Next Article in Journal
A Pilot Study to Incorporate Collaboration and Energy Competency into an Engineering Ethics Course
Previous Article in Journal
Parents’, Teachers’ and Principals’ Views on Parental Involvement in Secondary Education Schools in Greece
Previous Article in Special Issue
Makerspaces in First-Year Engineering Education
Open AccessArticle

How Creativity in STEAM Modules Intervenes with Self-Efficacy and Motivation

1
Centre of Math & Science Education (Z-MNU), Department of Biology Education, Faculty-II, University of Bayreuth, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany
2
R&D Department, Ellinogermaniki Agogi, 153 51 Pallini, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2020, 10(3), 70; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030070
Received: 21 February 2020 / Revised: 10 March 2020 / Accepted: 11 March 2020 / Published: 13 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trends in STEM Education)
Many current curricula, in going beyond traditional goals, increasingly foster creativity in science classrooms, declaring creativity a core skill of the 21st century. For enhancing creativity in science classrooms, the subject Arts is considered to offer a potential way from STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) to STEAM (STEM with Arts)). The Horizont-2020 project Creations prepared more than 100 creativity-enhancing STEAM modules based on the 5E instructional model. STEM subjects were mathematics, biology, physics, chemistry or technology, and often interdisciplinary for different school and class levels between the ages of nine and nineteen. All modules provided a social environment fostering creativity where students imagine, explore, experiment, test, manipulate, and speculate. Exemplarily, five modules including physics, math, and biology, were selected, for monitoring motivation and creativity. The first was measured on the level of career-motivation and self-efficacy, the latter focused on two sub-constructs: active cognition such as idea processing (Act), and a mental state of creative immersion (Flow). Subjects were a sample of 995 students (9–18 years). In summary, no gender impact or age effect appeared in any of the monitored variables. Participation intervened with Self-Efficacy and Act, while Career Motivation or Flow did not. Act as a cognitive variable associated with creativity might be more sensitive to changes, whereas Flow as a parameter measuring a state of mind related to emotion appears more stable. Path analysis supported the role of creativity for Career-Motivation by promoting Self-Efficacy. Conclusions for appropriate educational settings to foster STEAM environments are discussed. View Full-Text
Keywords: creativity; self-efficacy; STEM education; STEAM (enriched with arts); inquiry-based science education; science classroom creativity; self-efficacy; STEM education; STEAM (enriched with arts); inquiry-based science education; science classroom
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Conradty, C.; Sotiriou, S.A.; Bogner, F.X. How Creativity in STEAM Modules Intervenes with Self-Efficacy and Motivation. Educ. Sci. 2020, 10, 70.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop