X. Da Vinci robotic assisted pyeloplasty versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty in newborns under 3 months. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 28435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, L.; Zhao, D.; Shen, Y.; Tang, D.; Chen, G.; Zhu, L.; Yang, Y.; Tao, C. Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted pyeloplasty in infants and young children. Asian J. Surg. 2023, 46, 868–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Andolfi, C.; Lombardo, A.M.; Aizen, J.; Recabal, X.; Walker, J.P.; Barashi, N.S.; Reed, F.; Lopez, P.J.; Wilcox, D.T.; Gundeti, M.S. Laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty as minimally invasive alternatives to the open approach for the treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction in infants: A multi-institutional comparison of outcomes and learning curves. World J. Urol. 2022, 40, 1049–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, L.; Huang, J.; Xie, H.; Chen, F. The learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. J. Robot. Surg. 2024, 18, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wen, J.; Chen, G.; Wu, Y.; Cui, Z.; Liao, J.; Yi, X.; Zhang, X.; Jia, H.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, D.; et al. Comparison of robot-assisted and laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A retrospective multicenter study. Sci. Rep. 2026, 16, 16322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]



| Variable | RALUU (n = 28) | LUU (n = 24) | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (months) | 7.8 ± 2.4 (6.8–8.7) | 7.3 ± 2.9 (6.1–8.5) | 0.499 |
| Weight (kg) | 8.1 ± 1.5 (7.5–8.7) | 8.2 ± 1.9 (7.4–9.0) | 0.833 |
| Gender, n (%) | 0.816 | ||
| Male | 9 (32.1%) | 7 (29.2%) | |
| Female | 19 (67.9%) | 17 (70.8%) | |
| Laterality, n (%) | 0.832 | ||
| Left | 14 (50%) | 14 (58.3%) | |
| Right | 11 (39.3%) | 8 (33.3%) | |
| Bilateral | 3 (10.7%) | 2 (8.3%) | |
| Type of Pathology, n (%) | 0.815 | ||
| Ureteral ectopia | 24 (85.7%) | 22 (91.7%) | |
| Ureterocele | 4 (14.3%) | 2 (8.3%) | |
| Surgical indication, n (%) | 0.532 | ||
| Hydronephrosis | 14 (50%) | 9 (37.5%) | |
| UTI | 14 (50%) | 15 (62.5%) | |
| Operative time (min) | 139.6 ± 16.6 (133.1–146.0) | 151.8 ± 21.6 (142.7–160.9) | 0.029 |
| Docking time (min) | 14.5 ± 3.8 (13.8–16.2) | — | |
| Console time (min) | 111.2 ± 15.6 (108.2–120.1) | — | |
| Estimated blood loss (ml) | 10.8 ± 4.5 (9.1–12.6) | 12.1 ± 5.0 (10.0–14.3) | 0.329 |
| Oral feeding time (h) | 8.5 ± 2.2 (7.7–9.4) | 8.9 ± 2.4 (7.8–9.9) | 0.535 |
| FLACC pain score | 2.1 ± 1.2 (1.6–2.5) | 2.4 ± 1.1 (2.0–2.9) | 0.207 |
| Hospital stay (days) | 4.8 ± 1.1 (4.3–5.2) | 5.2 ± 1.2 (4.7–5.7) | 0.216 |
| Complications, (Clavien–Dindo, n), n (%) | 2 (7.1%) | 3 (12.5%) | 0.652 |
| Urine leakage (Grade I) | 0 | 1 (4.2%) | |
| UTI (Grade II) | 2 (7.1%) | 2 (8.3%) | |
| Secondary surgery (Grade III) | 0 | 0 |
| Variable | RALUU (n = 31 Units) | LUU (n = 26 Units) | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative APD (mm) | 20.4 ± 7.3 (17.7–23.1) | 20.7 ± 6.6 (18.0–23.4) | 0.881 |
| Postoperative APD (mm) | 7.5 ± 3.5 (6.2–8.8) | 7.8 ± 2.3 (6.9–8.7) | 0.704 |
| Change in APD (mm) | 12.9 ± 4.8 (11.1–14.7) | 12.9 ± 5.5 (10.7–15.1) | 0.990 |
| Preoperative UD (mm) | 11.8 ± 5.0 (9.9–13.6) | 11.7 ± 5.4 (9.5–13.9) | 0.975 |
| Postoperative UD (mm) | 4.9 ± 1.7 (4.3–5.6) | 5.0 ± 2.7 (3.9–6.1) | 0.890 |
| Change in UD (mm) | 6.8 ± 4.0 (5.4–8.3) | 6.7 ± 3.8 (5.2–8.2) | 0.901 |
| Preoperative RF (%) | 14.5 ± 2.6 (13.5–15.5) | 14.1 ± 3.0 (12.9–15.3) | 0.590 |
| Postoperative RF (%) | 16.7 ± 3.4 (15.4–17.9) | 16.5 ± 3.0 (15.3–17.7) | 0.830 |
| Change in DRF (%) | 2.2 ± 1.2 (1.8–2.6) | 2.4 ± 0.9 (2.0–2.8) | 0.432 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Liu, H.; Pan, M.; Jin, L.; Chen, G.; Tao, C.; Yan, X. Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Ureteroureterostomy for Duplicated Kidney Malformations in Infants: A Comparative Cohort Study. Children 2026, 13, 839. https://doi.org/10.3390/children13060839
Liu H, Pan M, Jin L, Chen G, Tao C, Yan X. Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Ureteroureterostomy for Duplicated Kidney Malformations in Infants: A Comparative Cohort Study. Children. 2026; 13(6):839. https://doi.org/10.3390/children13060839
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Huazhang, Minghui Pan, Liming Jin, Guangjie Chen, Chang Tao, and Xiang Yan. 2026. "Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Ureteroureterostomy for Duplicated Kidney Malformations in Infants: A Comparative Cohort Study" Children 13, no. 6: 839. https://doi.org/10.3390/children13060839
APA StyleLiu, H., Pan, M., Jin, L., Chen, G., Tao, C., & Yan, X. (2026). Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Ureteroureterostomy for Duplicated Kidney Malformations in Infants: A Comparative Cohort Study. Children, 13(6), 839. https://doi.org/10.3390/children13060839
