Next Article in Journal
Robust-Mean–Geometric-Mean and Robust Haberman Linking with Invariant Item Discriminations Under Sparse Differential Item Functioning
Previous Article in Journal
Riemann Solitons and Ricci Bi-Conformal Vector Fields on 4-Dimensional Oscillator Group
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

On a Norm Inequality for Three 2 × 2 Matrices with One Normal Factor

Bigdata Modeling and Intelligent Computing Research Institute, School of Mathematics and Statistics, Hubei University of Education, Wuhan 430205, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2026, 14(9), 1548; https://doi.org/10.3390/math14091548
Submission received: 4 April 2026 / Revised: 26 April 2026 / Accepted: 30 April 2026 / Published: 2 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section A: Algebra and Logic)

Abstract

In this paper, we continue to investigate the norm inequality for three real matrices that was recently conjectured by L. László. We establish the validity of the conjecture for the case where n = 2 and one of the matrices is normal.

1. Introduction

Let M n ( R ) denote the set of real n × n matrices. For A , B M n ( R ) , Böttcher–Wenzel [1] conjectured that
[ A , B ] F 2 2 A F 2 B F 2 ,
where · F denotes the Frobenius norm. This conjecture has been proved by many authors; for an overview and some generalizations, see [2,3,4,5,6,7] and the references therein. Motivated by (1), László [8] considered three real n × n matrices and proved a new norm inequality, as follows.
Theorem 1
([8], Theorem 3.1). If A , B , C M n ( R ) , then
A B C C B A F 2 A F 2 B F 2 C F 2 B F 2 tr 2 A T C .
At the same time, László [8] introduced the commutator for A , B , C M n ( R )
D : = A B C + B C A + C A B C B A + A C B + B A C ,
and proposed the following conjecture:
Conjecture 1
([8]). For any A , B , C M n ( R ) , the inequality
D F 2 3 2 A F 2 · [ B , C ] F 2 + B F 2 · [ C , A ] F 2 + C F 2 · [ A , B ] F 2
holds.
László [8] himself verified the conjecture for n = 2 and A , B , C being upper-triangular. The second cited author [9] established the conjecture for n = 2 , where one of A , B , C is symmetric. In this paper, we will continue to consider László’s conjecture for n = 2 . To be precise, we will prove the following theorem.
Theorem 2.
Let A , B , C M 2 ( R ) , and suppose one of these elements is normal. Consequently,
D F 2 3 2 A F 2 · [ B , C ] F 2 + B F 2 · [ C , A ] F 2 + C F 2 · [ A , B ] F 2 .
Remark 1.
Since every symmetric matrix is normal, our result generalizes Theorem 1.3 in [9].

2. Proof of Theorem 2

Step 1: For 2 × 2 real matrices, the normal matrices are exactly the symmetric matrices and the scaled rotations of the form λ E 2 + λ 2 J , where E 2 is the 2 identity matrix and J = 1 1 .
Without loss of generality, we assume C is normal.
(i)
If C is symmetric, then (3) follows from Theorem 1.3 in [9].
(ii)
If C is not symmetric, then
C = λ 1 λ 2 λ 2 λ 1 = λ 1 E 2 + λ 2 1 1 ,
where λ 1 , λ 2 R and λ 2 0 .
Step 2: Computation of [ A , B ] , [ B , C ] , [ C , A ] .
Let
A = a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 , B = b 1 b 2 b 3 b 4 .
Then,
[ A , B ] = a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 b 1 b 2 b 3 b 4 b 1 b 2 b 3 b 4 a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 = a 1 b 1 + a 2 b 3 a 1 b 2 + a 2 b 4 a 3 b 1 + a 4 b 3 a 3 b 2 + a 4 b 4 a 1 b 1 + a 3 b 2 a 2 b 1 + a 4 b 2 a 1 b 3 + a 3 b 4 a 2 b 3 + a 4 b 4 = a 2 b 3 a 3 b 2 ( a 1 b 2 a 2 b 1 ) + ( a 2 b 4 a 4 b 2 ) ( a 3 b 1 a 1 b 3 ) + ( a 4 b 3 a 3 b 4 ) ( a 2 b 3 a 3 b 2 ) ,
[ B , C ] = λ 2 ( b 2 + b 3 ) b 1 b 4 b 1 b 4 b 2 + b 3 ,
and
[ C , A ] = λ 2 a 2 + a 3 a 4 a 1 a 4 a 1 ( a 2 + a 3 ) .
Step 3: Computation of C [ A , B ] , A [ B , C ] , B [ C , A ] .
From (4), we have
C [ A , B ] = λ 1 ( a 2 b 3 a 3 b 2 ) ( a 1 b 2 a 2 b 1 ) + ( a 2 b 4 a 4 b 2 ) ( a 1 b 3 a 3 b 1 ) ( a 3 b 4 a 4 b 3 ) ( a 2 b 3 a 3 b 2 ) λ 2 ( a 1 b 3 a 3 b 1 ) + ( a 3 b 4 a 4 b 3 ) ( a 2 b 3 a 3 b 2 ) ( a 2 b 3 a 3 b 2 ) ( a 1 b 2 a 2 b 1 ) + ( a 2 b 4 a 4 b 2 ) .
From (5), we have
A [ B , C ] = a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 λ 2 ( b 2 + b 3 ) b 1 b 4 b 1 b 4 b 2 + b 3 = λ 2 a 1 ( b 2 + b 3 ) + a 2 b 1 b 4 a 1 b 1 b 4 + a 2 b 2 + b 3 a 3 ( b 2 + b 3 ) + a 4 b 1 b 4 a 3 b 1 b 4 + a 4 b 2 + b 3 .
From (6), we have
B [ C , A ] = b 1 b 2 b 3 b 4 λ 2 a 2 + a 3 a 4 a 1 a 4 a 1 ( a 2 + a 3 ) = λ 2 b 1 ( a 2 + a 3 ) + b 2 a 4 a 1 b 1 a 4 a 1 b 2 ( a 2 + a 3 ) b 3 ( a 2 + a 3 ) + b 4 a 4 a 1 b 3 a 4 a 1 b 4 ( a 2 + a 3 ) .
Step 4: Computation of D 2 . Set
x i j = a i b j a j b i , 1 i , j 4 .
It is obvious that x i j = x j i . From (7)–(9), we get
D = C [ A , B ] + A [ B , C ] + B [ C , A ] = λ 1 x 23 x 12 + x 24 x 13 x 34 x 23 λ 2 2 x 12 + 2 x 13 + x 24 + x 34 x 14 x 14 x 12 + x 13 + 2 x 24 + 2 x 34 ,
Therefore,
D F 2 = x 23 λ 1 2 x 12 + 2 x 13 + x 24 + x 34 λ 2 2 + x 12 + x 24 λ 1 x 14 λ 2 2 + x 13 + x 34 λ 1 + x 14 λ 2 2 + x 23 λ 1 + x 12 + x 13 + 2 x 24 + 2 x 34 λ 2 2 = 2 x 23 2 + x 12 + x 24 2 + x 13 + x 34 2 λ 1 2 + 2 x 12 + 2 x 13 + x 24 + x 34 2 + x 12 + x 13 + 2 x 24 + 2 x 34 2 + 2 x 14 2 λ 2 2 + 2 x 23 x 24 + x 34 x 12 x 13 + 2 x 14 x 13 + x 34 x 12 x 24 λ 1 λ 2 .
Step 5: Computation of A F 2 · [ B , C ] F 2 + B F 2 · [ C , A ] F 2 + C F 2 · [ A , B ] F 2 .
From (4)–(6), we get
A F 2 · [ B , C ] F 2 + B F 2 · [ C , A ] F 2 + C F 2 · [ A , B ] F 2 = 2 A F 2 b 2 + b 3 2 + b 1 b 4 2 λ 2 2 + 2 B F 2 a 2 + a 3 2 + a 1 a 4 2 λ 2 2 + 2 λ 1 2 + λ 2 2 [ A , B ] F 2 .
Step 6: Computation of
3 A F 2 · [ B , C ] F 2 + B F 2 · [ C , A ] F 2 + C F 2 · [ A , B ] F 2 2 D F 2 .
From (11) and (12), we find that
3 A F 2 · [ B , C ] F 2 + B F 2 · [ C , A ] F 2 + C F 2 · [ A , B ] F 2 2 D F 2 = p λ 1 2 + q λ 1 λ 2 + r λ 2 2 ,
where
p = 6 [ A , B ] F 2 2 2 x 23 2 + x 12 + x 24 2 + x 13 + x 34 2 , q = 4 x 23 x 24 + x 34 x 12 x 13 + x 14 x 13 + x 34 x 12 x 24 , r = 6 [ A , B ] F 2 + 6 A F 2 b 2 + b 3 2 + b 1 b 4 2 + 6 B F 2 a 2 + a 3 2 + a 1 a 4 2 2 2 x 12 + 2 x 13 + x 24 + x 34 2 + x 12 + x 13 + 2 x 24 + 2 x 34 2 + 2 x 14 2
Step 7: Estimation of p. From (4), we have
[ A , B ] F 2 = 2 x 23 2 + x 12 + x 24 2 + x 13 + x 34 2 .
Hence,
p = 4 2 x 23 2 + x 12 + x 24 2 + x 13 + x 34 2 0 .
Step 8: Estimation of
3 A F 2 · [ B , C ] F 2 + B F 2 · [ C , A ] F 2 + C F 2 · [ A , B ] F 2 2 D F 2
under the condition p = 0 .
If p = 0 , then
x 23 = 0 , x 12 + x 24 = 0 , x 13 + x 34 = 0 ,
which, together with (14), implies
q = 4 x 23 x 24 + x 34 x 12 x 13 + x 14 x 13 + x 34 x 12 x 24 = 4 0 · x 24 + x 34 x 12 x 13 + x 14 0 0 = 0 ,
and
r = 6 A F 2 b 2 + b 3 2 + b 1 b 4 2 + 6 B F 2 a 2 + a 3 2 + a 1 a 4 2 2 x 12 + x 13 2 + x 24 + x 34 2 + 2 x 14 2 .
Via the AM-GM inequality, we have
a 1 2 b 2 + b 3 2 + b 1 2 a 2 + a 3 2 1 2 a 1 ( b 2 + b 3 ) b 1 ( a 2 + a 3 ) 2 = 1 2 ( a 1 b 2 a 2 b 1 ) + ( a 1 b 3 a 3 b 1 ) 2 = 1 2 x 12 + x 13 2 ,
a 4 2 b 2 + b 3 2 + b 4 2 a 2 + a 3 2 1 2 a 4 ( b 2 + b 3 ) b 4 ( a 2 + a 3 ) 2 = 1 2 ( a 2 b 4 a 4 b 2 ) + ( a 3 b 4 a 4 b 3 ) 2 = 1 2 x 24 + x 34 2 ,
a 1 2 b 1 b 4 2 + b 1 2 a 1 a 4 2 1 2 a 1 ( b 1 b 4 ) b 1 ( a 1 a 4 ) 2 = 1 2 a 1 b 4 a 4 b 1 2 = 1 2 x 14 2 ,
and
a 4 2 b 1 b 4 2 + b 4 2 a 1 a 4 2 1 2 a 4 ( b 1 b 4 ) b 4 ( a 1 a 4 ) 2 = 1 2 a 1 b 4 a 4 b 1 2 = 1 2 x 14 2 .
By combining (15)–(19), we get
r 6 1 2 x 12 + x 13 2 + 1 2 x 24 + x 34 2 + 1 2 x 14 2 + + 1 2 x 14 2 2 x 12 + x 13 2 + x 24 + x 34 2 + 2 x 14 2 = x 12 + x 13 2 + x 24 + x 34 2 + 2 x 14 2 0 .
Therefore, under the condition p = 0 ,
3 A F 2 · [ B , C ] F 2 + B F 2 · [ C , A ] F 2 + C F 2 · [ A , B ] F 2 2 D F 2 = p λ 1 2 + q λ 1 λ 2 + r λ 2 2 = r λ 2 2 0 .
Step 9: Estimation of
3 A F 2 · [ B , C ] F 2 + B F 2 · [ C , A ] F 2 + C F 2 · [ A , B ] F 2 2 D F 2
under the condition p > 0 .
First, we estimate r. Through the Cauchy–Schwartz inequality and AM-GM inequality, we have
a 1 a 4 2 + a 2 + a 3 2 b 2 + b 3 2 + b 1 b 4 2 a 1 a 4 ( b 2 + b 3 ) b 1 b 4 ( a 2 + a 3 ) 2 = ( a 1 b 2 a 2 b 1 ) + ( a 1 b 3 a 3 b 1 ) + ( a 2 b 4 a 4 b 2 ) + ( a 3 b 4 a 4 b 3 ) 2 = x 12 + x 13 + x 24 + x 34 2 ,
a 1 + a 4 2 b 2 + b 3 2 + b 1 + b 4 2 a 2 + a 3 2 1 2 a 1 + a 4 b 2 + b 3 b 1 + b 4 a 2 + a 3 2 = 1 2 ( a 1 b 2 a 2 b 1 ) + ( a 1 b 3 a 3 b 1 ) ( a 2 b 4 a 4 b 2 ) ( a 3 b 4 a 4 b 3 ) 2 = 1 2 x 12 + x 13 x 24 x 34 2 ,
and
a 1 + a 4 2 b 1 b 4 2 + b 1 + b 4 2 a 1 a 4 2 1 2 a 1 + a 4 ( b 1 b 4 ) b 1 + b 4 ( a 1 a 4 ) 2 = 1 2 2 ( a 1 b 4 + a 4 b 1 ) 2 = 2 x 14 2 .
By combining (22)–(24), we have
2 A F 2 b 2 + b 3 2 + b 1 b 4 2 + 2 B F 2 a 2 + a 3 2 + a 1 a 4 2 = a 1 + a 4 2 + a 1 a 4 2 + a 2 + a 3 2 + a 2 a 3 2 b 2 + b 3 2 + b 1 b 4 2 + b 1 + b 4 2 + b 1 b 4 2 + b 2 + b 3 2 + b 2 b 3 2 a 2 + a 3 2 + a 1 a 4 2 2 a 1 a 4 2 + a 2 + a 3 2 b 2 + b 3 2 + b 1 b 4 2 + a 1 + a 4 2 b 2 + b 3 2 + b 1 + b 4 2 a 2 + a 3 2 + a 1 + a 4 2 b 1 b 4 2 + b 1 + b 4 2 a 1 a 4 2 2 x 12 + x 13 + x 24 + x 34 2 + 1 2 x 12 + x 13 x 24 x 34 2 + 2 x 14 2 .
Since
2 x 12 + 2 x 13 + x 24 + x 34 2 + x 12 + x 13 + 2 x 24 + 2 x 34 2 = x 12 + x 13 + x 12 + x 13 + x 24 + x 34 2 + x 12 + x 13 + x 24 + x 34 + x 24 + x 34 2 = x 12 + x 13 2 + 2 x 12 + x 13 x 12 + x 13 + x 24 + x 34 + x 12 + x 13 + x 24 + x 34 2 + x 24 + x 34 2 + 2 x 24 + x 34 x 12 + x 13 + x 24 + x 34 + x 12 + x 13 + x 24 + x 34 2 = x 12 + x 13 2 + x 24 + x 34 2 + 4 x 12 + x 13 + x 24 + x 34 2 ,
together with (26), we find that
r = 6 A B B A F 2 + 6 A F 2 b 2 + b 3 2 + b 1 b 4 2 + 6 B F 2 a 2 + a 3 2 + a 1 a 4 2 2 2 x 12 + 2 x 13 + x 24 + x 34 2 + x 12 + x 13 + 2 x 24 + 2 x 34 2 + 2 x 14 2 6 x 12 + x 13 2 + 6 x 24 + x 34 2 + 6 x 12 + x 13 + x 24 + x 34 2 + 3 2 x 12 + x 13 x 24 x 34 2 + 6 x 14 2 2 x 12 + x 13 2 + x 24 + x 34 2 + 4 x 12 + x 13 + x 24 + x 34 2 + 2 x 14 2 4 x 12 + x 13 2 + 4 x 24 + x 34 2 2 x 12 + x 13 + x 24 + x 34 2 + 3 2 x 12 + x 13 x 24 x 34 2 + 2 x 14 2 1 2 x 12 + x 13 x 24 x 34 2 + 2 x 14 2 .
Secondly, we compute Δ = q 2 4 p r .
1 16 Δ = 1 16 q 2 4 p r x 23 x 24 + x 34 x 12 x 13 + x 14 x 13 + x 34 x 12 x 24 2 2 x 23 2 + x 12 + x 24 2 + x 13 + x 34 2 · 1 2 x 12 + x 13 x 24 x 34 2 + 2 x 14 2 x 23 x 24 + x 34 x 12 x 13 + x 14 x 13 + x 34 x 12 x 24 2 2 x 23 2 + 1 2 x 12 + x 24 x 13 x 34 2 · 1 2 x 12 + x 13 x 24 x 34 2 + 2 x 14 2 x 23 x 24 + x 34 x 12 x 13 + x 14 x 13 + x 34 x 12 x 24 2 2 x 23 · 1 2 x 12 + x 13 x 24 x 34 + 2 x 14 · 1 2 x 12 + x 24 x 13 x 34 2 = x 23 x 24 + x 34 x 12 x 13 + x 14 x 13 + x 34 x 12 x 24 2 x 23 x 24 + x 34 x 12 x 13 x 14 x 13 + x 34 x 12 x 24 2 = 0 .
where the first inequality follows from (14) and (27), the second inequality follows from the AM-GM inequality, and the last inequality follows from the Cauchy–Schwartz inequality. Hence,
p λ 1 2 + q λ 1 λ 2 + r λ 2 2 0 .
Based on (13), this means that
3 A F 2 · [ B , C ] F 2 + B F 2 · [ C , A ] F 2 + C F 2 · [ A , B ] F 2 2 D F 2 0 .
By combining Step 8 and Step 9, we arrive at the following result. Let A , B , C M 2 ( R ) , and suppose one of them is normal. Then,
D F 2 3 2 A F 2 · [ B , C ] F 2 + B F 2 · [ C , A ] F 2 + C F 2 · [ A , B ] F 2 .
Remark 2.
In [9], F. Wang gives the follow example: Let
A = 1 0 , B = 0 1 , C = 1 1 ,
Consequently, it is easy to check that
D F 2 = 3 2 A F 2 · B C C B F 2 + B F 2 · C A A C F 2 + C F 2 · A B B A F 2 = 18 ,
which shows that the constant 3 2 in (29) is optimal.

Author Contributions

Investigation, N.L. and F.W.; writing—original draft, F.W.; writing—review and editing, N.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

N.L. Supported by the Scientific Research Fund of Hubei Provincial Department of Eduction (No. B2024174); F.W. Supported by the Foundation of Hubei Provincial Department of Eduction (No. Q20233003), the Scientific Research Fund of Hubei Provincial Department of Eduction (No. B2022207) and Hubei University of Education.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Böttcher, A.; Wenzel, D. How big can the commutator of two matrices be and how big is it typically? Linear Algebra Its Appl. 2005, 403, 216–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. Cheng, C.M.; Liang, Y.R. Some sharp bounds for the commutator of real matrices. Linear Algebra Its Appl. 2017, 521, 263–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Cheng, C.M.; Jin, X.Q.; Vong, S.W. A survey on the Böttcher-Wenzel conjecture and related problems. Oper. Matrices 2015, 9, 659–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  4. Fang, W.B.; Cheng, C.M. On some conjectures concerning the Böttcher-Wenzel inequality for weighted Frobenius norms. Linear Algebra Its Appl. 2025, 718, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Ge, J.Q.; Li, F.G.; Zhou, Y. Some generalizations of the DDVV and BW inequalities. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 2021, 374, 5331–5348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Gil’, M. A sharp bound for the Frobenius norm of self-commutators of matrices. Linear Multilinear Algebra 2017, 65, 2333–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Nobori, M. A generalization of the Böttcher-Wenzel inequality for three rectangular matrices. Linear Algebra Its Appl. 2025, 725, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. László, L. A norm inequality for three matrices. Electron. J. Linear Algebra 2022, 36, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Wang, F. A norm inequality for three real matrices. Oper. Matrices 2023, 17, 823–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, N.; Wang, F. On a Norm Inequality for Three 2 × 2 Matrices with One Normal Factor. Mathematics 2026, 14, 1548. https://doi.org/10.3390/math14091548

AMA Style

Li N, Wang F. On a Norm Inequality for Three 2 × 2 Matrices with One Normal Factor. Mathematics. 2026; 14(9):1548. https://doi.org/10.3390/math14091548

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Na, and Fen Wang. 2026. "On a Norm Inequality for Three 2 × 2 Matrices with One Normal Factor" Mathematics 14, no. 9: 1548. https://doi.org/10.3390/math14091548

APA Style

Li, N., & Wang, F. (2026). On a Norm Inequality for Three 2 × 2 Matrices with One Normal Factor. Mathematics, 14(9), 1548. https://doi.org/10.3390/math14091548

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop