1. Introduction
The global digital transformation is fundamentally reshaping economic systems and employment structures, serving as a critical driver for achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. World Bank data from 2023 indicates that between 2000 and 2022, the information technology services sector expanded at twice the rate of overall economic growth, with employment in digital services growing by 7% annually compared to just 1% for overall employment, clearly demonstrating digital technology’s transformative impact on labor markets (
Autor, 2015). Digital literacy has evolved significantly from its original conceptualization as basic information processing capability (
Gilster, 1997) to become a multidimensional skillset encompassing technical operation, content creation, and social participation (
Martin & Grudziecki, 2006). This evolution reflects its current status as essential social capital in the digital era (
Eshet, 2012). The dual characteristics of digital literacy, combining technological integration with social adaptation, provide a theoretical basis for understanding its empowering potential for vulnerable populations.
The unequal distribution of digital empowerment manifests most prominently along urban–rural and gender dimensions. Recent data from the European Union Statistics Office (2023) reveals a significant disparity: while internet penetration reaches 91%, merely 55.6% of the population possesses basic digital skills, with cross-country variations in ICT training further exacerbating the digital divide (
Hargittai, 2002). China’s National Report on Digital Literacy and Skills Development (2024) highlights this inequality, showing that 19.83% of urban workers demonstrate advanced digital literacy compared to only 9.53% in rural areas. Rural women face particularly acute disadvantages, experiencing compounded digital exclusion at the intersection of geographic and gender barriers (
Dijk, 2005). This exclusion has tangible economic consequences. Despite China’s rural e-commerce sector growing at 8.62% annually from 2020 to 2024, rural women’s limited digital access has prevented equitable participation in these technological benefits (
Qiu et al., 2019). The persistent gender gap in digital skill distribution continues to constrain rural women’s economic opportunities in the digital transformation. The GSMA estimates that closing the mobile internet gender gap in low- and middle-income countries between 2023 and 2030 could add
$1.3 trillion to global GDP while generating an additional
$230 billion in revenue for the mobile communications industry. This underscores the significant economic and social value of addressing the digital gender divide.
Non-agricultural employment for rural women represents a critical mechanism for advancing both poverty reduction and gender equality objectives. However, persistent multidimensional barriers continue to constrain its development. Individual-level constraints include limited educational attainment (
Estudillo & Otsuka, 1999;
D. P. Sun et al., 2022;
H. Liu et al., 2025), occupational skill deficits (
Pan et al., 2021), health challenges (
J. F. Sun et al., 2024), and marital status considerations (
Deng & Luo, 2025). Family-level factors encompass traditional gender role expectations (
Z. H. Yang & Chen, 2024), caregiving responsibilities (
Van et al., 2013;
Taye & Tesfaye, 2024;
D. Yang et al., 2025), and household structure characteristics (
G. Y. Sun & Sun, 2022). Societal-level barriers feature prominently in the form of digital skill gaps within increasingly technology-driven economies (
Ding et al., 2025). These intersecting challenges perpetuate a cyclical pattern of limited skills, constrained earnings, and restricted development opportunities (
Chang & Zhang, 2025). Digital literacy emerges as a particularly valuable competency in this context due to its dynamic and upgradable nature. By enabling continuous skill adaptation to technological changes and facilitating access to more stable income streams through digital tools, digital literacy offers a viable pathway to break this persistent cycle and support sustainable improvements in employment quality (
Xu, 2024).
Existing research has demonstrated digital literacy’s positive impact on rural women’s non-agricultural employment through multiple channels, including information channel expansion (
Boateng et al., 2018;
L. L. Zhou et al., 2024;
Miao et al., 2024;
Fang et al., 2025) and increased employment probability (
Ruan & Luo, 2024). Emerging studies have begun to explore longer-term effects, such as digital skills’ association with employment stability (
D. Zhou et al., 2024) and economic independence-induced family power structure reorganization (
Aguilera et al., 2021). However, three critical gaps exist in this field of research, whose significance is underscored by deficiencies in the existing literature. First, theoretical frameworks lack integration. While most studies acknowledge the multidimensional nature of digital literacy (
L. L. Li et al., 2025), they often examine these attributes in isolation. For instance, prior research clearly depicts device usage patterns, yet analyses fail to extend to the interaction between underlying cognitive skills and family support environments, resulting in fragmented perspectives (
W. L. Jiang & Zhao, 2022). Second, mechanism studies exhibit pronounced narrow-mindedness. The existing literature thoroughly reveals the direct benefits of explicit pathways like skill training and expanding information channels (
Chen & Weng, 2024), yet systematic research demonstrating the implicit mediating role of psychological capital remains extremely rare. Third, research on non-agricultural employment primarily focuses on overall non-agricultural employment (
J. Wang & Han, 2023;
F. Liu et al., 2024), with relatively few studies examining the impact of digital literacy on rural women’s non-agricultural employment. This gap hinders the provision of decision support for enhancing rural women’s non-agricultural employment capabilities in the digital economy era.
Building on social learning theory (
Bandura & Walters, 1977), this study constructs an analytical framework to examine the impact of digital literacy on non-agricultural employment among rural women and its underlying mechanisms through the dimensions of psychological capital and information environment. The framework specifically assesses long-term impacts on sustainable poverty reduction and gender equality outcomes.
This research makes three primary contributions. Firstly, it advances theoretical understanding by employing causal inference methods including instrumental variables to isolate digital literacy’s net effect on non-agricultural employment, thereby expanding social learning theory’s applications in digital economy contexts. Secondly, it elucidates the mechanisms fostering sustainable employment competitiveness through complementary psychological capital and information capability pathways. Thirdly, it proposes policy strategies that simultaneously address short-term needs and long-term capacity development. These integrated recommendations promote rural women’s high-quality employment while supporting poverty reduction, gender equity, and rural revitalization objectives, providing valuable guidance for global sustainable development initiatives.
The structure of this paper is as follows: after the introduction, the second part will describe the theoretical background related to digital literacy and rural women’s non-agricultural employment, and on the basis of which the research hypotheses will be formulated. The third part will present the research data and methodology, the fourth part shows the empirical results containing benchmark regression, robustness test, mechanism test, etc., and the fifth part elucidates the conclusion and recommendation, containing its limitations and future research plans.
5. Research Conclusions and Policy Recommendations
5.1. Research Conclusions
This study employs a social learning theory perspective and utilizes a two-way fixed-effects model to systematically analyze data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) from 2014 to 2020, investigating how digital literacy influences non-agricultural employment among rural women. Findings reveal that digital literacy significantly enhances non-agricultural employment outcomes, though its effectiveness varies across regions, age groups, household sizes, and educational attainment. This indicates that digital literacy, as a transformative human capital asset, not only helps overcome structural employment barriers but also highlights the influence of contextual factors. Mechanism analysis reveals dual empowerment pathways: psychological capital development enhances employment confidence and career decision-making by boosting self-efficacy and cognitive abilities; information environment optimization strengthens resource acquisition and integration capabilities through expanded digital social participation and improved information channel utilization. Additionally, household economic capital and regional development potential emerge as key moderating variables—household resources determine skill acquisition opportunities, while regional conditions shape skill application scenarios, jointly influencing the effectiveness of digital literacy in translating into non-agricultural employment advantages.
Although this study systematically examined the impact of digital literacy on non-agricultural employment among rural women and its underlying mechanisms, the following limitations remain: First, the measurement method for digital literacy may have certain limitations. While this study constructed a composite indicator for digital literacy, this indicator still relies on a limited set of items from the China Family Panel Studies questionnaire, failing to fully capture the multidimensional nature of digital literacy. Future research may consider collecting richer primary data through field surveys to enhance the comprehensiveness and accuracy of measurement indicators. Second, although this study utilized the 2014–2020 CFPS panel data, data continuity remains insufficient. Access to longer-term, higher-frequency longitudinal data in future research would better confirm the dynamic causal relationship between digital literacy and non-agricultural employment. Third, the sample selection scope remains limited. This study focuses on rural women; subsequent research could broaden the sample scope to conduct cross-group comparisons, thereby gaining a more comprehensive understanding of the role of digital literacy in the labor market.
5.2. Policy Recommendations
This study proposes comprehensive policy recommendations in the following five areas in order to further promote the implementation of policies and enhance rural women’s capacity for off-farm employment and sustainable development in the digital economy:
First, a comprehensive “Tiered Digital Literacy Enhancement Program” should be implemented to establish a scientifically structured tiered training and targeted support system. This program must conduct precise group selection based on rural women’s age, educational background, and employment intentions, prioritizing coverage for those aged 16 to 45 with at least a junior high school education and clear non-agricultural employment aspirations. A simplified training pathway focused on short video applications, digital payments, and social marketing should be established for women aged 46 and above. Training content should be systematically advanced, progressing from foundational device operation and internet access to e-commerce operations, remote collaboration tools, and basic data analysis. Advanced courses covering platform management, digital compliance, and market strategy should be offered to those with entrepreneurial potential. It is recommended that county-level human resources departments lead the development of modular curricula in collaboration with vocational institutions and major digital enterprises to achieve sustainable empowerment through teaching individuals how to fish.
Second, establish an integrated social support system combining employment and childcare to effectively alleviate the family care burdens faced by rural women participating in training and employment. It is recommended to set up temporary childcare centers at township training centers and areas with high concentrations of female employment, providing free childcare services during training hours. Additionally, rural women who have secured non-agricultural jobs should receive monthly childcare subsidies ranging from 200 to 400 yuan, which should be incorporated into local employment support funds. Furthermore, actively guide community organizations to develop neighborhood mutual-aid childcare models. Coordinated by women’s federations or village committees, these arrangements would involve rotating childcare duties, forming low-cost community-based parenting support networks. This approach would free up rural women’s time and energy, unlocking their employment potential.
Third, to promote regional coordination and industrial integration, it is recommended to establish “Rural Women’s Digital Employment Incubation Centers” at the county level. These centers should integrate functions such as skills training, job matching, entrepreneurship incubation, and resource linkage. Operated jointly by governments, universities, and digital enterprises, they should focus on emerging sectors like rural e-commerce, digital agritourism, and remote services, providing end-to-end services from skill enhancement to actual employment. Clear, quantifiable targets should be established, such as training 500,000 rural women within three years, increasing non-agricultural employment rates by 5 to 8 percentage points, and successfully incubating at least 10,000 micro-enterprises led by rural women—including online stores and digital cooperatives. This will foster a virtuous cycle of digital employment that connects talent, industry, and regional development.
Fourth, a scientific dynamic monitoring and policy evaluation mechanism should be established, integrating digital literacy indicators with employment quality metrics into the rural revitalization performance evaluation system. Leveraging authoritative databases such as the China Panel Study, a multidimensional assessment framework encompassing digital literacy levels, non-agricultural employment stability, income growth rates, and career development trajectories should be developed. Regular publication of the Rural Women’s Digital Employment Development Report would provide evidence-based support for policy refinement and regional implementation. This approach facilitates a systemic shift from short-term employment promotion to long-term career development, thereby advancing the dual missions of gender equality and decent work within the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
Fifth, while advancing digital empowerment, it is imperative to prioritize and systematically address algorithmic bias, information harassment, and data privacy risks within cyberspace. It is recommended that all digital training programs incorporate a mandatory module on “Digital Security and Rights Protection”, covering personal information safeguards, strong password creation, and anti-fraud techniques. Dedicated sessions should guide participants in recognizing potential gender and regional biases in platform algorithms and mastering appeal and feedback mechanisms. Additionally, collaboration with cyberspace administration and public security departments should establish a “Green Channel for Rural Women’s Online Rights Protection”. This channel would provide rapid reporting and legal aid services for cyber harassment and data misuse, ensuring rural women gain self-protection capabilities as they access the digital world.