Next Article in Journal
Challenges for Educational Technologists in the 21st Century
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring Elements That Support Teachers Engagement in Online Professional Development
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Double Blind Peer-Review in Education Sciences

1
School of Education, Faculty of Arts and Education, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
2
MDPI AG, Klybeckstrasse 64, CH-4057 Basel, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2015, 5(3), 220; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci5030220
Submission received: 30 July 2015 / Revised: 30 July 2015 / Accepted: 30 July 2015 / Published: 31 July 2015
We are pleased to announce that all manuscripts submitted to Education Sciences after 1 July 2015 will be reviewed using a double blind peer-review process. This means that, in addition to authors not knowing the identities of reviewers, during the review process reviewers will not know the identities of the article’s authors. This process has become standard in the field and we are pleased to respond to the feedback of scholars wishing to publish in the journal.
Our sincere hope is that the change to double blind peer-review will give a more balanced review, with feedback less likely to suffer from unconscious bias and reviewers able to focus solely on the work in hand. We also believe that this process will benefit scholars without an established reputation.
The standard of peer-review in Education Sciences has been excellent and we would like to take this opportunity to thank the many reviewers who have participated, along with the Editorial Board and other academic editors who have assisted in overseeing the editorial process. We hope that this step will serve to further improve the standards of Education Sciences.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Albright, J.; Rittman, M. Double Blind Peer-Review in Education Sciences. Educ. Sci. 2015, 5, 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci5030220

AMA Style

Albright J, Rittman M. Double Blind Peer-Review in Education Sciences. Education Sciences. 2015; 5(3):220. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci5030220

Chicago/Turabian Style

Albright, James, and Martyn Rittman. 2015. "Double Blind Peer-Review in Education Sciences" Education Sciences 5, no. 3: 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci5030220

APA Style

Albright, J., & Rittman, M. (2015). Double Blind Peer-Review in Education Sciences. Education Sciences, 5(3), 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci5030220

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop