Next Article in Journal
Artificial Neural Network, Quantile and Semi-Log Regression Modelling of Mass Appraisal in Housing
Next Article in Special Issue
A Novel Analysis of the Smooth Curve with Constant Width Based on a Time Delay System
Previous Article in Journal
Tropical Balls and Its Applications to K Nearest Neighbor over the Space of Phylogenetic Trees
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Generalized Affine Connections Associated with the Space of Centered Planes

Institute of Physical and Mathematical Sciences and IT, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, A. Nevsky Str. 14, 236016 Kaliningrad, Russia
Mathematics 2021, 9(7), 782; https://doi.org/10.3390/math9070782
Submission received: 12 March 2021 / Revised: 29 March 2021 / Accepted: 3 April 2021 / Published: 5 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Differential Geometry of Spaces with Special Structures)

Abstract

:
Our purpose is to study a space Π of centered m-planes in n-projective space. Generalized fiberings (with semi-gluing) are investigated. Planar and normal affine connections associated with the space Π are set in the generalized fiberings. Fields of these affine connection objects define torsion and curvature tensors. The canonical cases of planar and normal generalized affine connections are considered.

1. Introduction

The theory of connections occupies an important place in differential geometry. The concept of connection was introduced by T. Levi-Civita [1] as a parallel displacement of tangent vectors of a manifold. Weyl introduced the concept of a space of the affine connection [2]. This concept was continued in the works of Cartan [3] and Ehresmann [4]. Different ways to determine the connection were inputted by Nomizu [5], Vagner [6], and Laptev [7]. Veblen and Whitehead [8] introduced a connection in a composite manifold. In [9], Laptev gave an invariant definition of connections as a certain law defining the mapping of infinitely close fibres. He also provided a well-known theoretical-group method on the basis of the Cartan calculation.
Rashevskii [10], Nomizu [11], and Norden [12] studied affine connections. Generalized affine connections were considered in book [13], where a relation was shown between a generalized affine connection and a linear connection (see also [14,15]). In [16], all invariant affine connections on three-dimensional symmetric homogeneous spaces admitting a normal connection were described; canonical connections and natural torsion-free connections were also considered.
The theory of affine connections is widely used in physics [17,18,19,20,21] and by studying geodesics [22] (see, e.g., [23,24,25,26,27,28]).
This paper is the result of the author’s research [29,30], where the concepts of generalized bundles are used (see, e.g., [31]). Principal fibering with gluing to the base was introduced in the paper [32] and generalized principal fibering (a principal fibering with semi-gluing to the base) was introduced in the paper [33]. Connections in the fiberings associated with the space of centered planes were studied in [34,35]. In the present paper, generalized affine connections associated with this space are considered.
The notion of vector, or specifically, principal bundles over a smooth manifold is one of the central notions in modern mathematics and its applications to mathematical and theoretical physics. In particular, all known types of physical interactions (gravitational, electromagnetic, etc.) are described in terms of connections and other geometric structures on vector/principal bundles on underlying manifolds. The properties of physical fields can be formulated in terms of geometric invariants of connections such as curvature and characteristic classes of corresponding vector/principal bundles [36].
There are affine connections which arise in different contexts. These connections are used in geometry for illustration of parallel transports, and they can be applied to mechanics. Therefore, I hope this article will be of interest to geometers and physicists.
The important role of the affine connections and the previous author’s work in the study of manifolds of planes was the motivation for writing this paper.
This paper will be arranged in the following way. Section 2 will describe the analytical apparatus and the space of centered planes as the object of research. In Section 3 and Section 4, a review of planar and normal generalized affine connections will be given, respectively. A brief summary of the paper is given in Section 5.

2. Analytical Apparatus and Object of Research

It is a well-known fact that projective space P n can be represented as a quotient space L n + 1 / of a linear space L n + 1 with respect to equivalence (collinearity) ∼ of non-zero vectors, that is, P n = ( L n + 1 { 0 } ) / . Projective frame in the space P n is a system formed by points A I , I = 0 , , n , and a unit point E (see [37]). In linear space L n + 1 , linearly independent vectors e I correspond to the points A I , and a vector e = I = 0 n e I corresponds to the point E. Moreover, these vectors are determined in the space L n + 1 with accuracy up to a common factor. The unit point is specified together with the basic points, although you do not have to mention it every time.
In the present paper, we will use the method of a moving frame (see, e.g., [38]) { A , A I } , I , = 1 , , n , the derivation formulae of the vertices of which are
d A = θ A + ω I A I , d A I = θ A I + ω I J A J + ω I A ,
where the form θ acts as a proportionality factor, and the structure forms ω I , ω J I , ω I of the projective group G P ( n ) , effectively acting on the space P n , and satisfying the Cartan equations (see [39], cf. [40])
D ω I = ω J ω J I , D ω J I = ω J K ω K I + δ J I ω K ω K + ω J ω I , D ω I = ω I J ω J .
Throughout this paper, d is the symbol of ordinary differentiation in the space P n , and D is the symbol of exterior differentiation. This apparatus is successfully used by geometers in Kaliningrad (see, e.g., [41]).
In the projective space P n , a space Π (see [34,42,43]) of all centered m-dimensional planes is considered (cf. [44,45,46,47]). Vertices A and A a , a , = 1 , , m , of the moving frame are placed on the centered plane, with vertex A fixed as a centre. The forms ω a , ω α , ω a α ( α , = m + 1 , , n ) are the basic forms of the space Π .
Remark 1.
The space Π is a differentiable manifold whose points are m-dimensional centered planes.
The technique used in the present paper was based on the Laptev–Lumiste method. This, in turn, requires knowledge of calculating external differential forms.

3. Planar Generalized Affine Connection

Now we introduce the following definition.
Definition 1.
A smooth manifold with structure equations
D ω a = ω b ω b a + ω α ω α a , D ω α = ω β ω β α + ω a ω a α , D ω a α = ω b β ( δ a b ω β α δ β α ω a b ) ω α ω a , D ω b a = ω b c ω c a ω c ( δ c a ω b + δ b a ω c ) δ b a ω α ω α + ω b α ω α a
is called a generalized bundle of planar affine frames [48] and is denoted by A m 2 + [ m ] ( Π ) .
Remark 2.
The symbol m is enclosed in square brackets, since m forms ω a are included in both basic and fibre forms. We will call the forms ω a basic-fibre.
To define an affine connection in the generalized bundle A m 2 + [ m ] ( Π ) , we extend to it the Laptev–Lumiste method of defining group connections in principal bundles. We transform the basic-fibre forms ω a and fibre forms ω b a of the fibering A m 2 + [ m ] ( Π ) , using linear combinations of the basic forms ω a , ω α , ω a α [32] as follows:
ω ˜ a = ω a C b a ω b C α a ω α C α a b ω b α , ω ˜ b a = ω b a Γ b c a ω c Γ b α a ω α Γ b α a c ω c α .
Finding the exterior differentials of forms (2) with the help of structure equations (1) and applying the Cartan–Laptev theorem in this generalized case, we obtain
Δ C b a = C b , c a ω c + C b , α a ω α + C b , α a , c ω c α , Δ C α a C b a ω α b + C α a b ω b + ω α a = C α , b a ω b + C α , β a ω β + C α , β a , b ω b β , Δ C α a b = C α , c a b ω c + C α , β a b ω β + C α , β a b , c ω c β , Δ Γ b c a δ b a ω c δ c a ω b = Γ b c , d a ω d + Γ b c , α a ω α + Γ b c , α a , d ω d α , Δ Γ b α a Γ b c a ω α c + Γ b α a c ω c δ b a ω α = Γ b α , c a ω c + Γ b α , β a ω β + Γ b α , β a , c ω c β , Δ Γ b α a c + δ b c ω α a = Γ b α , d a c ω d + Γ b α , β a c ω β + Γ b α , β a c , d ω d β ,
where C b , c a , … are Pfaffian derivatives [32], and Δ is a tensor differential operator acting according to the law Δ C b a = d C b a + C b e ω e a C e a ω b e (see, e.g., [49]).
We will use the following terminology (see [50]):
A substructure of a structure S is called simple if it is not a union of two substructures of the structure S. A simple substructure is called the simplest if it, in turn, does not have a substructure.
Statement 1.
The object of a planar generalized affine connection Γ P = { C b a , C α a , C α a b , Γ b c a , Γ b α a , Γ b α a c } associated with the space Π of centered planes contains two simplest tensors C b a , C α a b in a simple quasi-tensor of a connection C = { C b a , C α a , C α a b } and two simplest subquasi-tensors Γ b c a , Γ b α a c of a simple quasi-tensor of a planar linear connection { Γ b c a , Γ b α a , Γ b α a c } .
Let us take into account differential Equations (3) in the structure equations of the connection forms (2)
D ω ˜ a = ω ˜ b ω ˜ b a + T b c a ω b ω c + T b α a ω b ω α + T b α a c ω b ω c α + T α β a ω α ω β + T α β a b ω α ω b β + T α β a b c ω b α ω c β , D ω ˜ b a = ω ˜ b c ω ˜ c a + R b c d a ω c ω d + R b c α a ω c ω α + R b c α a d ω c ω d α + R b α β a ω α ω β + R b α β a c ω α ω c β + R b α β a c d ω b α ω d β .
The components of a torsion object T P = { T b c a , T b α a , T b α a c , T α β a , T α β a b , T α β a b c } of a planar affine connection are expressed by the formulae
T b c a = Γ [ b c ] a + C [ b , c ] a C [ b e Γ e c ] a , T b α a = Γ b α a + C α c Γ c b a C b c Γ c α a + C b , α a C α , b a , T b α a c = Γ b α a c δ b c C α a C b e Γ e α a c + C α e c Γ e b a + C b , α a , c C α , b a c , T α β a = C [ α , β ] a C [ α b Γ b β ] a , T α β a b = C β c b Γ c α a C α c Γ c β a b + C α , β a , b C β , α a b , T α β a b c = C a [ α , β b , c ] C e [ α b Γ e β a c ] ,
and the components of the curvature object R P = { R b c d a , R b c α a , R b c α a d , R b α β a , R b α β a c , R b α β a c d } have the form
R b c d a = Γ b [ c , d ] a Γ b [ c e Γ e d ] a , R b c α a = Γ b c , α a Γ b α , c a + Γ b α d Γ d c a Γ b c d Γ d α a , R b c α a d = Γ b c , α a , d Γ b α , c a d + Γ b α e d Γ e c a Γ b c e Γ e α a d δ c d Γ b α a , R b α β a = Γ b [ α , β ] a Γ b [ α c Γ c β ] a , R b α β a c = Γ b α , β c , b Γ b β , α a c + Γ b β d c Γ d α a Γ b α d Γ d β a c , R b α β a c d = Γ b a [ α , β c , d ] Γ b e [ α c Γ e β a d ] .
Remark 3.
Here and in what follows, the square brackets denote alternation by extreme indices and by pairs of indices.
Remark 4.
In the generalized case, just as in the usual case, the structure equations (4) of the connection forms (2) include the components of torsion and curvature objects expressed by the Formulae (5) and (6). Curvature R P is not expressed in terms of the quasi-tensor components C and their Pfaffian derivatives.
Theorem 1.
In the space Π of centered planes, the objects of torsion T P and curvature R P of the planar generalized affine connection are tensors containing the simplest subtensors T 1 P = { T b c a } , T 2 P = { T b α a c } , T 3 P = { T α β a b c } , R 1 P = { R b c d a } , R 2 P = { R b c α a d } , R 3 P = { R b α β a c d } and simple subtensors T 4 P = { T b α a , T b c a , T b α a c } , T 5 P = { T α β a b , T α β a b c , T c β a b } , R 4 P = { R b c α a , R b c d a , R b c α a d } , R 5 P = { R b α β a c , R b α β a c d , R b d β a c } .
Proof. 
Prolongating Equation (3) of the components of the connection object Γ P and using Formulae (5), (6) for expressions for the components of torsion and curvature objects, we find differential congruences modulo the basic forms
Δ T b c a 0 , Δ T b α a 2 T b c a ω α c + T b α a c ω c 0 , Δ T b α a c 0 ,
Δ T α β a + T b [ α a ω β ] b + T [ α β ] a b ω b 0 , Δ T α β a b 2 T β α a b c ω c T c β a b ω α c 0 , Δ T α β a b c 0 ,
Δ R b c d a 0 , Δ R b c α a 2 R b c d a ω α d + R b c α a d ω d 0 , Δ R b c α a d 0 ,
Δ R b α β a + R b c [ α a ω β ] c + R b [ α β ] a c ω c 0 , Δ R b α β a c 2 R b α β a c d ω d R b d β a c ω α d 0 , Δ R b α β a c d 0 ,
which these components satisfy. The obtained differential congruences prove the validity of this theorem. □
Statement 2.
Differential congruences for torsion T i P and curvature R i P subtensors correspond to each other, i = 1 , , 5 .
Now we consider the canonical case of a planar affine connection when the tensor components C b a , C α a b of the connection quasi-tensor C vanish. In this case, ω ˜ a = ω a C α a ω α , therefore, the left and right sides of the Formulae (3) 1 and (3) 3 are identically zero, and the Equations (3) 2 take the form
Δ C 0 α a + ω α a = C 0 α , b a ω b + C 0 α , β a ω β + C 0 α , β a , b ω b β ,
where zero means the equalities C b a = 0 , C α a b = 0 in the expressions (5) for the components of the torsion tensor.
Statement 3.
In the canonical case, the quasi-tensor C of the planar generalized affine connection is reduced to the quasi-tensor C 0 α a , and the connection object is simplified: Γ P 0 = { 0 , C 0 α a , 0, Γ b c a , Γ b α a , Γ b α a c } .
If the tensor components C b a , C α a b of the connection quasi-tensor C are equal to zero, the expressions for the components of the torsion tensor have the form
T 0 b c a = Γ [ b c ] a , T 0 b α a = Γ b α a + C 0 α c Γ c b a C 0 α , b a , T 0 b α a c = Γ b α a c δ b c C 0 α a , T 0 α β a = C 0 [ α , β ] a C 0 [ α b Γ b β ] a , T 0 α β a b = C 0 α , β a , b C 0 α c Γ c β a b , T 0 α β a b c = 0 .
Statement 4.
Thus, the torsion tensor of canonical connection is non-zero but contains zero components T α β a b c .
If the torsion tensor vanishes, then from the expressions (7) we obtain
Γ [ b c ] a = 0 , Γ b α a = C 0 α , b a C 0 α c Γ c b a , Γ b α a c = δ b c C 0 α a ,
C 0 [ α , β ] a = C 0 [ α b Γ b β ] a , C 0 α , β a , b = C 0 α c Γ c β a b , T 0 α β a b c = 0 .
These equalities imply the following theorem.
Theorem 2.
The canonical planar generalized torsion-free affine connection Γ P 0 has the properties:
(1) 
The simplest quasi-tensor of affine connection Γ b c a is symmetric;
(2) 
A planar linear connection { Γ b c a , Γ b α a , Γ b α a c } is reduced to an affine subconnection Γ b c a using the planar subfield of the quasi-tensor of the connection C 0 α a of the space Π of centered planes, that is, a subobject Γ b α a is covered by a subobject Γ b c a , complementing it with a linearly connection object { Γ b c a , Γ b α a , Γ b α a c } by a quasi-tensor C 0 α a and its planar Pfaffian derivatives C 0 α , b a ;
(3) 
The simplest quasi-tensor Γ b α a c is formed by the components of the quasi-tensor C 0 α a ;
(4) 
Alternating normal Pfaffian derivatives C 0 [ α , β ] a of the connection quasi-tensor C 0 α a are formed by alternations of the convolutions of the quasi-tensor C 0 α b and the subobject Γ b β a of the planar linear connection { Γ b c a , Γ b α a , Γ b α a c } ;
(5) 
The Pfaffian derivatives C 0 α , β a , b of the connection quasi-tensor C 0 α a are formed by convolutions of the components of the quasi-tensor C 0 α a itself and the components of the simplest quasi-tensor Γ c β a b .

4. Normal Generalized Affine Connection

Definition 2.
A smooth manifold with structure equations
D ω a = ω b ω b a + ω α ω α a , D ω α = ω β ω β α + ω a ω a α , D ω a α = ω b β ( δ a b ω β α δ β α ω a b ) ω α ω a , D ω β α = ω β γ ω γ α ω γ ( δ γ α ω β + δ β α ω γ ) δ β α ω a ω a ω a α ω β a
is called the generalized bundle of normal affine frames [48] and is denoted by A h 2 + [ h ] ( Π ) , where h = n m .
Remark 5.
The symbol h is enclosed in square brackets, since n m forms ω α are included in both basic forms and fibre forms. We will call the forms ω α basic-fibre.
To define an affine connection in the generalized bundle A h 2 + [ h ] ( Π ) we extend to it the Laptev–Lumiste method. We transform the basic-fibre forms ω α and fibre forms ω β α of the fibering A h 2 + [ h ] ( Π ) using linear combinations of the basic forms ω α , ω a α , ω a
ω ˜ α = ω α L a α ω a L β α ω β L β α a ω a β , ω ˜ β α = ω β α Γ β a α ω a Γ β γ α ω γ Γ β γ α a ω a γ .
Finding the exterior differentials of forms (9) by using structure equations (8) and applying the Cartan–Laptev theorem in this generalized case, we get
Δ L a α = L a , b α ω b + L a , β α ω β + L a , β α , b ω b β , Δ L β α + L β α a ω a L a α ω β a = L β , a α ω a + L β , γ α ω γ + L β , γ α , a ω a γ , Δ L β α a = L β , b α a ω b + L β , γ α a ω γ + L β , γ α a , b ω b γ , Δ Γ β a α δ β α ω a = Γ β a , b α ω b + Γ β a , γ α ω γ + Γ β a , γ α , b ω b γ , Δ Γ β γ α Γ β a α ω γ a + Γ β γ α a ω a δ β α ω γ δ γ α ω β = Γ β γ , a α ω a + Γ β γ , μ α ω μ + Γ β γ , μ α , a ω a μ , Δ Γ β γ α a δ γ α ω β a = Γ β γ , b α a ω b + Γ β γ , μ α a ω μ + Γ β γ , μ α a , b ω b μ .
Statement 5.
The object of normal generalized affine connection Γ N = { L a α , L β α , L β α a , Γ β a α , Γ β γ α , Γ β γ α a } associated with the space of centered planes contains two simplest subtensors L a α , L β α a of a simple tensor of connection L = { L a α , L β α , L β α a } and two simplest subquasi-tensors Γ β a α , Γ β γ α a of a simple quasi-tensor of normal linear connection { Γ β a α , Γ β γ α , Γ β γ α a } .
We substitute the differential Equations (10) into the structure equations of the connection forms (9)
D ω ˜ α = ω ˜ β ω ˜ β α + T a b α ω a ω b + T β a α ω β ω a + T a β α b ω a ω b β + T β γ α ω β ω γ + T β γ α a ω β ω a γ + T β γ α a b ω a β ω b γ , D ω ˜ β α = ω ˜ β γ ω ˜ γ α + R β a b α ω a ω b + R β γ a α ω γ ω a + R β a γ α b ω a ω b γ + R β γ μ α ω γ ω μ + R β γ μ α a ω γ ω a μ + R β γ μ α a b ω a γ ω b μ .
The components of a torsion object T N = { T a b α , T β a α , T a β α b , T β γ α , T β γ α a , T β γ α a b } of normal affine connection are expressed by the formulae
T a b α = L [ a , b ] α L [ a β Γ β b ] α , T β a α = Γ β a α + Γ γ β α γ a L β γ Γ γ a α L a , β α + L β , a α , T a β α b = L a , β α , b L β , a α b Γ γ β α b L a γ + L β γ b Γ γ a α + δ a b δ β α δ a b L β α , T β γ α = L [ β , γ ] α + Γ [ β γ ] α L [ β μ Γ μ γ ] α , T β γ α a = L β , γ α , a + Γ β γ α a L β μ Γ μ γ α a + L γ μ a Γ μ β α L γ , β α a , T β γ α a b = L α [ β , γ a , b ] + Γ μ α [ β a L γ μ b ] ,
and the curvature object R N = { R β a b α , R β γ a α , R β a γ α b , R β γ μ α , R β γ μ α a , R β γ μ α a b } has components
R β a b α = Γ β [ a , b ] α + Γ γ [ a α Γ β b ] γ , R β γ a α = Γ β γ , a α Γ β a , γ α Γ μ a α Γ β γ μ + Γ μ γ α Γ β a μ , R β a γ α b = Γ β a , γ α , b Γ β γ , a α b + Γ μ a α Γ β γ μ b Γ μ γ α b Γ β a μ δ a b Γ β γ α , R β γ μ α = Γ β [ γ , μ ] α + Γ η [ γ α Γ β μ ] η , R β γ μ α a = Γ β [ γ , μ ] α , a Γ β γ , μ α a + Γ η γ α Γ β μ η a Γ η μ α a Γ β γ η , R β γ μ α a b = Γ β α [ γ , μ a , b ] + Γ η α [ γ a Γ β μ η b ] .
Remark 6.
In the generalized case, as in the usual case, the structure Equations (11) of the connection forms (9) include the components of torsion and curvature objects expressed by Formulae (12) and (13). The curvature R N is not expressed in terms of the quasi-tensor L components and their Pfaffian derivatives.
Theorem 3.
In the space Π of centered planes, the torsion T N and curvature R N objects of normal affine connection are tensors containing the simplest subtensors T 1 N = { T a b α } , T 2 N = { T a β α b } , T 3 N = { T β γ α a b } , R 1 N = { R β a b α } , R 2 N = { R β a γ α b } , R 3 N = { R β γ μ α a b } and simple subtensors T 4 N = { T β a α , T a b α , T a β α b } , T 5 N = { T β γ α a , T β γ α a b , T b γ α a } , R 4 N = { R β γ a α , R β a b α , R β a γ α b } , R 5 N = { R β γ μ α a , R β μ γ α a b , R β b μ α a } .
Proof. 
Prolongating Equations (10) of the components of the connection object Γ N and using the Formulae (12) and (13) for the expressions of the components of the torsion and curvature objects, we find the differential congruences
Δ T a b α 0 , Δ T β a α + 2 T a b α ω β b T a β α b ω b 0 , Δ T a β α b 0 ,
Δ T β γ α T [ β a α ω γ ] a + T [ β γ ] α a ω a 0 , Δ T β γ α a 2 T γ β α a b ω b T b γ α a ω β b 0 , Δ T β γ α a b 0 ,
Δ R β a b α 0 , Δ R β γ a α + 2 R β a b α ω γ b R β a γ α b ω b 0 , Δ R β a γ α b 0 , Δ R β γ μ α a b 0 ,
Δ R β γ μ α R β [ γ a α ω μ ] a + R β [ γ μ ] α a ω a 0 , Δ R β γ μ α a 2 R β μ γ α a b ω b R β b μ α a ω γ b 0 ,
which are satisfied by the components of these objects. The theorem is thereby proved. □
Statement 6.
Differential congruences for torsion T i N and curvature R i N subtensors correspond to each other, i = 1 , , 5 .
We consider a canonical case of normal affine connection when the connection tensor L vanishes. In this case, ω ˜ α = ω α , that is, transformation of basic-fibre forms ω α is not converted, and the connection object is simplified: Γ N 0 = { 0 , 0, 0, Γ β a α , Γ β γ α , Γ β γ α a } . If we take into account the equalities L a α = 0 , L β α = 0 , L β α a = 0 in expressions (12) for the components of the torsion tensor, then
T 0 a b α = 0 , T 0 β a α = Γ β a α , T 0 a β α b = δ a b δ β α , T 0 β γ α = Γ [ β γ ] α , T 0 β γ α a = Γ β γ α a , T 0 β γ α a b = 0 .
These equalities indicate the validity of the following theorem.
Theorem 4.
In the canonical case, the torsion tensor of a normal affine connection contains zero components T a b α , T β γ α a b ; the components T β a α , T β γ α a coincide with the corresponding components of the connection object; components T β γ α are alternations of analogous components of a connection object; and components T a β α b are equal to the product of the Kronecker symbols.
Corollary 1.
The canonical normal generalized affine connection associated with the space of centered planes is always with torsion. Thus, this connection is a canonical connection of the second kind (see [51], cf. [52]).

5. Conclusions

This paper studied planar and normal generalized affine connections, which are associated with the space of centered planes in projective space P n . It was shown that, by using the Cartan–Laptev–Lumiste theory, the torsion tensor of a canonical planar generalized affine connection is non-zero but contains zero components, and the canonical normal generalized affine connection is always with torsion. Moreover, some properties have been obtained for the canonical planar generalized torsion-free connection.
It is important to emphasize that affine connections are very popular in various kinds of research [53,54], and, therefore, we hope that this paper will be useful for geometers.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Levi-Civita, T. Nozione di parallelismo in una varieta qualunque e conseguente specificazione geometrica della curvatura Riemanniana. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 1917, 42, 173–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Weyl, H. Raum–Zeit–Materie; Vorlesungen über allgemeine Relativitätstheorie, Verlag von Julius Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1923. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cartan, E. Spaces of Affine, Projective, and Conformal Connections; Publishing house of Kazan University: Kazan, Russia, 1962. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ehresmann, C. Les prolongements d’une variété différentiable. In Calcul des jets, Prolongement Principal; CRAS: Paris, France, 1951; Volume 233, pp. 598–600. [Google Scholar]
  5. Nomizu, K. Lie Groups and Differential Geometry; Foreign Literature: Moscow, Russia, 1960. [Google Scholar]
  6. Vagner, V.V. Composite manifold theory. Trans. Semin. Vect. Tens. Anal. 1950, 8, 11–72. [Google Scholar]
  7. Laptev, G.F. A group-theoretic method for differential geometric researches. Trans. 3rd All-Union. Math. Congr. 1958, 3, 409–418. [Google Scholar]
  8. Veblen, O.; Whitehead, J. Foundations of Differential Geometry; Foreign Literature: Moscow, Russia, 1949. [Google Scholar]
  9. Laptev, G.F. Differential geometry of immersed manifolds. Group-theoretical method of differential geometric researches. Trans. MMO 1953, 2, 275–382. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rashevskii, P.K. Riemannian Geometry and Tensor Analysis; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1967. [Google Scholar]
  11. Nomizu, K. Invariant affine connections on homogeneous spaces. Amer. J. Math. 1954, 76, 33–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Norden, A.P. Affine Connection Spaces; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kobayashi, S.; Nomizu, K. Foundations of Differential Geometry I; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kuleshov, A.V. Generalized connections on a complex of centered planes in projective space. DGMF 2010, 41, 75–85. [Google Scholar]
  15. Safonov, D.A. Generalized affine connection and its degeneration into affine connection. DGMF 2014, 45, 120–125. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mozhei, N.P. Canonical connections on three-dimensional symmetric spaces of solvable Lie groups. Trudy BSTU. Ser. 3 2017, 1, 8–13. [Google Scholar]
  17. Katanaev, M.O. Geometric Methods in Mathematical Physics. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1311.0733v3. [Google Scholar]
  18. Manov, S. Spaces with contravariant and covariant affine connections and metrics. Phys. Elem. Part. At. Nucl. 1999, 30, 1233–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Katanaev, M.O. Normal coordinates in affine geometry. Uchen. Zapiski. Kazan. Univ. Ser. Phys.-Math. Nauki 2017, 159, 47–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Egorov, I.P. On Generalized Spaces; Librokom: Moscow, Russia, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  21. Schutz, B. Geometric Methods of Mathematical Physics; MIR: Moscow, Russia, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mikeš, J.; Stepanova, E.; Vanžurova, A. Differential Geometry of Special Mappings; Palacky University: Olomouc, Czech Republic, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  23. Belova, O.; Mikeš, J.; Strambach, K. Complex curves as lines of geometries. Results Math. 2017, 71, 145–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Belova, O.; Mikeš, J.; Strambach, K. Almost geodesics curves. J. Geom. 2018, 109, 16–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Belova, O.; Mikeš, J.; Strambach, K. Geodesics and almost geodesics curves. Results Math. 2018, 73, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Belova, O.; Mikeš, J.; Strambach, K. About almost geodesic curves. Filomat 2019, 33, 1013–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Belova, O.; Mikeš, J. Almost Geodesics and Special Affine Connection. Results Math. 2020, 75, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Berezovski, V.; Cherevko, Y.; Mikeš, J.; Rýparová, L. Canonical Almost Geodesic Mappings of the First Type of Spaces with Affine Connections onto Generalized m-Ricci-Symmetric Spaces. Mathematics 2021, 9, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Belova, O.O. Plane generalized affine connection associated with space of centered planes. Geometry of manifolds and its applications. In Proceedings of the Scientific Conference with International Participation, Ulan-Ude, Russia, 6–9 December 2010; pp. 8–13. [Google Scholar]
  30. Belova, O.O. Normal generalized affine connection associated with space of centered planes. DGMF 2010, 41, 7–12. [Google Scholar]
  31. Shevchenko, Y.I. General fundamental group connection from the point of view bundles. DGMF 1990, 21, 100–105. [Google Scholar]
  32. Evtushik, L.E.; Lumiste, Y.G.; Ontianu, N.M.; Shirokov, A.P. Differential-geometric structures on manifolds. Itogi Nauki i Tekhniki. Ser. Probl. Geom. VINITI 1979, 9, 5–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Schevchenko, Y.I. The Semisolder Principal Bundle. Geometry of Manifolds and Its Applications, Abstracts of International Conference “Geometry in Odessa–2011”, “Science”; Foundation: Odessa, Ukraine, 2011; p. 90. [Google Scholar]
  34. Belova, O.O. Connections in fiberings associated with the Grassman manifold and the space of centered planes. J. Math. Sci. 2009, 162, 605–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Belova, O. Reduction of Bundles, Connection, Curvature, and Torsion of the Centered Planes Space at Normalization. Mathematics 2019, 7, 901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. García-Río, E.; Gilkey, P.; Nikčević, S.; Vázquez-Lorenzo, R. Applications of Affine and Weyl Geometry. Synth. Lect. Math. Stat. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Akivis, M.A.; Goldberg, V.V. Projective Differential Geometry of Submanifolds; North-Holland Mathematical Library: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; London, UK; New York, NY, USA; Tokyo, Japan, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  38. Akivis, M.A.; Rosenfeld, B.A. Eli Cartan; MCNMO: Moscow, Russia, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kobayashi, S. Transformation Groups in Differential Geometry; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  40. Akivis, M.A.; Goldberg, V.V. On the Theory of Almost Grassmann Structures. arXiv 1998, arXiv:math/9805109v1. [Google Scholar]
  41. Polyakova, K.V. Parallel displacements on the surface of a projective space. J. Math. Sci. 2009, 162, 675–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Belova, O. An analog of Neifeld’s connection induced on the space of centred planes. Miskolc Math. Notes 2018, 19, 749–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Belova, O.O. On Grassmann-Like Manifold and an Analogue of Neifeld’s Connection. 2020; submitted to Itogy nauki i techniki. [Google Scholar]
  44. Belova, O. The third type bunch of connections induced by an analog of Norden’s normalization for the Grassman-like manifold of centered planes. Miskolc Math. Notes 2013, 14, 557–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Belova, O.O. The Grassmann-like manifold of centered planes. Math. Notes 2018, 104, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Belova, O.O. Reduction of bundles of a Grassmann-like manifold of centered planes by normalization. Itogy Nauki i Techniki. Ser. Modern. Math. Appl. Topic. Rev. 2020, 180, 3–8. [Google Scholar]
  47. Dhooghe, P.F. Grassmannian structures on manifolds. Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. 1994, 1, 597–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Shevchenko, Y.I. Connections Associated with the Distribution of Planes in Projective Space; Russian State University: Kaliningrad, Russia, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  49. Polyakova, K.V. Second-order tangent-valued forms. Math. Notes 2019, 105, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shevchenko, Y.I. Equipments of Center-Projective Manifolds; Kaliningrad State University: Kaliningrad, Russia, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  51. Kobayashi, S.; Nomizu, K. Foundations of Differential Geometry, II; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  52. Polyakova, K.V. Special affine connections of the 1st and 2nd orders. DGMF 2015, 46, 114–128. [Google Scholar]
  53. Hall, G.S. Symmetries and Curvature Structure in General Relativity; World Scientific Lecture Notes in Physics: Singapore, 2004; Volume 46. [Google Scholar]
  54. Minčić, S.M.; Stanković, M.S.; Velimirović, L.S. Generalized Riemannian Spaces and Spaces of Non-Symmetric Affine Connection; Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics: Nis, Serbia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Belova, O. Generalized Affine Connections Associated with the Space of Centered Planes. Mathematics 2021, 9, 782. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9070782

AMA Style

Belova O. Generalized Affine Connections Associated with the Space of Centered Planes. Mathematics. 2021; 9(7):782. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9070782

Chicago/Turabian Style

Belova, Olga. 2021. "Generalized Affine Connections Associated with the Space of Centered Planes" Mathematics 9, no. 7: 782. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9070782

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop