Next Article in Journal
A Sensitive Impedimetric Sensor Based on Biosourced Polyphosphine Films for the Detection of Lead Ions
Next Article in Special Issue
Optical Immunoassays Methods in Protein Analysis: An Overview
Previous Article in Journal
The Use of Aptamers and Molecularly Imprinted Polymers in Biosensors for Environmental Monitoring: A Tale of Two Receptors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vertically Coupling ZnO Nanorods onto MoS2 Flakes for Optical Gas Sensing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Optical Chemosensors and Biosensors

by
Ambra Giannetti
1,* and
Markéta Bocková
2
1
CNR-IFAC, Institute of Applied Physics “Nello Carrara”, Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino (FI), Italy
2
Institute of Photonics and Electronics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Chaberská 1014/57, 8-Kobylisy, 182 00 Praha, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Chemosensors 2020, 8(2), 33; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors8020033
Submission received: 6 May 2020 / Accepted: 6 May 2020 / Published: 9 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Optical Chemosensors and Biosensors)

1. Introduction

The field of chemo- and biosensors, ranging from biomedical/clinical applications to environmental applications and food analyses, has been growing in the last two decades. In fact, in all these fields, there is a continuously increasing demand for rapid responses, quality control, usable devices, and low-cost analyses. The growth is likely to be driven by continuous technological advancements in sensor systems, which lead to the development of devices characterized by ever higher performances capable of satisfying the increasingly strong requests in terms of sensitivity and detection limit in the different application sectors. All these features could lead to an improved, healthy life, ranging from a more reliable and controlled quality of food and environment to a faster and more specific diagnosis [1,2,3,4].
The optical detection methods applied in chemo- and biosensors make use of both label-based or label-free techniques. The former ones make use, for example, of fluorescent [4,5] or chemiluminescent-based detection systems [6,7], while the latter are generally based on the direct optical detection of the refractive index changes induced by chemical/biochemical reactions [8,9,10].
The proposed contributions in this issue focus on bacterium, oxygen, metal or metal ion, and gas sensing devices for food/environmental applications, as well as on glucose and sepsis biomarker detection for medical applications.

2. The Special Issue

This special issue is focused on chemo- and biosensors based on optical detection methods, with both label-based and label-free techniques. The described applications in the nine full articles range from the theoretical and experimental demonstration of polar-time evolutions of chemiluminescence emission thanks to the anisotropic emission of light at the solid–liquid interface; to environmental and food applications starting from gas sensing and proceeding to nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, metal ions, microorganisms, and oxygen sensors for food packaging. Moreover, two papers for medical applications are included for glucose detection in urine samples and for the detection of sepsis biomarkers in serum.
Berneschi et al. [11] described a method for the real-time monitoring of chemiluminescence (CL) emission anisotropy at the liquid–solid interface based on a radial array of optical fibers. The spatial distribution of a CL emission from an enzyme reaction and its time evolution were investigated, and the study revealed that the anisotropic CL emission occurs when the enzymes catalyzing the CL reaction are in close proximity to the liquid–solid interface.
A contactless optical sensor for NO2 is demonstrated by Faglia et al. [12], who developed a system based on the photoluminescence properties of a 1D/2D hybrid structure realized by depositing ZnO nanorods through magnetron sputtering on exfoliated MoS2.
A Schiff base ligand was investigated via UV–Vis spectroscopy in the work of Alorabi et al. [13]. The high selectivity and sensitivity of the ligand, bearing azomethine (>C=N-) and thiol (-SH) moieties capable of coordinating to metal ions (i.e., Cr3+, Fe2+, Fe3+, Hg2+), was demonstrated, making it an attractive candidate to be used in colorimetric chemosensors for the detection of heavy metal ions.
Another sensor for metal ions is proposed by Helal [14], who employs a fluorescein-allyloxy benzene conjugate. In this work, UV–Vis and fluorescence spectroscopy are used for the sequential detection of palladium and chromium oxyanions in a mixed aqueous solution providing a limit of detection (LOD) of 49 ppb for Pd2+, and 127 and 259 ppb for the two chromate ions CrO42− and Cr2O72−, respectively.
In the paper of Monteiro-Silva et al. [15], UV–Vis spectroscopy was used for the direct quantification of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (N, P, K) in nutrient-containing fertilizer solutions. This was achieved by determining the spectral interference between N, P, and K in fertilizer solutions and by employing an innovative self-learning artificial intelligence algorithm.
A sensor based on the surface plasmon resonance technique and molecularly imprinted nanoparticles was reported by Saylan and coworkers for the direct and label-free detection of Enterococcus faecalis in water samples [16]. In this approach, E. faecalis surface protein is imprinted on the nanoparticles to create artificial recognition sites for bacteria detection. The reported LOD was estimated to be 3.4 × 104 cfu/mL.
A comparative study of five differently stable types of phosphorescence-based oxygen sensors for food packaging applications was conducted by Kelly at al. [17]. When exposed to a panel of standard food simulants and upon direct contact with raw meat and cheese samples packaged under a modified atmosphere, the sensors based on ungrafted polypropylene material and impregnated with phosphorescent dye by the soaking method were shown to provide the best implementation in terms of stability and performance.
Wang et al. [18] reported a label-free colorimetric method for the direct determination of urine glucose using a smartphone ambient light sensor as a data reader. This method takes advantage of a horseradish peroxidase—hydrogen peroxide—3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (HRP-H2O2-TMB) coloring system that allows the determination of glucose present in urine samples based on the fading of the color solution. Good repeatability, sensitivity and accuracy makes this approach potentially applicable for the point-of-care monitoring of urine glucose.
A fluorescence-based integrated optical measurement system for the simultaneous detection of C-reactive protein (CRP) and neopterin (NP) sepsis biomarkers is described by Giannetti et al. [19]. A limit of detection as low as 10 and 2.1 μg/L was achieved for CRP and NP in commercially available human serum, respectively. The portable point-of-care testing system was also evaluated for the detection of CRP and NP in serum samples collected from septic patients.
In conclusion, this special issue explores new insights on the label-based and label-free methodologies for sensing applications for an improved, healthy life, ranging from a more reliable and controlled quality of food and environment to a faster and more specific diagnosis.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the authors, that contributed with their scientific work, and all the reviewers for their precious reviewing process, which together assured the high quality of this Special Issue. We also would like to thank the Chemosensors Editorial Office for giving us the opportunity to edit this issue and, in particular, to Lilian Liu, first, and to Eugenia Li, in a second moment, for their continuous help in managing and organizing this SI.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vigneshvar, S.; Sudhakumari, C.C.; Senthilkumaran, B.; Prakash, H. Recent advances in biosensor technology for potential applications—An overview. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2016, 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Ding, X.; Srinivasan, B.; Tung, S. Development and Applications of Portable Biosensors. J. Lab. Autom. 2015, 20, 365–389. [Google Scholar]
  3. Qian, R.C.; Long, Y.T. Wearable Chemosensors: A Review of Recent Progress. ChemistryOpen 2018, 7, 118–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Wu, D.; Sedgwick, A.C.; Gunnlaugsson, T.; Akkaya, E.U.; Yoon, J.; James, T.D. Fluorescent chemosensors: The past, present and future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 7105–7123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Giannetti, A.; Tombelli, S.; Baldini, F. Oligonucleotide optical switches for intracellular sensing Optical Nanosensing in Cells. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2013, 405, 6181–6196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Roda, A.; Mirasoli, M.; Michelini, E.; Di Fusco, M.; Zangheri, M.; Cevenini, L.; Roda, B.; Simoni, P. Progress in chemical luminescence-based biosensors: A critical review. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 76, 164–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Marquette, C.A.; Blum Loic, J. Chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassays: A review of bioanalytical applications. Bioanalysis 2009, 1, 1259–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chiavaioli, F.; Zubiate, P.; Del Villar, I.; Zamarreño, C.R.; Giannetti, A.; Tombelli, S.; Trono, C.; Arregui, F.J.; Matias, I.R.; Baldini, F. Femtomolar Detection by Nanocoated Fiber Label-Free Biosensors. ACS Sensors 2018, 3, 936–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zubiate, P.; Urrutia, A.; Zamarreño, C.R.; Egea-Urra, J.; Fernández-Irigoyen, J.; Giannetti, A.; Baldini, F.; Díaz, S.; Matias, I.R.; Arregui, F.J.; et al. Fiber-based early diagnosis of venous thromboembolic disease by label-free D-dimer detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. X 2019, 2, 100026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Homola, J. Surface plasmon resonance sensors for detection of chemical and biological species. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 462–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Berneschi, S.; Trono, C.; Mirasoli, M.; Giannetti, A.; Zangheri, M.; Guardigli, M.; Tombelli, S.; Marchegiani, E.; Baldini, F.; Roda, A. In-parallel polar monitoring of chemiluminescence emission anisotropy at the solid-liquid interface by an optical fiber radial array. Chemosensors 2020, 8, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Faglia, G.; Ferroni, M.; le Dang, T.T.; Donarelli, M.; Rigoni, F.; Baratto, C. Vertically coupling ZnO nanorods onto MoS2 flakes for optical gas sensing. Chemosensors 2020, 8, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Alorabi, A.Q.; Abdelbaset, M.; Zabin, S.A. Colorimetric detection of multiple metal ions using schiff base 1-(2-Thiophenylimino)-4-(N-dimethyl)benzene. Chemosensors 2020, 8, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Helal, A. Sequential detection of palladium and chromium oxyanion by a fluorescein based chemosensor in mixed aqueous media. Chemosensors 2020, 8, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Monteiro-Silva, F.; Jorge, P.A.S.; Martins, R.C. Optical sensing of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium: A spectrophotometrical approach toward smart nutrient deployment. Chemosensors 2019, 7, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Saylan, Y.; Erdem, Ö.; Cihangir, N.; Denizli, A. Detecting Fingerprints of Waterborne Bacteria on a Sensor. Chemosensors 2019, 7, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Kelly, C.A.; Cruz-Romero, M.; Kerry, J.P.; Papkovsky, D.B. Stability and safety assessment of phosphorescent oxygen sensors for use in food packaging applications. Chemosensors 2018, 6, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Wang, T.T.; Guo, K.; Hu, X.M.; Liang, J.; Li, X.D.; Zhang, Z.F.; Xie, J. Label-free colorimetric detection of urine glucose based on color fading using smartphone ambient-light sensor. Chemosensors 2020, 8, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Giannetti, A.; Trono, C.; Porro, G.; Domenici, C.; Puntoni, M.; Baldini, F. Towards an integrated system as point-of-care device for the optical detection of sepsis biomarkers. Chemosensors 2020, 8, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Giannetti, A.; Bocková, M. Optical Chemosensors and Biosensors. Chemosensors 2020, 8, 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors8020033

AMA Style

Giannetti A, Bocková M. Optical Chemosensors and Biosensors. Chemosensors. 2020; 8(2):33. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors8020033

Chicago/Turabian Style

Giannetti, Ambra, and Markéta Bocková. 2020. "Optical Chemosensors and Biosensors" Chemosensors 8, no. 2: 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors8020033

APA Style

Giannetti, A., & Bocková, M. (2020). Optical Chemosensors and Biosensors. Chemosensors, 8(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors8020033

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop