Next Article in Journal
Macro-Scale Temporal Attenuation for Electoral Forecasting: A Retrospective Study on Recent Elections
Next Article in Special Issue
Predicting CO2 Emissions with Advanced Deep Learning Models and a Hybrid Greylag Goose Optimization Algorithm
Previous Article in Journal
Robust Estimation of L1-Modal Regression Under Functional Single-Index Models for Practical Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Using Machine Learning for the Precise Experimental Modeling of Catastrophe Phenomena: Taking the Establishment of an Experimental Mathematical Model of a Cusp-Type Catastrophe for the Zeeman Catastrophe Machine as an Example

by
Shaonan Zhang
and
Liangshan Xiong
*
School of Mechanical Science & Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2025, 13(4), 603; https://doi.org/10.3390/math13040603
Submission received: 22 January 2025 / Revised: 8 February 2025 / Accepted: 11 February 2025 / Published: 12 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Artificial Intelligence and Optimization in Engineering Applications)

Abstract

When catastrophe theory is applied to the experimental modeling of catastrophe phenomena, it is impossible to know in advance the corresponding relationship and mapping form between the parameters of the actual catastrophe mathematical model and the parameters of the canonical catastrophe mathematical model. This gives rise to the problem in which the process of experimental modeling cannot be completed in many instances. To solve this problem, an experimental modeling method of catastrophe theory is proposed. It establishes the quantitative relationship between the actual catastrophe mathematical model and the canonical catastrophe mathematical model by assuming that the actual potential function is equal to the canonical potential function, and it uses a machine learning model to represent the diffeomorphism that can realize the error-free transformation of the two models. The method is applied to establish the experimental mathematical model of a cusp-type catastrophe for the Zeeman catastrophe machine. Through programming calculation, it is found that the prediction errors of the potential function, manifold, and bifurcation set of the established model are 0.0455%, 0.0465%, and 0.1252%, respectively. This indicates that the established model can quantitatively predict the catastrophe phenomenon.
Keywords: catastrophe theory; precise experimental modeling; Zeeman catastrophe machine; machine learning catastrophe theory; precise experimental modeling; Zeeman catastrophe machine; machine learning

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, S.; Xiong, L. Using Machine Learning for the Precise Experimental Modeling of Catastrophe Phenomena: Taking the Establishment of an Experimental Mathematical Model of a Cusp-Type Catastrophe for the Zeeman Catastrophe Machine as an Example. Mathematics 2025, 13, 603. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13040603

AMA Style

Zhang S, Xiong L. Using Machine Learning for the Precise Experimental Modeling of Catastrophe Phenomena: Taking the Establishment of an Experimental Mathematical Model of a Cusp-Type Catastrophe for the Zeeman Catastrophe Machine as an Example. Mathematics. 2025; 13(4):603. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13040603

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Shaonan, and Liangshan Xiong. 2025. "Using Machine Learning for the Precise Experimental Modeling of Catastrophe Phenomena: Taking the Establishment of an Experimental Mathematical Model of a Cusp-Type Catastrophe for the Zeeman Catastrophe Machine as an Example" Mathematics 13, no. 4: 603. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13040603

APA Style

Zhang, S., & Xiong, L. (2025). Using Machine Learning for the Precise Experimental Modeling of Catastrophe Phenomena: Taking the Establishment of an Experimental Mathematical Model of a Cusp-Type Catastrophe for the Zeeman Catastrophe Machine as an Example. Mathematics, 13(4), 603. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13040603

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop