Using Digital Tools to Teach Soft Skill-Oriented Subjects to University Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Analysis of the level of digitalization of teaching academic disciplines at NUST ″MISIS″
- Identifying academic disciplines having the highest level of digital tool usage in the process of forming the soft skills of university students.
- Describing best practices of digital tool usage referring to actual procedures of teaching specific academic disciplines aimed at forming the soft skills of university students.
2. Literature Review
3. Materials and Methods
- Information and organizational block;
- Theoretical materials;
- Control and measurement materials;
- Learning technologies;
- Course design;
- Student and instructor activity in the online course
4. Results
4.1. Analysis of the Level of Digitalization of Teaching Academic Disciplines at NUST “MISIS”
4.2. Brief Description of Contents of the Academic Disciplines
4.3. Methodology Approaches to Teaching of Academic Disciplines Included in Our Review
4.4. Digital Tools for Teaching of Academic Disciplines Developing University Students’ Soft Skills
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bunakova, T. Hybrid Learning Classes of English at MGIMO University. 6 November 2020. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3737771 (accessed on 10 February 2022).
- Tong, D.H.; Uyen, B.P.; Ngan, L.K. Blended Learning for Mathematics Education during a COVID-19 Lockdown: A Case Study of Apprehendingconventions for Coordinates in the Plane. Heliyon, 2021; 1–11, under review. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, S.; Raza Rabbani, M.; Thalassinos, E.I.; Atif, M. Corona Virus Pandemic Paving Ways to Next Generation of Learning and Teaching: Futuristic Cloud Based Educational Model. 8 August 2020. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3669832 (accessed on 10 February 2022).
- Grund, J.; Brock, A. Why We Should Empty Pandora’s Box to Create a Sustainable Future: Hope, Sustainability and Its Implications for Education. Sustainability 2019, 11, 893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Shaping the Future We Want; Final Report of the UN Decade ‘‘Education for Sustainable Development’’, 2005–2014; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2014; Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000230171 (accessed on 10 February 2022).
- Saadat, S.; Rawtani, D.; Hussain, C.M. Environmental perspective of COVID-19. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 728, 138870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Walls, A. Learning for a Sustainable Future. United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development; SDG, 2005–2014; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2019; Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000139937 (accessed on 10 February 2022).
- Shradhanjali, S. Developing soft skills in engineering students with COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and limitations of digital classes. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Best Innovative Teaching Strategies, ICON-BITS, Online, 29–31 July 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siswanto, J.; Prahani, B.; Suminar, I. Supporting scientific communication skills with multiple representations: Learning physics in the COVID-19 pandemic. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Education & Social Science Research (ICESRE), Online, 17 October 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Temnova, E. Self-Efficacy in University Students as a Perdictor of Success Amid the Lockdown Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. 8 March 2021. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3840932 (accessed on 10 February 2022).
- Boboshko, D.Y. Digitalization in small business tax administration. In Industry Competitiveness: Digitalization, Management, and Integration; ISCI 2019, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems; Bogoviz, A., Ragulina, Y., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; Volume 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sujová, E.; Čierna, H.; Simanová, Ľ.; Gejdoš, P.; Štefková, J. Soft Skills Integration into Business Processes Based on the Requirements of Employers—Approach for Sustainable Education. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hirudayaraj, M.; Baker, R.; Baker, F.; Eastman, M. Soft Skills for Entry-Level Engineers: What Employers Want. Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vergara-Rodríguez, D.; Antón-Sancho, Á.; Fernández-Arias, P. Variables Influencing Professors’ Adaptation to Digital Learning Environments during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 3732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Antón-Sancho, Á.; Vergara, D.; Fernández-Arias, P. Self-Assessment of Soft Skills of University Teachers from Countries with a Low Level of Digital Competence. Electronics 2021, 10, 2532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrews, J.; Higson, H. Graduate Employability, “Soft Skills” versus “Hard” business knowledge: A European study. High. Educ. Eur. 2008, 33, 411–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Aasheim, C.L.; Li, L.; Williams, S. Knowledge and skills requirements for entry-level Information and Technology workers: A comparison of industry and academia. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 2009, 20, 349–356. [Google Scholar]
- Mitchell, G.W.; Skinner, L.B.; White, B.J. Essential Soft Skills for Success in the Twenty-First Century Workforce as Perceived by Business Educators. Delta Pi Epsil. J. 2010, 52, 43–53. [Google Scholar]
- Crawford, P.; Lang, S.; Fink, W.; Dalton, R.; Fielitz, L. Comparative Analysis of Soft Skills: What is Important for New Graduates? Perceptions of Employers, Alum, Faculty, and Students. 2011. Available online: http://www.aplu.org/members/commissions/food-environment-and-renewable-resources/CFERR_Library/comparative-analysis-of-soft-skills-what-is-important-for-new-graduates/file (accessed on 14 January 2022).
- Hanover Research. A Crosswalk of 21st Century Skills. 2011. Available online: https://www.scribd.com/document/328458075/A-Crosswalk-of-21st-Century-Skills-Membership (accessed on 14 January 2022).
- Robles, M.M. Executive perceptions of the top 10 soft skills needed in today’s workplace. Bus. Commun. Q. 2012, 75, 453–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lippman, L.H.; Ryberg, R.; Carney, R.; Moore, K.A. Workforce Connections: Key ‘Soft Skills’ that Foster Youth Workforce Success: Toward a Consensus across Fields. 2015. Available online: http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/367556 (accessed on 14 January 2022).
- Wikle, T.A.; Fagin, T.D. Hard and soft skills in preparing GIS professionals: Comparing perceptions of employers and educators. Trans. Gis 2014, 19, 641–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berger, G. Data Reveals the Most In-Demand Soft Skills among Candidates. 2016. Available online: https://business.linkedin.com/talent-solutions/blog/trends-and-research/2016/most-indemand-soft-skills (accessed on 14 January 2022).
- Riley, D.R.; Horman, M.J.; Messner, J.I. Embedding leadership development in construction engineering and management education. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 2008, 134, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pócsová, J.; Bednárová, D.; Bogdanovská, G.; Mojžišová, A. Implementation of Agile Methodologies in an Engineering Course. Educ. Sci. 2020, 10, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandes, P.R.d.S.; Jardim, J.; Lopes, M.C.d.S. The Soft Skills of Special Education Teachers: Evidence from the Literature. Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sutil-Martín, D.L.; Otamendi, F.J. Soft Skills Training Program Based on Serious Games. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hirudayaraj, M.; Matić, J. Leveraging Human Resource Development Practice to Enhance Organizational Creativity: A Multilevel Conceptual Model. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 2021, 20, 172–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernández-Arias, P.; Antón-Sancho, Á.; Vergara, D.; Barrientos, A. Soft Skills of American University Teachers: Self-Concept. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crocamo, C.; Bachi, B.; Cioni, R.M.; Schecke, H.; Nieminen, I.; Zabłocka-Żytka, L.; Woźniak-Prus, M.; Bartoli, F.; Riboldi, I.; Appleton, J.V.; et al. Professionals’ Digital Training for Child Maltreatment Prevention in the COVID-19 Era: A Pan-European Model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regona, M.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Xia, B.; Li, R.Y.M. Artificial Intelligent Technologies for the Construction Industry: How Are They Perceived and Utilized in Australia? J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2022, 8, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stoyanova, T.; Stoyanov, P.; Remnova, A.; Kushniruk, S.; Rakityanska, L.; Drobyazko, S. System-Cluster Technology of e-Learning Improvement under the Conditions of COVID-19. Sustainability 2021, 13, 14024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abouhashem, A.; Abdou, R.M.; Bhadra, J.; Santhosh, M.; Ahmad, Z.; Al-Thani, N.J. A Distinctive Method of Online Interactive Learning in STEM Education. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vukićević, A.M.; Mačužić, I.; Djapan, M.; Milićević, V.; Shamina, L. Digital Training and Advanced Learning in Occupational Safety and Health Based on Modern and Affordable Technologies. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antón-Sancho, Á.; Vergara, D.; Lamas-Álvarez, V.E.; Fernández-Arias, P. Digital Content Creation Tools: American University Teachers’ Perception. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veledinskaya, S.B.; Dorofeeva, M.Y. The effectiveness of e-learning: Online Course Requirements. Open Distance Educ. 2016, 2, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Veledinskaya, S.B.; Dorofeeva, M.Y.; Boronina, N.A. Monitoring of E-Learning Process: New Approaches. Available online: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25392398 (accessed on 10 February 2022).
- Sidorova, E.; Sebechenko, E.; Kostyukhin, Y.; Boboshko, D.; Kostin, A.; Kostina, O.; Vikhrova, N. Formation of a Sustainable Mechanism of Preferential VAT Taxation of Exports as Evidenced by the Russian Federation Practice. Economies 2021, 9, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zasko, V.; Sidorova, E.; Komarova, V.; Boboshko, D.; Dontsova, O. Digitization of the Customs Revenue Administration as a Factor of the Enhancement of the Budget Efficiency of the Russian Federation. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uhde, N. Validity of Scoring Methods in the Presence of Outliers. J. Bus. Econ. Res. 2008, 6, 2495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Piante Henriksen, A.; Palocsay, S.W. An Excel-Based Decision Support System for Scoring and Ranking Proposed R&D Projects. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 2008, 7, 529–546. [Google Scholar]
- Arkhipova, E.N.; Kryukov, V.V.; Shakhgeldyan, K.I. Automation of the Rating Assessment of the Activities of the Educational Unit of the University—University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2012. Available online: https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/view/561?locale=en_US (accessed on 10 February 2022).
- Toffler, A. The Future Shock; Random House: New York, NY, USA, 1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanvey, R.G. An attainable global perspective. Theory Into Pract. 1982, 21, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hicks, D.; Holden, C. Remembering the future: What do children think? Environ. Educ. Res. 2007, 13, 501–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hicks, D. Thirty Years of Global Education: A reminder of key principles and precedents. Educ. Rev. 2003, 55, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whitehead, A.N. Process and Reality; McMillan: New York, NY, USA, 1929; Available online: https://antilogicalism.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/process-and-reality.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2022).
- Esbjorn-Hargens, S. Integral Ecology: Uniting Multiple Perspectives on the Natural World; Integral Books: Kerala, India, 2010; Available online: http://integral-review.org/documents/Inglis,%20Review%20Integral%20Ecology%20Vol.%205%20No.%201.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2022).
- Migey, G.; Rajagopalan, R. Critical Systems Thinking, Systemic Intervention and Beyond. 2019. Available online: http://www.researchgate.netpublication/333118236_Critical_Systems_Thinking_Systemic_Intervention_and_Beyond (accessed on 10 February 2022).
- Capra, F.; Luisi, P. The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, NY, USA, 2016; Available online: https://assets.cambridge.org/97811070/11366/frontmatter/9781107011366_frontmatter.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2022).
- Capra, F.; March, R. The Turning Point: Science, Society and the Rising Culture. Phys. Today 1982, 35, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vulfovich, E. Case Study in Teaching Foreign Language for Professional Communication. Int. Res. J. 2014, 4, 23. [Google Scholar]
- Simanjuntak, S.A.; Lien, H.-N. Teaching and Learning EIL Approach: A Case Study in Indonesia. J. World Engl. Educ. Pract. 2020, 2, 3661301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sidorova, E.Y.; Timokhova, G.V.; Kostyukhin, Y.Y. Systems Thinking and the Theory of Constraints; Peter: St. Petersburg, Russia, 2022; 192p. [Google Scholar]
- Weiss, E.N. A Brief Note on the Theory of Constraints. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1584169 (accessed on 10 February 2022).
- Ebner, N.; Mitchell, L.; Parlamis, J.; Lewicki, R.J. Teaching Negotiation Online—Part 2: Getting Started. Signal 2014, 29, 12. [Google Scholar]
- Navarro, M.M.; Prasetyo, Y.T.; Young, M.N.; Nadlifatin, R.; Redi, A.A.N.P. The Perceived Satisfaction in Utilizing Learning Management System among Engineering Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Integrating Task Technology Fit and Extended Technology Acceptance Model. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ochoa-Orihuel, J.; Marticorena-Sánchez, R.; Sáiz-Manzanares, M.C. Moodle LMS Integration with Amazon Alexa: A Practical Experience. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panda, S. Analyzing Effectiveness of Learning Management System in Present Scenario: Conceptual Background and Practical Implementation. Int. J. Innov. Res. Adv. Stud. 2020, 7, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Author/Source | Area of Focus | Source of Data | List of Soft Skills Considered Important |
---|---|---|---|
Andrews and Higson, 2008 [16] (over 1200 citations) | Graduate employment | Literature review | Professionalism, reliability, ability to cope with uncertainty, ability to work under pressure, ability to plan and think strategically, capability to communicate and interact with others either in a team or through networking, good written and verbal communication skills, creativity and self-confidence, good self-management and time management skills, willingness to learn and accept responsibility |
Aasheim, Li, and Williams, 2009 [17] (over 140 citations) | Information technology (entry-level) | Senior and middle management | Communication, ability to work in teams, interpersonal skills, personal skills or traits, honesty/integrity, analytical skills, flexibility/adaptability, motivation, creative thinking, organizational skills, entrepreneurial skills/risk-taking |
Mitchell, Skinner, and White, 2010 [18] (over 350 citations) | Business graduates | Recruiters | Positive attitude, being respectful, trustworthy, honest and ethical, taking initiative and responsibility, being co-operative and a team player, possessing good communication and interpersonal skills, being ambitious and self-confident, and ability to think critically |
Crawford, Lang, Fink, Dalton, and Fielitz, 2011 [19] | Students graduating from agriculture and natural resources related programs | Employers Alum, Faculty, Students | Seven soft skills clusters: communication, decision-making/problem-solving, self-management, team work, professionalism |
21st century skills for engineers (Hanover, 2011) [20] | Engineers | Team work, consensus building, entrepreneurial mindset, creative design, empathy and social responsibility, global awareness and perspective, ethical behavior and trustworthiness, broad systems thinking, multidisciplinary thinking | |
Robles, 2012 [21] (over 1600 citations) | Business graduates | Business Executives | Communication, courtesy, flexibility, integrity, interpersonal skills, positive attitude, professionalism, responsibility, team work, work ethic |
Lippman, Ryberg, Carney, and Moore, 2015 [22] (over 200 citations) | Youth | Literature review | Social skills, communication skills, higher order thinking skills, self-control, positive self-concept |
Wikle and Fagin, 2015 [23] (over 50 citations) | Geographic Information Science | Employer | Problem solving/trouble shooting, critical thinking, flexibility/adaptability, working in a team environment/ability to work independently, time management/multi-tasking, creativity/verbal presentation, writing, project management/leadership |
Berger, 2016 [24] (over 5 citations) | Entry-level contributors | LinkedIn profiles | Communication, organization, team work, creativity, social skills, critical thinking, interpersonal communication, adaptability, punctuality, friendly personality |
John and Chen, 2017 [25] (over 2 citations) | STEM | Employer | Team work, communication, empathy, analytical skills, self-control, positive self-concept |
Pócsová, Bednárová, Bogdanovská, and Mojžišová, 2020 [26] (over 2 citations) | Engineers | Social and emotional learning competencies | Critical thinking/problem solving, creativity, communication skills, collaboration |
Fernandes, Jardim, and Lopes, 2021 [27] (over 5 citations) | Special education teachers | Literature review | Personal and social skills, personal attributes management, performance improvement, sustaining interpersonal relationships |
Academic Discipline Block | Block Components | Points | File Formats |
---|---|---|---|
4. Learning technologies | Scenarios of application of active learning methods at offline classes (business games, projects, discussions…) | 3 | pdf, doc, ppt |
Availability of assignments with mutual testing of other student’s assignments (work in pairs, performed online) | 3 | LMS Canvas tools | |
Availability of assignments involving online interaction between the students using LMS Canvas tools (discussions, cooperative and group work) | 3 | LMS Canvas tools | |
Implementation (using the LMS Canvas tools) of online-based project activities involving the academic discipline taught | 3 | LMS Canvas tools, external services | |
Use of multimedia materials and Internet services for online assignments | 3 | LMS Canvas tools, external services |
Points | The Number of Disciplines Receiving the Indicated Number of Points |
---|---|
Over 30 | 20 |
25–30 | 27 |
19–24 | 76 |
12–18 | 113 |
Total disciplines analyzed | 236 |
The Digital Tools | Formed Soft Skills |
---|---|
Courses are implemented on the LMS Canvas platform, where materials and tasks are placed for groups of some students to complete them in a fixed time. | Good self-management and time management skills, willingness to learn and accept responsibility, ability to work independently |
Pair assignments with mutual checking of each other’s work (using cross-assessment function in LMS Canvas) | Communication, decision-making, self-management, team work, professionalism, multi-tasking |
The case-study method, which is implemented with a self-search for data from the Internet resources | Professionalism, adaptability ability to cope with uncertainty, ability to plan and think strategically, capability to interact with others either in a team or through networking |
Groups in WhatsApp messenger created for correspondence; conferences and consultations in Zoom (MS Teams, Google conference, etc.) | Communication, working in a team environment, ability to work independently, time management, leadership |
Google tables for collaboration | Communication, ability to work in teams, inter-personal skills, personal skills, analytical skills, organizational skills |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Volkov, A.; Rishko, Y.; Kostyukhin, Y.; Sidorova, E.; Boboshko, D.; Savinova, D.; Ershova, V. Using Digital Tools to Teach Soft Skill-Oriented Subjects to University Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050335
Volkov A, Rishko Y, Kostyukhin Y, Sidorova E, Boboshko D, Savinova D, Ershova V. Using Digital Tools to Teach Soft Skill-Oriented Subjects to University Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Education Sciences. 2022; 12(5):335. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050335
Chicago/Turabian StyleVolkov, Aleksandr, Yury Rishko, Yury Kostyukhin, Elena Sidorova, Diana Boboshko, Darya Savinova, and Veronika Ershova. 2022. "Using Digital Tools to Teach Soft Skill-Oriented Subjects to University Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic" Education Sciences 12, no. 5: 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050335
APA StyleVolkov, A., Rishko, Y., Kostyukhin, Y., Sidorova, E., Boboshko, D., Savinova, D., & Ershova, V. (2022). Using Digital Tools to Teach Soft Skill-Oriented Subjects to University Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Education Sciences, 12(5), 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050335