Exploring the Use of Magic Tricks with Students with Disabilities to Meet the Universal Design for Learning Engagement Consideration of Nurturing Joy and Play: A Systematic Narrative Review
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Methodology
- Study used empirical data or a conceptual framework;
- Study published in peer-reviewed journal;
- Study included key word(s) connected to the research question;
- Study written in English;
- Study rated a “2” or “3” on the SRCRS.
- Study rated a “0” or “1” on the SRCRS;
- Study focused on magic purely as a performance (e.g., magic show attendance, etc.);
- Study not in English;
- Study elements of magic experience not related to teaching/learning outcomes;
- Study editorial or opinion piece.
3. Results
3.1. Student Engagement
3.2. UDL and Students with Disabilities
3.3. Nurturing Joy and Play for Students with Disabilities
3.4. Magic Tricks in Education and with Students with Disabilities
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. Incorporating Magic in Academic Subject Areas
Academic Subject | Strategy | Examples (Add Words “Magic Trick” to the Titles When Searching Google) |
Math | Use magic tricks involving dice, numbers and counting. |
|
Science | Use magic tricks to demonstrate scientific principles (e.g., make things float or change color). |
|
Language Arts | Create stories, poems or play scripts. |
|
History/Social Studies | Incorporate historical events into magic performances. |
|
Reading | Write a magic script including current vocabulary words. |
|
Spelling | Use spelling words in a magic script. |
|
Art | Have students color, draw, cut or glue to make a magic trick. |
|
Writing | Have students write a magic script. |
|
Character Education Messages | Use words like integrity, respectful, responsible, honest and caring in a magic script. |
|
Appendix B. 30 s or Less Magic Tricks to Perform for Classroom Rewards
Color Changing Wand | Rising Wand | Appearing Cane |
Jumping Rubber Bands | Floating Ring on Rubber Band | Color Changing Scarf |
Static Magic Straw | Linking Paper Clips | Rising Card |
Vanishing and Appearing Coin: French Drop | Miracle Sponge Ball to Rabbit | Ring Escape from Rope |
Stiff Rope | One Hand Rope Trick | Dissolving Knot |
Ball and Vase | Prayer Vase | Ring on Chain |
Coin Slide | Link and Unlink Straw | Cut and Restored String in Straw |
Cut and Restored String in Envelope | Rubber Band Penetration Through Thumb | Unlink Rubber Band |
Magic Coloring Book | Threading the Needle Rope Trick | Pen Through Dollar |
Vanishing Toothpick | Rubber Pencil Illusion | Magician’s Choice (Equivocation) |
Exploding Dice | Magic Crayon Trick | Pulling Thumb Off Illusion |
The Haunted Key | Coin in Bottle | Coin from Elbow |
Princess Card Trick | Card Warp | Broken and Restored Rubber Band |
Tree of Diamonds | Disintegration Chamber | Stop Light Cards |
Hot Rod Stick | Color Cube-Tell-A-Vision | Wonder Bubbles |
Appendix C. Dr. Dan’s 7 “Magical Steps to Enhance Student Engagement in the Classroom
Step 1 Anticipatory Set (Setting the Stage): For teachers starting the implementation of magic tricks in the classroom, it is important to introduce the program in a fun manner. Teachers might consider starting by inviting a local magician to perform to introduce magic tricks to their classroom. Another option is to show a video performance of magic tricks. Teachers can also learn and prepare a short magic show and perform as a way of setting the stage for upcoming magic tricks. Teachers should not feel they need to be professional magicians to perform magic tricks for their students. There are many levels in magic, and it can be enjoyed at every level. Professional magicians, just like other professionals, may include more skills than amateurs when they perform, but not having professional level skills should not deter amateurs from performing magic tricks. Just as one does not need to be a professional basketball player to enjoy playing a game of basketball, one can enjoy performing magic tricks without being a professional magician. Regardless of how you introduce magic, it is important to set the tone for what is to come by getting the students excited about learning and performing magic tricks. |
Step 2 Select Age-Appropriate Easy-to-Learn Magic Tricks: Find age-appropriate easy-to-learn magic tricks and design lessons to teach them. If teachers use everyday objects (e.g., rubber bands, envelopes and paper clips), they can use YouTube or other tutorial videos to include in their lesson. If using commercially purchased magic props, instructions are usually included with the trick and can be used as part of the lesson. A great overall resource to use is the classic book, Mark Wilson’s Complete Course in Magic, which has many easy-to-perform magic trick instructions with everyday objects and even includes instructions for easy to make stage illusions. The book has been in print since 1975 but still has relevant material that can be used as a teacher’s manual for teaching magic tricks. It is important that the tricks match the child’s age and dexterity level. Teachers should determine the skills needed for each trick and decide if the students have the skills needed to successfully perform the trick. Since eye–hand coordination skills are part of many magic tricks, an evaluation of this prerequisite skill should be done prior to introducing most magic tricks. It is important that teachers do not introduce tricks beyond the capabilities of the students. |
Step 3 Perform the Trick to be Taught: The students need to see the magic trick performed so they will know the audience’s perspective. Students can use their critical thinking skills to guess how the magic trick is done. Ideally, the students should be excited and inspired to learn the trick. Teachers can perform or find a video of the magic trick performance. Knowing the audience’s perspective gives the students a model of how they too should impress their audience when they perform the magic trick for others. |
Step 4 Teach the Magic Move (Technique): Students should know the magic move or technique required to hide the secret behind the trick. Understanding how the trick works and the proper handling techniques needed, such as angling and positioning or sleight-of-hand, are the critical attributes of a successful magic trick performance. Performing and understanding the “magic move” is a separate skill set than the presentation itself. Although teachers can introduce presentation ideas, it is important to practice the “magic moves” until they are mastered, prior to performing the trick to others. |
Step 5 Create the Performance Presentation: After the students have successfully mastered the techniques of the magic trick, focus can be placed on the presentation of the magic trick. This may involve storytelling with a script. Magicians refer to the script as the “patter for the trick.” Timing, dramatic pauses, clear speech and eye contact are all important elements of the presentation of a magic trick. In some cases, magic tricks can be performed with music without dialogue, but attention to presentation details (e.g., timing and dramatic pauses) is still very important. One of the most important aspects of presenting a magic trick is called “misdirection.” Misdirection is directing the audience and managing the audience’s attention to what the performer wants them to see and away from the “magic move” itself. Students should practice and rehearse the magic performance until they feel confident in their performance. A common strategy is to practice in front of a mirror to see what the audience will see. Videoing their practice is another effective strategy. Students can watch their performance and see the audience’s view. Once the students feel comfortable, they are ready to perform their magic tricks for others. Never have a student perform until they believe they are ready. |
Step 6 Perform for Others: When performing for others, special consideration should be given to create a successful first performance. Performing for the teacher and/or close friend in a safe, non-judgmental environment is a good strategy prior to performing for their peers. One option may be to have the students perform first for a puppet. Another effective strategy is to perform for younger children (e.g., preschool or kindergarten class). Creating success and confidence in their magic performance is the ultimate goal. |
Step 7 Reflect on the Performance: Reflecting on the performance is a part of the overall learning process. This is where the performers can learn what they did well and areas where they can improve upon for future performances. It is very important that the students self-reflect and evaluate their own performance instead of only hearing feedback from their teacher. An effective strategy is to video the magic performance so the students can watch and critique their own performance. Sometimes students are harder on themselves, and it is essential that teachers focus the students’ attention on the positive aspects of their performance to reinforce confidence and self-assurance. |
References
- Abid, N., Saeed, A., & Akhter, M. (2022). Examining relationship between secondary school students’ academic engagement and their academic achievement: A case of Punjab. Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 9(2), 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alibekova, M. A. (2024). From isolation to integration: The role of a positive classroom community in driving student motivation and engagement. Mental Enlightenment Scientific-Methodological Journal, 5(3), 34–41. [Google Scholar]
- Almeqdad, Q. I., Alodat, A. M., Alquraan, M. F., Mohaidat, M. A., & Al-Makhzoomy, A. K. (2023). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2218191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almeqdad, Q. I., Bataineh, O., & Aljarrah, A. (2011). The level of social skills amongst students with and without learning disabilities in Jordan according to their teachers. Jordanian Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(3), 253–270. [Google Scholar]
- Ammar, A., & Hassan, R. M. (2018). Taking it through: Collaborative dialogue and second language learning. Language Learning, 68(1), 46–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anwar, M. N., Mushtaq, N., Mubeen, A., & Iqbal, M. (2024). The power of ZPD: Enhancing teaching and learning. Journal of Education and Social Studies, 5(2), 396–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Axelson, R. D., & Flick, A. (2011). Defining student engagement. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 43(1), 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagienski, S., & Kuhn, G. (2019). The crossroads of magic and wellbeing: A review of wellbeing-focused magic programs, empirical studies, and conceivable theories. International Journal of Wellbeing, 9(2), 41–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baker, M., & Davila, G. S. (2018). Inquiry is play: Playful participatory research. Young Children, 73(5), 64–71. [Google Scholar]
- Baybayon, G. (2021). The use of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework in teaching and learning: A meta-analysis. Academia Letters, 7, e692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beazidou, E. (2024). Inclusive indicators that promote school practices: Social and academic. In Psycholinguistic dynamics and educational inclusion for children and adolescents (p. 1). IGI Global. [Google Scholar]
- Bedore, B. (2004). 101 improv games for children and adults: Fun and creativity with improvisation and acting. Hunter House. [Google Scholar]
- Berns, G. (2010). Satisfaction: Sensation seeking, novelty, and the science of finding true fulfillment. Henry Holt and Company. [Google Scholar]
- Biaddang, D., Mauline, L., & Caroy, A. A. (2024). Student voice and choice in the virtual classroom: Engagement strategies. Discover Education, 3(1), 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blackorby, J., & Cameto, R. (2004). Changes in school engagement and academic performance of students with disabilities. In Wave 1 wave 2 overview (pp. 1–8). SRI International. [Google Scholar]
- Bow, J. N. (1988). Treating resistant children. Child and Adolescent Social Work, 5, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruefach, T., & Reynolds, J. R. (2022). Social isolation and achievement of students with learning disabilities. Social Science Research, 104, 102667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CAST. (n.d.). What we do. In A look at all CAST does. Available online: https://www.cast.org/what-we-do/ (accessed on 11 May 2025).
- CAST. (2022). About Universal Design for Learning. In What is Universal Design for Learning (UDL)? CAST. Available online: https://www.cast.org/what-we-do/universal-design-for-learning/ (accessed on 11 May 2025).
- CAST. (2024a). UDL Guidelines—Engagement—Consideration 7.3 nurture joy and play. In Nurture joy and play. CAST. Available online: https://udlguidelines.cast.org/engagement/interests-identities/joy-play/ (accessed on 11 May 2025).
- CAST. (2024b). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 3.0. In The UDL guidelines. CAST. Available online: https://udlguidelines.cast.org (accessed on 11 May 2025).
- Catlett, C., & Soukakou, E. P. (2019). Assessing opportunities to support each child: 12 practices for quality inclusion. Young Children, 74(3), 34–43. [Google Scholar]
- Conner, J., Chen, J., Mitra, D. L., & Holquist, S. E. (2024). Student voice and choice in the classroom: Promoting academic engagement. In Instructional strategies for active learning (Vol. 61). BoD—Books on Demand. [Google Scholar]
- Conner, J., Posner, M., & Nsowaa, B. (2022). The relationship between student voice and student engagement in urban high schools. Urban Review, 54, 755–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cools, R. (2011). Dopaminergic control of the striatum for high-level cognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 21(3), 402–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cronqvist, M. (2021). Joy in learning: When children feel good and realize they learn. Educare, (3), 54–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crossman, D. C. (2013). Fostering creativity within the classroom. [Unpublished Masters Project]. Department of Creative Studies, Buffalo State College. [Google Scholar]
- Cundall, M. K. (2007). Humor and the limits of incongruity. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2–3), 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dang, L. C., Donde, A., Madison, C., O’Neil, J. P., & Jagust, W. J. (2012). Striatal dopamine influences the default mode network to affect shifting between object features. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 1960–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darrow, A. (2009). Barriers to effective inclusion and strategies to overcome them. General Music Today, 22(3), 29–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dennis, S. L. (2017, February 6). Increase student motivation with more choices. (EJ1131742). ERIC. [Google Scholar]
- Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DiCarlo, S. E. (2009). Too much content, not enough thinking, and too little FUN! Advances in Physiology Education, 33, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doğan, U. (2015). Student engagement, academic self-efficacy, and academic motivation as predictors of academic performance. The Anthropologist, 20(3), 553–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dowling, J. S. (2014). School-age children talking about humor: Data from focus groups. Humor, 27(1), 121–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dubinsky, J. M., & Hamid, A. A. (2024). The neuroscience of active learning and direct instruction. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 163, 105737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dwyer, K. K., & Davidson, M. M. (2012). Is public speaking really more feared than death? Communication Research Reports, 29(2), 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elder, K. L., Deviney, D. E., MacKinnon, R. J., & Dyer, J. (2012). Using illusions in the classroom: Principles, best practices, and measurement. [Unpublished manuscript].
- Elkin, D. J., & Pravder, H. D. (2018). The art of magic: Bridging magic and medicine. The Lancet, 391(10127), 1254–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eriksson, L., & Granlund, M. (2004). Perceived participation. A comparison of students with disabilities and students without disabilities. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 6(3), 206–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ezell, D., & Klein-Ezell, C. (2003). M.A.G.I.C. W.O.R.K.S (Motivating activities geared-to instilling confidence-wonderful opportunities to raise kid’s self-esteem). Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38(4), 441–450. [Google Scholar]
- Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fredricks, J., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frith, G. H., & Walker, J. C. (1983). Magic as motivation for handicapped students. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 15(2), 108–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galea, A. (2025). Positive experiences of inclusive education of children within the autism spectrum in primary schools [Master’s thesis, University of Malta]. [Google Scholar]
- Garibay, J. C. (2015). Creating a positive classroom climate for diversity. UCLA Diversity & Faculty Development, 4, 3–4. [Google Scholar]
- Geletu, G. M., & Mihiretie, D. M. (2024). The effects of primary school teachers’ professional development activities on differentiated instructional practices and possibilities of elevating students’ learning engagement. Education 3–13, 52(8), 1222–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gentrup, S., Lorenz, G., Kristen, C., & Kogan, I. (2020). Self-fulfilling prophecies in the classroom: Teacher expectations, teacher feedback and student achievement. Learning and Instruction, 66, 101296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gesel, S. A., Foreman-Murray, L., & Gilmour, A. F. (2022). Sufficiency of teachers’ access to resources and supports for students with disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 45(3), 204–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grawemeyer, B., Mavrikis, M., Holmes, W., Gutiérrez-Santos, S., Wiedmann, M., & Rummel, N. (2017). Affective learning: Improving engagement and enhancing learning with affect-aware feedback. User Model User-Adapted Interaction, 27, 119–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, K. B., Terry, N. P., & Gallagher, P. A. (2014). Progress in language and literacy skills among children with disabilities in inclusive early reading first classrooms. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 33(4), 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grigorenko, E. L., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, L. S., Wagner, R. K., Willcutt, E. G., & Fletcher, J. M. (2020). Understanding, educating, and supporting children with specific learning disabilities: 50 years of science and practice. American Psychologist, 75(1), 37–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grossman, H. (2002). Ending discrimination in special education (2nd ed.). Charles C. Thomas, Publisher, Ltd. [Google Scholar]
- Hall, T. E., Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (2012). Universal design for learning in the classroom: Practical application. Guilford Press. [Google Scholar]
- Hamilton, A. (2023). The neuroscience of play. In Seriously therapeutic play with LEGO® (pp. 31–48). Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Han, C., & Lei, J. (2024). Teachers’ and students’ beliefs towards Universal Design for Learning framework: A scoping review. SAGE Open, 14(3), 21582440241272032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hart, R., & Walton, M. (2010). Magic as a therapeutic intervention to promote coping in hospitalized pediatric patients. Pediatric Nursing, 36(1), 11. [Google Scholar]
- Harte, D., & Spencer, K. (2014). Sleight of hand: Magic, therapy and motor performance. Journal of Hand Therapy, 27(1), 67–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hedne, M. R., Norman, E., & Metcalfe, J. (2016). Intuitive feelings of warmth and confidence in insight and noninsight problem solving of magic tricks. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1408), 1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henricks, T. (2008). The nature of play. American Journal of Play, 1(2), 157–180. [Google Scholar]
- Henry, K., Knight, K. E., & Thornberry, T. P. (2011). School disengagement as a predictor of dropout, delinquency, and problem substance use during adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(2), 156–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 151–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hilas, C. S., & Politis, A. (2014). Motivating students’ participation in a computer networks course by means of magic, drama and games. SpringerPlus, 3(1), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hines, A., Bundy, A. C., Haertsch, M., & Wallen, M. A. (2018). Magic-themed upper limb intervention for children with unilateral cerebral palsy: The perspectives of parents. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 22(2), 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hirsh-Pasek, K., Zosh, J. M., Golinkoff, R., Gray, J., Robb, M., & Kaufman, J. (2015). Putting education in “educational” apps: Lessons from the science of learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16, 3–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hovey, K. A., Gauvreau, A. N., & Lohmann, M. J. (2022). Providing multiple means of action and expression in the early childhood classroom through a universal design for learning framework. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 11(2), 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ikhsanudin, I., Sudarsono, S., & Salam, U. (2019). Using magic trick problem-based activities to improve students’ engagement in a listening class. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations and Materials, 1(1), 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- James, A., & Nerantzi, C. (2019). The power of play in higher education: Creativity in tertiary learning. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
- Jardinez, M. J., & Natividad, L. R. (2024). The advantages and challenges of inclusive education: Striving for equity in the classroom. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 12(2), 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeet, G., & Pant, S. (2023). Creating joyful experiences for enhancing meaningful learning and integrating 21st century skills. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 6(2), 900–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kashdan, T. B., Stiksma, M. C., Disabato, D. D., McKnight, P. E., Bekier, J., Kaji, J., & Lazarus, R. (2018). The five-dimensional curiosity scale: Capturing the bandwidth of curiosity and identifying four unique subgroups of curious people. Journal of Research in Personality, 73, 130–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katz, J. (2015). Implementing the three-block model of universal design for learning: Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy, stress, and job satisfaction in inclusive classrooms K-12. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(1–20), 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaufer, D. (2011, January). What can neuroscience research teach us about teaching? (Vol. 25) How Students Learn Working Group at the GSI Teaching and Resource Center, University of California, Berkeley. [Google Scholar]
- Klonowska, K., & Chen, E. Z. (2024, June). Meet the demands of the future today with Universal Design for Learning (UDL). In Conference Proceedings. The Future of Education 2024. Pixel-online.net. [Google Scholar]
- Koushki, A. L. (2019). Engaging English learners through literature, fairy tales, and drama. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 8(2), 138–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kovács, I. J. (2023). Young magicians in kindergarten: Skill development through performing magic tricks. Theory into Practice, 62(2), 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lam, S., Wong, B., Yang, H., & Yi, L. (2012). Understanding student engagement with a contextual model. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 403–419). Springer. [Google Scholar]
- Leddington, J. (2016). The experience of magic. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 74(3), 253–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- León, W. U., & Cely, E. V. (2010). Encouraging teenagers to improve speaking skills through games in a Colombian public school. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 12(1), 11–31. [Google Scholar]
- Lester, D. (2013). A review of the student engagement literature. Focus on Colleges, Universities, and Schools, 7(1), 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, C., Solis, S. L., Jensen, H., Hopkins, E., Neale, D., Zosh, J., Pasek, K. H., & Whitebread, D. (2017). Neuroscience and learning through play: A review of the evidence. The LEGO Foundation. [Google Scholar]
- Lyons, M., & Menolotto, A. M. (1990). Use of magic in psychiatric occupational therapy: Rationale, results and recommendations. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 37, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, R. E., & Ochsner, K. N. (2016). The neuroscience of emotion regulation development: Implications for education. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST. [Google Scholar]
- Moreira, P. A., Bilimória, H., Pedrosa, C., Pires, M. D., Cepa, M. D., de Deus Mestre, M., Ferreira, M., & Serra, N. (2015). Engagement with school in students with special educational needs. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 15(3), 361–375. [Google Scholar]
- Moss, S. A., Irons, M., & Boland, M. (2016). The magic of magic: The effect of magic tricks on subsequent engagement with lecture material. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(1), 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nelson, L. P., & Crow, M. L. (2014). Do active-learning strategies improve students’ critical thinking? Higher Education Studies, 4(2), 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ng, B. (2018). The neuroscience of growth mindset and intrinsic motivation. Brain Sciences, 8(2), 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ntoulia, A. (2023). Tapping playful research to create an inclusive classroom community. YC Young Children, 78(3), 71–79. [Google Scholar]
- Omer-Attali, M., Lefstein, A., & Netz, H. (2024). Laughter and classroom boundaries. Language and Education, 39(1), 154–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ostroff, W. L. (2016). Cultivating curiosity in K-12 classrooms: How to promote and sustain deep learning. ASCD. [Google Scholar]
- Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petty, R. E., DeMarree, K. G., Brinol, P., Horcajo, J., & Strathman, A. J. (2008). Need for cognition can magnify or attenuate priming effects in social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 900–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pérez-Salas, C. P., Parra, V., Sáez-Delgado, F., & Olivares, H. (2021). Influence of teacher-student relationships and special educational needs on student engagement and disengagement: A correlational study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 708157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phillips, J. (2025). The power of expectations and implications for DLIFLC teachers and students. Dialog on Language Instruction, 35(1), 63–70. [Google Scholar]
- Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. Norton. [Google Scholar]
- Pipe, M., & Wilson, J. C. (1994). Cues and secrets: Influences on children’s event reports. Developmental Psychology, 30(4), 515–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poh, J. H., & Adcock, R. A. (2025). Interactions between memory and reward systems. In Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (3rd ed., Vol. 3). Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- Porter, J., McDermott, T., Daniels, H., & Ingram, J. (2024). Feeling part of the school and feeling safe: Further development of a tool for investigating school belonging. Educational Studies, 50(3), 382–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Praveen, A., Bashir, F., Ganie, A. N., Jan, S., & Zimik, P. (2024). The use of UDL in an inclusive classroom: A review based study. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(4), 1–26. [Google Scholar]
- Reyes, M. R., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., White, M., & Salovey, P. (2012). Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rimm-Kaufman, S., & Sandilos, L. (2011). Improving students’ relationships with teachers to provide essential supports for learning. Teacher’s Modules, 6(8), 2. [Google Scholar]
- Rusticus, S. A., Wilson, D., Casiro, O., & Lovato, C. (2020). Evaluating the quality of health professions learning environments: Development and validation of the health education learning environment survey (HELES). Evaluation & the Health Professions, 43(3), 162–168. [Google Scholar]
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saha, R., Bhushan, K., & Satgunam, P. (2023). Feasibility of measuring eye–hand coordination in children with developmental delay using Sanet Vision Integrator. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 42(2), 518–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schultz, W. (2002). Getting formal with dopamine and reward. Neuron, 36(2), 241–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Semmar, Y., & Al-Thani, T. (2015). Piagetian and Vygotskian approaches to cognitive development in the kindergarten classroom. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 5(2), 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, S. (2024). Enhancing inclusive learning environments: Strategies for curriculum adaptation and modification. Future of Special Education in India, 109, 121. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma, S., & Sarkar, P. (2024). Bridging gaps in special education: A comprehensive review of student motivation and engagement for inclusive classrooms. Diversity, Equity & Inclusion, 145, 148. [Google Scholar]
- Shean, M., & Mander, D. (2020). Building emotional safety for students in school environments: Challenges and opportunities. In Health and education interdependence: Thriving from birth to adulthood (pp. 225–248). Springer. [Google Scholar]
- Shumow, L., & Schmidt, J. (2014). Enhancing adolescents’ motivation for science: Research-based strategies for teaching male and female students. Corwin Press. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, S. J., & Lowrey, K. A. (2017). Making the UDL framework universal: Implications for individuals with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 55(1), 2–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spencer, K. (2011). Hocus Focus: Evaluating the benefits of integrating magic tricks in the classroom. Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education, 2(16), 87–99. [Google Scholar]
- Spencer, K. (2012). Hocus Focus: Evaluating the academic and functional benefits of integrating magic tricks in the classroom. Journal of the International Association of Special Education, 13, 87–99. [Google Scholar]
- Spencer, K., & Balmer, S. (2020). A pilot study: Magic tricks in the ELL classroom increasing verbal communication initiative and self-efficacy. English Language Teaching and Linguistics Studies, 2(1), 11–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strnadová, I., Danker, J., Dowse, L., & Tso, M. (2023). Supporting students with disability to improve academic, social and emotional, and self-determination and life-skills outcomes: Umbrella review of evidence-based practices. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(14), 3606–3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subbotsky, E. (2010). Curiosity and exploratory behavior towards possible and impossible events in children and adults. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 481–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subbotsky, E., Hysted, C., & Jones, N. (2010). Watching films with magical content facilitates creativity in children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 111(1), 261–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sui, P., & Sui, M. (2007, August 19). Use of magic: Creative means for psychosocial rehabilitation [Paper Presentation]. International Health and Mental Health Conference, Hong Kong, China. [Google Scholar]
- Sullivan, A. L., Kohli, N., Farnsworth, E. M., Sadeh, S., & Jones, L. (2017). Longitudinal models of reading achievement of students with learning disabilities and without disabilities. School Psychology Quarterly, 32(3), 336–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suwarni, S., Poncowati, S. D., Supriatna, E., Adiputra, D. K., & Pasongli, H. (2024). Provide instructors with a learning experience that is fun, convenient, andcc enjoyable for students. EDUKASIA Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The LEGO Foundation. (2017, June). What we mean by: Learning through play. The LEGO Foundation. [Google Scholar]
- Thelen, R. L., Burns, M. K., & Christiansen, N. D. (2003). Effects of high-incidence disability labels on the expectations of teachers, peers, and college students. Ethical Human Sciences and Services, 5(3), 183–193. [Google Scholar]
- Thiemann-Bourque, K. (2021). Peer-mediated intervention. In Encyclopedia of autism spectrum disorders (pp. 3384–3393). Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- Thomas, A. E., & Mueller, F. H. (2017). A magic dwells in each beginning? Contextual effects of autonomy support on students’ intrinsic motivation in unfamiliar situations. Social Psychology of Education, 20(1), 791–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomason, S. (2021, October 5). Learning magic tricks can help self-esteem of kids with ADHD. The University of Alabama at Birmingham news. Research & Innovation. Available online: https://www.uab.edu/news/research-innovation/learning-magic-tricks-can-help-self-esteem-of-kids-with-adhd (accessed on 5 May 2025).
- Toth, M. D., & Fitzgerald, M. (2025). Why is deeper student engagement important? 6 strategies for increasing achievement by engaging students with academic rigor. Instructional Empowerment’s Applied Research Center. [Google Scholar]
- Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review (November 2010). In Lancaster university, department of educational research. The Higher Education Academy. [Google Scholar]
- Vagnoli, L., Caprilli, S., Robiglio, A., & Messeri, A. (2005). Clown doctors as a treatment for preoperative anxiety in children: A randomized, prospective study. Pediatrics, 116, e563–e567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valerio, K. M. (2012). Intrinsic motivation in the classroom. Journal of Student Engagement: Education Matters, 2(1), 30–35. [Google Scholar]
- Valov, D. (2025). The importance of play: Symbolic foundations of child development. Research Gate. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Acker, R., & Wehby, J. H. (2000). Exploring the social contexts influencing student success or failure: Introduction. Preventing School Failure, 44(3), 93–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veraksa, N., & Samuelsson, I. P. (2022). Piaget and Vygotsky in XXI century: Discourse in early childhood education (1st ed., Vol. 4). Springer International. [Google Scholar]
- Villavicencio, F. T., & Bernardo, A. B. I. (2013). Positive academic emotions moderate the relationship between self-regulation and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 329–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., Levine, P., & Marder, C. (2007). Perceptions and expectations of youth with disabilities. A special topic report of findings from the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NLTS2). NCSER 2007-3006. National Center for Special Education Research. [Google Scholar]
- Walsh, G., McMillan, D., & McGuinness, C. (Eds.). (2017). Playful teaching and learning. SAGE. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y. (2022, December). A comparative study on the effectiveness of traditional and modern teaching methods. In proceedings of the 2022 5th international conference on humanities education and social sciences (ICHESS 2022) (Vol. 720, pp. 270–277). Atlantis Press SARL. [Google Scholar]
- Waugh, C. E., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2006). Nice to know you: Positive emotions, self–other overlap, and complex understanding in the formation of a new relationship. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(2), 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- White, W., & Ingram, R. (2023). Reconceptualizing postgraduate taught student experience through the lens of emotions and well-being: Moving from explanatory methodology to revelatory. International Journal of Educational Research, 117, 102135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whitebread, D., Basilio, M., Kuvalja, M., & Verma, M. (2012). The importance of play (pp. 1–55). Toy Industries of Europe. [Google Scholar]
- Willis, J. (2007). Brain-friendly strategies for the inclusion classroom. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (ED509109). ERIC. [Google Scholar]
- Wimpenny, K., & Savin-Baden, M. (2013). Alienation, agency, and authenticity: A synthesis of the literature on student engagement. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 311–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiseman, R. (2023, August 15). Magic: Arts for health. Emerald Publishing Limited. [Google Scholar]
- Wiseman, R., & Watt, C. (2018). Achieving the impossible: A review of magic-based interventions and their effects on wellbeing. PeerJ, 6, e6081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wiseman, R., & Watt, C. (2020). Conjuring cognition: A review of educational magic-based interventions. PeerJ, 8, e8747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wiseman, R., & Watt, C. (2024). Seeing the impossible: The impact of watching magic on positive emotions, optimism, and wellbeing. PeerJ, 12, e17308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Witkowski, P., & Cornell, T. (2015). An investigation into student engagement in higher education classrooms. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 10, 56–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yogman, M., Garner, A., Hutchinson, J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health & Council on Communications and Media. (2018). The power of play: A pediatric role in enhancing development in young children. Pediatrics, 142(3), e20182058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, J., Kreijkes, P., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2022). Students’ growth mindset: Relation to teacher beliefs, teaching practices, and school climate. Learning and Instruction, 80, 101616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuen, H. K., Spencer, K., Edwards, L., Kirklin, K., & Jenkins, G. R. (2023). A magic trick training program to improve social skills and self-esteem in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 77, 7701205120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zosh, J. M., Hopkins, E. J., Jensen, H., Liu, C., Neale, D., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Solis, S. L., & Whitebread, D. (2017). The LEGO Foundation learning through play: A review of the evidence. White paper. The LEGO Foundation. [Google Scholar]
0 = The article title and/or abstract did not include any relationship reference to the research question (indicating no relationship) |
1 = The article title and/or abstract included one relationship reference to the research question (indicating somewhat related) |
2 = The article title and/or abstract included two relationship references to the research question (indicating a relationship) |
3 = The article title and/or abstract included three or more relationship references to the research question (indicating a strong relationship) |
Creates a Positive Learning Environment (Crossman, 2013; Spencer, 2011) | Reinforces that Learning Can Be Fun (Crossman, 2013; Spencer, 2011) | Stimulates Cognitive Development (Petty et al., 2008; Wiseman & Watt, 2018) | Enhances Critical Thinking and Problem Solving (Petty et al., 2008; Wiseman & Watt, 2018) |
Enhances Executive Functioning (Spencer, 2012) | Builds Self-Regulation and Impulse Control (Bow, 1988) | Encourages Emotional Regulations (Kovács, 2023) | Boosts Self-Esteem and Confidence (Ezell & Klein-Ezell, 2003) |
Supports Personal Growth (Alibekova, 2024) | Supports Introspective Learning and Reflection: Metacognition (Hedne et al., 2016; Spencer, 2012) | Sparks Curiosity (Subbotsky, 2010) | Encourages Imaginative Thinking (Subbotsky, 2010) |
Stimulates Creativity (Subbotsky, 2010) | Captures Attention and Strengthens Focus (Hilas & Politis, 2014) | Builds Intrinsic Motivation (Hilas & Politis, 2014; Kovács, 2023) | Increases Engagement (Lyons & Menolotto, 1990) |
Promotes Feelings of Accomplishment and Success (Hines et al., 2018) | Promotes a Joyful Learning Environment (Kashdan et al., 2018; Waugh & Fredrickson, 2006) | Promotes Positive Attention and Inclusion (Ezell & Klein-Ezell, 2003) | Emphasizes Skills Over Deficits (Thomason, 2021) |
Fosters Friendships and Builds Camaraderie w/Peers w/o Disabilities (Spencer, 2011) | Levels the Playing Field (Frith & Walker, 1983) | Shifts Perspectives of Others to Positive (Frith & Walker, 1983; Spencer, 2011, 2012) | Promotes Social Interactions and Development (Spencer, 2011) |
Improves Communication Skills (Kovács, 2023) | Encourages Verbal Expressions (Kovács, 2023) | Promotes Eye Contact (Kovács, 2023) | Practices Social Reciprocity (Kovács, 2023) |
Builds Positive Teacher/Student Rapport (Spencer, 2012) | Promotes Eye–Hand Coordination (Wiseman & Watt, 2018) | Increases Fine and Gross Motor Skills (Harte & Spencer, 2014; Sui & Sui, 2007; Wiseman & Watt, 2018) | Encourages Storytelling (Spencer, 2012) |
Promotes Language Development (Spencer, 2012) | Increases Memory Retention (Wiseman & Watt, 2018) | Promotes Sequencing and Sequential Reasoning (Spencer, 2012) | Promotes Multisensory Learning (Frith & Walker, 1983; Ikhsanudin et al., 2019) |
Encourages Persistence and Growth Mindset (Wiseman, 2023) | Reduces Anxiety and Stress (Elkin & Pravder, 2018; Wiseman & Watt, 2018; Kovács, 2023; Lyons & Menolotto, 1990) | Promotes Public Speaking (León & Cely, 2010; Ezell & Klein-Ezell, 2003) | Reduces Stage Fright (Ezell & Klein-Ezell, 2003) |
Encourages Flexibility and Improvisation (Elder et al., 2012; Wiseman & Watt, 2018; Bedore, 2004) | Learns to Adapt to Mistakes and Promotes Resilience (Elder et al., 2012; Wiseman & Watt, 2018) | Promotes Choice and Autonomy (Hines et al., 2018; Thomas & Mueller, 2017) | Creates a Feeling of Safety (Porter et al., 2024) |
Elements | Literature Findings Magic Tricks (Peer- Reviewed) | Author’s Magic Experience (Observations) | Literature Findings Joy and Play (Peer-Reviewed) | Aligned (Observations Matched Literature Findings) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Engagement | Bagienski and Kuhn (2019) Spencer (2012) |
| Van Acker and Wehby (2000) Yogman et al. (2018) | ✔ |
Joyfulness and playfulness | Hilas and Politis (2014) Kashdan et al. (2018) Waugh and Fredrickson (2006) |
| Cools (2011) Cronqvist (2021) Dang et al. (2012) | ✔ |
Multiple means of expression | Kovács (2023) Wiseman (2023) |
| Hovey et al. (2022) Praveen et al. (2024) | ✔ |
Suspension of disbelief | Leddington (2016) |
| Koushki (2019) | ✔ |
Surprise | Bagienski and Kuhn (2019) Wiseman and Watt (2024) |
| Ostroff (2016) Berns (2010) | ✔ |
Fosters a positive environment | Kovács (2023) Spencer (2012) |
| Omer-Attali et al. (2024) Walsh et al. (2017) | ✔ |
Atmosphere of warmth and excitement | White and Ingram (2023) Wiseman and Watt (2024) |
| Villavicencio and Bernardo (2013) White and Ingram (2023) | ✔ |
Laughter | Hart and Walton (2010) Cundall (2007) Omer-Attali et al. (2024) |
| Dowling (2014) Omer-Attali et al. (2024) | ✔ |
Evokes curiosity and imagination | Leddington (2016) Subbotsky (2010) |
| Henricks (2008) Dubinsky and Hamid (2024) | ✔ |
Encourages creativity | Bagienski and Kuhn (2019) Subbotsky (2010) |
| Henricks (2008) | ✔ |
Promotes social competence and self-esteem | Ezell and Klein-Ezell (2003) Yuen et al. (2023) |
| Van Acker and Wehby (2000) Yogman et al. (2018) | ✔ |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ezell, D. Exploring the Use of Magic Tricks with Students with Disabilities to Meet the Universal Design for Learning Engagement Consideration of Nurturing Joy and Play: A Systematic Narrative Review. Educ. Sci. 2025, 15, 1212. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091212
Ezell D. Exploring the Use of Magic Tricks with Students with Disabilities to Meet the Universal Design for Learning Engagement Consideration of Nurturing Joy and Play: A Systematic Narrative Review. Education Sciences. 2025; 15(9):1212. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091212
Chicago/Turabian StyleEzell, Dan. 2025. "Exploring the Use of Magic Tricks with Students with Disabilities to Meet the Universal Design for Learning Engagement Consideration of Nurturing Joy and Play: A Systematic Narrative Review" Education Sciences 15, no. 9: 1212. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091212
APA StyleEzell, D. (2025). Exploring the Use of Magic Tricks with Students with Disabilities to Meet the Universal Design for Learning Engagement Consideration of Nurturing Joy and Play: A Systematic Narrative Review. Education Sciences, 15(9), 1212. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091212