Next Article in Journal
The Nonlinear Dynamic Response and Vibration Transmission Characteristics of an Unloading System with Granular Materials
Next Article in Special Issue
Backward Continuation of the Solutions of the Cauchy Problem for Linear Fractional System with Deviating Argument
Previous Article in Journal
Certificateless Provable Data Possession Scheme for Cloud-Based Electronic Health Records System
Previous Article in Special Issue
A New Inclusion on Inequalities of the Hermite–Hadamard–Mercer Type for Three-Times Differentiable Functions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

On Fractal–Fractional Simpson-Type Inequalities: New Insights and Refinements of Classical Results

by
Fahad Alsharari
1,*,
Raouf Fakhfakh
1 and
Abdelghani Lakhdari
2
1
Department of Mathematics, College of Science, Jouf University, Sakaka P.O. Box 2014, Saudi Arabia
2
Laboratory of Energy Systems Technology, National Higher School of Technology and Engineering, Annaba 23005, Algeria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2024, 12(24), 3886; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12243886
Submission received: 11 November 2024 / Revised: 7 December 2024 / Accepted: 8 December 2024 / Published: 10 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fractional Calculus and Mathematical Applications, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
In this paper, we introduce a novel fractal–fractional identity, from which we derive new Simpson-type inequalities for functions whose first-order local fractional derivative exhibits generalized s-convexity in the second sense. This work introduces an approach that uses the first-order local fractional derivative, enabling the treatment of functions with lower regularity requirements compared to earlier studies. Additionally, we present two distinct methodological frameworks, one of which achieves greater precision by refining classical outcomes in the existing literature. The paper concludes with several practical applications that demonstrate the utility of our results.
MSC:
26A33; 26A51; 26D10; 26D15

1. Introduction

Convexity is a fundamental concept in mathematical analysis, essential in fields such as optimization, economics, and functional analysis. A function is generally considered convex if the line segment connecting any two points on its graph lies above or on the graph itself. This seemingly simple geometric property leads to powerful mathematical results, and has extensive applications, including in the development of inequalities and approximation methods. Convexity also provides essential tools in understanding the behavior of complex functions, allowing researchers to draw meaningful conclusions about their properties and the systems they describe.
The renowned Hermite–Hadamard inequality (refer to [1,2]) represents a cornerstone result in the theory of convex functions, and can be expressed as follows.
Theorem 1.
Let h : 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 R be a convex function. Then, we have
h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 h ϰ d ϰ h 𝚤 1 + h 𝚤 2 2 .
Definition 1
([3]). A function h : 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 R is said to be s-convex in the second sense on 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 for some fixed s ( 0 , 1 ] if, for all ϰ 1 , ϰ 2 D and t [ 0 , 1 ] , the inequality
h t ϰ 1 + 1 t ϰ 2 t s h ϰ 1 + 1 t s h ϰ 2
holds.
In [4], Dragomir and Fitzpatrick provided the following Hermite–Hadamard inequality for s-convex functions:
2 s 1 h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 h ( ϰ ) d ϰ h ( 𝚤 1 ) + h ( 𝚤 2 ) s + 1 ,
where h is s-convex in the second sense on [ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 ] .
Within the realm of approximation theory, convexity has been extensively employed to evaluate and enhance numerical techniques for calculating definite integrals. Among these numerical methods, Simpson’s rule is one of the most renowned formulas for approximating definite integrals. It is particularly valued for its simplicity and accuracy when dealing with smooth functions over closed intervals. Simpson’s formula approximates the integral of a function by using quadratic polynomials, offering better accuracy compared to basic methods, such as the midpoint and trapezoidal rules. For a four times continuously differentiable function h on the interval [ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 ] , the classical error bounds of Simpson’s formula is given by
1 6 h 𝚤 1 + 4 h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + h 𝚤 2 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 2 h ( t ) d t 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 4 2880 h ( 4 ) ,
where h ( 4 ) = sup x [ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 ] h ( 4 ) ( x ) < .
Dragomir et al. in [5], pointed out the following Simpson-type inequality expressed in terms of lower derivatives.
Theorem 2
([5]). Let h : 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 R with f L 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 . Then, we have
1 6 h 𝚤 1 + 4 h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + h 𝚤 2 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 h t d t 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 3 f 1 ,
where f 1 = 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 f ( ϰ ) d ϰ .
In [6], Sarikaya et al. established the following inequality for differentiable s-convex functions.
Theorem 3
([6]). Let h : D R be a differentiable function on D , 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 D with 𝚤 1 < 𝚤 2 , such that h L 1 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 . If h is s-convex in the second sense on 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 , for some fixed s ( 0 , 1 ] , then we have
1 6 h 𝚤 1 + 4 h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + h 𝚤 2 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 h t d t 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ( s 4 ) 6 s + 1 + 2 × 5 s + 2 2 × 3 s + 2 + 2 6 s + 2 ( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) h 𝚤 1 + h 𝚤 2 .
Corollary 1
([6]). For s = 1 , Theorem 3 will be reduced to
1 6 h 𝚤 1 + 4 h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + h 𝚤 2 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 h t d t 5 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 72 h 𝚤 1 + h 𝚤 2 .
For further work on Simpson’s inequality using different types of integral operators, we refer the readers to [7,8,9,10,11].
Fractional calculus, which generalizes integrals and derivatives to arbitrary, non-integer orders, has become a potent extension of classical calculus. When modeling processes with memory, when conventional integer-order models are inadequate, this more comprehensive approach works especially well. Fractional calculus is important because it may be used to explain phenomena in a variety of disciplines, including biology, engineering, physics, and economics, where systems show anomalous diffusion, non-local interactions, or viscoelastic behavior. Because of this, fractional calculus has shown itself to be a vital tool for comprehending intricate systems that defy easy explanations. For recent advances in fractional calculus, we refer to [12,13,14,15,16].
In recent years, fractional calculus has seen substantial expansion, attracting considerable interest from scholars in both theoretical and applied domains. This increased interest has led to the development of various fractional operators, each designed for specific applications and mathematical contexts. The introduction of operators such as the Riemann–Liouville, k-Riemann–Liouville, Hadamard, and Conformable fractional integrals, among others, has broadened the reach of fractional calculus, enabling more flexible and precise modeling of complex systems. Using the notion of convexity, several studies have been conducted to establish certain integral inequalities through various types of fractional integrals; see [17,18,19]. To address the diversity of these operators, Sarikaya and Ertuğral, in [20], proposed a generalized fractional operator that unifies many well-known fractional integrals, as follows.
Definition 2
([20]). Let [ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 ] be a real interval, and h L [ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 ] . The left- and right-sided generalized fractional integrals are given, respectively, by
J ϑ 𝚤 1 + h ϰ = 𝚤 1 ϰ ϑ ϰ t ϰ t h ( t ) d t , 𝚤 1 < ϰ
and
J ϑ 𝚤 2 h ϰ = ϰ 𝚤 2 ϑ t ϰ t ϰ h ( t ) d t , ϰ < 𝚤 2 ,
where ϑ satisfies
1 0 ϑ ( ϰ ) ϰ d ϰ < .
Remark 1.
The capacity to include several kinds of fractional integrals, such as the Riemann–Liouville, Katugampola, k-Riemann–Liouville, conformable, Hadamard, and others, is the main characteristic of the generalized fractional integrals (2) and (3). The following describes these important special cases:
  • For ϑ ( t ) = t α Γ ( α ) with α > 0 , operators (2) and (3) will be reduced to the Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals defined in [21].
  • For ϑ ( t ) = t α k k Γ k ( α ) with α > 0 , we obtain the k-Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals defined in [22].
  • For ϑ t = t log ( 𝚤 2 ) log 𝚤 2 t α 1 Γ α 𝚤 2 t with α > 0 and 𝚤 1 1 , the generalized integrals will be reduced to the Hadamard integrals, defined in [21].
  • For ϑ t = t log ( 𝚤 2 ) log 𝚤 2 t α k 1 k Γ k α 𝚤 2 t with α > 0 and 𝚤 1 1 , we obtain the Hadamard k-fractional integrals, defined in [23].
  • For ϑ t = ρ 1 α 𝚤 2 t ρ 𝚤 2 ρ 𝚤 2 t ρ α 1 Γ α with α , ρ > 0 , we obtain the Katugampola fractional integrals introduced in [24].
  • For ϑ t = t α e λ t Γ α with α > 0 , we obtain the tempered fractional integrals introduced in [25].
  • For ϑ t = t 𝚤 2 t α 1 with α > 0 , (2) and (3) will be reduced to the conformable fractional integrals proposed by Khalil et al. in [26].
  • For ϑ t = t α exp 1 α α t with α ( 0 , 1 ) , we obtain the fractional integrals with exponential kernel introduced in [27].
In the realm of fractional calculus, numerous researchers have concentrated on the investigation of Simpson-type inequalities through the use of a various types of fractional integrals [28,29,30,31]. However, the most notable work in this regard is that of Ertuğral and Sarikaya in [32], where the authors established the following generalized Simpson-type inequality.
Theorem 4
([32]). Let h : D R be a differentiable function on D , 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 D with 𝚤 1 < 𝚤 2 , such that h L 1 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 . If h is convex on 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 , then we have
1 6 h 𝚤 1 + 4 h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + h 𝚤 2 1 2 Λ 1 1 J ϑ 𝚤 1 + h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + J ϑ 𝚤 2 h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 12 Λ 1 1 K h 𝚤 1 + h 𝚤 2 ,
where
K = 1 0 2 Λ 1 ( 1 ) 3 Λ 1 ( t ) d t ,
with Λ ( t ) = 0 t ϑ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 2 s s ϱ d s < , and J ϑ 𝚤 1 + , J ϑ 𝚤 2 are given by (2) and (3), respectively.
Remark 2.
It is worth noting that by choosing ϑ ( t ) = t , Theorem 4 simplifies to Corollary 1, provided by Sarikaya et al. in [6].
Fractal sets are geometric structures that frequently possess intricate, irregular shapes and demonstrate self-similarity at various scales. Defined through recursive processes, fractals are fundamental in fields like dynamical systems and signal processing, as they can model natural phenomena with irregular patterns, such as coastlines or turbulent flows. They are also studied for their ability to quantify complexity using concepts like the Hausdorff dimension.
In [33], Yang expanded the notion of convexity to fractal sets as follows.
Definition 3
([33]). Let h : D R R ϱ , where 0 < ϱ 1 is the fractal dimension. For any ϰ 1 , ϰ 2 D and t [ 0 , 1 ] , if
h t ϰ 1 + 1 t ϰ 2 t ϱ h ϰ 1 + 1 t ϱ h ϰ 2
holds, then h is a generalized convex function on D .
In [34], Mo et al. provided the following definition of generalized s-convexity in the second sense.
Definition 4.
Let h : D R R ϱ . For any ϰ 1 , ϰ 2 D and t [ 0 , 1 ] , if
h t ϰ 1 + 1 t ϰ 2 t s ϱ h ϰ 1 + 1 t s ϱ h ϰ 2
holds for some fixed s ( 0 , 1 ] , then the function h is generalized s-convex in the second sense on D .
Fractal calculus has swiftly evolved as a result of intensive research by different experts and is now widely used in a variety of scientific and technical disciplines. Its growing popularity in recent years can be related to its emphasis on non-differentiable mappings, which provide new insights and methods for modeling complicated and irregular processes.
In the context of integral inequalities on fractal sets, several scholars have developed novel estimations connected to various quadrature formulae and different types of generalized convexity; see [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44] and the references therein.
In [45], Yu et al. were the first to introduce generalized fractal integrals. These are called fractal–fractional integrals, and are defined as follows.
Definition 5.
The left and right-sided fractal–fractional integrals are given, respectively, by
J ( ϱ ) 𝚤 1 + ϑ h ϰ = 1 Γ ( 1 + ϱ ) 𝚤 1 ϰ ϑ ϰ t ϰ t ϱ h ( t ) ( d t ) ϱ , ϰ > 𝚤 1 ,
and
J ( ϱ ) 𝚤 2 ϑ h ϰ = 1 Γ ( 1 + ϱ ) ϰ 𝚤 2 ϑ t ϰ t ϰ ϱ h ( t ) ( d t ) ϱ , ϰ < 𝚤 2 ,
where Γ ( . ) is the Gamma function, and ϑ satisfies
1 Γ ( 1 + ϱ ) 1 0 ϑ ( ϰ ) ϰ ϱ d ϰ ϱ < ϱ .
In the same paper [45], the authors provided midpoint-type inequalities for twice local fractional differentiable generalized convex functions. Building on this, using fractal–fractional integrals, Butt et al. established Simpson-type inequalities in [46] and parametric inequalities in [47], also for functions whose second-order local fractional derivatives are generalized convex. In [48], Yuan et al. first introduced the class of generalized ( P , m ) -convex functions, and then developed a multi-parameter identity using fractal–fractional integral operators. From this, they were able to establish interesting results related to various formulas for twice local fractional differentiable generalized ( P , m ) -convex functions.
Inspired by the preceding works, we begin this article by presenting a new fractal–fractional identity, from which we derive several new Simpson-type inequalities for functions whose first-order local fractional derivative is generalized s-convex in the second sense. This study is particularly significant because it is the first to prove such inequalities using the first-order local fractional derivative, which does not require high regularity. On the other hand, we examine two ways, one of which produces more refined results, by refining classical results from the literature.

2. Basics of Local Fractional Calculus

In this section, we recall some concepts of fractal theory, as detailed in the monographs [33,49]. It is important to highlight that ϱ does not represent an exponential symbol, but rather a fractal dimension defined on the Cantor set. For 0 < ϱ 1 , we have the following ϱ -type set.
The ϱ -type set of integer is defined as the set
Z ϱ : = 0 ϱ , ± 1 ϱ , ± 2 ϱ , . . . , ± n ϱ , . . . .
The ϱ -type set of the rational numbers is defined as
Q ϱ : = m ϱ = p q ϱ : p , q Z and q 0 .
The ϱ -type set of the irrational numbers is defined as
J ϱ : = m ϱ p q ϱ : p , q Z and q 0 .
The ϱ -type set of the real line numbers is defined as
R ϱ : = Q ϱ J ϱ .
If u ϱ , v ϱ and w ϱ belongs the set R ϱ of real line numbers, then we have
1. u ϱ + v ϱ and u ϱ v ϱ belongs the set R ϱ .
2. u ϱ + v ϱ = v ϱ + u ϱ = u + v ϱ = v + u ϱ .
3. u ϱ + v ϱ + w ϱ = u + v ϱ + w ϱ .
4. u ϱ v ϱ = v ϱ u ϱ = u v ϱ = v u ϱ .
5. u ϱ v ϱ w ϱ = u ϱ v ϱ w ϱ .
6. u ϱ v ϱ + w ϱ = u ϱ v ϱ + u ϱ w ϱ .
7. u ϱ + 0 ϱ = 0 ϱ + u ϱ = u ϱ and u ϱ 1 ϱ = 1 ϱ u ϱ = u ϱ .
Definition 6
([33]). A non-differentiable function h : R R ϱ is local fractional continuous at ϰ 0 , if
ϵ > 0 , δ > 0 : h ϰ h ϰ 0 < ϵ ϱ
holds for | ϰ ϰ 0 | < δ , where ϵ , δ R . We denote the set of all local fractional continuous functions on ( 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 ) by C ϱ ( 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 ) .
Definition 7
([33]). The local fractional derivative of h ( ϰ ) of order ϱ at ϰ = ϰ 0 is defined as
h ϱ ϰ 0 = d ϱ h ϰ d ϰ ϱ ϰ = ϰ 0 = lim ϰ ϰ 0 Δ ϱ h ϰ h ϰ 0 ϰ ϰ 0 ϱ ,
where Δ ϱ h ϰ h ϰ 0 Γ ϱ + 1 h ϰ h ϰ 0 .
If there exists h k ϱ ( ϰ ) = D ϱ D ϱ . . . D ϱ k times h ( ϰ ) for any ϰ D R , then we say that h D k ϱ ( I ) , where k = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , . . . .
Definition 8
([33]). Let h ( ϰ ) C ϱ [ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 ] . Then, the local fractional integral is defined by
I 𝚤 2 ϱ 𝚤 1 h ϰ = 1 Γ ϱ + 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 h t d t ϱ = 1 Γ ϱ + 1 lim Δ t 0 j = 0 N 1 h t j Δ t j ϱ
with Δ t j = t j + 1 t j and Δ t = max Δ t 1 , Δ t 2 , . . . , Δ t N 1 , where t j , t j + 1 , j = 0 , 1 , . . . , N 1 and a = t 0 < t 1 < . . . < t N = b is partition of interval 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 .
Here, it follows that I 𝚤 2 ϱ 𝚤 1 h ϰ = 0 if 𝚤 1 = 𝚤 2 and I 𝚤 2 ϱ 𝚤 1 h ϰ = 𝚤 2 I 𝚤 1 ϱ h ϰ if 𝚤 1 < 𝚤 2 . If for any ϰ [ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 ] , there exists I 𝚤 2 ϱ 𝚤 1 h ϰ , then we denoted by h ϰ I ϰ ϱ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 .
Lemma 1
([33]). Suppose that h ϰ = g ϱ ϰ C ϱ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 ; then, we have
I 𝚤 2 ϱ 𝚤 1 h ϰ = g 𝚤 2 g 𝚤 1 .
Lemma 2
([33]). Suppose that h , g D ϱ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 and h ϱ ϰ , g ϱ ϰ C ϱ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 ; then, we have
I 𝚤 2 ϱ 𝚤 1 h ϰ g ϱ ϰ = h ϰ g ϰ 𝚤 1 𝚤 2 I 𝚤 2 ϱ 𝚤 1 h ϱ ϰ g ϰ .
Lemma 3
([33]). For h ( ϰ ) = ϰ k ϱ , we have the following equations:
d ϱ ϰ k ϱ d ϰ ϱ = Γ 1 + k ϱ Γ 1 + k 1 ϱ ϰ k 1 ϱ , 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϰ k ϱ d ϰ ϱ = Γ 1 + k ϱ Γ 1 + k + 1 ϱ 𝚤 2 k + 1 ϱ 𝚤 1 k + 1 ϱ , k R .
In [33], Yang presented the generalized Hölder inequality in fractal domain as follows.
Lemma 4
([33]). Let h , g C ϱ [ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 ] , and the functions h p , g q are both local fractional integral on [ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 ] for p , q > 1 with 1 p + 1 q = 1 ; then,
1 Γ 1 + ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 h t g t d t ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 h t p d t ϱ 1 p 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 g t q d t ϱ 1 q .
More recently, Luo et al. [50] introduced the following improved version of generalized Hölder integral inequality.
Lemma 5
([50]). Let h , g C ϱ [ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 ] , and the functions h p , g q are both local fractional integral on [ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 ] for p , q > 1 with 1 p + 1 q = 1 ; then,
1 Γ 1 + ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 h t g t d t ϱ 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ( 𝚤 2 t ) ϱ h t p d t ϱ 1 p 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ( 𝚤 2 t ) ϱ g t q d t ϱ 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ( t 𝚤 1 ) ϱ h t p d t ϱ 1 p 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ( t 𝚤 1 ) ϱ g t q d t ϱ 1 q .
In [51], Yu et al. gave the generalized power mean inequality in fractal domain as follows.
Lemma 6
([51]). Let h , g C ϱ [ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 ] , and the functions h , h g q are both local fractional integral on [ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 ] for q 1 ; then,
1 Γ 1 + ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 h t g t d t ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 h t d t ϱ 1 1 q 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 h ( t ) g t q d t ϱ 1 q .
In the same paper, the authors provided the following improved version of generalized power mean inequality.
Lemma 7
([51]). Let h , g C ϱ [ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 ] , and the functions h , h g q are both local fractional integral on [ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 ] for q 1 , then
1 Γ 1 + ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 h t g t d t ϱ 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ( 𝚤 2 t ) ϱ h t d t ϱ 1 1 q 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ( 𝚤 2 t ) ϱ h t g t q d t ϱ 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ( t 𝚤 1 ) ϱ h t d t ϱ 1 1 q 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ( t 𝚤 1 ) ϱ h t g t q d t ϱ 1 q .

3. Main Findings

This section commences with the introduction of a novel fractal–fractional integral identity, which will serve as the basis for the establishment of error bounds for the Simpson rule when applied to fractal–fractional integrals. Following this, we will discuss some special cases.

3.1. Fractal–Fractional Identity

In order to prove our results, we need the following lemma. We assume that ϑ : 0 , 0 ϱ , ϱ satisfy the following condition: 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϑ ϰ ϰ ϱ d ϰ ϱ < ϱ .
Lemma 8.
Let h : D R ϱ be a function such that h D ϱ D , 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 D with 𝚤 1 < 𝚤 2 , and h ϱ C ϱ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 ; then, the following equality holds:
1 ϱ 6 ϱ h 𝚤 1 + 4 ϱ h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + h 𝚤 2 1 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 J ϱ 𝚤 2 ϑ h 𝚤 1 + J ϱ 𝚤 1 + ϑ h 𝚤 2 = 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 6 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 Λ ϱ t h ϱ 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t h ϱ 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ 3 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 Λ ϱ t h ϱ t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t h ϱ t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ ,
where J ( ϱ ) 𝚤 1 + ϑ and J ( ϱ ) 𝚤 2 ϑ are defined as in (4) and (5), respectively, and the functions Λ ϱ ( . ) and Ω ϱ ( . ) are defined as bellow,
Λ ϱ t = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 t ϑ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 s s ϱ d s ϱ < ϱ
and
Ω ϱ t = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ t 1 ϑ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 s s ϱ d s ϱ < ϱ .
Proof. 
Let
P = 3 ϱ ( P 1 P 3 ) + P 2 P 4 ,
where
P 1 = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 Λ ϱ t h ϱ 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ , P 2 = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t h ϱ 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ , P 3 = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 Λ ϱ t h ϱ t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ , P 4 = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t h ϱ t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ ,
Using the local fractional integration by parts for P 1 , we obtain
P 1 = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 Λ ϱ t h ϱ 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ = 1 ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ Λ ϱ t h 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 0 1 2 1 ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 ϑ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 t t ϱ h 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ = 1 ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 2 h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 1 ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 ϑ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 t t ϱ h 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ .
Similarly, for P 2 , we obtain
P 2 = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t h ϱ 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ = 1 ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t h 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 1 2 1 3 ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 ϑ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 t t ϱ h 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ = 1 ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 h 𝚤 2 + 1 ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 2 ϱ Ω ϱ 1 2 Λ ϱ 1 2 h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 3 ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 ϑ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 t t ϱ h 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ = 1 ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 h 𝚤 2 + 1 ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 2 h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 3 ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 ϑ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 t t ϱ h 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ ,
P 3 = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 Λ ϱ t h ϱ t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ = 1 ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ Λ ϱ t h t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 0 1 2 + 1 ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 ϑ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 t t ϱ h t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ = 1 ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 2 h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + 1 ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 ϑ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 t t ϱ h t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ
and
P 4 = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t h ϱ t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ = 1 ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t h t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 1 2 1 + 3 ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 ϑ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 t t ϱ h t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ = 1 ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 h 𝚤 1 + 1 ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 2 2 ϱ Ω ϱ 1 2 h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + 3 ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 ϑ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 t t ϱ h t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ = 1 ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 h 𝚤 1 1 ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 2 h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + 3 ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 ϑ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 t t ϱ h t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ .
Using (7)–(10) into (6), then multiplying the resulting equality by 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 6 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 , we obtain the desired result. □
Corollary 2.
In Lemma 8, if we attempt to take ϑ ( s ) = s ϱ , we obtain the following Simpson identity via local fractional integral:
1 ϱ 6 ϱ h 𝚤 1 + 4 ϱ h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + h 𝚤 2 Γ 1 + ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ I 𝚤 2 ϰ 𝚤 1 h = 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 6 ϱ 3 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ h ϱ 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 h ϱ t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 3 t 2 ϱ h ϱ 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 h ϱ t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ ,
which represents a novel contribution to the literature.
Remark 3.
By setting ϱ = 1 in Corollary 2, we obtain
1 6 h 𝚤 1 + 4 h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + h 𝚤 2 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 h ϰ d ϰ = 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 6 3 0 1 2 t h 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 h t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 d t + 1 2 1 3 t 2 h 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 h t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 d t ,
which is proved by Alomari et al. in Lemma 1 from [52].

3.2. Simpson-Type Inequalities via Fractal–Fractional Integrals

Theorem 5.
Let h : D R ϱ be a function such that h D ϱ D , 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 D with 𝚤 1 < 𝚤 2 , and h ϱ C ϱ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 . If h ϱ is generalized s-convex on 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 , for some fixed s ( 0 , 1 ] , then we have
1 ϱ 6 ϱ h 𝚤 1 + 4 ϱ h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + h 𝚤 2 1 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 J ϱ 𝚤 2 ϑ h 𝚤 1 + J ϱ 𝚤 2 ϑ h 𝚤 2 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 6 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ C 1 ϱ , s + 3 ϱ C 2 ϱ , s + C 3 ϱ , s + C 4 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 + h ϱ 𝚤 2 ,
where
C 1 ϱ , s = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 Λ ϱ t 1 t s ϱ d t ϱ ,
C 2 ϱ , s = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 Λ ϱ t t s ϱ d t ϱ ,
C 3 ϱ , s = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t 1 t s ϱ d t ϱ
and
C 4 ϱ , s = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t t s ϱ d t ϱ .
Proof. 
From Lemma 8, the properties of the modulus, and the generalized s-convexity of h ϱ , we have
1 ϱ 6 ϱ h 𝚤 1 + 4 ϱ h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + h 𝚤 2 1 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 J ϱ 𝚤 2 ϑ h 𝚤 1 + J ϱ 𝚤 1 + ϑ h 𝚤 2 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 6 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 Λ ϱ t h ϱ 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t h ϱ 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ + 3 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 Λ ϱ t h ϱ t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t h ϱ t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 6 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 Λ ϱ t 1 t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 + t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 2 d t ϱ + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t 1 t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 + t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 2 d t ϱ + 3 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 Λ ϱ t t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 + 1 t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 2 d t ϱ + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 + 1 t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 2 d t ϱ = 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 6 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 Λ ϱ t 1 t s ϱ d t ϱ + 3 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 Λ ϱ t t s ϱ d t ϱ + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t 1 t s ϱ d t ϱ + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t t s ϱ d t ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 + h ϱ 𝚤 2 = 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 6 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ C 1 ϱ , s + 3 ϱ C 2 ϱ , s + C 3 ϱ , s + C 4 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 + h ϱ 𝚤 2 ,
where we have used (11)–(14), and the fact that Λ ϱ t + Ω ϱ t = Λ ϱ 1 . The proof is completed. □

3.3. Special Cases

Corollary 3.
In Theorem 5, if we set ϱ = 1 , we obtain the following Simpson-type inequality via generalized fractional integrals:
1 6 h 𝚤 1 + 4 h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + h 𝚤 2 1 2 Λ 1 1 J ϑ 𝚤 2 h 𝚤 1 + J ϑ 𝚤 1 + h 𝚤 2 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 6 Λ 1 1 3 C 1 1 , s + 3 C 2 1 , s + C 3 1 , s + C 4 1 , s h 𝚤 1 + h 𝚤 2 ,
where C i ( i = 1 , 4 ) are defined as in (11)–(14), respectively, and J ϑ 𝚤 1 + , J ϑ 𝚤 2 are given by (2) and (3).
Remark 4.
Taking into account the many circumstances covered in Remark 1, the conclusion derived in Corollary 3 represents a multitude of results pertaining to Fractional Simpson’s inequalities.
Corollary 4.
In Corollary 3, if we take ϑ ( t ) = t , we obtain
1 6 h 𝚤 1 + 4 h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + h 𝚤 2 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 h t d t 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 6 s + 2 ( s + 2 ) 4 × 3 s + 3 + 3 × 2 2 s + 5 + 2 s + 2 6 s + 3 s + 1 s + 2 h 𝚤 1 + h 𝚤 2 .
Remark 5.
We observe that the result obtained in Corollary 4 represents a new estimate similar to the one by Sarikaya in [6], as given by Theorem 3. If we denote by
Υ ( s ) = ( s 4 ) 6 s + 1 + 2 × 5 s + 2 2 × 3 s + 2 + 2 6 s + 2 ( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) ,
and
Σ ( s ) = 6 s + 2 ( s + 2 ) 4 × 3 s + 3 + 3 × 2 2 s + 5 + 2 s + 3 6 s + 3 s + 1 s + 2 ,
the coefficients of ( 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ) h ( 𝚤 1 ) + h ( 𝚤 2 ) in Theorem 3 and Corollary 4, respectively.
These are shown in Figure 1, from which we observe that the estimate given in Theorem 3 is finer than that of Corollary 4.

3.4. Refinement of Fractal–Fractional Simpson-Type Inequalities

To improve our result, we will attempt to involve the term h ( ϱ ) 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 by making the appropriate variable substitutions. This leads to the following theorem.
Theorem 6.
Let h : D R ϱ be a function such that h D ϱ D , 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 D with 𝚤 1 < 𝚤 2 , and h ϱ C ϱ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 . If h ϱ is generalized s-convex on 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 , for some fixed s ( 0 , 1 ] , then we have
1 ϱ 6 ϱ h 𝚤 1 + 4 ϱ h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + h 𝚤 2 1 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 J ( ϱ ) 𝚤 2 ϑ h 𝚤 1 + J ϱ 𝚤 1 + ϑ h 𝚤 2 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 12 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 D 1 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 + h ϱ 𝚤 2 + D 2 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 ,
where D 1 and D 2 are given by
D 1 ϱ , s = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 ν 2 + 3 ϱ Λ ϱ ν 2 1 ν s ϱ d ν ϱ
and
D 2 ϱ , s = 2 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 ν 2 + 3 ϱ Λ ϱ ν 2 ν s ϱ d ν ϱ .
Proof. 
From Lemma 8, the properties of the modulus, and the generalized s-convexity of h ϱ , we have
1 ϱ 6 ϱ h 𝚤 1 + 4 ϱ h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + h 𝚤 2 1 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 J ϱ 𝚤 2 ϑ h 𝚤 1 + J ϱ 𝚤 1 + ϑ h 𝚤 2 = 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 6 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 Λ ϱ t h ϱ 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t h ϱ 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ 3 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 Λ ϱ t h ϱ t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t h ϱ t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 d t ϱ = 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 12 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 Λ ϱ ν 2 h ϱ 1 ν 𝚤 1 + ν 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 d ν ϱ + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 Λ ϱ 1 ν 2 2 ϱ Ω ϱ 1 ν 2 h ϱ ν 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + 1 ν 𝚤 2 d ν ϱ 3 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 Λ ϱ ν 2 h ϱ ν 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + 1 ν 𝚤 2 d ν ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 Λ ϱ 1 ν 2 2 ϱ Ω ϱ 1 ν 2 h ϱ 1 ν 𝚤 1 + ν 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 d ν ϱ = 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 12 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 1 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ ν 2 Λ ϱ 1 ν 2 + 2 ϱ Ω ϱ 1 ν 2 h ϱ 1 ν 𝚤 1 + ν 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 d ν ϱ + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 Λ ϱ 1 ν 2 2 ϱ Ω ϱ 1 ν 2 3 ϱ Λ ϱ ν 2 h ϱ ν 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + 1 ν 𝚤 2 d ν ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 12 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 1 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ ν 2 Λ ϱ 1 ν 2 + 2 ϱ Ω ϱ 1 ν 2 h ϱ 1 ν 𝚤 1 + ν 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 d ν ϱ + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ ν 2 Λ ϱ 1 ν 2 + 2 ϱ Ω ϱ 1 ν 2 h ϱ ν 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + 1 ν 𝚤 2 d ν ϱ 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 12 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 1 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ ν 2 Λ ϱ 1 ν 2 + 2 ϱ Ω ϱ 1 ν 2 1 ν s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 + ν s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 d ν ϱ + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ ν 2 Λ ϱ 1 ν 2 + 2 ϱ Ω ϱ 1 ν 2 ν s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + 1 ν s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 2 d ν ϱ = 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 12 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 1 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ ν 2 Λ ϱ 1 ν 2 + 2 ϱ Ω ϱ 1 ν 2 1 ν s ϱ d ν ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 + h ϱ 𝚤 1 + 2 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ ν 2 Λ ϱ 1 ν 2 + 2 ϱ Ω ϱ 1 ν 2 ν s ϱ d ν ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 = 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 12 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 2 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 ν 2 + 3 ϱ Λ ϱ ν 2 ν s ϱ d ν ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 ν 2 + 3 ϱ Λ ϱ ν 2 1 ν s ϱ d ν ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 + h ϱ 𝚤 2 = 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 12 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 D 1 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 + h ϱ 𝚤 2 + D 2 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 ,
where D 1 and D 2 are defined as in (15) and (16), respectively. □
Corollary 5.
By setting ϱ = 1 and ϑ = t in Theorem 6, we obtain
1 6 h 𝚤 1 + 4 h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + h 𝚤 2 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 h t d t 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 12 2 s + 3 + 3 s + 1 s 1 3 s + 1 s + 1 s + 2 h 𝚤 1 + h 𝚤 2 + 2 2 + 3 s + 1 2 s + 1 3 s + 1 s + 1 s + 2 h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 .
Furthermore, using the convexity of h i . e . , h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 h ( 𝚤 1 ) + h ( 𝚤 2 ) 2 1 s ( s + 1 ) , we obtain
1 6 h 𝚤 1 + 4 h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + h 𝚤 2 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 h t d t 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 12 2 s + 3 + 3 s + 1 ( s 1 ) ( s + 1 ) + 2 s + 1 + 3 s + 1 2 s ( 2 s + 1 ) 3 s + 1 s + 1 2 s + 2 h 𝚤 1 + h 𝚤 2 .
Moreover, by setting s = 1 , we obtain
1 6 h 𝚤 1 + 4 h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + h 𝚤 2 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 h t d t 5 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 72 h 𝚤 1 + h 𝚤 2 ,
which coincides with Corollary 1 obtained by Sarikaya et al. in [6].
Remark 6.
In contrast to Corollary 4, the result in Corollary 5 is a refinement of the one presented in Theorem 3 by Sarikaya et al. in [6], for s ( 0 , 1 ) .
Indeed, if we denote by
Π ( s ) = 2 s + 3 + 3 s + 1 ( s 1 ) ( s + 1 ) + 2 s + 1 + 3 s + 1 2 s ( 2 s + 1 ) 4 × 3 s + 2 s + 1 2 s + 2 ,
the coefficients of ( 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ) h ( 𝚤 1 ) + h ( 𝚤 2 ) in the second inequality of Corollary 5. From the representation in Figure 2, it can be seen that the estimate in Corollary 5 is more accurate and finer compared to those in Theorem 3 and Corollary 4.

4. Further Results

Theorem 7.
Let h : D R ϱ be a function such that h D ϱ D , 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 D with 𝚤 1 < 𝚤 2 , and h ϱ C ϱ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 . If h ϱ q is generalized s-convex on 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 , where q > 1 with 1 p + 1 q = 1 ; then, we have
1 ϱ 6 ϱ h 𝚤 1 + 4 ϱ h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + h 𝚤 2 1 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 J ϱ 𝚤 2 ϑ h 𝚤 1 + J ϱ 𝚤 1 + ϑ h 𝚤 2 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 12 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p + 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p × L 1 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + L 2 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + L 2 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + L 1 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p + 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p × L 3 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + L 4 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + L 4 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + L 3 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q ,
where L i ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) are defined as in (17)–(20), respectively.
Proof. 
From Lemma 8, the properties of the modulus, the improved generalized Hölder’s inequality, and the generalized s-convexity of h ϱ q , we have
1 ϱ 6 ϱ h 𝚤 1 + 4 ϱ h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + h 𝚤 2 1 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 J ϱ 𝚤 2 ϑ h 𝚤 1 + J ϱ 𝚤 1 + ϑ h 𝚤 2 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 12 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ h ϱ 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ h ϱ 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ h ϱ 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ h ϱ 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ h ϱ t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ h ϱ t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ h ϱ t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ h ϱ t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 12 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ 1 t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ 1 t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ 1 t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ 1 t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + 1 t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + 1 t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + 1 t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + 1 t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 12 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p L 1 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + L 2 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p L 3 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + L 4 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p L 4 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + L 3 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p L 2 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + L 1 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p L 2 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + L 1 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p L 4 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + L 3 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p L 3 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + L 4 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p L 1 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + L 2 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q = 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 12 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p + 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p × L 1 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + L 2 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + L 2 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + L 1 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p + 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t p d t ϱ 1 p × L 3 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + L 4 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + L 4 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + L 3 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q ,
where
L 1 ϱ , s = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ 1 t s ϱ d t ϱ = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ t s ϱ d t ϱ = 1 s + 2 ϱ 1 2 s + 2 ϱ Γ 1 + s + 1 ϱ Γ 1 + s + 2 ϱ 1 2 ϱ 1 2 s + 2 ϱ Γ 1 + s ϱ Γ 1 + s + 1 ϱ ,
L 2 ϱ , s = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ t s ϱ d t ϱ = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ 1 t s ϱ d t ϱ = 1 2 s + 2 ϱ Γ 1 + s ϱ Γ 1 + s + 1 ϱ Γ 1 + s + 1 ϱ Γ 1 + s + 2 ϱ ,
L 3 ϱ , s = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ 1 t s ϱ d t ϱ = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ t s ϱ d t ϱ = 1 2 2 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ Γ 1 + 2 ϱ 1 2 s + 2 ϱ Γ 1 + s + 1 ϱ Γ 1 + s + 2 ϱ
and
L 4 ϱ , s = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t 1 + s ϱ d t ϱ = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t 1 + s ϱ d t ϱ = 1 2 s + 2 ϱ Γ 1 + s + 1 ϱ Γ 1 + s + 2 ϱ .
The proof is completed. □
Theorem 8.
Let h : D R ϱ be a function such that h D ϱ D , 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 D with 𝚤 1 < 𝚤 2 , and h ϱ C ϱ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 . If h ϱ q is generalized s-convex on 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 , where q 1 ; then, we have
1 ϱ 6 ϱ h 𝚤 1 + 4 ϱ h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + h 𝚤 2 1 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 J ϱ 𝚤 2 ϑ h 𝚤 1 + J ϱ 𝚤 1 + ϑ h 𝚤 2 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 12 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q η 1 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + η 2 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q η 3 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + η 4 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q η 5 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + η 6 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q η 7 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + η 8 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q η 2 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + η 1 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q η 4 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + η 3 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q η 6 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + η 5 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q η 8 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + η 7 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q ,
where η i , ( i = 1 , . . . , 8 ) are given by (21)–(28), respectively.
Proof. 
From Lemma 8, the properties of the modulus, the improved generalized power mean inequality, and the generalized s-convexity of h ϱ q , we have
1 ϱ 6 ϱ h 𝚤 1 + 4 ϱ h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + h 𝚤 2 1 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 J ϱ 𝚤 2 ϑ h 𝚤 1 + J ϱ 𝚤 1 + ϑ h 𝚤 2 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 12 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t h ϱ 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t h ϱ 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t h ϱ 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t h ϱ 1 t 𝚤 1 + t 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t h ϱ t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t h ϱ t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t h ϱ t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ Λ ϱ t 2 ϱ Ω ϱ t h ϱ t 𝚤 1 + 1 t 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 12 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t 1 t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t 1 t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q × 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t 1 t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q × 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t 1 t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + 1 t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + 1 t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q × 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + 1 t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q × 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + 1 t s ϱ h ϱ 𝚤 2 q d t ϱ 1 q .
So, we have
1 ϱ 6 ϱ h 𝚤 1 + 4 ϱ h 𝚤 1 + 𝚤 2 2 + h 𝚤 2 1 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 J ϱ 𝚤 2 ϑ h 𝚤 1 + J ϱ 𝚤 1 + ϑ h 𝚤 2 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 12 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q η 1 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + η 2 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q η 3 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + η 4 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q η 5 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + η 6 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q η 7 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + η 8 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q η 2 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + η 1 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + 3 ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q η 4 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + η 3 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q η 6 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + η 5 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q + 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t d t ϱ 1 1 q η 8 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 1 q + η 7 ϱ , s h ϱ 𝚤 2 q 1 q ,
where we have used
η 1 ϱ , s = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t 1 t s ϱ d t ϱ ,
η 2 ϱ , s = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t t s ϱ d t ϱ ,
η 3 ϱ , s = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 t ϱ Λ ϱ t 1 t s ϱ d t ϱ ,
η 4 ϱ , s = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 Λ 1 t t 1 + s ϱ d t ϱ ,
η 5 ϱ , s = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t 1 t 1 + s ϱ d t ϱ ,
η 6 ϱ , s = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 1 t ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t t s ϱ d t ϱ ,
η 7 ϱ , s = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t 1 t s ϱ d t ϱ
and
η 8 ϱ , s = 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 1 2 1 t 1 2 ϱ 2 ϱ Λ ϱ 1 3 ϱ Λ ϱ t t s ϱ d t ϱ .
The proof is completed. □

5. Applications

5.1. Quadrature Formula

Let Φ be the partition of the points 𝚤 1 = x 0 < x 1 < . . . < x n = 𝚤 2 of the interval 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 , and consider the quadrature formula,
1 Γ ϱ + 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 h u d u ϱ = λ h , Φ + R h , Φ ,
where
λ h , Φ = 1 Γ ϱ + 1 n 1 i = 0 x i + 1 x i ϱ 6 ϱ h x i + 4 ϱ h x i + x i + 1 2 + h x i + 1
and R h , Φ denotes the associated approximation error.
Proposition 1.
Let n N and h : 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 R ϱ be a differentiable function on 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 with 0 𝚤 1 < 𝚤 2 and h ϱ C ϱ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 . If h ϱ is generalized convex function, we have
R h , Φ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ n 1 i = 0 x i + 1 x i 2 ϱ 6 ϱ 3 2 ϱ 2 ϱ 3 ϱ Γ 1 + 2 ϱ 3 ϱ 2 ϱ 3 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ h ϱ x i + h ϱ x i + 1 .
Proof. 
Applying Theorem 5 with ϑ ( t ) = t ϱ and s = 1 on the subintervals x i , x i + 1 i = 0 , 1 , . . . , n 1 of the partition Φ , then using the generalized convexity of h ϱ , we obtain
1 ϱ 4 ϱ h x i + 2 ϱ h x i + x i + 1 2 + h x i + 1 Γ ϱ + 1 x i + 1 x i ϱ I x i + 1 ϱ x i h t Γ 1 + ϱ 6 ϱ D 1 ϱ , 1 h ϱ x i + h ϱ x i + 1 + D 2 ϱ , 1 h ϱ x i + x i + 1 2 ,
where D 1 and D 2 are defined as in (15) and (16), respectively, with
Λ ϱ t = x i + 1 x i ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ t ϱ .
Using the fact that h ϱ x i + x i + 1 2 h ϱ x i + h ϱ x i + 1 2 , Inequality (29) gives
1 ϱ 4 ϱ h x i + 2 ϱ h x i + x i + 1 2 + h x i + 1 Γ ϱ + 1 x i + 1 x i ϱ I x i + 1 ϱ x i h t Γ 1 + ϱ 6 ϱ D 3 ϱ , 1 h ϱ x i + h ϱ x i + 1 ,
where D 3 is given by
D 3 ϱ , 1 = x i + 1 x i ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 1 Γ 1 + ϱ 0 1 2 1 ϱ 3 t ϱ d t ϱ = x i + 1 x i ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ 3 2 ϱ 2 ϱ 3 ϱ Γ 1 + 2 ϱ 3 ϱ 2 ϱ 3 ϱ Γ 1 + ϱ .
Multiplying both sides of Inequality (30) by 1 Γ 1 + α x i + 1 x i ν , and then summing the obtained inequalities for all i = 0 to n 1 , and using the triangular inequality, we obtain the desired result. □

5.2. Special Means

For arbitrary real numbers 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 we have the following.
The Arithmetic mean: A ϱ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 = 𝚤 1 ϱ + 𝚤 2 ϱ 2 ϱ .
The n-Logarithmic mean: L n ϱ 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 = Γ 1 + n ϱ Γ 1 + n + 1 ϱ 𝚤 2 n + 1 ϱ 𝚤 1 n + 1 ϱ n + 1 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 1 n , 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 > 0 , 𝚤 1 𝚤 2 and n Z 1 , 0
Proposition 2.
Let 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 R with 0 < 𝚤 1 < 𝚤 2 , and n N with n 2 ; then, we have
Λ ϱ 1 2 ϱ A ϱ 𝚤 1 n , 𝚤 2 n + 4 ϱ A ϱ n 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 3 ϱ J ϱ 𝚤 2 ϑ h 𝚤 1 + J ϱ 𝚤 1 + ϑ h 𝚤 2 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ C 1 ϱ , 1 + C 2 ϱ , 1 + C 3 ϱ , 1 + C 4 ϱ , 1 Γ 1 + n ϱ Γ 1 + n 1 ϱ 𝚤 1 n 1 ϱ + 𝚤 2 n 1 ϱ ,
where C i , i = 1 to 4 are defined as in (11)–(14), respectively.
Proof. 
The assertion follows from Theorem 5 with s = 1 , applied to the function h x = x n ϱ . □
Proposition 3.
Let 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 R with 0 < a < b , and n N with n 2 ; then, we have
Λ ϱ 1 2 ϱ A ϱ 𝚤 1 n , 𝚤 2 n + 4 ϱ A ϱ n 𝚤 1 , 𝚤 2 3 ϱ J ϱ 𝚤 2 ϑ h 𝚤 1 + J ϱ 𝚤 1 + ϑ h 𝚤 2 𝚤 2 𝚤 1 ϱ 2 n ϱ Γ 1 + n ϱ Γ 1 + n 1 ϱ 2 n 1 ϱ D 1 ϱ , 1 + D 2 ϱ , 1 𝚤 1 n 1 ϱ + 𝚤 2 n 1 ϱ ,
where D 1 and D 2 are defined as in (15) and (16), respectively.
Proof. 
The assertion follows from Theorem 7 with s = 1 , applied to the function h x = x n ϱ . □

6. Conclusions

In conclusion, this work has introduced a new fractal–fractional identity and derived innovative Simpson-type inequalities for functions with generalized s-convexity in the second sense through their first-order local fractional derivatives. By lowering regularity requirements, our approach expands the scope of fractal–fractional calculus applications and provides refined methods that enhance classical results. This research opens new horizons in the study of fractal–fractional integral inequalities, paving the way for further exploration and potential advancements in mathematical analysis and applied sciences.
Additionally, this work lays the groundwork for investigating the error associated with Simpson’s formula under other types of generalized convexity. Future studies could also explore extensions to other quadrature rules, such as Bullen’s and Milne’s formulas, to further enrich the framework of fractal–fractional analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.A. and A.L.; methodology, R.F.; software, R.F.; validation, F.A. and A.L.; formal analysis, F.A.; investigation, F.A.; resources, R.F.; data curation, A.L.; writing—original draft preparation, F.A. and A.L.; writing—review and editing, F.A., R.F. and A.L.; visualization, R.F.; supervision, A.L.; project administration, F.A.; funding acquisition, F.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is funded by the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research at Jouf University through the Fast-Track Research Funding Program.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors state that they do not have any conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hadamard, J. Étude sur les propriétes des fonctions entières et en particulier d’une fonction considrée par Riemann. J. Math. Pures Appl. 1893, 58, 171–215. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hermite, C. Sur deux limites d’une intégrale definie. Mathesis 1883, 3, 82. [Google Scholar]
  3. Breckner, W.W. Stetigkeitsaussagen für eine Klasse verallgemeinerter konvexer Funktionen in topologischen linearen Räumen. Publ. Inst. Math. 1978, 23, 13–20. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dragomir, S.S.; Fitzpatrick, S. The Hadamard inequalities for s-convex functions in the second sense. Demonstr. Math. 1999, 32, 687–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dragomir, S.S.; Agarwal, R.P.; Cerone, P. On Simpson’s inequality and applications. J. Inequal. Appl. 2000, 5, 533–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sarikaya, M.Z.; Set, E.; Ozdemir, M.E. On new inequalities of Simpson’s type for s-convex functions. Comput. Math. Appl. 2010, 60, 2191–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Moumen, A.; Boulares, H.; Meftah, B.; Shafqat, R.; Alraqad, T.; Ali, E.E.; Khaled, Z. Multiplicatively Simpson type inequalities via fractional integral. Symmetry 2023, 15, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ali, M.A.; Budak, H.; Zhang, Z.; Yildirim, H. Some new Simpson’s type inequalities for coordinated convex functions in quantum calculus. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2021, 44, 4515–4540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hamida, S.; Meftah, B. Some Simpson type inequalities for differentiable h-preinvex functions. Indian J. Math. 2020, 62, 299–319. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhou, Y.; Du, T. The Simpson-type integral inequalities involving twice local fractional differentiable generalized (s,P)-convexity and their applications. Fractals 2023, 31, 2350038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mahmoudi, L.; Meftah, B. Parameterized Simpson-like inequalities for differential s-convex functions. Analysis 2023, 43, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ben Makhlouf, A. Stability with respect to part of the variables of nonlinear Caputo fractional differential equations. Math. Commun. 2018, 23, 119–126. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ben Makhlouf, A. A novel finite time stability analysis of nonlinear fractional-order time delay systems: A fixed point approach. Asian J. Control 2022, 24, 3580–3587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ben Makhlouf, A. Partial practical stability for fractional-order nonlinear systems. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2022, 45, 5135–5148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, T.; Li, Y. Global exponential stability of discrete-time almost automorphic Caputo–Fabrizio BAM fuzzy neural networks via exponential Euler technique. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2022, 246, 108675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hussain, W.S.; Ali, S.; Fatima, N.; Shah, K.; Abdeljawad, T. Presentation of the efficient scheme for solving fractional order telegraph problems. Partial. Differ. Equ. Appl. Math. 2024, 12, 100976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lakhdari, A.; Bin-Mohsin, B.; Jarad, F.; Xu, H.; Meftah, B. A parametrized approach to generalized fractional integral inequalities: Hermite–Hadamard and Maclaurin variants. J. King Saud-Univ.-Sci. 2024, 36, 103523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Meftah, B. Fractional Ostrowski type inequalities for functions whose first derivatives are s-preinvex in the second sense. Int. J. Anal. Appl. 2017, 15, 146–154. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lakhdari, A.; Budak, H.; Awan, M.U.; Meftah, B. Extension of Milne-type inequalities to Katugampola fractional integrals. Bound. Value Probl. 2024, 100, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sarıkaya, M.Z.; Ertuğral, F. On the generalized Hermite-Hadamard inequalities. An. Univ. Craiova Ser. Mat. Inform. 2020, 47, 193–213. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kilbas, A.A.; Srivastava, H.M.; Trujillo, J.J. Theory and applications of fractional differential equations. In North-Holland Mathematics Studies; Elsevier Science B.V.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; Volume 204. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mubeen, S.; Habibullah, G.M. k-Fractional integrals and application. Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sci. 2012, 7, 89–94. [Google Scholar]
  23. Farid, G.; Habibullah, G.M. An extension of Hadamard fractional integral. Int. J. Math. Anal. 2015, 9, 471–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Katugampola, U.N. New approach to a generalized fractional integral. Appl. Math. Comput. 2011, 218, 860–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sabzikar, F.; Meerschaert, M.M.; Chen, J. Tempered fractional calculus. J. Comput. Phys. 2015, 293, 14–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Khalil, R.; Al Horani, M.; Yousef, A.; Sababheh, M. A new definition of fractional derivative. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2014, 264, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ahmad, B.; Alsaedi, A.; Kirane, M.; Torebek, B.T. Hermite-Hadamard, Hermite-Hadamard-Fejér, Dragomir-Agarwal and Pachpatte type inequalities for convex functions via new fractional integrals. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2019, 353, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hwang, S.-R.; Tseng, K.-L.; Hsu, K.-C. New inequalities for fractional integrals and their applications. Turkish J. Math. 2016, 40, 471–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Karim, M.; Fahmi, A.; Qaisar, S.; Ullah, Z.; Qayyum, A. New developments in fractional integral inequalities via convexity with applications. AIMS Math. 2023, 8, 15950–15968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kermausuor, S. Simpson’s type inequalities via the Katugampola fractional integrals for s-convex functions. Kragujevac J. Math. 2021, 45, 709–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nasir, J.; Qaisar, S.; Butt, S.I.; Khan, K.A.; Mabela, R.M. Some Simpson’s Riemann-Liouville fractional integral inequalities with applications to special functions. J. Funct. Spaces 2022, 12, 2113742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ertuğral, F.; Sarikaya, M.Z. Simpson type integral inequalities for generalized fractional integral. Rev. Real Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Ser. A Mat. 2019, 113, 3115–3124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, X.-J. Advanced Local Fractional Calculus and Its Applications; World Science Publisher: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mo, H.-X.; Sui, X. Generalized s-convex functions on fractal sets. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2014, 2014, 254737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Du, T.; Wang, H.; Khan, M.A.; Zhang, Y. Certain integral inequalities considering generalized m-convexity on fractal sets and their applications. Fractals 2019, 27, 1950117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lakhdari, A.; Meftah, B.; Saleh, W. On corrected Simpson-type inequalities via local fractional integrals. Georgian Math. J. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, H.; Lakhdari, A.; Jarad, F.; Xu, H.; Meftah, B. An expanded analysis of local fractional integral inequalities via generalized (s,P)-convexity. J. Inequal. Appl. 2024, 2024, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Luo, C.; Wang, H.; Du, T. Fejér-Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities involving generalized h-convexity on fractal sets and their applications. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2020, 131, 109547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Saleh, W.; Meftah, B.; Lakhdari, A.; Kiliçman, A. Exploring the Companion of Ostrowski’s Inequalities via Local Fractional Integrals. Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2023, 16, 1359–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sarikaya, M.Z.; Budak, H.; Erden, S. On new inequalities of Simpson’s type for generalized convex functions. Korean J. Math. 2019, 27, 279–295. [Google Scholar]
  41. Xu, H.; Lakhdari, A.; Saleh, W.; Meftah, B. Some New Parametrized Inequalities on Fractal Set. Fractals 2024, 32, 2450063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xu, H.; Lakhdari, A.; Jarad, F.; Abdeljawad, T.; Meftah, B. On multiparametrized integral inequalities via generalized α-convexity on fractal set. Math. Meth. Appl. Sci. 2024, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yu, Y.; Liu, J.; Du, T. Certain error bounds on the parameterized integral inequalities in the sense of fractal sets. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2022, 161, 112328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bin-Mohsin, B.; Lakhdari, A.; Karabadji, N.E.I.; Awan, M.U.; Makhlouf, A.B.; Meftah, B.; Dragomir, S.S. An Extension of Left Radau Type Inequalities to Fractal Spaces and Applications. Axioms 2024, 13, 653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yu, S.; Zhou, Y.; Du, T. Certain midpoint-type integral inequalities involving twice differentiable generalized convex mappings and applications in fractal domain. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2022, 164, 112661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Butt, S.I.; Khan, A.; Tipurić-Spužević, S. New fractal-fractional Simpson estimates for twice differentiable functions with applications. Kuwait J. Sci. 2024, 51, 100205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Butt, S.I.; Khan, A. New fractal–fractional parametric inequalities with applications. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2023, 172, 113529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yuan, X.; Budak, H.; Du, T. The multi-parameter Fractal–Fractional inequalities for fractal (P,m)-convex functions. Fractals 2024, 32, 2450025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yang, Y.-J.; Baleanu, D.; Yang, X.-J. Analysis of fractal wave equations by local fractional Fourier series method. Adv. Math. Phys. 2013, 6, 632309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Luo, C.; Yu, Y.; Du, T. An improvement of Hölder integral inequality on fractal sets and some related Simpson-like inequalites. Fractals 2021, 29, 2150126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yu, S.; Mohammed, P.O.; Xu, L.; Du, T. An improvement of the power-mean integral inequality in the frame of fractal space and certain related midpoint-type integral inequalities. Fractals 2022, 30, 2250085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Alomari, M.; Darus, M.; Dragomir, S.S. New inequalities of Simpson’s type for s-convex functions with applications. Res. Rep. Collect. 2009, 12, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Comparison between Theorem 3 and Corollary 4.
Figure 1. Comparison between Theorem 3 and Corollary 4.
Mathematics 12 03886 g001
Figure 2. Comparison between Theorem 3, Corollary 4, and Corollary 5.
Figure 2. Comparison between Theorem 3, Corollary 4, and Corollary 5.
Mathematics 12 03886 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alsharari, F.; Fakhfakh, R.; Lakhdari, A. On Fractal–Fractional Simpson-Type Inequalities: New Insights and Refinements of Classical Results. Mathematics 2024, 12, 3886. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12243886

AMA Style

Alsharari F, Fakhfakh R, Lakhdari A. On Fractal–Fractional Simpson-Type Inequalities: New Insights and Refinements of Classical Results. Mathematics. 2024; 12(24):3886. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12243886

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alsharari, Fahad, Raouf Fakhfakh, and Abdelghani Lakhdari. 2024. "On Fractal–Fractional Simpson-Type Inequalities: New Insights and Refinements of Classical Results" Mathematics 12, no. 24: 3886. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12243886

APA Style

Alsharari, F., Fakhfakh, R., & Lakhdari, A. (2024). On Fractal–Fractional Simpson-Type Inequalities: New Insights and Refinements of Classical Results. Mathematics, 12(24), 3886. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12243886

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop