Next Article in Journal
Newton’s Second Law Teaching Strategies—Identifying Opportunities for Educational Innovation
Previous Article in Journal
ChatGPT or Human Mentors? Student Perceptions of Technology Acceptance and Use and the Future of Mentorship in Higher Education
Previous Article in Special Issue
Understanding the Relationship Between Educational Leadership Preparation Program Features and Graduates’ Career Intentions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Conceptualizing the Education Doctorate (EdD) as a Lever for Improving Education Leaders’ Use of Research Evidence

by
Jill Alexa Perry
1,*,
Elizabeth Farley-Ripple
2,*,
Andrew Leland
3,
Samantha Shewchuk
2 and
William Firestone
4
1
School of Education, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
2
School of Education, University of Delaware, Newark, NJ 19716, USA
3
City Year Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19123, USA
4
Graduate School of Education, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(6), 747; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060747 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 31 January 2025 / Revised: 27 May 2025 / Accepted: 29 May 2025 / Published: 13 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Strengthening Educational Leadership Preparation and Development)

Abstract

This paper explores how redesigned Education Doctorate (EdD) programs in educational leadership can serve as a lever for strengthening the use of research evidence (URE) in schools and districts. Drawing on the COM-B framework, we conceptualize a theory of action that links EdD program design to leaders’ capabilities, motivations, and behaviors in applying research to educational improvement. We identify key dimensions of leadership preparation that align with well-documented URE practices. Finally, we discuss how these insights can inform doctoral programs as well as in-service professional learning and suggest the need for additional empirical work on these relationships and a deeper understanding of how local contexts shape the effectiveness of leadership preparation in supporting research-informed decision-making.
Keywords: educational leadership; education doctorate; use of research evidence educational leadership; education doctorate; use of research evidence

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Perry, J.A.; Farley-Ripple, E.; Leland, A.; Shewchuk, S.; Firestone, W. Conceptualizing the Education Doctorate (EdD) as a Lever for Improving Education Leaders’ Use of Research Evidence. Educ. Sci. 2025, 15, 747. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060747

AMA Style

Perry JA, Farley-Ripple E, Leland A, Shewchuk S, Firestone W. Conceptualizing the Education Doctorate (EdD) as a Lever for Improving Education Leaders’ Use of Research Evidence. Education Sciences. 2025; 15(6):747. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060747

Chicago/Turabian Style

Perry, Jill Alexa, Elizabeth Farley-Ripple, Andrew Leland, Samantha Shewchuk, and William Firestone. 2025. "Conceptualizing the Education Doctorate (EdD) as a Lever for Improving Education Leaders’ Use of Research Evidence" Education Sciences 15, no. 6: 747. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060747

APA Style

Perry, J. A., Farley-Ripple, E., Leland, A., Shewchuk, S., & Firestone, W. (2025). Conceptualizing the Education Doctorate (EdD) as a Lever for Improving Education Leaders’ Use of Research Evidence. Education Sciences, 15(6), 747. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060747

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop