Next Article in Journal
Comparative Proteome-Wide Analysis of Bone Marrow Microenvironment of β-Thalassemia/Hemoglobin E
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of Targeted Mass Spectrometry-Based Approaches for Quantitation of Proteins Enriched in the Postsynaptic Density (PSD)
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Analysis of the Peptide Terminome Characterizes Dynamics of Proteolytic Regulation in Vertebrate Skeletal Muscle Under Severe Stress
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sex-Specific Proteomic Changes Induced by Genetic Deletion of Fibroblast Growth Factor 14 (FGF14), a Regulator of Neuronal Ion Channels
Open AccessCorrection

Correction: Baucum II, Anthony J. et al. Proteomic Analysis of the Spinophilin Interactome in Rodent Striatum Following Psychostimulant Sensitization. Proteomes 2018, 6, 53

1
Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine Medical Neuroscience Graduate Program, Indianapolis, IN 46278, USA
2
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46278, USA
3
Department of Biology, Ball State University, Muncie, IN 47306, USA
4
Department of Biology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
5
Stark Neurosciences Research Institute Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
6
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Proteomes 2019, 7(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/proteomes7010007
Received: 16 January 2019 / Accepted: 17 January 2019 / Published: 13 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neuroproteomics)
The author wishes to make the following corrections to the methods section of their paper [1]:
The corrections include: (1) Replace the sentence “Mouse striatum (including both dorsal and ventral (accumbens) striatum or olfactory tubercle) was homogenized and sonicated in 1 mL in a low-ionic strength Tris buffer containing 20 mM Tris, 10 mM DTT, 2 mM 0.5 M EDTA, 10% Triton X-100, 1% protease inhibitor cocktail (Bimake, Houston, TX, USA)” with “Mouse striatum (including both dorsal and ventral (accumbens) striatum or olfactory tubercle) was homogenized and sonicated in 1 mL in a low-ionic strength Tris buffer containing 2 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM DTT, 2 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, and 1X protease inhibitor cocktail (Bimake, Houston, TX, USA)”; (2) replace the sentence “magnetic separation in an immunoprecipitation wash buffer (50 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.5% (v/v) Triton X-100)” with “magnetic separation in an immunoprecipitation wash buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.5% (v/v) Triton X-100)”.
These corrections do not affect the conclusions of the study. We apologize for the typographical errors, and the authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by these changes. The manuscript will be updated, and the original manuscript will remain online on the article webpage.

References

  1. Watkins, D.S.; True, J.D.; Mosley, A.L.; Baucum, A.J., II. Proteomic Analysis of the Spinophilin Interactome in Rodent Striatum Following Psychostimulant Sensitization. Proteomes 2018, 6, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Back to TopTop