Next Article in Journal
Supporting Project-Based Learning through Economical and Flexible Learning Spaces
Previous Article in Journal
The Dual-Coding and Multimedia Learning Theories: Film Subtitles as a Vocabulary Teaching Tool
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multi-Timescale Education Program for Temporal Expansion in Ecocentric Education: Using Fixed-Point Time-Lapse Images for Phenology Observation
Open AccessReview

The Contested Space of Animals in Education: A Response to the “Animal Turn” in Education for Sustainable Development

Department of Pedagogical, Curricular and Professional Studies, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden
Educ. Sci. 2019, 9(3), 211; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030211
Received: 31 May 2019 / Revised: 19 July 2019 / Accepted: 31 July 2019 / Published: 8 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ecocentric Education)
The so-called “animal turn”, having been on the agenda for around 15 years in the humanities and social sciences, is gaining force also in the educational sciences, typically with an orientation toward posthumanist ontologies. One particular space where educational “more-than-human” relations are debated is the field of education for sustainable development (ESD). This paper responds to two recent contributions to this debate, both positioned within ESD frameworks. The purpose of this response is two-fold: First, to give a critical account of the knowledge claims of the two articles, their overlaps and divergences, as well as their implications for pedagogical practice and their potential consequences for the position of animals in education and in society at large. The meaning and usefulness of analytic tools such as “critical pluralism” and “immanent critique” in relation to animals in education is discussed, as well as whose realities are represented in ESD, revealing contested spaces of teaching and learning manifested through an “enlightened distance” to anthropocentrism in-between compliance and change. The second purpose is to sketch a foundation of reflective practice for critical animal pedagogies, offering a critical theory-based form of resistance against recent posthumanist configurations of the “animal question” in education and beyond. View Full-Text
Keywords: education for sustainable development; animals; posthumanism; anthropocentrism; more-than-human; critical animal pedagogies education for sustainable development; animals; posthumanism; anthropocentrism; more-than-human; critical animal pedagogies
MDPI and ACS Style

Pedersen, H. The Contested Space of Animals in Education: A Response to the “Animal Turn” in Education for Sustainable Development. Educ. Sci. 2019, 9, 211.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map

1
Back to TopTop