The Middle Space: On Blogs and Beyond in Blended Learning
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Blended Learning in Teacher Education
2.2. Blogs and Blended Learning
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Research Context
3.2. Participants
3.3. Data Collection
- Focus groups: Two groups of 5 and 6 PSTs (out of 51 enrolled in the BL course) participated, aiming to minimize dominant speaker influence (Fay et al., 2000). Discussions explored the PSTs’ perceptions of using reflective blogs in BL, addressing questions about blogging experiences, benefits, and challenges. Each session lasted 60 min, followed by a 10 min summary.
- Reflective blog posts: A total of 528 blog posts, exceeding the required 510, were analyzed, with an average length of 108 words. Comments (94% of the required 510) were excluded from the analysis due to brevity (average of 10 words). Blogs provided insights into the PSTs’ experiences, supporting this study’s focus on their “voice” (Mitra, 2004) and enhancing trustworthiness (Carcary, 2009).
- TE’s reflections: three TEs, two of whom were the researchers, reflected individually on integrating blogs into the course, followed by a group discussion to share their insights.
3.4. Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Keeping Learning Sequential
“Posting encouraged me to think of connections between the F2F and distance meetings. While TEs referenced past content in F2F, I had to actively make those connections during online sessions” [PST-b].
“I posted about ideas I wanted to remember, which helped me recall F2F content and prepared me to discuss it with the TE or with peers in the following session” [PST-g].
“The asynchronous session on the education system was followed by an F2F discussion on political movements and their impact on education” [PST-35].
This is our sixth lesson in the course, and I’ve noticed that our lessons are based on previous ones. The TE provides us with a preview of the topic in the previous lesson, and in the following lesson we elaborate and understand it more deeply [PST-51 post 6].
It is important to me to see if the learning was meaningful if they enjoyed the assignment and felt that it was contributing to them. In the F2F meetings, I can see in their body reactions their interest in what I teach. I can see if they are with me or if I lost them, I could see their hands-on learning. I cannot see this in the distance meetings. So, reading their reflective blog provides me with a kind of a clear picture of how their distance learning was [TE-b].In the distance learning week, I always think- is the assignment I have given them clear enough? Do they need me and are too embarrassed to approach me? Is the connection between the assignment and what they have learned till now clear to them? [TE-a].
4.2. Supporting Self-Directed Learning
I enjoyed reflecting on the distance meeting. Prior to posting a reflection, I used to read more about the scholars, theories, or concepts that were introduced in the online assignment to see if I understand the whole picture before posting. I think it [the need to post in the blog] motivated me to understand the ideas and theories more deeply before posting on them. [PST-i]
Reading others’ [PSTs] posts, I could see if I understood correctly the focus of the video we were asked to watch or the article we were asked to read. [PST-f]It gave me a lot of confidence in my learning when I realized [from reading peers’ posts] that I understand the theory or the assignment and that I am on the same page with other students. [PST-g]
4.3. Keeping a Sense of a Learning Community
Today’s F2F meeting on behaviorism was awkward. A feeling of discomfort spread throughout the classroom, and I saw how many students [PSTs] moved uncomfortably in their chairs. [PST-19 post 7]
a space for ventilating my feelings regarding the contents or my learning process and thoughts. I felt that for me the blog is like being in the classroom [F2F meetings] where I can share feelings and thoughts. I think that I felt less isolated online when I posted on the blog or read other [PSTs’] posts. [PST-e]
4.4. Increasing Motivation
I felt that there are PSTs that may struggle with online meetings. If I just ask them to read the course materials in preparation for our next meeting they will not put effort into doing it. I used the blog to motivate them to read at least part of the material. I believe that reflecting on the blog encourages them to read or listen to materials I have uploaded and to be more prepared for the next meeting. [TE-c]
I love to read their posts each week and find treasures that I can share in the F2F meeting. Posts may act as triggers to discuss misconceptions or what will be the focus of the F2F meeting. I realized that there are PSTs who put effort into their posts so I will choose theirs to share.
I invested a lot of thought when reflecting on the online assignment as I wanted the TE to share and discuss my post in the following [F2F] meeting. [PST-h]
5. Discussion
5.1. Principle 1: Continuity in Learning
- A linear sequence: A chronological, step-by-step progression that connects different learning phases. For example, theory introduced in an F2F session might be reinforced, expanded, or translated into practice through an online activity, ensuring a clear and logical flow.
- A rhizomatic sequence: a branching, non-linear path where learners build on prior knowledge and experiences, promoting exploration, creativity, and critical thinking.
- A spiral sequence: iterative knowledge construction, where learners revisit concepts over time, adding depth and perspective with each iteration.
- Inter- and intra-content sequences: deepening understanding within a single topic (intra-content) or connecting knowledge across multiple areas (inter-content), fostering holistic learning.
5.2. Principle 2: Fostering Autonomous Learning
5.3. Principle 3: Building a Learning Community
5.4. Principle 4: Reflectivity and Professional Development
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bataller-Català, A. (2024). From reflective practice to communicative interaction: A case study on the use of blogs by student teachers. The Australian Educational Researcher, 52(2), 1731–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biberman-Shalev, L. (2018). Personal blogs or communal blogs? Pre-service teachers’ perceptions regarding the contribution of these two platforms to their professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 69, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biberman-Shalev, L., Broza, O., & Chamo, N. (2023). Contextual changes and shifts in pedagogical paradigms: Post-COVID-19 blended learning as a negotiation space in teacher education. Education Sciences, 13(3), 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bizami, N. A., Tasir, Z., & Kew, S. N. (2023). Innovative pedagogical principles and technological tools capabilities for immersive blended learning: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1373–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Blaschke, L. M., & Hase, S. (2019). Heutagogy and digital media networks. Pacific Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Terry, G. (2019). Thematic analysis. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp. 843–860). Springer. [Google Scholar]
- Cahapay, M. B. (2020). Rethinking education in the new normal post COVID-19 era: A curriculum studies perspective. Aquademia, 4(2), 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calderón, A., Scanlon, D., MacPhail, A., & Moody, B. (2021). An integrated blended learning approach for physical education teacher education programs: Teacher educators’ and pre-service teachers’ experiences. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 26(6), 562–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carcary, M. (2009). The research audit trial—Enhancing trustworthiness in qualitative inquiry. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 7(1), 11–24. [Google Scholar]
- Chamo, N., & Broza, O. (2023). Six milestones responding to five calls in the process of becoming teacher-leader. European Journal of Teacher Education. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, E. Y. M. (2019). Blended learning dilemma: Teacher education in the Confucian heritage culture. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 36–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, Y. J., & Chang, Y. S. (2014). Assessing peer support and usability of blogging in hybrid learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(1), 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, S. K. W., Chan, C. K. K., & Tiwari, A. F. Y. (2012). Using blogs to support learning during internship. Computers & Education, 58, 989–1000. [Google Scholar]
- Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cronje, J. (2020). Towards a new definition of blended learning. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 18(2), 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, L., & Yuen, A. H. K. (2011). Towards a framework for educational affordances of blogs. Computers & Education, 56(2), 441–451. [Google Scholar]
- Fattah, S. F. E. S. A. (2016). The effectiveness of using blogs as an independent learning tool to develop reading skills for university students. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(32), 65–73. [Google Scholar]
- Fay, N., Garrod, S., & Carletta, J. (2000). Group discussion as interactive dialogue or as serial monologue: The influence of group size. Psychological Science, 11(6), 481–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fife, S. T., & Gossner, J. D. (2024). Deductive qualitative analysis: Evaluating, expanding, and refining theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 16094069241244856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flick, U. (2004). Design and process in qualitative research. In U. Flick, E. von Kardoff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 146–152). Sage. [Google Scholar]
- Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends and future directions. In C. J. Bonk, & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). Pfeiffer. [Google Scholar]
- Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Howard, N. J. (2021). Navigating blended learning, negotiating professional identities. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(5), 654–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hrastinski, S. (2019). What do we mean by blended learning? TechTrends, 63(5), 564–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, M., & Ryan, J. (2017). The online space: Developing strong pedagogy for online reflective practice. In R. Brandenburg, K. Glasswell, M. Jones, & J. Ryan (Eds.), Reflective theory and practice in teacher education (pp. 205–222). Springer. [Google Scholar]
- Karpava, S. (2023). The effect of the use of information and communication technology and blogging on the pre-service teacher and student training process. English as a Foreign Language International Journal, 27(3), 44–90. [Google Scholar]
- Keengwe, J., & Kang, J. J. (2013). A review of empirical research on blended learning in teacher education programs. Education and Information Technologies, 18, 479–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: What is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Authentik. [Google Scholar]
- McFadden, J., Ellis, J., Anwar, T., & Roehrig, G. (2014). Beginning science teachers’ use of a digital video annotation tool to promote reflective practices. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(3), 458–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Megahed, N., & Hassan, A. (2021). A blended learning strategy: Reimagining the post-COVID-19 architectural education. International Journal of Architectural Research, 16(1), 184–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitra, D. L. (2004). The significance of students: Can increasing “student voice” in schools lead to gains in youth development? Teachers College Record, 106, 651–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Motteram, G. (2006). ‘Blended’ education and the transformation of teachers: A long-term case study in postgraduate UK Higher Education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(1), 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noel, L. (2015). Using blogs to create a constructivist learning environment. Procedia-Social Sciences, 174, 617–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oravec, J. A. (2003). Blending by blogging: Weblogs in blended learning initiatives. Journal of Educational Media, 28(2–3), 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pape, L. (2010). Blended teaching and learning. The Education Digest, 76(2), 22–27. [Google Scholar]
- Prosser, M. (2000). Using phenomenographic research methodology in the context of research in teaching and learning. In J. A. Bowden, & E. Walsh (Eds.), Phenomenography (pp. 34–46). RMIT University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. [Google Scholar]
- Richards, L. (2009). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar]
- River, J., Currie, J., Crawford, T., Betihavas, V., & Randall, S. (2016). A systematic review examining the effectiveness of blending technology with team-based learning. Nurse Education Today, 45, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar]
- Tang, E., & Lam, C. (2014). Building an effective online learning community (OLC) in blog-based teaching portfolios. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Topping, K. J. (2023). Advantages and disadvantages of online and face-to-face peer learning in higher education: A review. Education Sciences, 13(4), 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H. H., & MacLeod, J. (2019). Blended learning in teacher education. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. [Google Scholar]
- Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college-and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L. (2024, January 19–21). Exploring the three-stage blended learning model and its effectiveness in teacher training programs. The 5th International Conference on Big Data and Informatization Education (ICBDIE 2024) (pp. 402–413), Sanya, China. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, Y., & Watterston, J. (2021). The changes we need: Education post COVID-19. Journal of Educational Change, 22(3), 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Biberman-Shalev, L.; Chamo, N. The Middle Space: On Blogs and Beyond in Blended Learning. Educ. Sci. 2025, 15, 597. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050597
Biberman-Shalev L, Chamo N. The Middle Space: On Blogs and Beyond in Blended Learning. Education Sciences. 2025; 15(5):597. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050597
Chicago/Turabian StyleBiberman-Shalev, Liat, and Nurit Chamo. 2025. "The Middle Space: On Blogs and Beyond in Blended Learning" Education Sciences 15, no. 5: 597. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050597
APA StyleBiberman-Shalev, L., & Chamo, N. (2025). The Middle Space: On Blogs and Beyond in Blended Learning. Education Sciences, 15(5), 597. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050597