1. Introduction
The stability problem for functional equations or differential equations began with the well known question of Ulam [
1]:
Let and be a group and a metric group with a metric , respectively. Given , does there exist a such that if a function satisfies the inequality for all , then there exists a homomorphism with for all ?
In short, the Ulam’s question states as follows:
Under what conditions does there exist an additive function near an approximately additive function? (For more details about the historical background, see [
1,
2,
3,
4,
5].)
In 1941, Hyers [
6] gave a partial solution to the question of Ulam under the assumption that relevant functions are defined on Banach spaces. Indeed, Hyers’ (modified) theorem states that the following statement is true for all
: If a function
f satisfies the inequality
for all
x, then there exists an exact additive function
F and a function
such that
for all
x and
. In this case, the Cauchy additive functional equation,
, is said to have (or satisfy) the Hyers–Ulam stability.
When Hyers’ theorem is true even if we replace and by and , where and are functions not depending on f and F explicitly, the corresponding equation is said to have (or satisfy) the generalized Hyers–Ulam stability. These terminologies will also be applied for other functional equations.
Since Hyers’ paper, a number of mathematicians have extensively investigated the stability problems for several functional equations (see for example [
2,
3,
4,
5,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12,
13,
14,
15] and the references therein).
Given abelian groups
and
and any mapping
, we will set
for all
. In connection with these notations, a mapping
is said to be a quartic mapping, a cubic mapping, a quadratic mapping, or an additive mapping provided
f satisfies the functional equation
,
,
or
for all
, respectively. Those functional equations seem to be familiar to us because we can easily find out examples for the existence of their solutions. For example, the mapping
given by
,
,
or
is a solution of
,
,
, or
, respectively.
If a mapping can be represented by the sum of a quartic mapping, a cubic mapping, a quadratic mapping, and an additive mapping, then we call f a quartic-cubic-quadratic-additive mapping and vice versa. For example, the mapping given by is a quartic-cubic-quadratic-additive mapping. A functional equation is said to be a quartic-cubic-quadratic-additive functional equation provided the set of all of its solutions is the same as the set of all quartic-cubic-quadratic-additive mappings.
Throughout this paper, we assume that V and W are real vector spaces, X a real normed space, and that Y is a real Banach space if there is no specification. Let be the set of all nonnegative integers, the set of all real numbers, and let denote the set of all rational numbers.
In this paper, we prove some general stability theorems that can be easily applied to the (generalized) Hyers–Ulam stability of a large class of functional equations of the form
which includes quartic-cubic-quadratic-additive functional equations. From now on, for any given mapping
, we define
by
for all
, where
ℓ and
n are fixed integers larger than 1, and
are fixed real constants throughout this paper. The direct method, which is the most powerful one in studying the stability problems of functional equations, is mainly applied to the proof of main theorems of this paper and the paper [
10], while another method known as the “fixed point approach” was applied to the proof of the main theorem of [
11].
Until now, we have followed out a routine and monotonous procedure for studying the stability problems of the quartic-cubic-quadratic-additive functional equations. However, the stability theorems of this paper can save us the trouble of proving the stability of relevant solutions repeatedly appearing in the stability problems for various functional equations (see [
16,
17,
18,
19,
20]).
3. Main Results
In this section, we assume that V is a real vector space and Y is a real Banach space if there is no specification. In the following theorems, we prove that there exists only one exact solution near every approximate solution to .
Theorem 1. Given a real constant a with , assume that the functions satisfy the conditionsfor all and a function satisfies the conditionfor all . If a mapping satisfies ,for all , and, if f moreover satisfies the inequalityfor all , then there exists a unique mapping such thatfor all , andfor all , and such thatfor all . Proof. First, we define the mappings
by
for all
and
. It then follows from (
2) and (
10) that
for all
.
In view of (
8) and (
15) and since
, the sequence
is a Cauchy sequence for all
. Since
Y is complete and
, the sequence
converges for all
. Hence, we can define a mapping
by
for all
.
If we replace
x with
in the second inequality of (
10) and divide the resulting inequality by
, then we obtain
for all
and
. In view of the second inequalities of (
8), this implies that
because of our hypothesis that
. Analogously, by the first inequalities of (
8) and (
10), we obtain
By (
2), (
16), (
17), and (
18), we have
for all
.
In view of (
2) and (
19), we easily obtain
for all
. Hence, we obtain
for all
.
Moreover, by (
2) and (
19), we obtain
for each
. Thus, we obtain
for all
.
Similarly, using (
2), (
17), and (
19), we have
for every
. Thus, we have
for all
.
Furthermore, by (
2), (
18), and (
19), we obtain
for all
. Therefore, it holds that
for all
.
Now, it follows from (
1), (
2), and (
16) that
for all
.
Hence, in view of (
9) and (
11), we have
for all
, where
, i.e.,
for all
. Moreover, if we set
and let
in (
15), then we obtain the inequality (
14).
We note that the equalities
are true in view of (
13). (When
, we have
since
is odd. By the definition of
(see (
2)) and since we already showed that
for all
, we further obtain
and so on.)
On account of Lemma 1 with
, the mapping
is the unique mapping satisfying the equalities in (
13) and the inequality (
14), since the inequality
holds for all
, where
and
. ☐
In the following theorem, let V and Y be a real vector space and a real Banach space, respectively.
Theorem 2. Given a real constant a with , assume that the functions satisfy the conditionsfor all and a function satisfies the conditionfor all . If a mapping satisfies and inequalities in for all , and if f satisfies inequality for all , then there exists a unique mapping satisfying for all and for all , and such thatfor all . Proof. First, we define the mappings
by
for all
and
. It then follows from (
2) and (
10) that
for all
and
.
On account of (
20) and (
23), the sequence
is a Cauchy sequence for all
. Since
Y is complete and
, the sequence
converges for all
. Hence, we can define a mapping
by
for all
. Moreover, if we put
and let
in (
23), we obtain the inequality (
22).
As we saw in the proof of the previous theorem, it follows from (
10) and (
20) that
By (
2) and (
25), we obtain
for all
.
In view of (
2), (
25), and (
26), we have
for each
. Therefore, it holds that
for any
. Analogously, it follows from (
2), (
25), and (
26) that
for every
. Thus, we have
for all
.
Similarly, using (
2), (
25), and (
26), we obtain
for all
. Hence, we easily see that
for any
. Moreover, similarly as the case of
, we obtain
and
for any
.
Now, using (
1), (
2), and (
24), we have
for all
. Hence, by (
11) and (
21), we obtain
for all
, where
. Thus, it holds that
for all
.
As we see in the proof of Theorem 1, we notice that
for all
. According to Lemma 1, the mapping
satisfying equalities in (
13) and inequality (
22) is determined uniquely, since
for all
, where
and
. ☐
We assume again that V is a real vector space and Y is a real Banach space if there is no specification.
Theorem 3. Given a real constant a with , assume that the functions satisfy all the conditionsfor all and a function satisfies the conditionsfor all . If a mapping satisfies and inequalities of for all , and if f satisfies inequality for all , then there exists a unique mapping satisfying equality for all , equalities in for all , andfor all . Proof. We define the mappings
by
for all
and
. By (
2) and (
10), we have
for all
and for all
.
In view of (
27) and (
30), the sequence
is a Cauchy sequence for all
. Since
Y is complete and
, the sequence
converges for all
. Hence, we can define a mapping
by
for all
.
By (
1), (
2), and (
31), we obtain
for all
. Hence, by (
11) and (
28), we have
for any
, where
, i.e.,
for all
. Moreover, if we set
and let
in (
30), then we obtain the inequality (
29).
As we did in the proofs of the previous theorems, on account of (
10) and (
27), we can show that
In view of (
2), (
31), and the last relations, we obtain
for all
.
By using (
2) and (
32), we obtain
for all
. Hence, we can verify that
,
,
, and
for each
.
Similarly as in the proof of Theorem 1, we can use (
13) to show that
Due to Lemma 2, the mapping
is the unique mapping satisfying equalities in (
13) and inequality (
14), since it follows from (
29) that
for all
, where we set
,
and
. ☐
In the following theorem, let V be a real vector space and Y a real Banach space.
Theorem 4. Assume that the functions satisfy the conditionsfor all and a function satisfies the conditionsfor all . If a mapping satisfies and the inequality for all and if f satisfies for all , then there exists a unique mapping satisfying the equality for all , the equalities in for all , andfor all . Proof. We define the mappings
by
for all
and
. It then follows from (
2) and (
10) that
for all
.
In view of (
33) and (
36), the sequence
is a Cauchy sequence for all
. Since
Y is complete and
, the sequence
converges for all
. Hence, we can define a mapping
by
for all
. Then, by oddness and evenness of
and
, it follows from (
37) that
for all
. Moreover, if we set
and let
in (
36), we obtain the inequality (
35).
In view of (
10) and (
33), it holds that
converge for all
. Using these facts, we obtain
for all
. Therefore,
for all
. By the similar way, we can show that the equalities in (
13) hold true for any
.
On account of (
1), (
2), and (
37), it holds that
for all
.
Using (
11) and (
34), we obtain
for all
, i.e.,
for all
. By a similar way as the previous proofs, we notice that the equalities
are true in view of (
13).
Using Lemma 3, we conclude that the mapping
is the unique mapping satisfying equalities in (
13) and the inequality (
35), since
for all
, where we set
,
and
. ☐
Theorem 5. Assume that the functions satisfy all the conditionsfor all and a function satisfies the conditionsfor all . If a mapping satisfies and the inequality for all , and if f satisfies for all , then there exists a unique mapping satisfying the equality for all , the equalities in for all , andfor all . Proof. We define the mappings
by
for all
and
. It follows from (
2) and (
10) that
for all
and
.
On the other hand, by (
10) and (
38), we further see that
In view of (
38) and (
41), the sequence
is a Cauchy sequence for all
. Since
Y is complete and
, the sequence
converges for all
. Hence, considering (
2) and (
42), we can define a mapping
by
for all
. Moreover, if we set
and let
in (
41), we obtain inequality (
40).
On account of (
2) and (
43), the oddness and evenness of
and
imply that
for all
. Using these facts, for example, we obtain
for all
. Therefore,
for all
. Similarly, we can show that all the equalities in (
13) hold true for any
.
By using (
1), (
2), and (
43), we have
for all
.
By (
11) and (
39), together with the last equality, we obtain
for all
, i.e.,
for all
.
We remark that the equalities
are true in view of (
13).
Using Lemma 4, we conclude that the mapping
is the unique mapping satisfying equalities in (
13) and the inequality (
40), since
for all
, where we set
,
and
. ☐
4. Corollaries
By using Theorems 1–5, we can prove the Hyers–Ulam–Rassias stability of the functional Equation (
1).
Corollary 1. Assume that X is a real normed space, Y is a real Banach space, and p, θ, η, and ξ are real constants such that , , , , and . If a mapping satisfies andfor all and if f moreover satisfies the inequalityfor all , then there exists a unique mapping satisfying for all , and the equalities in for all , as well asfor all . Proof. If we set
for all
, then
satisfies (
9), (
21), (
28), (
34), and (
44) when
,
,
,
, and
, respectively.
Therefore, there is a unique mapping
satisfying
for all
, the equalities in
for all
, as well as
From the above inequalities, we obtain the desired inequality (
46). ☐
Corollary 2. Assume that X is a real normed space, Y is a real Banach space, and that p, θ, η, and ξ are real constants such that , , , and . If a mapping satisfies and the inequalities in for all , and if f satisfies the inequality for all , then there exists a unique mapping satisfying for all , the equalities in for all , and for all .
Proof. Replacing
x by
and multiplying
in the first inequality of (
44), we obtain
for all
. Analogously, replacing
x by
and multiplying
in the second inequality of (
44), we have
for all
.
Let
. Then we obtain the inequalities
for all
. By Corollary 1, there exists a unique mapping
satisfying
for all
, the equalities in
for all
, and
for all
. ☐