Next Article in Journal
Bioinformatics-Based Adaptive System towards Real-Time Dynamic E-learning Content Personalization
Next Article in Special Issue
A Learning Community Involving Collaborative Course-Based Research Experiences for Foundational Chemistry Laboratories
Previous Article in Journal
Children’s Interest in Learning English Through Picture Books in an EFL Context: The Effects of Parent–Child Interaction and Digital Pen Use
Previous Article in Special Issue
University Student Satisfaction and Skill Acquisition: Evidence from the Undergraduate Dissertation

Evaluation of Pharmacy Students’ Knowledge and Perception of Scientific Integrity

Department of Pharmacy, The Royal Medical Services, Amman 11733, Jordan
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid-22110, Jordan
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2020, 10(2), 41;
Received: 15 January 2020 / Revised: 8 February 2020 / Accepted: 13 February 2020 / Published: 15 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Undergraduate Research as a High Impact Practice in Higher Education)
Scientific integrity, proper research conduct and avoiding research misconduct including plagiarism, fabrication and falsification, are all essential to all disciplines. Since research experience is a recommended skill to gain during undergraduate education, undergraduate students need to be aware of research misconduct in order to avoid it. This study was carried out to determine the level of knowledge and awareness regarding research misconduct, and the independent factors that might contribute to attitudes towards research misconduct. In this cross-sectional study, a questionnaire was self-filled by pharmacy undergraduate students about their knowledge of practices in research misconduct. Among the respondents (n=800), 79.12% had poor knowledge, whereas 20.88% had good knowledge about research misconduct and research ethics. Furthermore, only 9% indicated having previous training in research conduct/misconduct, whereas 36.5% had previous training in research ethics. In conclusion, this study reflects insufficient knowledge and awareness about research misconduct concepts and their main terminologies among undergraduate pharmacy students, which emphasizes the importance of implanting proper training programs/courses on research ethics during students’ academic years. View Full-Text
Keywords: students; knowledge; awareness; research misconduct; Jordan students; knowledge; awareness; research misconduct; Jordan
MDPI and ACS Style

Ababneh, R.A.; Alzoubi, K.H.; Ababneh, M.A. Evaluation of Pharmacy Students’ Knowledge and Perception of Scientific Integrity. Educ. Sci. 2020, 10, 41.

AMA Style

Ababneh RA, Alzoubi KH, Ababneh MA. Evaluation of Pharmacy Students’ Knowledge and Perception of Scientific Integrity. Education Sciences. 2020; 10(2):41.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ababneh, Rawan A., Karem H. Alzoubi, and Mera A. Ababneh. 2020. "Evaluation of Pharmacy Students’ Knowledge and Perception of Scientific Integrity" Education Sciences 10, no. 2: 41.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop