1. Introduction
In 1906, L. Fejér [
1] proved the following integral inequalities known in the literature as Fejér’s inequality:
      where 
 is convex and 
 is integrable and symmetric to 
. If in (
1) we consider 
, we recapture the classic Hermite–Hadamard inequality [
2,
3]:
      In [
4], two difference mappings 
L and 
P associated with Hermite–Hadamard’s inequality have been introduced as follows:
      Some properties for 
L and 
P, refinements for Hermite–Hadamard’s inequality and some applications were raised in [
4] as well:
      
Theorem 1 (Theorem 1 in [
4]
).Letbe a convex mapping on the interval I and letbe fixed in. 
Then, we have the following: - (i)
- The mapping L is nonnegative, monotonically nondecreasing, and convex on  
- (ii)
- The following refinement of Hadamard’s inequality holds:for each . 
- (iii)
- The following inequality holds:for every  and each . 
 Theorem 2 (Theorem 2 in [
4]
).Let  be a convex mapping on the interval I and let  be fixed in . Then, we have the following: - (i)
- The mapping P is nonnegative and monotonically nondecreasing on . 
- (ii)
- The following inequality holds: 
- (iii)
- The following refinement of Hadamard’s inequality holds:for all . 
 The main results obtained in [
4] (Theorems 1 and 2) are based on the facts that if 
 is convex, then for all 
 with 
 we have (see, [
5,
6]):
      and
      
      where 
 is the right-derivative of f at 
y.
Motivated by the above concepts, inequalities and results, we introduce two difference mappings, 
 and 
, related to Fejér’s inequality:
In the case that , the mappings  and  reduce to L and P, respectively.
In this paper we obtain some properties for  and  that imply some refinements for Fejér’s inequality in the case that w is a nonsymmetric monotone function. Also, our results generalize Theorems 1 and 2 from Hermite–Hadamard’s type to Fejér’s type. Furthermore as applications, we find some numerical and special means type inequalities.
To obtain our respective results, we need the modified version of Theorem 5 in [
7] which includes the left and right part of Fejér’s inequality in the monotone nonsymmetric case.
Theorem 3. Let  be a convex function on the interval I and differentiable on . Consider  with  such that  is a nonnegative, integrable and monotone function. Then
- (1)
- If  ,  and  , then 
- (2)
- If  ,  and  , then 
 The main point in Theorem 3 (1) (
), is that we have (
2) for any 
 with 
 without the need for 
w to be symmetric with respect to 
. Also similar properties hold for other parts of the above theorem.
Example 1. Consider  and  for . It is clear that f is convex and w is nonsymmetric and decreasing. If we consider , then from the fact that  we obtain thatThis inequality implies thatIt follows thatSoshows that f and w satisfy (3) on , where w is not symmetric. Also, we can see that f and w satisfy (2).    2. Main Results
The first result of this section is about some properties of the mapping  where the function w is nonincreasing.
Theorem 4. Let  be a convex function on the interval I and differentiable on . Consider  with  such that  is a nonnegative and differentiable function with  for all . Then
- (i)
- The mapping  is nonnegative on , if  for all . 
- (ii)
- The mapping  is convex on , if f is nondecreasing. Also  is monotonically nondecreasing on . 
- (iii)
- The following refinement of (2) holds:for any  with . 
- (iv)
- If f is nondecreasing, then the following inequality holds:for any  and each . 
- (v)
- If , then for each  we haveFurthermore when  is convex on , then: 
 Proof.  (i) We need only the inequality
        
        for all 
. This happens according to Theorem 3 (1).
(ii) Without loss of generality for 
 consider the following identity:
        
        Dividing with “
” and then letting 
 we obtain that
        
        Also from the convexity of 
f we have
        
        which, along with the fact that 
w is nonincreasing, implies that
        
        So from (
9) and (
10) we get
        
        On the other hand from (
8) and Theorem 3 (1), we have
        
        and, along with (
11), we obtain that
        
        This implies the convexity of 
.
For the fact that 
L is monotonically nondecreasing, from convexity of 
f on 
 we have
        
        for all 
 and so
        
        for any 
.
(iii) Since 
 is monotonically nondecreasing we have 
, for all 
 and so
        
        which implies that
        
        Also, by the use of Theorem 3 (1) we get
        
        Now from (
12) and (
13), we have the result.
(iv) Since 
 is convex, then from the fact that
        
        for any 
 and each 
, we have the result.
(v) The following identity was obtained in [
8]:
        
        for any 
 where
        
        Since 
w is nonincreasing, then we obtain
        
        and
        
        So
        
        Now by the use of (
15) in (
14) we get
        
        for any 
. Using the change of variable 
 and some calculations imply that
        
        for any 
. Furthermore if 
 is convex on 
, then from (
16) and by the use of the change of variable 
 we get
        
       which implies that
        
        for any 
. □
 Remark 1. (i) By the use of Theorem 3 (1), it is not hard to see that if w is nondecreasing on , then some properties of  and corresponding results obtained in Theorem 4 may change. However the argument of proof is similar. The details are omitted.
(ii) Theorem 4 gives a generalization of Theorem 1, along with some new results.
 The following result is including some properties of the mapping  in the case that w is nondecreasing.
Theorem 5. Let  be a convex function on the interval I and differentiable on . Consider  with  such that  is a nonnegative and continuous function with  for all . Then
- (i)
-  is nonnegative, if  for any . 
- (ii)
- If for any  we have , then  is nondecreasing on . 
- (iii)
- If , then for each  we haveFurthermore when  is convex on , then: 
- (iv)
- The following inequality holds:provided that  for all . 
- (v)
- If for any  we have , then the following refinement of (3) holds:for all . 
 Proof.  (i) It follows from Theorem 3 (2).
(ii) Suppose that 
. So from Theorem 3 (2) and the facts that 
w is nondecreasing and 
f is convex, we get
        
        This completes the proof.
(iii) The following identity is obtained in [
8]:
        
        for any 
, where
        
        By similar method used to prove part (v) of Theorem 4, we can obtain the results. We omitted the details here.
(iv) By Theorem 3 (1), for any 
 we have
        
        and
        
        If we add (
21) to (
22), we obtain
        
        which is equivalent with
        
        This implies the desired result.
(v) The left side of (
20) is a consequence of assertion (i) and the following inequality:
        
        for all 
.
Since 
 is nondecreasing we have 
 for all 
, i. e.
        
        Then we have the right side of (
20). □
 Remark 2. (i) By the use of Theorem 3 (2) (w is nonincreasing on ) in the proof of Theorem 5, we can obtain some different properties for  with new corresponding results. The details are omitted.
(ii) Theorem 5 gives a generalization of Theorem 2, along with some new results.
   3. Applications
The following means for real numbers 
 are well known:
      The following result holds between the two above special means:
      
Theorem 6. For any  with  and  we have  
      In this section as applications of our results in previous section, we give some refinements for the inequalities mentioned in (
23).
Consider 
 with 
. Define
      
      From (
4) with some calculations we have
      
      for all 
, which implies that
      
      Inequality (
24) gives a refinement for the right part of (
23).
In the case that 
 we have
      
      In the case that 
 we get
      
      for all 
. In fact inequality (
25) is equivalent with the first inequality obtained in the applications section of [
4].
Now with the same assumption for 
f and 
w as was used to obtain (
24), by the use of (
20) we get:
      for all 
 and 
. Inequality (
26) gives a refinement for the left part of (
23). Also if we consider 
, then we obtain
      
      for all 
. In a more special case, if we set 
, then we get:
      for all 
.
Finally we encourage interested readers to use inequalities (
4)–(
7) and inequalities (
17)–(
20), for appropriate functions 
f and 
w to obtain some new special means types and numerical inequalities.