Next Article in Journal
Precursor Intensity-Based Label-Free Quantification Software Tools for Proteomic and Multi-Omic Analysis within the Galaxy Platform
Next Article in Special Issue
How Do the Different Proteomic Strategies Cope with the Complexity of Biological Regulations in a Multi-Omic World? Critical Appraisal and Suggestions for Improvements
Previous Article in Journal
The Power of Three in Cannabis Shotgun Proteomics: Proteases, Databases and Search Engines
Open AccessReview

A Critical Review of Bottom-Up Proteomics: The Good, the Bad, and the Future of This Field

1
Biochemistry & Proteomics Group, Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Science, Clarkson University, 8 Clarkson Avenue, Potsdam, NY 13699-5810, USA
2
Laboratory of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iasi, 700506 Iasi, Romania
3
Laboratory of Biochemistry, Department of Chemistry, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iasi, 700506 Iasi, Romania
4
Center for Fundamental Research and Experimental Development in Translation Medicine–TRANSCEND, Regional Institute of Oncology, 700506 Iasi, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Proteomes 2020, 8(3), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/proteomes8030014
Received: 1 June 2020 / Revised: 25 June 2020 / Accepted: 1 July 2020 / Published: 6 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Review Papers in Proteomes)
Proteomics is the field of study that includes the analysis of proteins, from either a basic science prospective or a clinical one. Proteins can be investigated for their abundance, variety of proteoforms due to post-translational modifications (PTMs), and their stable or transient protein–protein interactions. This can be especially beneficial in the clinical setting when studying proteins involved in different diseases and conditions. Here, we aim to describe a bottom-up proteomics workflow from sample preparation to data analysis, including all of its benefits and pitfalls. We also describe potential improvements in this type of proteomics workflow for the future. View Full-Text
Keywords: mass spectrometry; proteomics; protein identification; protein characterization mass spectrometry; proteomics; protein identification; protein characterization
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Dupree, E.J.; Jayathirtha, M.; Yorkey, H.; Mihasan, M.; Petre, B.A.; Darie, C.C. A Critical Review of Bottom-Up Proteomics: The Good, the Bad, and the Future of This Field. Proteomes 2020, 8, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/proteomes8030014

AMA Style

Dupree EJ, Jayathirtha M, Yorkey H, Mihasan M, Petre BA, Darie CC. A Critical Review of Bottom-Up Proteomics: The Good, the Bad, and the Future of This Field. Proteomes. 2020; 8(3):14. https://doi.org/10.3390/proteomes8030014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dupree, Emmalyn J.; Jayathirtha, Madhuri; Yorkey, Hannah; Mihasan, Marius; Petre, Brindusa A.; Darie, Costel C. 2020. "A Critical Review of Bottom-Up Proteomics: The Good, the Bad, and the Future of This Field" Proteomes 8, no. 3: 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/proteomes8030014

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop