Next Article in Journal
Comparison of Constrained Parameterisation Strategies for Aerodynamic Optimisation of Morphing Leading Edge Airfoil
Next Article in Special Issue
Energy Harvesting Performance of Plate Wing from Discrete Gust Excitation
Previous Article in Journal
To Burn-In, or Not to Burn-In: That’s the Question
Previous Article in Special Issue
Structured Control Design for a Highly Flexible Flutter Demonstrator
Open AccessArticle

CFD-Based Aeroelastic Sensitivity Study of a Low-Speed Flutter Demonstrator

1
Chair of Aerodynamics and Fluid Mechanics, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr. 15, D-85748 Garching, Germany
2
Institute of Aircraft Design, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr. 15, D-85748 Garching, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Aerospace 2019, 6(3), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace6030030
Received: 6 February 2019 / Revised: 22 February 2019 / Accepted: 1 March 2019 / Published: 6 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Aeroelasticity)
The goal of developing aircraft that are greener, safer and cheaper can only be maintained through significant innovations in aircraft design. An integrated multidisciplinary design approach can lead to an increase in the performance of future derivative aircraft. Advanced aerodynamics and structural design technologies can be achieved by both passive and active suppression of aeroelastic instabilities. To demonstrate the potential of this approach, the EU-funded project Flutter Free Flight Envelope Expansion for Economical Performance Improvement is developing an unmanned aerial vehicle with a high-aspect-ratio-wing and clearly defined flutter characteristics. The aircraft is used as an experimental test platform. The scope of this work is the investigation of the aeroelastic behaviour of the aircraft and the determination of its flutter limits. The modeling of unsteady aerodynamics is performed by means of the small disturbance CFD approach that provides higher fidelity compared to conventional linear-potential-theory-based methods. The CFD-based and the linear-potential-theory-based results are compared and discussed. Furthermore, the sensitivity of the flutter behaviour to the geometric level of detail of the CFD model is evaluated. View Full-Text
Keywords: computational aeroelasticity; SD-CFD; linearized CFD; FLEXOP; flutter analysis; antisymmetric boundary condition; flutter demonstrator; stability analysis; sensitivity study computational aeroelasticity; SD-CFD; linearized CFD; FLEXOP; flutter analysis; antisymmetric boundary condition; flutter demonstrator; stability analysis; sensitivity study
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Rozov, V.; Volmering, A.; Hermanutz, A.; Hornung, M.; Breitsamter, C. CFD-Based Aeroelastic Sensitivity Study of a Low-Speed Flutter Demonstrator. Aerospace 2019, 6, 30.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop