Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

congratulations for your work. 

I think it's an interest and understimate topic, useful in partucular to select what kind of muscolar activity shoul be preferred to potentiate and should not be leave behind for young continent women 

I have no great comments or suggestions for what concern this paper, at least for the methods and the topic. Maybe you should consider to enrich a bit your results.

Greetings again,.

Author Response

We very much appreciate your comments.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Consulte el archivo adjunto

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

I suggest those minor corrections and a review of the english and then I could be published:

In the abstract: "Anova test, Friedman’s test and Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used. Perhaps you should detail just a little bit, something like: Anova, Friedman’s and Pearson’s tests where used to compare means and observe correlations.

Introduction paragraph #3 (b) General (should be :general)

 

Statistical analysis

Anova test (which kind of Anova?) and Friedman’s test were used to identify differences  (between the means? )in the measurements of the three exercises.

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf