Equipping Teachers for Success in Rural Communities: Unveiling the Key Characteristics and Attributes of Thriving Rural Teachers
Abstract
1. Introduction
- What are the key dispositions and attributes that rural leaders identify as enabling teachers to thrive in rural contexts?
- Based on these identified attributes, what are the implications for policy and practice in preparing and supporting teachers for rural contexts?
2. Background Literature
2.1. Defining Rural Education in the Australian Context
2.2. Teachers Thriving in Rural Educational Contexts
2.3. Developing ‘Rural Readiness’ Through Rural Pre-Service Teaching Experiences
- Sustainability—partnerships were personnel-dependent, which could impact succession planning and the sustainability of the program;
- Scalability—utilising the identified structures and processes to expand the number of pre-service teachers;
- Influence on professional experience placements more broadly, extending the support structures beyond targeted rural placements [21] (p. 43).
2.3.1. Pre-Service Teacher Professional Readiness in Rural Educational Contexts
2.3.2. Pre-Service Teacher Community Readiness in Rural Educational Contexts
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Participant Selection
- Current leadership position in a rural community or school;
- Minimum of five years of rural education experience;
- Direct involvement in teacher supervision and support;
- Experience with teacher recruitment and retention.
3.3. Data Collection Methods
- Specific attributes and dispositions of successful rural teachers;
- Contextual factors influencing teacher effectiveness;
- Observable patterns on teacher success;
- Challenges and support mechanisms;
- Examples of thriving in practice.
3.4. Theoretical Framework
- Acknowledges the complex interplay between personal attributes and contextual factors;
- Supports the analysis of how leaders distinguish between fixed traits and developable capabilities;
- Provides tools for understanding how leaders perceive teacher agency in rural success;
- Enables the examination of how context-specific factors influence attribute interpretation.
- Which teacher attributes are perceived as internal (personality-based) versus external (context-dependent);
- Whether attributes are viewed as stable (fixed traits) or unstable (developmental capabilities).
- Patterns in leaders’ causal explanations;
- Contextual influences on attribute interpretation;
- Perceived relationships between personal and environmental factors.
3.5. Data Analysis
- To ensure the findings were grounded in the data;
- To reveal explicit elements and underpinning assumptions. The following iterative sense-making steps were taken.
4. Results
4.1. Community Characteristics and Attributes
4.2. Personal Attributes
4.3. Professional Characteristics and Attributes
4.4. Classroom Characteristics and Attributes
5. Discussion
5.1. Community Equipped Attributes
5.2. Personally Equipped Attributes
5.3. Classroom Equipped Attributes
5.4. Professionally Equipped Attributes
5.5. Policy Reform: From Classroom Ready to Rurally Equipped
- Comprehensive professional development programs that address personal, interpersonal and technical teaching skills;
- A focus on building resilience, adaptability and self-management skills;
- Creating supportive school environments that provide necessary resources and foster collegial networking;
- Encourage ongoing reflection and continuous learning;
- Prepare teachers for the specific challenges and opportunities of rural education;
- Address both the professional skills and personal well-being of teachers.
6. Conclusions
- Revise initial teacher education programs to incorporate the “equipped” framework, ensuring graduates are prepared across all four key areas: community, personal, classroom, and professional;
- Invest in robust partnerships between universities, rural schools, and communities to provide immersive experiences and ongoing support for pre-service and early career teachers;
- Invest in comprehensive rural mentoring and professional development programs that address the specific needs of rural educators, focusing on building resilience, adaptability, and community connection;
- Advocate for policy changes and funding allocations that support the unique needs of rural education, including resources for personalised teacher support and community engagement initiatives.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Azano, A.P.; Stewart, T.T. Exploring place and practicing justice: Preparing pre-service teachers for success in rural schools. J. Res. Rural Educ. (Online) 2015, 30, 1. [Google Scholar]
- Downes, N.; Roberts, P. Revisiting the schoolhouse: A literature review on staffing rural, remote and isolated schools in Australia 2004–2016. Aust. Int. J. Rural Educ. 2018, 28, 31–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Green, N.C.; Noone, G.; Nolan, A. Contemporary paradigms of rural teaching: The significance of place. Aust. Int. J. Rural Educ. 2013, 23, 91–115. Available online: http://search.informit.com.au/fullText;dn=430181963452939;res=IELHSS (accessed on 9 February 2023). [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Salter, P.; Halbert, K. Balancing classroom ready with community ready: Enabling agency to engage with community through critical service learning. Asia-Pac. J. Teach. Educ. 2019, 47, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group [TEMAG]. Action Now: Classroom Ready Teachers Report. 2014. Available online: https://www.education.gov.au/teaching-and-school-leadership/resources/action-now-classroom-ready-teachers-report-0 (accessed on 14 November 2023).
- Sharplin, E.; O’Neill, M.; Chapman, A. Coping strategies for adaptation to new teacher appointments: Intervention for retention. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2011, 27, 136–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Halsey, J. Independent Review into Regional, Rural and Remote Education—Final Report; Department of Education and Training: Canberra, ACT, Australia, 2018.
- State of Queensland (Department of Education). Advancing Rural and Remote Education: An Action Plan to Support Every Rural and Remote Student to Succeed. 2018. Available online: https://education.qld.gov.au/schools-and-educators/other-education/Documents/advancing-rural-remote-education-qld-state-schools-action-plan.docx (accessed on 1 June 2023).
- Trinidad, S.; Sharplin, E.; Ledger, S.; Broadley, T. Connecting for innovation: Four universities collaboratively preparing pre-service teachers to teach in rural and remote Western Australia. J. Res. Rural Educ. 2014, 29, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- White, S.; Kline, J. Developing a rural teacher education curriculum package. Rural Educ. 2012, 33, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Richards, S. Coast to country: An initiative aimed at changing pre-service teachers’ perceptions of teaching in rural and remote locations. Aust. Int. J. Rural Educ. 2012, 22, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Haynes, J.; Miller, J. Transitioning from university to teaching in schools located in rural and remote settings. Aust. Int. J. Rural Educ. 2016, 26, 34–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Preston, J.; Barnes, K.E. Successful leadership in rural schools: Cultivating collaboration. Rural Educ. 2017, 38, 6–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Reid, J.A.; Green, B.; Cooper, M.; Hastings, W.; Lock, G.; White, S. Regenerating rural social space? Teacher education for rural—Regional sustainability. Aust. J. Educ. 2010, 54, 262–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hine, R.; Patrick, P.; Berger, E.; Diamond, Z.; Hammer, M.; Morris, Z.A.; Fathers, C.; Reupert, A. From struggling to flourishing and thriving: Optimizing educator wellbeing within the Australian education context. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2022, 115, 103727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tran, H.; Smıth, D. The strategic support to thrive beyond survival model: An administrative support framework for improving student outcomes and addressing educator staffing in rural and urban high-needs schools. Res. Educ. Adm. Leadersh. 2020, 5, 870–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gallo, J. Against the Grain: Narratives of Rural Teachers’ Professional Lives. Rural Educ. 2020, 41, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Starrett, A.; Yow, J.; Lotter, C.; Irvin, M.J.; Adams, P. Teachers connecting with rural students and places: A mixed methods analysis. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2021, 97, 103231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Beltman, S.; Mansfield, C. What is teacher professional resilience?: And whose responsibility is it? Prof. Educ. 2017, 17, 32–36. [Google Scholar]
- Branand, B.; Nakamura, J. The well-being of teachers and professors. In The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Positivity and Strengths-Based Approaches at Work; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 466–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fitzgerald, A.; Bradbury, O.; Leach, T. It takes a village: Using communities of practice as a framework for reflecting on rural and regional professional experience opportunities. In Rural Education Across the World: Models of Innovative Practice and Impact; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 25–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hudson, P.; Hudson, S. Changing preservice teachers’ attitudes for teaching in rural schools. Aust. J. Teach. Educ. 2008, 33, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Walker-Gibbs, B. Rural ‘tourist’—Rural ‘resident’—Betwixt and between places and spaces. In Interdisciplinary Unsettlings of Place and Space: Conversations, Investigations and Research; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 69–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Leach, T.; Le, A.H.; Barton, G.M. Preservice teachers’ self-efficacy through COVID-19: A large scale survey of students at a regional university in Australia. Aust. J. Teach. Educ. 2022, 47, 19–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wenger, E. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Nguyen, H.T.; Yang, H. Learning to become a teacher in Australia: A study of pre-service teachers’ identity development. Aust. Educ. Res. 2018, 45, 625–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mitchell, R.; Wynhoff, O.; Hampton, P.; Hicks, J.; Long, D.; Olsen, K. Rural exposures: An examination of three initiatives to introduce and immerse preservice teachers into rural communities and rural schools in the US and Australia. Rural Educ. 2019, 40, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Burton, M.; Brown, K.; Johnson, A. Storylines about rural teachers in the United States: A narrative analysis of the literature. J. Res. Rural Educ. 2013, 28, 1. Available online: https://jrre.psu.edu/sites/default/files/2019-08/28-12.pdf (accessed on 14 April 2023).
- Downes, N.; Fuqua, M. Equity, access and quality education in rural Australia: A survey of SPERA members and supporters. Aust. Int. J. Rural Educ. 2018, 28, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hascher, T.; Waber, J. Teacher well-being: A systematic review of the research literature from the year 2000–2019. Educ. Res. Rev. 2021, 34, 100411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Guba, E.G.; Lincoln, Y.S. Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. In Handbook of Qualitative Research; SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1994; pp. 105–117. [Google Scholar]
- Weiner, B. The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: A history of ideas. Educ. Psychol. 2010, 45, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Malle, B.F. The actor-observer asymmetry in attribution: A (surprising) meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 2006, 132, 895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Robinson, J.A. Exploring attribution theory and bias. Commun. Teach. 2017, 31, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Clarke, V.; Braun, V. Thematic analysis. J. Posit. Psychol. 2017, 12, 297–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Green, C.; Mynhier, L.; Banfill, J.; Edwards, P.; Kim, J.; Desjardins, R. Preparing education for the crises of tomorrow: A framework for adaptability. Int. Rev. Educ. 2020, 66, 857–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Epstein, J.L. School, family, and community partnerships in teachers’ professional work. J. Educ. Teach. 2018, 44, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Johnson, G.; Dempster, N. Challenging dominant discourses of home–school partnerships in indigenous communities. In International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Social (In)Justice; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 397–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rennie, J.; White, S.; Anderson, P.; Darling, A. Preparing teachers to work with and for remote indigenous communities: Unsettling institutional practices. In Teacher Education in and for Uncertain Times; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 113–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ateşkan, A. Pre-service teachers’ cultural and teaching experiences abroad. J. Educ. Teach. 2016, 42, 135–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mukeredzi, T.G. The “Journey to Becoming” Pre-Service Teachers’ Experiences and Understandings of Rural School Practicum in a South African Context. Glob. Educ. Rev. 2016, 3, 88–107. Available online: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1090181.pdf (accessed on 11 January 2023).
- Brown, N. Classroom readiness: Complex, collaborative and continuing. Prof. Educ. 2015, 14, 17–18. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/docview/1688467569?parentSessionId=AFmHmIzfnSJT3KaMIlpXfeo4xYV7xHOmugjx%2BP2tuQg%3D&pq-origsite=primo&accountid=14647&sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals (accessed on 12 January 2023).
- Kline, J.; White, S.; Lock, G. The rural practicum: Preparing a quality teacher workforce for rural and regional Australia. J. Res. Rural Educ. 2013, 28, 1–3. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/docview/1349930239/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo&sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals (accessed on 1 February 2023).
- Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership [AITSL]. Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. 2018. Available online: https://www.aitsl.edu.au/teach/standards (accessed on 10 January 2023).


| Theme | Code Groups | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Community Characteristics and Attributes | Community Connections | 53 |
| Community Contributions | 36 | |
| Community Expectations | 24 | |
| Personal Characteristics and Attributes | Well-Being | 32 |
| Work-life Balance | 42 | |
| Emotional Resilience | 33 | |
| Professional Characteristics and Attributes | Curriculum Knowledge | 43 |
| Mentoring and Coaching | 32 | |
| Professional Development | 31 | |
| Classroom Characteristics and Attributes | Classroom Management | 52 |
| Differentiation | 37 | |
| Authoritative and Transparent Communication | 26 |
| Attribute | Locus | Stability | Controllability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Listening | Internal | Potentially stable (can be seen as a personality trait) | Controllable (can be improved with effort) |
| Empathetic | Internal | Potentially stable (can be considered a personality trait) | Partially controllable (can be developed but some innate components) |
| Respectful | Internal | Potentially stable (can be a consistent character trait) | Controllable (can be learned and practised) |
| Able to adapt | Internal | Unstable (can change based on situations) | Controllable (can be improved with effort and experience) |
| Accountability for their behaviour choices | Internal | Potentially stable (can be a consistent character trait) | Controllable (can be developed and maintained) |
| Collaborative | Internal | Potentially unstable (may vary with different groups or situations) | Controllable (can be improved with practice) |
| Attribute | Locus | Stability | Controllability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Well-being | Internal | Unstable (can fluctuate over time) | Partially controllable (influenced by both personal actions and external factors) |
| Stress management | Internal | Unstable (can improve or decline with practice and circumstances) | Controllable (can be learned and improved) |
| Work-life balance | Internal (though influenced by external factors) | Unstable (can change with circumstances and personal choices) | Partially controllable (personal choices play a role, but external demands can impact) |
| Emotional resilience | Internal | Potentially stable (can be a trait, but also developed over time) | Partially controllable (can be developed, but some innate capacity may exist) |
| Self-awareness | Internal | Potentially unstable (can increase over time) | Controllable (can be developed through reflection and practice) |
| Flexibility | Internal | Potentially unstable (can vary with situations) | Controllable (can be improved with effort) |
| Self-regulation | Internal | Potentially stable (can be developed) | Controllable (can be improved with practice) |
| Effective time management skills | Internal | Unstable (can be improved over time) | Controllable (can be learned and refined) |
| Establishing boundaries | Internal | Potentially unstable (can change with experience and circumstances) | Controllable (can be learned and adjusted) |
| Attribute | Locus | Stability | Controllability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Curriculum expertise | Internal | Potentially stable (but can be expanded) | Controllable (can be learned and cultivated) |
| Reflective practice | Internal | Potentially stable (can become a habit over time) | Controllable (can be learned and cultivated) |
| Mentorship (ability to be mentored or be a mentor) | Internal (for skills) External (for. opportunities) | Unstable (can change with different relationships and contexts) | Partially controllable (skills can be developed, but opportunities may depend on external factors) |
| Networking | Internal (for skills) External (for. opportunities) | Unstable (can change with context and effort) | Partially controllable (can be developed, but opportunities may vary) |
| Resilience | Internal | Potentially stable (can be a trait, but also developed over time) | Partially controllable (can be strengthened, but some innate capacity may exist) |
| Adaptability | Internal | Potentially unstable (can vary with situations) | Controllable (can be improved with effort and experience) |
| Continuous professional development | Internal (for motivation) External (for opportunities) | Potentially stable (as an ongoing commitment) | Partially controllable (personal commitment is controllable, but access to opportunities may vary) |
| Attribute | Locus | Stability | Controllability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Confidence in teaching the curriculum | Internal | Potentially stable (but can grow with experience) | Controllable (can be developed through study and practice) |
| Approachability | Internal | Potentially stable (often a personality trait) | Partially controllable (can be improved, but may have innate components) |
| Consistent classroom management | Internal (for skills) External (for. opportunities) | Potentially stable (improves with experience) | Controllable (can be learned and developed) |
| Clarity in instruction | Internal | Potentially unstable (can vary with subject matter or context) | Controllable (can be improved with practice) |
| Creativity | Internal | Potentially stable (can be cultivated) | Partially controllable (can be developed, but may have innate components) |
| Having necessary resources | External | Unstable (can change with funding, policies and access) | Partially controllable (can advocate for resources, but ultimate provision is often external) |
| Skills to establish optimal learning environments | Internal | Potentially stable (improves with experience) | Controllable (can be learned and refined) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Leach, T.; Bradbury, O. Equipping Teachers for Success in Rural Communities: Unveiling the Key Characteristics and Attributes of Thriving Rural Teachers. Educ. Sci. 2024, 14, 1384. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121384
Leach T, Bradbury O. Equipping Teachers for Success in Rural Communities: Unveiling the Key Characteristics and Attributes of Thriving Rural Teachers. Education Sciences. 2024; 14(12):1384. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121384
Chicago/Turabian StyleLeach, Tania, and Ondine Bradbury. 2024. "Equipping Teachers for Success in Rural Communities: Unveiling the Key Characteristics and Attributes of Thriving Rural Teachers" Education Sciences 14, no. 12: 1384. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121384
APA StyleLeach, T., & Bradbury, O. (2024). Equipping Teachers for Success in Rural Communities: Unveiling the Key Characteristics and Attributes of Thriving Rural Teachers. Education Sciences, 14(12), 1384. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121384

