Next Article in Journal
Engineering Education and Technological/Professional Learning
Previous Article in Journal
Predictive Models for Imbalanced Data: A School Dropout Perspective
Open AccessArticle

The Concept of Active Learning and the Measurement of Learning Outcomes: A Review of Research in Engineering Higher Education

1
Faculty of Education and Culture, Tampere University, P.O. Box 700, FI-33014 Tampere, Finland
2
Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, Siltavuorenpenger 1B, 00014 Psychologicum, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2019, 9(4), 276; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040276
Received: 4 October 2019 / Revised: 9 November 2019 / Accepted: 14 November 2019 / Published: 19 November 2019
Active learning has gained growing political, instructional, and research interest. However, the definitions of active learning are wide. The learning outcomes related to it have been mostly positive but the measurement methods are not without problems. This review provides an overview of active learning, especially in the context of engineering higher education, by answering two research questions: (1) How is the concept of active learning defined and justified in engineering higher education research? (2) What are the learning outcomes connected to active learning and how is learning measured in engineering higher education research? Sixty-six empirical articles were analyzed inductively with qualitative content analysis. The analysis showed that active learning was defined in various ways, and in some articles, it was not defined at all. In addition, justification (theoretical or empirical) for the use of active learning was seldomly reported. Finally, the indicators used to measure the impact of active learning on students’ learning outcomes were mostly based on students’ self-report data and focused on course specific development in subject-related knowledge. More thorough descriptions and theoretical justifications, as well as the consideration of learning outcomes with appropriate research methods, could reinforce the transparency of empirical interventions and the application of active learning. View Full-Text
Keywords: active learning; learning outcomes; higher education; engineering; review active learning; learning outcomes; higher education; engineering; review
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Hartikainen, S.; Rintala, H.; Pylväs, L.; Nokelainen, P. The Concept of Active Learning and the Measurement of Learning Outcomes: A Review of Research in Engineering Higher Education. Educ. Sci. 2019, 9, 276.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop