DeFi perpetual futures have expanded from crypto-native instruments to tokenised equities and commodities, yet the economics of these instruments remain poorly understood. We study 17 assets—5 crypto coins, 8 tokenised equities, and 4 tokenised commodities—on three DeFi perpetual platforms (Hyperliquid, EdgeX, Lighter) over
[...] Read more.
DeFi perpetual futures have expanded from crypto-native instruments to tokenised equities and commodities, yet the economics of these instruments remain poorly understood. We study 17 assets—5 crypto coins, 8 tokenised equities, and 4 tokenised commodities—on three DeFi perpetual platforms (Hyperliquid, EdgeX, Lighter) over July 2025 to February 2026. Applying a rolling 3-day
t-test to identify abnormal trading volume without a predetermined event calendar, we document 1797 statistically significant volume anomalies. DeFi perpetual volume is driven primarily by macroeconomic and policy shocks (ADA
on the U.S. Crypto Strategic Reserve announcement; 15 of 17 assets simultaneously anomalous during January 2026 mega-cap earnings), asset-class-specific catalysts, and a recurring 24/7 market-structure effect tied to weekends and U.S. holidays. Price tracking accuracy reveals a sharp maturity gradient: crypto coin perpetuals exhibit near-perfect price tracking (
) and strong TradFi volume co-movement (
), while equity perpetuals show weaker integration and commodity perpetuals range from adequate (oil, gold) to unreliable (natural gas). We conclude that crypto DeFi perpetuals constitute credible synthetic economic claims on underlying assets, while equity and commodity perpetuals remain at an early developmental stage. Integration with traditional financial markets is well-established for crypto coin perpetuals; for equity and commodity perpetuals, the evidence is preliminary, given short observation windows, and further research with longer time series is needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn.
Full article