Abstract
There are six classes of endomorphisms for a graph. The sets of these endomorphisms form a chain under the inclusion of sets. In order to systematically study these endomorphisms, Böttcher and Knauer defined the concepts of the endomorphism spectrum and endomorphism type of a graph in 1992. In this paper, based on the property and structure of the endomorphism monoids of graphs, six classes of endomorphisms of double-edge fan graphs are described. In particular, we give the endomorphism spectra and endomorphism types of double-edge fan graphs.
MSC:
05C25; 20M20
1. Introduction
The endomorphism monoid of a graph is a generalization of the automorphism group of a graph. In recent years, the endomorphism monoids of graphs have attracted the attention of many scholars, and many meaningful results related to the endomorphism monoids of graphs have been obtained (cf. [1,2,3,4,5]). Some combinatorial counting problems related to the endomorphisms of graphs are some of the research hotspots in this field. In order to reveal the combinatorial counting properties of six kinds of endomorphisms of graphs at a deeper level, in [6], Böttcher and Knauer put forward the definition of the endomorphism spectrum and endomorphism type of graphs. In [7], the endomorphism types of bipartite graphs with diameter three and girth six were studied by Fan. In [8], Hou, Luo and Cheng gained the endomorphism spectrum and endomorphism type of by exploring the endomorphism of , where is defined as the complement of a path . In [9], Hou and Gu characterized the endomorphisms of fan graphs. The endomorphism types and endomorphism spectra of fan graphs were obtained. In [10], the endomorphisms of double fan graphs were studied, and the endomorphism types of double fan graphs were given.
Given a graph, we can define its six classes of endomorphisms. The endomorphism spectrum of a graph is a six-tuple related to the number of its endomorphisms. The endomorphism type of a graph is an integer from 0 to 31. In this paper, we investigate six classes of endomorphisms of double-edge fan graphs and give the endomorphism spectra and endomorphism types of double-edge fan graphs.
2. Preliminary Concepts
All graphs we consider are finite, undirected and simple. Let us suppose that G is a graph. The vertex set of G is denoted by , and the edge set of G is denoted by . If two vertices and are adjacent in G, the edge connecting and is denoted by , and . Subgraph H of G is called induced subgraph of G if for any , , if and only if . A graph G is called a complete graph if for any , . A complete graph with n vertices is denoted by . A graph is called fan graph if it results from the joining of and a vertex.
Let us suppose that X and Y are two graphs. Let g be a mapping from to . g is a homomorphism if implies that . A homomorphism g is half-strong if implies that there exist with and such that . A homomorphism g is locally strong if implies that for every there exists such that ; it is analogous for every preimage of (the subgraph of X induced by contains no isolated vertices). A homomorphism g is quasi-strong if implies that there exists adjacent to every vertex of ; it is analogous for the preimage of . A homomorphism g is strong if implies that every preimage of is adjacent to every preimage of (the subgraph of X induced by is a complete bipartite graph). A homomorphism g is an isomorphism if g is bijective and is a homomorphism. If g is a homomorphism (isomorphism) from X to itself, then it is called an endomorphism (automorphism) of X.
We denote the sets of all endomorphisms, half-strong endomorphisms, locally strong endomorphisms, quasi-strong endomorphisms, strong endomorphisms and automorphisms for a graph G by , , , , and , respectively. Obviously,
Let us suppose that G is a graph; then, the six-tuple
is called the endomorphism spectrum of G, and we denote it by . The integer is called the endomorphism type of G, where ; shows that the ith element is equal to the th element in , and , otherwise. We denote it by .
Let and . We denote by the restriction of f on H and by the endomorphic image of G under f. The endomorphic kernel induced by f is an equivalence relation on such that if and only if for any . We denote by the equivalence class of s under .
For concepts and terms related to graph theory and semigroup theory not listed in this paper, please read the relevant references [11,12,13,14].
3. Endomorphism Spectra of Double-Edge Fan Graphs
Let be a double-edge fan graph (see Figure 1). We denote , and . We denote , and . We denote by , , and the subgraph of induced by A, , and , respectively.
Figure 1.
Graph .
Lemma 1
([15]). Let G be a graph and . Then, if and only if is an induced subgraph of G.
Lemma 2.
Let . Then, the following apply:
- (1)
- for any .
- (2)
- If , then or , or .
- (3)
- If , then or .
Proof.
(1) Note that for any . If , then forms a loop in , which is a contradiction.
(2) If , then we have or . Otherwise, there are such that and . Since is connected, there exists a path from u to v in . Thus, there exists a path from to in . Note that every path from to must contain t. Hence, there exists such that . This contradicts (1). It is similar for or .
(3) If , then for some . Since for any , . Note that . If , then . If , then . □
Lemma 3.
if and only if .
Proof.
Necessity. We just need to verify that for any . Let f be a mapping on defined by
Then, . Clearly, , , . Note that there exist no and such that . Then, . Therefore, .
Sufficiency. Let and . If , then or by Lemma 2 (3). Note that both and are induced subgraphs of . By Lemma 1, .
If , then for by Lemma 2 (1). Thus, or , or . Let for some . If , then . If , then . Now, we suppose that . Then, for any . If and , then there exist and such that , since is connected. If and , then there exist and such that . Without loss of generality, let us suppose that and , then . Note that and ; thus, . This is a contradiction. Therefore, . □
Lemma 4.
Proof.
Let . There are two cases.
(1) . By Lemma 2 (2), or , or . Clearly, there are endomorphisms of satisfying and . Analogously, there are endomorphisms for the cases of and , and , and and . Thus, we obtain endomorphisms satisfying . It is known from [16] that
(2) . By Lemma 2 (3), there are two cases.
(i) Let us assume that . Then, , and or . There are subgraphs Y in such that . Let K be a subgraph of such that and for some . Since , . Furthermore, there are two methods to map to . Hence, we obtain endomorphisms satisfying and . (ii) Let us assume that . Then, , and there are subgraphs Y in such that . Let F be a subgraph of satisfying and for some . Note that and for any . Hence, . Since for any , . There are four cases.
Case 1. Let us assume that and .
If n is odd, then and . Since , or . If , then and . Note that we have methods to divide set C into two non-empty subsets, and . Clearly, there are methods to map to . If , then and . Similarly, we have methods to divide set B into two non-empty subsets, and . Clearly, there are methods to map to . Thus, there are ways to map A to . Analogously, there are ways to map to . Therefore, there are endomorphisms in this case.
Similarly, if n is even, we can obtain endomorphisms.
Case 2. Let us assume that and .
If n is odd, then and . Since , there are ways to map A to by Case 1. Since , or . Now, we have two methods to map to or . Therefore, there are endomorphisms in this case.
Similarly, if n is even, we can obtain endomorphisms.
Case 3. Let us assume that and .
If n is odd, we can obtain endomorphisms by Case 2. If n is even, we can obtain endomorphisms.
Case 4. Let us assume that and .
Clearly, and , or and . If and , then there are two methods to map to , and there are two methods to map to . Analogously, if and , then there are also four methods to map A to and to map to . Hence, we obtain endomorphisms.
From the above discussion, the result of Lemma 4 can be obtained. □
Lemma 5.
Let be a double-edge fan graph with . Then, , where .
Proof.
Let for some . If , then or . Thus, is an induced subgraph of . By Lemma 1, .
If , then or , or . Then, if and only if , with ; , with ; and , with . Clearly, there are subgraphs in isomorphic to . Then, there are ways to map A to , and there are ways to map A to . Thus, there are endomorphisms, which are not half-strong.
It is known from [16] that
, where Z is a set of integers.
From the above discussion, the result of Lemma 5 can be obtained. □
Lemma 6.
if and only if .
Proof.
Necessity. We just need to verify that when . Let f be a mapping on defined by
Then, . Clearly, , , . Note that ; then, . Therefore, .
Sufficiency. Let . Then, , or . If , then the subgraphs of induced by , or have no isolated vertices. If , then the subgraphs of induced by , or have no isolated vertices. Therefore, . □
Lemma 7.
Let and . If , then if and only if one of the following conditions holds:
- (1)
- and , or and ;
- (2)
- , and , where P is a subgraph of induced by ;
- (3)
- and , where or , , , and the subgraph of induced by is disconnected.
Proof.
Necessity. Let . Since , by Lemma 2 (2), or , or .
(1) Let us assume that and . Let be such that . Since , for every , there exists such that , and it is similar for the preimage of b. Note that and . Then, . In the same way, we can obtain . Similarly, if and , then and .
(2) Let us assume that or . Let P be a subgraph of induced by . Let be such that . Since , the subgraph of induced by contains no isolated vertices. Since and ( and ), the subgraph of induced by and contains no isolated vertices. Then, and .
(3) Let us assume that or , but . Since , it is easy to obtain and , where or , and the subgraph of induced by is disconnected.
Sufficiency. Let and be such that .
(1) Let us suppose that and . Note that . If , then . Clearly, for any . If , then . Clearly, for any . If and , then or . If , then for every , there exists such that , and it is similar for the preimage of b. Thus, and . Analogously, if , then and . Therefore, . Similarly, if and , then .
(2) Let us suppose that , and , where P is a subgraph of induced by . If , then . Clearly, for any . If , then . Clearly, for any . If and , then or . Since and , the subgraphs of , which is induced by and , contain no isolated vertices. Since and , the subgraph of , which is induced by , contains no isolated vertices. Therefore, .
(3) Let us suppose that , and , where or , and the subgraph of induced by is disconnected. Then, it is a routine matter to verify that . □
Lemma 8.
Let and . If , then if and only if one of the following conditions holds:
- (1)
- ;
- (2)
- n is odd; ; and or , where , , and .
Proof.
Necessity. Let . Since , or by Lemma 2 (3).
Let us assume that . If n is even, then , and and is not a complete folding. Thus, f is not locally strong according to [17].
If n is odd, then . We only need to prove that when and . Without loss of generality, we suppose that , where , , , . Note that , but is an isolated vertex of . Thus, f is not locally strong.
Sufficiency. (1) If , then or . It is easy to verify that .
(2) Let us suppose that for some . Since , then . If , then , and , or and . It is not difficult to check that . If , then a similar argument shows that . □
Lemma 9.
Let .
- (1)
- If n is odd, then ;
- (2)
- If n is even, then , where ∣ means divisible.
Proof.
Let . If , then there exist three cases by Lemma 7.
Case 1. Let us assume that and , or and . If and , then there are ways to map to and to map to . Analogously, if and , then there are ways to map to and to map to . It is known from [17] that . Thus, we obtain locally strong endomorphisms.
Case 2. Let us assume that , satisfying Lemma 7 (2). If , then there are ways to map and to P. Analogously, if , then there are ways to map and to P. Thus, we obtain locally strong endomorphisms.
Case 3. Let us assume that , satisfying Lemma 7 (3). Then, there are ways to map A to fixed , and there are ways to map to fixed . There are subgraphs in and isomorphic to . It is known from [17] that . Thus, we have
locally strong endomorphisms.
If , then there exist two cases by Lemma 8.
Case 4. Let us assume that . Then, we have locally strong endomorphisms by Lemma 4.
Case 5. Let us assume that , satisfying Lemma 8(2). Then, or . Let us suppose that for some . Since , . Then, . Note that there are two methods to map to ; there are two methods to map to ; and there are subgraphs of induced by . Thus, we obtain locally strong endomorphisms.
From the above discussion, the result of Lemma 9 can be obtained. □
Lemma 10.
.
Proof.
Let f be a mapping on defined by
Then, . Thus, . □
Lemma 11.
if and only if .
Proof.
Necessity. We just need to prove that when . Let f be a mapping on defined by
Then, . Hence, . Note that . Then, . Therefore, .
Let f be a mapping on defined by
Then, . Note that , and . Then, . Therefore, .
Sufficiency. Let ; then, it is easy to see that .
Let and . Then, there exist such that . Clearly, . There are two cases.
(1) One between i and j is in A, and the other is in . Then, there exists such that . Since , there exists such that is adjacent to both i and j. This is impossible.
(2) , or . Without loss of generality, we suppose that . Then, there are two cases.
Case 1. . Then, there exists such that . Then, either and are true, or and are true. Note that . Then, . Since , there exists such that for any . This contradicts that c is adjacent to at most two vertices of B.
Case 2. . If is the middle point in image , then there exist such that and . Since , there exists such that and , and there exists such that and . So, form cycle . This contradicts that the subgraph of induced by A is a path. If is the end point in image , then there is exactly one vertex such that . But there still exists one vertex such that , since . Since , there exists such that and , and there exists such that . Then, is adjacent to at least three vertices of set A. This is impossible.
Consequently, for . □
Lemma 12.
.
Proof.
Let , then . If and , then there are four automorphisms in this case. Analogously, there are also four automorphisms such that and . Therefore, . □
Now, we obtain the main theorems of this paper.
Theorem 1.
where;
;
;
;
;
, where ∣ means divisible;
, where Z is the set of integers.
Proof.
This follows immediately from Lemmas 3–6, 9, 11 and 12. □
Theorem 2.
Proof.
This follows immediately from Theorem 1. □
4. Conclusions
In this paper, we give the endomorphism spectra and endomorphism types of double-edge fan graphs by studying six classes of endomorphisms.
The purpose of this paper is to establish the relation between the algebraic theory of semigroups and graph theory to study the combinatorial counting properties of graphs using the algebraic properties of the endomorphic monoids of graphs. In the future, we will stick to research in this field and reveal more combinatorial properties of the endomorphism monoids of graphs.
Author Contributions
Creation and conceptualization of ideas, K.X. and H.H.; writing—original draft preparation, K.X.; writing—review and editing, K.X., H.H. and Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was partially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11301151).
Data Availability Statement
Not available.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Kelarev, A.V.; Praeger, C.E. On transitive Cayley graphs of groups and semigroups. Eur. J. Comb. 2003, 24, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knauer, U. Endomorphisms of graphs II. Various unretractive graphs. Arch. Math. 1990, 55, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, S. Bipartite graphs and their endomorphism monoids. J. Graph Theory 1996, 23, 49–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, H.; Luo, Y. Graphs whose endomorphism monoids are regular. Discret. Math. 2008, 308, 3888–3896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knauer, U. Martin Nieporte. Endomorphisms of graphs I. The monoid of strong endomorphisms. Arch. Math. 1989, 52, 607–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bӧttcher, M.; Knauer, U. Endomorphism spectra of graphs. Discret. Math. 1992, 109, 45–57. [Google Scholar]
- Fan, S. Endomopphism spectra of bipartite graph with dimater three and girth six. Southeast Asian Bull. Math. 2001, 25, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, H.; Luo, Y.; Cheng, Z. The endomorphism monoid of . Eur. J. Comb. 2008, 29, 1173–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, H.; Gu, R.; Song, Y. Endomorphism spectra of fan graphs. Ars Comb. 2019, 142, 89–99. [Google Scholar]
- Tong, M.; Hou, H. Endomorphism Spectra of Double Fan Graphs. Mathematics 2020, 8, 1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Godsil, C.; Royle, G. Algebraic Graph Theory; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Kelarev, A.V. Graph Algebras and Automata; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Kelarev, A.V. Ring Constructions and Applications; World Scientific: River Edge, NJ, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Howie, J.M. Fundamentals of Semigroup Theory; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Li, W. Graphs with regular monoid. Discret. Math. 2003, 265, 105–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Z.; Zeng, J. On the number of congruence classes of paths. Discret. Math. 2012, 312, 1300–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arworn, S.; Knauer, U.; Leeratanavalee, S. Locally strong endomorphisms of paths. Discret. Math. 2008, 308, 2525–2532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).