Next Article in Journal
Has the Portuguese Compensatory Education Program Been Successful in Reducing Disadvantaged Schools’ Performance Gaps? A 15-Year Quantitative Analysis of National Exams
Next Article in Special Issue
Re-Thinking the “Problem” in Inquiry-Based Pedagogies through Exemplarity and World-Oriented
Previous Article in Journal
Advantages and Disadvantages of Modeling Beliefs by Single Item and Scale Models in the Context of the Theory of Planned Behavior
Previous Article in Special Issue
Developing Connective Pedagogy in Cultural Research—A Case Study from the Teachers’ Perspective in Adopting a Problem-Based Approach in Higher Education
Open AccessArticle

Mapping the Evaluation of Problem-Oriented Pedagogies in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review

Centre for Research on Problem-oriented Project Learning, Roskilde University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
Educ. Sci. 2019, 9(4), 269; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040269
Received: 8 October 2019 / Revised: 1 November 2019 / Accepted: 6 November 2019 / Published: 8 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Problem-based Pedagogies in Higher Education)
Problem-oriented pedagogies have emerged as strategic way for universities to respond to an international higher education agenda that increasingly prioritises innovative, student-centred learning, and the cultivation of both civic and employability competences. Alongside this pedagogic shift is a policy-driven emphasis on monitoring teaching and learning for quality assurance purposes. This article aims to untangle the ways problem- and inquiry-based pedagogies are currently evaluated in universities, and thus consider how ‘quality’ implementation, and the effects of this suite of pedagogic approaches, might be better understood, practised, and measured. Taking a systematic approach to the review of the literature, the article maps evaluation methods that assess the effectiveness of problem-oriented and inquiry-based pedagogies implemented in university settings. The key findings include that evaluation methods in the field (i) prioritise qualification-related outcomes, (ii) are limited in scale and scope, and (iii) often function as demonstrations of performativity rather than as part of an ongoing improvement cycle. The article argues that evaluations that take a multi-method approach from the perspective of a range of stakeholders, with an exploration of civic and social competences in addition to employability outcomes, would significantly strengthen the field. View Full-Text
Keywords: problem-based learning; inquiry learning; systematic literature review; pedagogic evaluation; quality assurance; higher education; measurement problem-based learning; inquiry learning; systematic literature review; pedagogic evaluation; quality assurance; higher education; measurement
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Acton, R. Mapping the Evaluation of Problem-Oriented Pedagogies in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Educ. Sci. 2019, 9, 269.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop