Next Article in Journal
There Are No Conformal Einstein Rescalings of Pseudo-Riemannian Einstein Spaces with n Complete Light-Like Geodesics
Next Article in Special Issue
New Inequalities of Weaving K-Frames in Subspaces
Previous Article in Journal
On Two Interacting Markovian Queueing Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
A New Gronwall–Bellman Inequality in Frame of Generalized Proportional Fractional Derivative
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Difference Mappings Associated with Nonsymmetric Monotone Types of Fejér’s Inequality

by
Mohsen Rostamian Delavar
1,* and
Manuel De La Sen
2
1
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Basic Sciences, University of Bojnord, P.O. Box 1339, Bojnord 94531, Iran
2
Institute of Research and Development of Processes, University of Basque Country, Campus of Leioa (Bizkaia)—Aptdo. 644, 48080 Bilbao, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2019, 7(9), 802; https://doi.org/10.3390/math7090802
Submission received: 28 July 2019 / Revised: 20 August 2019 / Accepted: 26 August 2019 / Published: 1 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inequalities)

Abstract

:
Two mappings L w and P w , in connection with Fejér’s inequality, are considered for the convex and nonsymmetric monotone functions. Some basic properties and results along with some refinements for Fejér’s inequality according to these new settings are obtained. As applications, some special means type inequalities are given.
MSC:
26D15, 26A51, 52A01

1. Introduction

In 1906, L. Fejér [1] proved the following integral inequalities known in the literature as Fejér’s inequality:
f a + b 2 a b g ( x ) d x a b f ( x ) g ( x ) d x f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 a b g ( x ) d x ,
where f : [ a , b ] R is convex and g : [ a , b ] R + = [ 0 , + ) is integrable and symmetric to x = a + b 2 g ( x ) = g ( a + b x ) , x [ a , b ] . If in (1) we consider g 1 , we recapture the classic Hermite–Hadamard inequality [2,3]:
f a + b 2 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 .
In [4], two difference mappings L and P associated with Hermite–Hadamard’s inequality have been introduced as follows:
L : [ a , b ] R , L ( t ) = f ( a ) + f ( t ) 2 ( t a ) a t f ( s ) d s P : [ a , b ] R , P ( t ) = a t f ( s ) d s ( t a ) f a + t 2 .
Some properties for L and P, refinements for Hermite–Hadamard’s inequality and some applications were raised in [4] as well:
Theorem 1
(Theorem 1 in [4]).Let f : I R R be a convex mapping on the interval I and let a < b be fixed in I . Then, we have the following:
(i)
The mapping L is nonnegative, monotonically nondecreasing, and convex on [ a , b ]
(ii)
The following refinement of Hadamard’s inequality holds:
1 b a a b f ( s ) d s 1 b a y b f ( s ) d s + y a b a f ( a ) + f ( y ) 2 f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 ,
for each y [ a , b ] .
(iii)
The following inequality holds:
α f ( t ) + f ( a ) 2 ( t a ) + ( 1 α ) f ( s ) + f ( a ) 2 ( s a ) f ( α t + ( 1 α ) s ) + f ( a ) 2 [ α t + ( 1 α ) s α ] α a t f ( u ) d u + ( 1 α ) a s f ( u ) d u a α t + ( 1 α ) s f ( u ) d u ,
for every t , s [ a , b ] and each α [ 0 , 1 ] .
Theorem 2
(Theorem 2 in [4]).Let f : I R R be a convex mapping on the interval I and let a < b be fixed in I . Then, we have the following:
(i)
The mapping P is nonnegative and monotonically nondecreasing on [ a , b ] .
(ii)
The following inequality holds:
0 P ( t ) L ( t ) , f o r a l l t [ a , b ] .
(iii)
The following refinement of Hadamard’s inequality holds:
f a + b 2 ( b a ) f a + b 2 ( y a ) f a + y 2 + 1 b a a y f ( s ) d s 1 b a a b f ( s ) d s ,
for all y [ a , b ] .
The main results obtained in [4] (Theorems 1 and 2) are based on the facts that if f : [ a , b ] R is convex, then for all x , y [ a , b ] with x y we have (see, [5,6]):
f x + y 2 1 y x x y f ( s ) d s f ( x ) + f ( y ) 2 ,
and
f ( x ) f ( y ) ( x y ) f + ( y ) ,
where f + ( y ) is the right-derivative of f at y.
Motivated by the above concepts, inequalities and results, we introduce two difference mappings, L w and P w , related to Fejér’s inequality:
L w : [ a , b ] R , L w ( t ) = f ( a ) + f ( t ) 2 a t w ( s ) d s a t f ( x ) w ( x ) d x , P w : [ a , b ] R , P w ( t ) = a t f ( x ) w ( x ) d x f a + t 2 a t w ( x ) d x .
In the case that w 1 , the mappings L w and P w reduce to L and P, respectively.
In this paper we obtain some properties for L w and P w that imply some refinements for Fejér’s inequality in the case that w is a nonsymmetric monotone function. Also, our results generalize Theorems 1 and 2 from Hermite–Hadamard’s type to Fejér’s type. Furthermore as applications, we find some numerical and special means type inequalities.
To obtain our respective results, we need the modified version of Theorem 5 in [7] which includes the left and right part of Fejér’s inequality in the monotone nonsymmetric case.
Theorem 3.
Let f : I R R be a convex function on the interval I and differentiable on I . Consider a , b I with a < b such that w : [ a , b ] R is a nonnegative, integrable and monotone function. Then
(1)
If w ( x ) 0 ( w ( x ) 0 ) , a x b and f ( a ) f ( b ) f ( a ) f ( b ) , then
a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 a b w ( x ) d x .
(2)
If w ( x ) 0 ( w ( x ) 0 ) , a x b and f ( a ) f ( a + b 2 ) f ( a ) f ( a + b 2 ) , then
f a + b 2 a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x .
The main point in Theorem 3 (1) ( w ( x ) 0 ), is that we have (2) for any x , y [ a , b ] with f ( x ) f ( y ) without the need for w to be symmetric with respect to x + y 2 . Also similar properties hold for other parts of the above theorem.
Example 1.
Consider f ( x ) = 1 t and w ( x ) = 1 t 2 for t > 0 . It is clear that f is convex and w is nonsymmetric and decreasing. If we consider 0 < x y , then from the fact that ( y x ) 2 0 we obtain that
2 x + y x + y 2 x y .
This inequality implies that
2 x + y y x x y y 2 x 2 2 x 2 y 2 .
It follows that
2 x + y 1 x 1 y 1 2 x 2 1 2 y 2 .
So
1 x + y 2 x y 1 t 2 d t x y 1 t 3 d t ,
shows that f and w satisfy (3) on [ x , y ] , where w is not symmetric. Also, we can see that f and w satisfy (2).

2. Main Results

The first result of this section is about some properties of the mapping L w where the function w is nonincreasing.
Theorem 4.
Let f : I R R be a convex function on the interval I and differentiable on I . Consider a , b I with a < b such that w : [ a , b ] R is a nonnegative and differentiable function with w ( x ) 0 for all a x b . Then
(i)
The mapping L w is nonnegative on [ a , b ] , if f ( a ) f ( t ) for all t [ a , b ] .
(ii)
The mapping L w is convex on [ a , b ] , if f is nondecreasing. Also L w is monotonically nondecreasing on [ a , b ] .
(iii)
The following refinement of (2) holds:
a b f ( x ) w ( x ) y b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x + f ( a ) + f ( y ) 2 a y w ( x ) d x f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 a b w ( x ) d x ,
for any y [ a , b ] with f ( a ) f ( y ) .
(iv)
If f is nondecreasing, then the following inequality holds:
t a u f ( x ) w ( x ) d x + ( 1 t ) a v f ( x ) w ( x ) d x a t u + ( 1 t ) v f ( x ) w ( x ) d x t f ( u ) + f ( a ) 2 a u w ( x ) d x + ( 1 t ) f ( v ) + f ( u ) 2 a v w ( x ) d x f ( t u + ( 1 t ) v ) + f ( a ) 2 a t u + ( 1 t ) v w ( x ) d x ,
for any u , v [ a , b ] and each t [ 0 , 1 ] .
(v)
If f L ( [ a , b ] ) , then for each t [ a , b ] we have
| L w ( t ) | ( t a ) 2 2 a t w ( x ) | f ( x ) | d x .
Furthermore when | f | is convex on [ a , b ] , then:
| L w ( t ) | t a 2 | f ( a ) | a t ( t x ) w ( x ) d x + | f ( t ) | a t ( x a ) w ( x ) d x .
Proof. 
(i) We need only the inequality
a t f ( x ) w ( x ) d x f ( a ) + f ( t ) 2 a t w ( x ) d x ,
for all t [ a , b ] . This happens according to Theorem 3 (1).
(ii) Without loss of generality for a y < x < b consider the following identity:
L w ( x ) L w ( y ) = f ( x ) + f ( a ) 2 a x w ( s ) d s f ( y ) + f ( a ) 2 a y w ( s ) d s y x f ( s ) w ( s ) d s
Dividing with “ x y ” and then letting x y we obtain that
2 L + w ( y ) f ( a ) w ( y ) + f ( y ) w ( y ) = f + ( y ) a y w ( s ) d s .
Also from the convexity of f we have
f + ( y ) f ( x ) f ( y ) x y ,
which, along with the fact that w is nonincreasing, implies that
f + ( y ) a y w ( s ) d s f ( x ) f ( y ) x y a y w ( s ) d s f ( x ) + f ( a ) x y a x w ( s ) d s f ( y ) + f ( a ) x y a y w ( s ) d s + [ f ( y ) f ( a ) ] w ( y ) f ( x ) + f ( y ) x y y x w ( s ) d s .
So from (9) and (10) we get
L + w ( y ) f ( x ) + f ( a ) 2 ( x y ) a x w ( s ) d s f ( y ) + f ( a ) 2 ( x y ) a y w ( s ) d s f ( x ) + f ( y ) 2 ( x y ) y x w ( s ) d s .
On the other hand from (8) and Theorem 3 (1), we have
L w ( x ) L w ( y ) x y f ( x ) + f ( a ) 2 ( x y ) a x w ( s ) d s f ( y ) + f ( a ) 2 ( x y ) a y w ( s ) d s f ( x ) + f ( y ) 2 ( x y ) y x w ( s ) d s ,
and, along with (11), we obtain that
L w ( x ) L w ( y ) x y L + w ( y ) .
This implies the convexity of L w ( t ) .
For the fact that L is monotonically nondecreasing, from convexity of f on [ a , b ] we have
f + ( y ) f ( y ) f ( a ) y a ,
for all y [ a , b ] and so
L w ( x ) L w ( y ) x y L + w ( y ) = f + ( y ) 2 a y w ( s ) d s + f ( a ) w ( y ) 2 f ( y ) w ( y ) 2 = 1 2 f + ( y ) a y w ( s ) d s + f ( a ) f ( y ) w ( y ) 1 2 f + ( y ) ( y a ) f ( y ) f ( a ) w ( y ) 0 ,
for any x > y .
(iii) Since L w is monotonically nondecreasing we have 0 L w ( y ) L w ( b ) , for all y [ a , b ] and so
f ( y ) + f ( a ) 2 a y w ( x ) d x a y f ( x ) w ( x ) d x f ( b ) + f ( a ) 2 a b w ( x ) d x a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x ,
which implies that
y b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x + f ( a ) + f ( y ) 2 a y w ( x ) d x f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 a b w ( x ) d x .
Also, by the use of Theorem 3 (1) we get
y b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x + f ( a ) + f ( y ) 2 a y w ( x ) d x y b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x + a y f ( x ) w ( x ) d x = a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x .
Now from (12) and (13), we have the result.
(iv) Since L w is convex, then from the fact that
L w ( t u + ( 1 t ) v ) t L w ( u ) + ( 1 t ) L w ( v ) ,
for any u , v [ a , b ] and each t [ 0 , 1 ] , we have the result.
(v) The following identity was obtained in [8]:
f ( a ) + f ( t ) 2 a t w ( x ) d x a t f ( x ) w ( x ) d x = ( t a ) 2 2 0 1 p ( s ) f s a + ( 1 s ) t d s ,
for any t [ a , b ] where
p ( s ) = s 1 w u a + ( 1 u ) t d u + s 0 w u a + ( 1 u ) t d u , s [ 0 , 1 ] .
Since w is nonincreasing, then we obtain
s 1 w u a + ( 1 u ) t d u w s a + ( 1 s ) t ( a s + ( 1 s ) t a ) = w s a + ( 1 s ) t ( 1 s ) ( t a ) ,
and
s 0 w u a + ( 1 u ) t d u w s a + ( 1 s ) t ( t s a ( 1 s ) t ) = w s a + ( 1 s ) t s ( t a ) .
So
| p ( s ) | w s a + ( 1 s ) t ( t a ) , s [ 0 , 1 ] .
Now by the use of (15) in (14) we get
| L w ( t ) | ( t a ) 3 2 0 1 w s a + ( 1 s ) t | f ( s a + ( 1 s ) t ) | d s ,
for any t [ a , b ] . Using the change of variable x = s a + ( 1 s ) t and some calculations imply that
| L w ( t ) | ( t a ) 2 2 a t w ( x ) | f ( x ) | d x ,
for any t [ a , b ] . Furthermore if | f | is convex on [ a , b ] , then from (16) and by the use of the change of variable x = s a + ( 1 s ) t we get
| L w ( t ) | ( t a ) 3 2 | f ( a ) | a t t x t a w ( x ) d x t a + | f ( t ) | a t x a t a w ( x ) d x t a ,
which implies that
| L w ( t ) | ( t a ) 2 | f ( a ) | a t ( t x ) w ( x ) d x + | f ( t ) | a t ( x a ) w ( x ) d x ,
for any t [ a , b ] . □
Remark 1.
(i) By the use of Theorem 3 (1), it is not hard to see that if w is nondecreasing on [ a , b ] , then some properties of L w and corresponding results obtained in Theorem 4 may change. However the argument of proof is similar. The details are omitted.
(ii) Theorem 4 gives a generalization of Theorem 1, along with some new results.
The following result is including some properties of the mapping P w in the case that w is nondecreasing.
Theorem 5.
Let f : I R R be a convex function on the interval I and differentiable on I . Consider a , b I with a < b such that w : [ a , b ] R is a nonnegative and continuous function with w ( x ) 0 for all a x b . Then
(i)
P w is nonnegative, if f ( a ) f a + t 2 for any t [ a , b ] .
(ii)
If for any x < y we have f ( x ) f ( x + y 2 ) , then P w is nondecreasing on [ a , b ] .
(iii)
If f L ( [ a , b ] ) , then for each t [ a , b ] we have
| P w ( t ) | ( t a ) a a + t 2 w ( x ) ( x a ) | f ( x ) | d x + a + t 2 t w ( x ) ( t x ) | f ( x ) | d x .
Furthermore when | f | is convex on [ a , b ] , then:
| P w ( t ) | a a + t 2 w ( x ) ( t x ) ( x a ) d x + a + t 2 t w ( x ) ( t x ) 2 d x | f ( a ) | + a a + t 2 w ( x ) ( x a ) 2 d x + a + t 2 t w ( x ) ( t x ) ( x a ) d x | f ( t ) | .
(iv)
The following inequality holds:
P w ( t ) L w ( t ) a t f ( x ) w ( x ) d x ,
provided that f ( a ) f a + t 2 for all t [ a , b ] .
(v)
If for any x < y we have f ( x ) f ( x + y 2 ) , then the following refinement of (3) holds:
f a + b 2 a b w ( x ) d x a t f ( x ) w ( x ) d x + f a + b 2 a b w ( x ) d x f a + t 2 a t w ( x ) d x a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x ,
for all t [ a , b ] .
Proof. 
(i) It follows from Theorem 3 (2).
(ii) Suppose that a x < y < b . So from Theorem 3 (2) and the facts that w is nondecreasing and f is convex, we get
P w ( y ) P w ( x ) = a y f ( t ) w ( t ) d t f a + y 2 a y w ( t ) d t a x f ( t ) w ( t ) d t + f a + x 2 a x w ( t ) d t = x y f ( t ) w ( t ) d t + f a + x 2 a x w ( t ) d t f a + y 2 a y w ( t ) d t f x + y 2 x y w ( t ) d t + f a + x 2 a x w ( t ) d t f a + y 2 a y w ( t ) d t f x + y 2 ( y x ) w ( x ) + f a + x 2 ( x a ) w ( a ) f a + y 2 ( y a ) w ( y ) f x + y 2 ( y x ) + f a + x 2 ( x a ) f a + y 2 ( y a ) w ( a ) 0 .
This completes the proof.
(iii) The following identity is obtained in [8]:
a t f ( x ) w ( x ) d x f a + t 2 a t w ( x ) d x = ( t a ) 2 0 1 k ( s ) f s a + ( 1 s ) t d s ,
for any t [ a , b ] , where
k ( s ) = 0 s w u a + ( 1 u ) t d u , s [ 0 , 1 2 ) ; s 1 w u a + ( 1 u ) t d u , s [ 1 2 , 1 ] .
By similar method used to prove part (v) of Theorem 4, we can obtain the results. We omitted the details here.
(iv) By Theorem 3 (1), for any t ( a , b ] we have
a a + t 2 f ( x ) w ( x ) d x f a + t 2 + f ( a ) 2 a a + t 2 w ( x ) d x f a + t 2 + f ( a ) 2 a t w ( x ) d x ,
and
a + t 2 t f ( x ) w ( x ) d x f a + t 2 + f ( t ) 2 a + t 2 t w ( x ) d x f a + t 2 + f ( t ) 2 a t w ( x ) d x .
If we add (21) to (22), we obtain
a t f ( x ) w ( x ) d x f a + t 2 + f ( a ) + f ( t ) 2 a t w ( x ) d x ,
which is equivalent with
a t f ( x ) w ( x ) d x P w ( t ) + L w ( t ) + 2 a t f ( x ) w ( x ) d x .
This implies the desired result.
(v) The left side of (20) is a consequence of assertion (i) and the following inequality:
a t f ( x ) w ( x ) d x f a + t 2 a t w ( x ) d x 0 ,
for all t [ a , b ] .
Since P w is nondecreasing we have P w ( t ) P w ( b ) for all t [ a , b ] , i. e.
a t f ( x ) w ( x ) d x f a + t 2 a t w ( x ) d x a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x f a + b 2 a b w ( x ) d x .
Then we have the right side of (20). □
Remark 2.
(i) By the use of Theorem 3 (2) (w is nonincreasing on [ a , b ] ) in the proof of Theorem 5, we can obtain some different properties for P w with new corresponding results. The details are omitted.
(ii) Theorem 5 gives a generalization of Theorem 2, along with some new results.

3. Applications

The following means for real numbers a , b R are well known:
A ( a , b ) = a + b 2 a r i t h m e t i c m e a n , L n ( a , b ) = b n + 1 a n + 1 ( n + 1 ) ( b a ) 1 n g e n e r a l i z e d l o g m e a n , n R , a < b .
The following result holds between the two above special means:
Theorem 6.
For any a , b R with 0 < a < b and n N we have
A n ( a , b ) L n n ( a , b ) A ( a n , b n ) .
In this section as applications of our results in previous section, we give some refinements for the inequalities mentioned in (23).
Consider a , b ( 0 , ) with a < b . Define
f ( x ) = x n , x [ a , b ] a n d n 1 ; w ( x ) = x s , x [ a , b ] a n d s [ 0 , 1 ) ( 1 , ) .
From (4) with some calculations we have
b n s + 1 a n s + 1 n s + 1 b n s + 1 t n s + 1 n s + 1 + a n + t n 2 t 1 s a 1 s 1 s a n + b n 2 b 1 s a 1 s 1 s ,
for all t [ a , b ] , which implies that
( b a ) L n s n s ( a , b ) ( b t ) L n s n s ( t , b ) + A ( a n , t n ) t 1 s a 1 s 1 s A ( a n , b n ) b 1 s a 1 s 1 s .
Inequality (24) gives a refinement for the right part of (23).
In the case that s = 1 we have
( b a ) L n 1 n 1 ( a , b ) ( b t ) L n 1 n 1 ( t , b ) + l n t a A ( a n , t n ) l n t a A ( a n , b n ) .
In the case that s = 0 we get
L n n ( a , b ) b t b a L n n ( t , b ) + t a b a A ( a n , t n ) A ( a n , b n ) ,
for all t [ a , b ] . In fact inequality (25) is equivalent with the first inequality obtained in the applications section of [4].
Now with the same assumption for f and w as was used to obtain (24), by the use of (20) we get:
A n ( a , b ) b 1 s a 1 s 1 s A n ( a , b ) b 1 s a 1 s 1 s + ( t a ) L n s n s ( t , a ) A n ( a , t ) t 1 s a 1 s 1 s ( b a ) L n s n s ( b , a ) ,
for all t [ a , b ] and s [ 0 , 1 ) ( 1 , ) . Inequality (26) gives a refinement for the left part of (23). Also if we consider s = 1 , then we obtain
l n b a A n ( a , b ) l n b a A n ( a , b ) + ( t a ) L n 1 n 1 ( t , a ) l n t a A n ( a , t ) ( b a ) L n 1 n 1 ( b , a ) ,
for all t [ a , b ] . In a more special case, if we set s = 0 , then we get:
A n ( a , b ) A n ( a , b ) + t a b a L n n ( t , a ) A n ( a , t ) L n n ( b , a ) ,
for all t [ a , b ] .
Finally we encourage interested readers to use inequalities (4)–(7) and inequalities (17)–(20), for appropriate functions f and w to obtain some new special means types and numerical inequalities.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R.D.; methodology, M.R.D. and M.D.L.S.; investigation, M.R.D. and M.D.L.S.; writing–original draft preparation, M.R.D.; writing–review and editing, M.D.L.S.; project administration, M.R.D.; funding acquisition, M.D.L.S.

Funding

This research was in part supported by a grant from University of Bojnord (No. 97/367/19164). The second author thanks the Basque Government for its support through Grant IT1207-19.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the referees and the editor for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fejér, L. Über die fourierreihen, II. Math. Naturwise. Anz Ungar. Akad. Wiss. 1906, 24, 369–390. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mitrinović, D.S.; Lacković, I.B. Hermite and convexity. Aequ. Math. 1985, 28, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dragomir, S.S.; Pearce, C.E.M. Selected Topics on Hermite-Hadamard Inequalities and Applications. RGMIA Monographs, Victoria University, 2000. Available online: http://ajmaa.org/RGMIA/monographs.php/ (accessed on 15 March 2016).
  4. Dragomir, S.S.; Agarwal, R.P. Two new mappings associated with Hadamard’s inequalities for convex functions. Appl. Math. Lett. 1998, 11, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Niculescu, C.P.; Persson, L.E. Convex Functions and Their Applications: A Contemporary Approach; CMS Books in Mathematics; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  6. Robert, A.W.; Varbeg, D.E. Convex Functions; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA; London, UK, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  7. Abramovich, S.; Persson, L.-E. Extensions and Refinements of Fejér and Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2018, 21, 759–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sarikaya, M.Z. On new Hermite Hadamard Fejér type integral inequalities. Stud. Univ. Babeş-Bolyai Math. 2012, 57, 377–386. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rostamian Delavar, M.; De La Sen, M. Difference Mappings Associated with Nonsymmetric Monotone Types of Fejér’s Inequality. Mathematics 2019, 7, 802. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7090802

AMA Style

Rostamian Delavar M, De La Sen M. Difference Mappings Associated with Nonsymmetric Monotone Types of Fejér’s Inequality. Mathematics. 2019; 7(9):802. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7090802

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rostamian Delavar, Mohsen, and Manuel De La Sen. 2019. "Difference Mappings Associated with Nonsymmetric Monotone Types of Fejér’s Inequality" Mathematics 7, no. 9: 802. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7090802

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop