3.1. Reactive Rarefied Hypersonic Flow over 3D Sphere
Determining the gas flow over a sphere is one of the simplest and most fundamental problems in the field of rarefied gas dynamics. It has been extensively used in numerical simulations and experiments as a validation test case [
14,
39,
40]. In this section, the results obtained by the dsmcFoam code for a reactive gas flow over a sphere at 90 and 130 km altitude are compared with those available in the work developed by Dogra et al. [
14]. The same gas species are used to simulate reactive flows; however, Dogra’s work employs 32 chemical reactions.
In the present investigation, the 1.6-meter-diameter sphere is immersed in a flow composed of molecular nitrogen, oxygen, and atomic oxygen. The species concentration and the freestream conditions employed in this work are shown in
Table 2 [
14]. Molecular collision is modeled by using the variable hard sphere (VHS) molecular model [
30].
Table 3 shows the gas properties, molecular mass (
m) and diameter (
d), viscosity index (
), and vibrational (
) and dissociation (
) temperatures for each of the gas species considered in the present investigation [
30]. Internal energy exchange is modeled using the Larsen–Borgnakke distribution function [
41] and the no-time-counter (NTC) collision sampling technique [
42]. The gas–surface interaction was modeled by assuming diffuse reflection with complete thermal accommodation at the specific surface temperature. Following DSMC good practice [
8], the cell size was set as one-third of the mean free path. The time step was calculated as one-fifth of molecular residence time and set as 2.3 ×
and 6.7 ×
for a 90 and 130 km altitude, respectively. The DSMC method is transient, and approximately 1 million time steps are required for both simulations to decrease the statistical error and obtain smooth curves for the macroscopic properties.
Figure 1 shows the computational mesh and boundary conditions employed in the 95 km altitude case. The computational domains were generated using the
snappyHexMesh tool for a quarter section of a sphere. The dimensions were carefully calculated to minimize computational costs and prevent interaction between the shock wave and domain boundaries. Following the snappy process, computational domains with 2.3 million and 446,000 cells were generated for 95 km and 130 km altitude cases, respectively. The cell size was chosen to be one-third of the mean free path, with eight subcells per cell, to facilitate the near-neighbor collision procedure. At the spline, a velocity of 7500 m/s was specified, whereas a vacuum condition is imposed at the downstream outflow boundary [
30]. The sides of the quarter section of the computational domain were defined as symmetry planes. A diffuse wall with full thermal and moment accommodation was chosen as a wall boundary condition. In addition, the temperature of the sphere wall was maintained at 188 K and 350 K for the cases at 95 km and 130 km altitude, respectively.
Figure 1 shows a slice of the computational domain with boundary conditions employed in the computations of inert and reactive gas flows over the sphere at 95 km altitude.
The surface quantities obtained using the dsmcFoam are compared to those available in Reference [
14] in
Figure 2. In this set of plots, heat transfer (
), pressure (
), and skin friction (
) coefficients are measured along the sphere’s surface for both altitudes considered, i.e., 90 and 130 km. A significant influence of rarefaction effects on
and
is clearly noticed; however, similar impacts are not observed for
.
Still referring to
Figure 2, it is noticed that
is maximum at the stagnation point (
) and decreases to a minimum value at the wake region at
. At the stagnation point, a difference of 8.5% and 5.0% is found for
at 90 and 130 km, respectively. Due to the lack of collisions at sufficiently high altitudes, most chemical reactions are unlikely to occur, thereby reducing the differences between the computed results at 130 km altitude. According to
Figure 2,
follows a similar trend to that described for the heat transfer coefficient; however, the maximum difference between the computational results is 3% at
. In contrast to
and
, the skin friction coefficient at
, due to the flow expansion around the sphere,
reaches its maximum value at
and decreases to a minimum value at the wake. Comparing the results obtained with the dsmcFoam code with those found in Reference [
14], the maximum difference in
is 1.5% at 90 km altitude. In addition, a good agreement is observed between the dsmcFoam and the results and those obtained by Dogra et al. [
14].
Figure 3 shows the nondimensional macroscopic properties’ distribution along the stagnation streamline at 90 and 130 km altitude. The macroscopic property ratios considered in this section are the mole fraction (
/
), temperature ratio (
), and density ratio (
/
). In addition, full symbols represent the computational data obtained using the dsmcFoam code, and empty symbols give the computational results obtained by Dogra et al. [
14] for a reactive gas flow over a 1.6 m sphere.
According to
Figure 3, despite the differences in the chemical reaction models and the number of reactions used during the simulations for both codes, a good agreement is observed between the computed data obtained by Dogra et al. [
14] and the dsmcFoam. At an altitude of 90 km, where most reactions are active due to intense intermolecular collisions, the mole fraction and density distribution along the stagnation streamline are very similar. We also noticed a significant degree of thermal non-equilibrium in the temperature distribution along the stagnation streamline. The translational, rotational, and vibrational temperature ratios follow the same trend; however, differences of 10% and 40% are observed in the translational and vibrational peak temperatures within the shock wave. Considering the 130 km altitude cases, due to the lack of intermolecular collisions in such a rarefied flow, it was observed that chemical reactions have no significant influence on the mole fraction, temperature, and density ratio distribution along the stagnation streamline.
3.2. Reactive Rarefied Hypersonic Flow over Orion Capsule
Rarefied hypersonic reacting flow is used to study the Orion capsule during reentry at altitudes of 95 and 105 km, respectively. In this investigation, the results obtained using the
dsmcFoam-QK (19 species reaction model) and
dsmcFoam-NR (no reactions) are compared with numerical solutions provided by Wilmoth et al. [
43] and Moss et al. [
44].
DSMC simulations were performed by Wilmoth et al. [
43] using the DS2V code [
30] with both traditional rate-based chemistry models (TCE) and a mixed TCE-QK model labeled “new chemistry” [
43]. In this mixed chemistry model, exchange and recombination reactions were not available during the simulations and were treated using traditional rate-based methods. However, dissociation reactions were performed using the new Q-K collision-based methodology. Additionally, the DAC code was used to calculate surface heat flux and compare it to the value obtained by the DS2V code.
Moss et al. [
44] conducted a series of numerical simulations to characterize Orion’s aerodynamics across various conditions, from free molecular to continuum hypersonic. For the rarefied portion of the Earth’s atmosphere, two DSMC mature codes, DS3V and DAC, were employed, both utilizing a five-species reacting air gas model.
In the present work, advantage was taken of Orion’s symmetry to reduce computational costs. In this way, the computational mesh was prepared using a quarter-section model with symmetry boundary conditions applied at the perpendicular planes, as depicted in
Figure 4. The Orion dimensions used in the present investigation can be found at reference [
44]. The OpenFOAM mesh utility called
snappyHexMesh was used to "snap” the mesh onto the Orion CAD geometry, creating hexahedral cells on the surface. After this process, a total of 15.06 ×
and 1.293 ×
cells were employed by the
dsmcFoam calculation for the 95 and 105 km altitudes, respectively. The gas–surface interaction was modeled by assuming diffuse reflection with complete thermal accommodation at the specific surface temperature.
The computational mesh was populated with 94 million and 17.5 million DSMC particles at altitudes of 95 and 105 km, respectively. Freestream boundary conditions were applied at the inlet, top, and sides of the computational domain. The flow at the downstream outflow boundary was supersonic, and vacuum conditions were specified. For all computations, the outflow boundary was located 2.0 body diameters (10 m) downstream of the forebody stagnation point. Additionally, for the two cases considered, the wall temperature was maintained at 951 K and 760 K for altitudes of 95 km and 105 km, respectively. The capsule surface was assumed to be noncatalytic with diffusive reflection and full thermal and momentum accommodation.
The freestream conditions are similar to those previously analyzed by Moss et al. [
44] for the Orion capsule. At both altitudes considered in this investigation, a freestream velocity of 7600 m/s was set. The reentry freestream conditions used in the present work, as well as the gas properties, are shown in
Table 4.
Figure 5 compares the molecular and atomic mole fractions extracted along the stagnation streamline. We clearly noticed an excellent agreement between the
dsmcFoam-QK and the DS2V (new chemistry) for the two altitudes considered. Nevertheless, the production of the molecular species NO through exchange reactions in the
dsmcFoam calculations seems to be slightly underpredicted when compared with DS2V computations. Considering that Wilmoth’s simulations were performed using a mixed TCE-QK chemistry model, a good concurrence was achieved with the
dsmcFoam-QK code.
One of the most critical parameters in developing a reliable thermal protection system (TPS) is accurately predicting the heat flux to the spacecraft surface, which has a direct impact on TPS design and material selection. To investigate the influence of reacting and non-reacting flows over the Orion capsule surface at 95 and 105 km of altitude, comparisons of surface heat flux measurements using the
dsmcFoam, DS2V, and DAC codes are presented in
Figure 6. According to the left-hand-side plot, at 95 km altitude, the heat transfer coefficients (
) calculated by both codes are in close agreement. Although the trends are similar, it is evident that the heat flux predicted using the
dsmcFoam-QK is in excess when compared with the DS2V calculations. Comparing the
dsmcFoam computations at 95 km altitude for reacting and non-reacting flows, a reduction of 36.8% in the
is observed. According to the right-hand plot of
Figure 6, it is evident that the heat transfer coefficient predicted by
dsmcFoam-QK is in very close agreement with DS2V (old chemistry). Furthermore, despite following a similar pattern to the Q-K approach, the DS2V (new chemistry) appears to underpredict
.
The sensitivity of the aerodynamic forces and moments to chemical reactions is presented in
Table 5 for 95 km altitude. According to the simulated data, the DSMC solutions show that the Orion aerodynamics are insensitive to the inclusion of chemical reactions. Despite the chemical insensitivity, reactive flows play a vital role in reducing the shock wave temperature and heat flux at the vehicle surface, as previously discussed.
Table 6 and
Table 7 show the
dsmcFoam aerodynamic calculations for the Orion capsule at 105 km altitude at two angles of attack,
and
, respectively. Included in these tables are the results from DAC and DS3V codes, which both use the DSMC technique, and LAURA, which provides solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations [
44]. For both angles of attack investigated, good agreement is shown between the
dsmcFoam, DAC, and DS3V. However, due to the rarefaction effects, the results obtained by LAURA show significant differences compared with the DSMC solutions. In general, the results demonstrate a high level of agreement and consistency among the various computational tools.
Reacting vs. Non-Reacting
The effect of chemical reactions on the computed results is of particular interest. The flowfield structure for the Orion capsule is shown in
Figure 7, where the overall temperature ratio (
) is presented for non-reacting (
-NR) and reacting (
-QK) conditions. Due to the endothermic nature of the chemical reactions, a significant decrease in the shock wave temperature is visible. A temperature reduction of 25.3% and 18.5% at altitudes of 95 and 105 km, respectively, demonstrates that the presence of chemical reactions has a significant impact on the shock wave stand-off distance, shock thickness, and temperature distribution at the wake region.
Notably, the temperature plots exhibit a significant degree of thermal non-equilibrium, with the overall kinetic temperature, as well as the translational, rotational, and vibrational temperatures, being presented. Furthermore, as the altitude changes, it is possible to observe an alteration in the curve shape, i.e., from a steep gradient at 95 km altitude to shallower gradients at 105 km altitude. This behavior demonstrates the diffuse nature of the shock wave when the degree of gas rarefaction increases.
The density profile for the initial species along the stagnation streamline is also shown in
Figure 8. At 95 km altitude, the number of density profiles is identical for reacting and non-reacting flows at location X < −0.65 m. However, for X ≈ −0.60 m, significant changes are evident for the number density ratio as the flow moves towards the Orion’s surface. Due to its low dissociation threshold, molecular oxygen is the first species to dissociate, resulting in a decrease in
concentration and an increase in atomic oxygen across the shock layer. In contrast, a slight reduction in the molecular nitrogen number density is observed when the results of inert gas flow are compared. Since the molecular nitrogen dissociation temperature is approximately double that of
, just a more severe reentry condition with higher enthalpy is able to fully dissociate the
. At an altitude of 105 km, the dissociation process is significantly less intense than at an altitude of 95 km. Consequently, a slight decrease in
and an increase in atomic oxygen concentration are close to the Orion surface, and no appreciable changes in the temperature, pressure, and velocity are noticed for reaching flow at this altitude.
Mach number, number density, and translational temperature ratio contours are depicted in
Figure 9 displays the hypersonic reacting flow over the Orion capsule at 95 and 105 km altitude, respectively. In this set of contour plots, total number density and translational temperature are normalized by the freestream conditions. According to the Mach number contours, the diffuse shock effect is evident throughout the entire computational domain, particularly in the wake region. While the sonic line at the forebody is located at almost the same position for both altitudes studied, the same phenomenon is not observed in the wake region. At the 95 km altitude, low Mach number values are observed at the wake region, and the position of the sonic line extends far downstream of the Orion capsule. However, for the 105 km altitude case, the sonic line is located closer to the vehicle’s afterbody.
Upon examining the number density and translational temperature ratio, the extremely diffuse nature of the shock wave is evident at an altitude of 105 km, and the shock structure extends well upstream of the Orion body. On the other hand, at an altitude of 95 km, the shock is confined to a region much closer to the vehicle’s heat shield. The number density in the near wake is relatively low for both altitudes, with magnitudes as low as 10% of the freestream value. Along the forebody, as the flow is compressed against the thermal protection system, a significant temperature increase is observed. In the wake region, the temperature decreases during the expansion process, and the highest value, which is 35 times the freestream temperature, can be found for the 105 km altitude case.
At the initial phase of the simulations, the atmospheric gas surrounding the Orion capsule is primarily composed of molecular nitrogen, oxygen, and atomic oxygen. If the spacecraft reentry occurs at a sufficiently high speed, dissociation, and exchange reactions may take place, introducing new molecular and atomic species into the simulations. To demonstrate this, normalized number density contours for each individual species are shown in
Figure 10. According to this group of contour plots, the highest concentrations of nitric oxide (NO) and atomic oxygen occur in the forebody region of the Orion Command Module, a consequence of the high temperatures inside the shock wave, which promote chemical reactions. Reactant species are also found in the afterbody region; however, their concentration is at least one order of magnitude lower than that of the forebody.
The study conducted above demonstrates that an accurate definition of an aero heating environment and the presence of chemical reactions play critical roles in capturing the correct physics during spacecraft reentry simulations.