Next Article in Journal
A Robust Tunable Simulator of Atmospheric Turbulence for Performance Analysis of Wireless Optical Links
Previous Article in Journal
KNA-SG: Keyframe–Node-Associated Open-Vocabulary 3D Scene Graphs from RGB Sequences
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Comprehensive Evaluation of 3D-Printed Breast Phantoms: Impacts of Printing Technology and STL Processing on Multimodal Fidelity

1
Department of Medical Equipment, Electronic and Information Technologies in Healthcare, Medical University of Varna, 9002 Varna, Bulgaria
2
ELPIDA Research Group, Medical University of Varna, 9002 Varna, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Technologies 2026, 14(7), 426; https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14070426
Submission received: 13 May 2026 / Revised: 8 July 2026 / Accepted: 10 July 2026 / Published: 12 July 2026

Abstract

Anthropomorphic breast phantoms are increasingly used for the development and evaluation of breast imaging technologies. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impacts of the material combination and stereolithography or Standard Tessellation Language (STL) export methodology on the multimodal imaging performance of patient-derived breast phantoms. A breast model derived from segmented magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data was used to fabricate four multi-material phantom sections representing adipose- and glandular-equivalent regions. Two material combinations—acrylic styrene acrylonitrile and high-impact polystyrene (ASA-HIPS) and acrylic styrene acrylonitrile and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ASA-ABS)—and two STL export procedures were evaluated, including a conventional mesh-based workflow and an in-house voxel-preserving approach designed to eliminate interface gaps. The phantoms were imaged using clinical computed tomography (CT), mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis systems. Quantitative evaluation included contrast-based image characteristics and region of interest-based intensity distribution analysis. The results showed that ASA-HIPS phantoms demonstrated higher inter-material contrast and greater attenuation separation than ASA-ABS across all imaging modalities. The voxel-preserving STL export procedure improved physical interface integrity and eliminated visible inter-material gaps, while producing only minor differences in global radiological metrics compared with the conventional workflow. CT imaging of the breast samples acquired at 70 kVp showed attenuation characteristics consistent with clinically reported Hounsfield unit ranges for low-density breast tissues observed in clinical CT examinations.
Keywords: anthropomorphic phantom; breast phantom; 3D printing; computed tomography; digital breast tomosynthesis; mammography anthropomorphic phantom; breast phantom; 3D printing; computed tomography; digital breast tomosynthesis; mammography

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dukov, N.; Nastev, V.; Petkova, V.; Buliev, I.; Bliznakov, Z.; Dobreva, V.; Bliznakova, K. A Comprehensive Evaluation of 3D-Printed Breast Phantoms: Impacts of Printing Technology and STL Processing on Multimodal Fidelity. Technologies 2026, 14, 426. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14070426

AMA Style

Dukov N, Nastev V, Petkova V, Buliev I, Bliznakov Z, Dobreva V, Bliznakova K. A Comprehensive Evaluation of 3D-Printed Breast Phantoms: Impacts of Printing Technology and STL Processing on Multimodal Fidelity. Technologies. 2026; 14(7):426. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14070426

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dukov, Nikolay, Vencislav Nastev, Viktoria Petkova, Ivan Buliev, Zhivko Bliznakov, Valentina Dobreva, and Kristina Bliznakova. 2026. "A Comprehensive Evaluation of 3D-Printed Breast Phantoms: Impacts of Printing Technology and STL Processing on Multimodal Fidelity" Technologies 14, no. 7: 426. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14070426

APA Style

Dukov, N., Nastev, V., Petkova, V., Buliev, I., Bliznakov, Z., Dobreva, V., & Bliznakova, K. (2026). A Comprehensive Evaluation of 3D-Printed Breast Phantoms: Impacts of Printing Technology and STL Processing on Multimodal Fidelity. Technologies, 14(7), 426. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14070426

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop