Next Article in Journal
Digital Transformation in Aircraft Design and Certification: Developing Requirements for Modeling Regulatory Documentation
Previous Article in Journal
Efficient Uncertainty Quantification for Satellite Antenna Pointing: A GSA-PEM Framework Integrating Multi-Source Disturbances
Previous Article in Special Issue
Uncertainty Modeling of Fouling Thickness and Morphology on Compressor Blade
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Flow and Flame Stabilization in Scramjet Engine Combustor with Two Opposing Cavity Flameholders

1
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA
2
Ansys Inc., Canonsburg, PA 15317, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Aerospace 2025, 12(8), 723; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12080723
Submission received: 2 June 2025 / Revised: 25 July 2025 / Accepted: 11 August 2025 / Published: 13 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Thermal Fluid, Dynamics and Control)

Abstract

Scramjet operation requires a comprehensive understanding of the internal flowfield, encompassing fuel–air mixing and combustion. This study investigates transient flow and flame development within a HIFiRE-2 scramjet engine combustor, which features two opposing cavities and dual sets of fuel injectors—the upstream (primary) and downstream (secondary) injectors. These cavities function as flameholders, creating circulating flows with elevated temperatures and pressures. Shock waves form both ahead of fuel plumes and at the diverging and converging sections of the flowpath. Special attention is given to the interactions among these shock waves and the shear layers along the supersonic core flow as the system progresses towards a quasi-steady state. Driven by increased backpressure, bow shocks and disturbances induced by the normal, secondary fuel injection and the inclined, primary fuel injection move upstream, amplifying the cavity pressure. These shocks generate adverse pressure gradients, causing near-wall flow separation adjacent to both injector sets, which enhances the penetration and dispersion of fuel plumes. Once a quasi-steady state is achieved, a feedback loop is established between dynamic wave motions and combustion processes, resulting in sustained entrainment of reactive mixtures into the cavities. This mechanism facilitates stable combustion in the cavities and near-wall separation zones.
Keywords: scramjet, fuel injection, flameholding, shock waves scramjet, fuel injection, flameholding, shock waves

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Small, J.C.; Zhang, L.; Crawford, B.G.; Viti, V. Flow and Flame Stabilization in Scramjet Engine Combustor with Two Opposing Cavity Flameholders. Aerospace 2025, 12, 723. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12080723

AMA Style

Small JC, Zhang L, Crawford BG, Viti V. Flow and Flame Stabilization in Scramjet Engine Combustor with Two Opposing Cavity Flameholders. Aerospace. 2025; 12(8):723. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12080723

Chicago/Turabian Style

Small, Jayson C., Liwei Zhang, Bruce G. Crawford, and Valerio Viti. 2025. "Flow and Flame Stabilization in Scramjet Engine Combustor with Two Opposing Cavity Flameholders" Aerospace 12, no. 8: 723. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12080723

APA Style

Small, J. C., Zhang, L., Crawford, B. G., & Viti, V. (2025). Flow and Flame Stabilization in Scramjet Engine Combustor with Two Opposing Cavity Flameholders. Aerospace, 12(8), 723. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12080723

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop