Next Article in Journal
A Critical Review of Bottom-Up Proteomics: The Good, the Bad, and the Future of This Field
Next Article in Special Issue
What Room for Two-Dimensional Gel-Based Proteomics in a Shotgun Proteomics World?
Previous Article in Journal
Is It Possible to Find Needles in a Haystack? Meta-Analysis of 1000+ MS/MS Files Provided by the Russian Proteomic Consortium for Mining Missing Proteins
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

The Power of Three in Cannabis Shotgun Proteomics: Proteases, Databases and Search Engines

Agriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Proteomes 2020, 8(2), 13; https://doi.org/10.3390/proteomes8020013
Received: 28 May 2020 / Revised: 12 June 2020 / Accepted: 12 June 2020 / Published: 15 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Proteomics: Technologies and Their Applications)
Cannabis research has taken off since the relaxation of legislation, yet proteomics is still lagging. In 2019, we published three proteomics methods aimed at optimizing protein extraction, protein digestion for bottom-up and middle-down proteomics, as well as the analysis of intact proteins for top-down proteomics. The database of Cannabis sativa proteins used in these studies was retrieved from UniProt, the reference repositories for proteins, which is incomplete and therefore underrepresents the genetic diversity of this non-model species. In this fourth study, we remedy this shortcoming by searching larger databases from various sources. We also compare two search engines, the oldest, SEQUEST, and the most popular, Mascot. This shotgun proteomics experiment also utilizes the power of parallel digestions with orthogonal proteases of increasing selectivity, namely chymotrypsin, trypsin/Lys-C and Asp-N. Our results show that the larger the database the greater the list of accessions identified but the longer the duration of the search. Using orthogonal proteases and different search algorithms increases the total number of proteins identified, most of them common despite differing proteases and algorithms, but many of them unique as well. View Full-Text
Keywords: cannabis sativa; bottom-up and middle-down proteomics; post-translational modification; missed cleavages; SEQUEST; Mascot; LC-MS; Asp-N; chymotrypsin; trypsin/Lys-C cannabis sativa; bottom-up and middle-down proteomics; post-translational modification; missed cleavages; SEQUEST; Mascot; LC-MS; Asp-N; chymotrypsin; trypsin/Lys-C
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Vincent, D.; Savin, K.; Rochfort, S.; Spangenberg, G. The Power of Three in Cannabis Shotgun Proteomics: Proteases, Databases and Search Engines. Proteomes 2020, 8, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/proteomes8020013

AMA Style

Vincent D, Savin K, Rochfort S, Spangenberg G. The Power of Three in Cannabis Shotgun Proteomics: Proteases, Databases and Search Engines. Proteomes. 2020; 8(2):13. https://doi.org/10.3390/proteomes8020013

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vincent, Delphine; Savin, Keith; Rochfort, Simone; Spangenberg, German. 2020. "The Power of Three in Cannabis Shotgun Proteomics: Proteases, Databases and Search Engines" Proteomes 8, no. 2: 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/proteomes8020013

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop