Next Article in Journal
A Method for the Life Assessment of Aero-Engine Turbine Disks Based on a Time-Varying Load Spectrum
Previous Article in Journal
GPU-Accelerated Eclipse-Aware Routing for SpaceWire-Based OBC in Low-Earth-Orbit Satellite Networks
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Novel, Direct Matrix Solver for Supersonic Boundary Element Method Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Evaluation of Aerodynamic and Sonic Boom Performance of Supersonic Transport Aircrafts with Multiple Wing Configurations

1
Department of Science of Technology Innovation, Nagaoka University of Technology, Niigata 940-2188, Japan
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Nagaoka University of Technology, Niigata 940-2188, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Aerospace 2025, 12(5), 421; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12050421
Submission received: 31 March 2025 / Revised: 2 May 2025 / Accepted: 5 May 2025 / Published: 9 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research and Development of Supersonic Aircraft)

Abstract

In this study, two-dimensional airfoil shapes obtained in aerodynamic optimizations are converted to three-dimensional wing models and then their aerodynamic and sonic boom performance are evaluated. The airfoil shapes analyzed are the diamond, Busemann, new supersonic biplane (NSB), and triplane airfoil configurations. The NSB is a modified version of the Busemann biplane airfoil proposed in previous studies. The triplane airfoil configuration is obtained in this study by maximizing the lift-to-drag ratio using an aerodynamic topology optimization method. Based on the obtained two-dimensional airfoil shapes, three-dimensional multiple (biplane/triplane) wing configurations are designed. The aerodynamic and sonic boom performance of these configurations is evaluated in detail through three-dimensional flow analyses as well as acoustic propagation analyses. The aerodynamic superiority of the multiple wing configurations is confirmed in this study.
Keywords: supersonic airfoil/wing; airfoil topology; aerodynamic optimization; sonic boom supersonic airfoil/wing; airfoil topology; aerodynamic optimization; sonic boom

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yamazaki, W.; Ishida, S. Evaluation of Aerodynamic and Sonic Boom Performance of Supersonic Transport Aircrafts with Multiple Wing Configurations. Aerospace 2025, 12, 421. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12050421

AMA Style

Yamazaki W, Ishida S. Evaluation of Aerodynamic and Sonic Boom Performance of Supersonic Transport Aircrafts with Multiple Wing Configurations. Aerospace. 2025; 12(5):421. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12050421

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yamazaki, Wataru, and Shu Ishida. 2025. "Evaluation of Aerodynamic and Sonic Boom Performance of Supersonic Transport Aircrafts with Multiple Wing Configurations" Aerospace 12, no. 5: 421. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12050421

APA Style

Yamazaki, W., & Ishida, S. (2025). Evaluation of Aerodynamic and Sonic Boom Performance of Supersonic Transport Aircrafts with Multiple Wing Configurations. Aerospace, 12(5), 421. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12050421

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop