Next Article in Journal
A Review of Low-Power Electric Propulsion Research at the Space Propulsion Centre Singapore
Previous Article in Journal
System Operation of Regional UTM in Taiwan
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Review of Concepts, Benefits, and Challenges for Future Electrical Propulsion-Based Aircraft
Open AccessArticle

Probabilistic Model for Aero-Engines Fleet Condition Monitoring

1
Simulation and Optimization for Future Industrial Applications, Mälardalen University, 72123 Västerås, Sweden
2
SAAB Aeronautic, 58254 Linköping, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Aerospace 2020, 7(6), 66; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace7060066
Received: 1 May 2020 / Revised: 24 May 2020 / Accepted: 25 May 2020 / Published: 26 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress in Jet Engine Technology)
Since aeronautic transportation is responsible for a rising share of polluting emissions, it is of primary importance to minimize the fuel consumption any time during operations. From this perspective, continuous monitoring of engine performance is essential to implement proper corrective actions and avoid excessive fuel consumption due to engine deterioration. This requires, however, automated systems for diagnostics and decision support, which should be able to handle large amounts of data and ensure reliability in all the multiple conditions the engines of a fleet can be found in. In particular, the proposed solution should be robust to engine-to-engine deviations and different sensors availability scenarios. In this paper, a probabilistic Bayesian network for fault detection and identification is applied to a fleet of engines, simulated by an adaptive performance model. The combination of the performance model and the Bayesian network is also studied and compared to the probabilistic model only. The benefit in the suggested hybrid approach is identified as up to 50% higher accuracy. Sensors unavailability due to manufacturing constraints or sensor faults reduce the accuracy of the physics-based method, whereas the Bayesian model is less affected. View Full-Text
Keywords: diagnostics; performance model; Bayesian network; turbofan; fleet diagnostics; performance model; Bayesian network; turbofan; fleet
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Zaccaria, V.; Fentaye, A.D.; Stenfelt, M.; Kyprianidis, K.G. Probabilistic Model for Aero-Engines Fleet Condition Monitoring. Aerospace 2020, 7, 66.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop