Abstract
We prove general stability theorems for n-dimensional quartic-cubic-quadratic-additive type functional equations of the form by applying the direct method. These stability theorems can save us the trouble of proving the stability of relevant solutions repeatedly appearing in the stability problems for various functional equations.
Keywords:
generalized Hyers–Ulam stability; functional equation; n-dimensional quartic-cubic-quadratic-additive type functional equation; direct method MSC:
39B82; 39B52
1. Introduction
The stability problem for functional equations or differential equations began with the well known question of Ulam [1]:
Let and be a group and a metric group with a metric , respectively. Given , does there exist a such that if a function satisfies the inequality for all , then there exists a homomorphism with for all ?
In short, the Ulam’s question states as follows: Under what conditions does there exist an additive function near an approximately additive function? (For more details about the historical background, see [1,2,3,4,5].)
In 1941, Hyers [6] gave a partial solution to the question of Ulam under the assumption that relevant functions are defined on Banach spaces. Indeed, Hyers’ (modified) theorem states that the following statement is true for all : If a function f satisfies the inequality for all x, then there exists an exact additive function F and a function such that for all x and . In this case, the Cauchy additive functional equation, , is said to have (or satisfy) the Hyers–Ulam stability.
When Hyers’ theorem is true even if we replace and by and , where and are functions not depending on f and F explicitly, the corresponding equation is said to have (or satisfy) the generalized Hyers–Ulam stability. These terminologies will also be applied for other functional equations.
Since Hyers’ paper, a number of mathematicians have extensively investigated the stability problems for several functional equations (see for example [2,3,4,5,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15] and the references therein).
Given abelian groups and and any mapping , we will set
for all . In connection with these notations, a mapping is said to be a quartic mapping, a cubic mapping, a quadratic mapping, or an additive mapping provided f satisfies the functional equation , , or for all , respectively. Those functional equations seem to be familiar to us because we can easily find out examples for the existence of their solutions. For example, the mapping given by , , or is a solution of , , , or , respectively.
If a mapping can be represented by the sum of a quartic mapping, a cubic mapping, a quadratic mapping, and an additive mapping, then we call f a quartic-cubic-quadratic-additive mapping and vice versa. For example, the mapping given by is a quartic-cubic-quadratic-additive mapping. A functional equation is said to be a quartic-cubic-quadratic-additive functional equation provided the set of all of its solutions is the same as the set of all quartic-cubic-quadratic-additive mappings.
Throughout this paper, we assume that V and W are real vector spaces, X a real normed space, and that Y is a real Banach space if there is no specification. Let be the set of all nonnegative integers, the set of all real numbers, and let denote the set of all rational numbers.
In this paper, we prove some general stability theorems that can be easily applied to the (generalized) Hyers–Ulam stability of a large class of functional equations of the form
which includes quartic-cubic-quadratic-additive functional equations. From now on, for any given mapping , we define by
for all , where ℓ and n are fixed integers larger than 1, and are fixed real constants throughout this paper. The direct method, which is the most powerful one in studying the stability problems of functional equations, is mainly applied to the proof of main theorems of this paper and the paper [10], while another method known as the “fixed point approach” was applied to the proof of the main theorem of [11].
Until now, we have followed out a routine and monotonous procedure for studying the stability problems of the quartic-cubic-quadratic-additive functional equations. However, the stability theorems of this paper can save us the trouble of proving the stability of relevant solutions repeatedly appearing in the stability problems for various functional equations (see [16,17,18,19,20]).
2. Preliminaries
Throughout this section, let V and W be real vector spaces and let Y be a real Banach space. Given a mapping and a real number a, we will use the following notations:
for all . We will now introduce some lemmas from [21] in the following Corollaries 1–4.
Lemma 1
([21] (Corollary 3.1)) Given a real constant , assume that a function satisfies either the condition
or
Furthermore, suppose is an arbitrary mapping. If a mapping satisfies the inequality
for all as well as the equalities
for all , then F is the unique mapping with the properties of and .
Lemma 2
([21] (Corollary 3.2)) Given a real number , assume that the functions satisfy each of the following conditions
for all , and is an arbitrary mapping. If a mapping satisfies the inequality
for all as well as the equalities in Expression for all , then F is the unique mapping satisfying equalities in for all and the inequality for all .
Lemma 3
([21] (Corollary 3.3)) Given a real number , assume that the functions satisfy each of the following conditions
for all , and is an arbitrary mapping. If a mapping satisfies the inequality for all as well as the equalities in for all , then F is the unique mapping satisfying the equalities in for all and the inequality for all .
Lemma 4
([21] (Corollary 3.4)) Assume that is a real number and the functions satisfy each of the following conditions
for all . In addition, suppose is an arbitrary mapping. If a mapping satisfies the inequality for all as well as the equalities in for all , then F is the unique mapping satisfying the equalities in for all and the inequality for all .
3. Main Results
In this section, we assume that V is a real vector space and Y is a real Banach space if there is no specification. In the following theorems, we prove that there exists only one exact solution near every approximate solution to .
Theorem 1.
Given a real constant a with , assume that the functions satisfy the conditions
for all and a function satisfies the condition
for all . If a mapping satisfies ,
for all , and, if f moreover satisfies the inequality
for all , then there exists a unique mapping such that
for all , and
for all , and such that
for all .
Proof.
In view of (8) and (15) and since , the sequence is a Cauchy sequence for all . Since Y is complete and , the sequence converges for all . Hence, we can define a mapping by
for all .
If we replace x with in the second inequality of (10) and divide the resulting inequality by , then we obtain
for all and . In view of the second inequalities of (8), this implies that
because of our hypothesis that . Analogously, by the first inequalities of (8) and (10), we obtain
Hence, in view of (9) and (11), we have
for all , where , i.e., for all . Moreover, if we set and let in (15), then we obtain the inequality (14).
In the following theorem, let V and Y be a real vector space and a real Banach space, respectively.
Theorem 2.
Given a real constant a with , assume that the functions satisfy the conditions
for all and a function satisfies the condition
for all . If a mapping satisfies and inequalities in for all , and if f satisfies inequality for all , then there exists a unique mapping satisfying for all and for all , and such that
for all .
Proof.
On account of (20) and (23), the sequence is a Cauchy sequence for all . Since Y is complete and , the sequence converges for all . Hence, we can define a mapping by
for all . Moreover, if we put and let in (23), we obtain the inequality (22).
In view of (2), (25), and (26), we have
for each . Therefore, it holds that for any . Analogously, it follows from (2), (25), and (26) that for every . Thus, we have for all .
Similarly, using (2), (25), and (26), we obtain
for all . Hence, we easily see that for any . Moreover, similarly as the case of , we obtain
and for any .
We assume again that V is a real vector space and Y is a real Banach space if there is no specification.
Theorem 3.
Given a real constant a with , assume that the functions satisfy all the conditions
for all and a function satisfies the conditions
for all . If a mapping satisfies and inequalities of for all , and if f satisfies inequality for all , then there exists a unique mapping satisfying equality for all , equalities in for all , and
for all .
Proof.
In view of (27) and (30), the sequence is a Cauchy sequence for all . Since Y is complete and , the sequence converges for all . Hence, we can define a mapping by
for all .
By (1), (2), and (31), we obtain
for all . Hence, by (11) and (28), we have
for any , where , i.e., for all . Moreover, if we set and let in (30), then we obtain the inequality (29).
Similarly as in the proof of Theorem 1, we can use (13) to show that
In the following theorem, let V be a real vector space and Y a real Banach space.
Theorem 4.
Assume that the functions satisfy the conditions
for all and a function satisfies the conditions
for all . If a mapping satisfies and the inequality for all and if f satisfies for all , then there exists a unique mapping satisfying the equality for all , the equalities in for all , and
for all .
Proof.
In view of (33) and (36), the sequence is a Cauchy sequence for all . Since Y is complete and , the sequence converges for all . Hence, we can define a mapping by
for all . Then, by oddness and evenness of and , it follows from (37) that
for all . Moreover, if we set and let in (36), we obtain the inequality (35).
In view of (10) and (33), it holds that
converge for all . Using these facts, we obtain
for all . Therefore, for all . By the similar way, we can show that the equalities in (13) hold true for any .
Theorem 5.
Assume that the functions satisfy all the conditions
for all and a function satisfies the conditions
for all . If a mapping satisfies and the inequality for all , and if f satisfies for all , then there exists a unique mapping satisfying the equality for all , the equalities in for all , and
for all .
Proof.
In view of (38) and (41), the sequence is a Cauchy sequence for all . Since Y is complete and , the sequence converges for all . Hence, considering (2) and (42), we can define a mapping by
for all . Moreover, if we set and let in (41), we obtain inequality (40).
On account of (2) and (43), the oddness and evenness of and imply that
for all . Using these facts, for example, we obtain
for all . Therefore, for all . Similarly, we can show that all the equalities in (13) hold true for any .
We remark that the equalities
are true in view of (13).
4. Corollaries
By using Theorems 1–5, we can prove the Hyers–Ulam–Rassias stability of the functional Equation (1).
Corollary 1.
Assume that X is a real normed space, Y is a real Banach space, and p, θ, η, and ξ are real constants such that , , , , and . If a mapping satisfies and
for all and if f moreover satisfies the inequality
for all , then there exists a unique mapping satisfying for all , and the equalities in for all , as well as
for all .
Proof.
Therefore, there is a unique mapping satisfying for all , the equalities in for all , as well as
From the above inequalities, we obtain the desired inequality (46). ☐
Corollary 2.
Assume that X is a real normed space, Y is a real Banach space, and that p, θ, η, and ξ are real constants such that , , , and . If a mapping satisfies and the inequalities in for all , and if f satisfies the inequality for all , then there exists a unique mapping satisfying for all , the equalities in for all , and for all .
Proof.
Replacing x by and multiplying in the first inequality of (44), we obtain
for all . Analogously, replacing x by and multiplying in the second inequality of (44), we have
for all .
Let . Then we obtain the inequalities
for all . By Corollary 1, there exists a unique mapping satisfying for all , the equalities in for all , and
for all . ☐
Author Contributions
Writing–original draft, Y.-H.L. and S.-M.J.; Writing–review & editing, Y.-H.L. and S.-M.J.
Funding
Soon-Mo Jung was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2016R1D1A1B03931061).
Acknowledgments
Soon-Mo Jung was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2016R1D1A1B03931061).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Ulam, S.M. A Collection of Mathematical Problems; Interscience Publ.: New York, NY, USA, 1960. [Google Scholar]
- Czerwik, S. Functional Equations and Inequalities in Several Variables; World Scientific: London, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Forti, G.L. Hyers–Ulam stability of functional equations in several variables. Aequ. Math. 1995, 50, 143–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyers, D.H.; Isac, G.; Rassias, Th.M. Stability of Functional Equations in Several Variables; Birkäuser: Boston, MA, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Jung, S.-M. Hyers–Ulam-Rassias Stability of Functional Equations in Nonlinear Analysis; Springer Optimization and Its Applications; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2011; Volume 48. [Google Scholar]
- Hyers, D.H. On the stability of the linear functional equation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1941, 27, 222–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brzdȩk, J.; Popa, D.; Xu, B. The Hyers–Ulam stability of nonlinear recurrences. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007, 335, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyers, D.H.; Rassias, T.M. Approximate homomorphisms. Aequ. Math. 1992, 44, 125–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gǎvrutǎ, P. A generalization of the Hyers–Ulam-Rassias stability of approximately additive mappings. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1994, 184, 431–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, S.-M.; Kim, J.-H. Hyers–Ulam stability of Lagrange’s mean value points in two variables. Mathematics 2018, 6, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, S.-M.; Lee, Y.-H. A fixed point approach to the stability of a mean value type functional equation. Mathematics 2017, 5, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popa, D.; Raşa, I. On the Hyers–Ulam stability of the linear differential equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2011, 381, 530–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qarawani, M.N. Hyers–Ulam stability for Mackey-Glass and Lasota differential equations. J. Math. Res. 2013, 5, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rassias, Th.M. On the stability of the linear mapping in Banach spaces. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1978, 72, 297–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brzdȩk, J.; Popa, D.; Raşa, I. Hyers–Ulam stability with respect to gauges. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2017, 453, 620–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.-H.; Jung, S.-M.; Rassias, M.T. Uniqueness theorems on functional inequalities concerning cubic-quadratic-additive equation. J. Math. Inequal. 2018, 12, 43–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.-H.; Jung, S.-M.; Rassias, M.T. On an n-dimensional mixed type additive and quadratic functional equation. Appl. Math. Comput. 2014, 228, 13–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.-H.; Jung, S.-M. A general uniqueness theorem concerning the stability of additive and quadratic functional equations. J. Funct. Spaces 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.-H.; Jung, S.-M. General uniqueness theorem concerning the stability of additive, quadratic, and cubic functional equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.-H.; Jung, S.-M. A fixed point approach to the stability of an additive-quadratic-cubic-quartic type functional equation. J. Funct. Spaces 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.-H.; Jung, S.-M. A general uniqueness theorem concerning the stability of AQCQ type functional equations. Kyungpook Math. J. 2018, 58, 291–305. [Google Scholar]
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).