Next Article in Journal
On Probabilistic Risk of Aircraft Collision along Air Corridors
Next Article in Special Issue
Velocity Obstacle Based Conflict Avoidance in Urban Environment with Variable Speed Limit
Previous Article in Journal
Automated Defect Detection and Decision-Support in Gas Turbine Blade Inspection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Probabilistic Prediction of Separation Buffer to Compensate for the Closing Effect on Final Approach †

Chair of Air Transport Technology and Logistics, Institute of Logistics and Aviation, TU Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This paper is an extended version of our paper published in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference for Research in Air Transportation (ICRAT), 2020.
Aerospace 2021, 8(2), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8020029
Submission received: 11 December 2020 / Revised: 15 January 2021 / Accepted: 21 January 2021 / Published: 26 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Data Science to Aviation)

Abstract

The air traffic is mainly divided into en-route flight segments, arrival and departure segments inside the terminal maneuvering area, and ground operations at the airport. To support utilizing available capacity more efficiently, in our contribution we focus on the prediction of arrival procedures, in particular, the time-to-fly from the turn onto the final approach course to the threshold. The predictions are then used to determine advice for the controller regarding time-to-lose or time-to-gain for optimizing the separation within a sequence of aircraft. Most prediction methods developed so far provide only a point estimate for the time-to-fly. Complementary, we see the need to further account for the uncertain nature of aircraft movement based on a probabilistic prediction approach. This becomes very important in cases where the air traffic system is operated at its limits to prevent safety-critical incidents, e.g., separation infringements due to very tight separation. Our approach is based on the Quantile Regression Forest technique that can provide a measure of uncertainty of the prediction not only in form of a prediction interval but also by generating a probability distribution over the dependent variable. While the data preparation, model training, and tuning steps are identical to classic Random Forest methods, in the prediction phase, Quantile Regression Forests provide a quantile function to express the uncertainty of the prediction. After developing the model, we further investigate the interpretation of the results and provide a way for deriving advice to the controller from it. With this contribution, there is now a tool available that allows a more sophisticated prediction of time-to-fly, depending on the specific needs of the use case and which helps to separate arriving aircraft more efficiently.
Keywords: probabilistic prediction; final approach; time-to-fly; random forest; quantile regression probabilistic prediction; final approach; time-to-fly; random forest; quantile regression
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Förster, S.; Schultz, M.; Fricke, H. Probabilistic Prediction of Separation Buffer to Compensate for the Closing Effect on Final Approach. Aerospace 2021, 8, 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8020029

AMA Style

Förster S, Schultz M, Fricke H. Probabilistic Prediction of Separation Buffer to Compensate for the Closing Effect on Final Approach. Aerospace. 2021; 8(2):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8020029

Chicago/Turabian Style

Förster, Stanley, Michael Schultz, and Hartmut Fricke. 2021. "Probabilistic Prediction of Separation Buffer to Compensate for the Closing Effect on Final Approach" Aerospace 8, no. 2: 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8020029

APA Style

Förster, S., Schultz, M., & Fricke, H. (2021). Probabilistic Prediction of Separation Buffer to Compensate for the Closing Effect on Final Approach. Aerospace, 8(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8020029

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop