Next Article in Journal
Analyzing the Impact of Vaccine Availability on Alternative Supplier Selection Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: A cFGM-FTOPSIS-FWI Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Telemedicine for Pre-Employment Medical Examinations and Follow-Up Visits on Board Ships: A Narrative Review on the Feasibility
Open AccessReview

Review of Current Spinal Robotic Orthoses

Department of Neurosurgery, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore 308433, Singapore
School of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Nanyang, Singapore 639798, Singapore
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2021, 9(1), 70;
Received: 23 November 2020 / Revised: 30 December 2020 / Accepted: 8 January 2021 / Published: 13 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Robotics)
Osteoporotic spine fractures (OSF) are common sequelae of osteoporosis. OSF are directly correlated with increasing age and incidence of osteoporosis. OSF are treated conservatively or surgically. Associated acute pain, chronic disabilities, and progressive deformities are well documented. Conservative measures include a combination of initial bed rest, analgesia, early physiotherapy, and a spinal brace (orthosis), with the aim for early rehabilitation to prevent complications of immobile state. Spinal bracing is commonly used for symptomatic management of OSF. While traditional spinal braces aim to maintain the neutral spinal alignment and reduce the axial loading on the fractured vertebrae, they are well known for complications including discomfort with reduced compliance, atrophy of paraspinal muscles, and restriction of chest expansion leading to chest infections. Exoskeletons have been developed to passively assist and actively augment human movements with different types of actuators. Flexible, versatile spinal exoskeletons are designed to better support the spine. As new technologies enable the development of motorized wearable exoskeletons, several types have been introduced into the medical field application. We have provided a thorough review of the current spinal robotic technologies in this paper. The shortcomings in the current spinal exoskeletons were identified. Their limitations on the use for patients with OSF with potential improvement strategies were discussed. With our current knowledge of spinal orthosis for conservatively managed OSF, a semi-rigid backpack style thoracolumbar spinal robotic orthosis will reduce spinal bone stress and improve back muscle support. This will lead to back pain reduction, improved posture, and overall mobility. Early mobilization is an important part of management of patients with OSF as it reduces the chance of developing complications related to their immobile state for patients with OSF, which will be helpful for their recovery. View Full-Text
Keywords: osteoporotic spine fracture; spinal orthosis; exoskeleton; wearable robotics; active orthosis osteoporotic spine fracture; spinal orthosis; exoskeleton; wearable robotics; active orthosis
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Mak, S.K.D.; Accoto, D. Review of Current Spinal Robotic Orthoses. Healthcare 2021, 9, 70.

AMA Style

Mak SKD, Accoto D. Review of Current Spinal Robotic Orthoses. Healthcare. 2021; 9(1):70.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mak, Siu K.D.; Accoto, Dino. 2021. "Review of Current Spinal Robotic Orthoses" Healthcare 9, no. 1: 70.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop