1. Introduction
The ionosphere, hypothesized by Carl Friedrich Gauss in 1839, is the ionized part of Earth’s upper atmosphere, i.e., a layer of electrons and ionized atoms and molecules. The ionosphere base is at 70–80 km, extending upwards to space, overlapping with the thermosphere and the upper mesosphere [
1]. Ionization is in general due to the interaction of solar radiation of short wavelength (extreme ultraviolet and X-ray radiation) with atmospheric constituents, but at high magnetic latitudes, high-energy particles become dominant sources of ionization.
Auroras are created by energetic particles traveling down the magnetic field lines at the Earth’s poles into the atmosphere and interacting with atmospheric gases [
2]. The ionosphere is of the utmost importance for the study of Sun–Earth interactions and it is what allows us to have radio communications. This region is divided into different regions/layers depending on their features. From the lowest to the highest, we have regions D, E, F1, and F2. The first one, the D region, does not have the Sun’s ionizing radiation at night, and the oxygen and nitrogen molecules combine to become neutral. On the contrary, the E region stays charged at night, which allows us to have worldwide radio communications. Last is the F region with the greatest concentration of ions, where layer F1 only appears during daylight, and layer F2 is always present and above F1 [
3]. The high-latitude ionosphere is the most non-stationary and inhomogeneous region, with diverse localized structures including phenomena such as poleward-moving auroral forms, polar cap patches, poleward boundary intensifications or auroral arcs, and knowledge on these structures and their variability is critical for the improvement of numerical ionospheric models [
4].
The ionospheric variability has two main origins: the solar wind [
5] and the variations in the troposphere and stratosphere [
6,
7]. The variation of the conditions in the space environment resulting from the interaction of the solar activity with Earth’s magnetosphere, ionosphere, and thermosphere, is called space weather [
8]. Space weather events can be classified according to their strength and impact on infrastructure [
9,
10,
11].
All the variations (both temporal and spatial) in the ionosphere can disturb different areas of daily life such as communication transmissions [
12], navigation systems [
13,
14], satellite functions [
15], power network systems [
16,
17], natural gas pipelines [
18], and even endanger human life or health [
19,
20]. Therefore, as the impact of space weather events increases in our daily life due to our greater dependence on electrical/electronic and space-based technologies, so does the interest in its study [
10,
11].
A key way to understand these ionospheric variations and their effects, and even to create a system to prevent the damages associated with them, is to have direct information on the ionosphere. In situ measurements of the ionosphere and long-term observations across different locations allow us to understand the temporal evolution and the spatial structure of the ionosphere and the dominant physical processes involved. Some of the most important in situ measures are plasma density, electron temperature, ion density and temperature, and also atmospheric composition.
This paper is divided into six sections.
Section 2 guide us throughout the history of the CubeSats.
Section 3 makes an overview of some of the CubeSat missions designed for ionospheric studies, with their main features, scientific goals, payload, and orbit parameters. A summary of the main features of the general instrumentation on the payload is described in
Section 4, followed by the characteristics of the most used orbits for this type of mission in
Section 5.
Section 6 presents an overview on the importance of the data and metadata from the missions.
Section 7 addresses ionospheric models.
2. The CubeSat Paradigm
A Cube Satellite (CubeSat) is a downsized type of satellite. A 1U CubeSat is a 10 cm cube, and several of these blocks can be added to create 2U, 3U, 6U, and so on [
21]. The concept was developed as student projects at the California Polytechnic State University and Stanford University. Right now they are used not only for educational purposes, but also for scientific, technological, and commercial roles. Several hundreds of them have already been launched so far [
22].
As CubeSats are mainly student projects, and according to [
23], about
of the missions ended up failing. However, when missions are planned and carried out by teams with some background and experience, this rate is considerably lower. The main reason for failure has been a not well performed (or not performed at all) functional testing on the ground at a system integration level.
Throughout the history of Cubesats (
Figure 1), and according the analysis made by [
24], between 2000 and 2015, the majority of CubeSats launched were either from the USA or Europe, and have a form factor of 3U. It was also found that only
of the missions launched in that period and reached orbit were successful.
Typically, small satellite missions are categorized by their main goal. For example, if the goal is to measure the plasma processes in the magnetosphere-ionosphere system, the mission goes into the “Solar and Space Physics (Heliophysics)” category, on the other hand, if it aims to carry out in situ investigations of planetary surfaces or atmospheres, it falls in the “Planetary Science” scope [
25].
There are some reviews on this type of mission, for example, [
26] reviews 39 small satellite missions grouped into five mission types: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Earth Science, Heliophysics, Planetary Science, and Technology demonstrations. Another example is [
27], which makes a review on 130 CubeSat missions, grouped depending on their main goal: Astrophysics, Deep Space Exploration, Earth Science, Heliophysics: Space Weather, Spaceborne In Situ Laboratory, and Technology Demonstration. Some examples are missions to perform asteroid mining and a Lunar CubeSat Injector to identify locations of water sources on the Moon with the help of a spectrometer [
28], and missions to quantify dust particles in orbit [
29].
It is also well-established that space travel can cause a lot of damage to the astronauts’ health and with that came the necessity to better study the space environment to understand those risks and how to mitigate them. As CubeSat missions are developing, they become apt for biomedical studies, replacing the typical biomedical platforms used so far. The advantages of the use of CubeSat missions for these studies are described in [
30].
A review of Thermospheric/Exospheric missions and Magnetospheric Missions is given by [
31]. For the first ones, it provides the remote sensing method, the mission altitude range, and the in situ method for cold neutrals. For the magnetospheric missions, the key regions studied, the mission orbit, and the ion mass are presented.
The development of miniaturized components made of lighter and stronger materials that can last in space and also the improvement in the efficiency of power generation and power storage systems has contributed to the upgrade of sensor/satellite systems [
32,
33]. This development means that they ended up taking fewer resources, which translates to a lower cost, facilitating the deployment of a larger number of sensors/satellites in one single launch vehicle [
27,
34,
35].
Over time, CubeSat missions have improved their performance and capacity, enabling new mission types, and their use in constellations allows missions with more complex tasks [
21,
36]. For example, [
37] shows how it is possible to study the auroral acceleration region by utilizing multiple CubeSats in different formations, and [
38] is a study on the use of radio signal exchanges to obtain ionospheric information.
However, a limitation of CubeSats is the lack of propulsion [
39,
40]. The large majority of CubeSats do not have their own means of propulsion, leaving them dependent on atmospheric drag and gravity, which limits their functionality and constellation deployment. Propulsion would enable it to sustain the CubeSat’s orbit while allowing maneuvering for collision avoidance and scheduled deorbiting [
41,
42].
CubeSats are prone to other problems, mainly, more failed launches when compared with traditional satellites, issues with the deployable mechanisms [
43] and their operational lifetime is limited because of their smaller dimensions [
44].
For those initiating their way into the CubeSat missions, there is a document with all the basic concepts and processes, the NASA’s “CubeSat 101 Document”, and a document on specifications, the “CubeSat Design Specification”. Both manuals can be found in the CubeSat Standard website (
https://www.cubesat.org/cubesatinfo (accessed on 15 June 2023)). There are two more books of great interest, “Cubesat Handbook: From Mission Design to Operations” [
45] and “Global Trends in Small Satellites” [
46]. NASA’s CubeSat Launch initiative (CSLI) (
https://www.nasa.gov/content/about-cubesat-launch-initiative (accessed on 15 June 2023)) allows U.S. formal and informal educational institutions to submit a CubeSat project, and the selected ones will be launched, providing access to space at a comparatively lower cost.
3. CubeSat Missions
This section reviews CubeSat missions launched to study the ionosphere. The focus is on their scientific goals and the payload and orbit used to achieve them.
Table 1 summarizes some key parameters of the missions mentioned in this paper: their size, launch year, mean lifetime expected (also represented in
Figure 2), and the orbit they were put in.
More CubeSat missions are being developed and improved, not only for educational purposes at universities, but also by the industry as the exploration technology is spreading and evolving.
Despite the many CubeSat missions already set up for the study of the ionosphere, as detailed in
Table 1, the data from these missions is scarce and in general is not accessible.
3.1. RAX (Radio Aurora Explorer)
The RAX mission(
https://www.eoportal.org/satellite-missions/rax (accessed on 15 June 2023)) has two satellites, RAX-1 [
47] and RAX-2 [
48], launched in November 2010 and October 2011, respectively, into a circular orbit (
Table 2) [
49]. It was the first nanosatellite mission funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and it was a collaboration between SRI International and the Michigan Exploration Laboratory (MXL) at the University of Michigan. The designs of both satellites are identical with the exception of the solar panels since those of RAX-1 failed after one month, causing its end [
47].
This mission is a based ground-to-space bi-static radar experiment designed to study the field-aligned irregularities (FAI), which translates into studying the plasma instabilities that lead to magnetic field-aligned irregularities of electron density. These irregularities are capable of disrupting communication and navigation signals. These FAI measurements are enabled by its primary payload, a UHF radar receiver [
50] designed to operate with five UHF megawatt-class incoherent scatter radars (ISR) on the ground [
49,
51].
The study of the electron density is carried out in the lower polar ionosphere (80–400 km) by mapping the auroral ionospheric irregularities for a wide range of ionospheric currents [
49,
51].
3.2. DICE (Dynamic Ionosphere CubeSat Experiment)
The DICE mission (
https://sites.erau.edu/sail/dice/ (accessed on 15 June 2023)) has a two-spacecraft constellation of two 1.5U CubeSat of 10 × 10 × 15 cm each, both spin-stabilized which allows simultaneous measurements of electric field and electron density [
34].
DICE is a constellation to observe the Sun-to-Earth system by addressing questions about the Storm Enhanced Density (SED) [
52]. This translates into understanding what physical processes are responsible for the formation of the SED bulge in the noon to the post-noon sector during magnetic storms and for the formation of the SED plume at the base of the SED bulge. It also aims to study the transport of the high-density SED plume across the magnetic pole and investigate the relationship between the Prompt Penetration Electric (PPE) fields and the formation and evolution of SED [
34].
To accomplish these goals, the satellite’s payload consists of three main instruments as listed in
Table 3.
This mission was launched in October 2011, into a nearly Sun-synchronous orbit with the parameters displayed in
Table 4.
The DICE mission is a collaborative effort between industry and universities, funded by NSF and NASA Educational Launch of Nanosatellites (ELaNa), implemented by university undergraduate and graduate students. One of the institutions involved, Utah State University/Space Dynamics Laboratory (USU/SDL), maintains a data center (DC) with the data acquisitions being stored in a MySQL database [
53].
3.3. TRIO-CINEMA (Triplet Ionospheric Observatory—Cubesat for Ion, Neutral, Electron and MAgnetic Fields)
TRIO-CINEMA (
http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/cinema/ (accessed on 15 June 2023)) is a constellation with three CubeSats that aims to perform space weather measurements, namely high sensitivity Electron Neutral Atoms (ENA) mapping and electron and ion measurements in the auroral and ring current precipitation regions [
54].
To accomplish these goals, the satellite’s payload consists of two main instruments, as listed in
Table 5.
CINEMA-1 was launched in September 2012 and CINEMA-2/3 were launched in November 2013, all into a Sun-synchronous orbit (
Table 6) [
56].
The first CubeSat of this constellation was developed by the Space Sciences Laboratory at the University of California, Berkeley (UCB/SSL), along with NASA Ames Research Center and the Imperial College London (ICL), funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). The other two were made by Kyung Hee University (KHU) under its World Class University (WCU) program [
54].
3.4. ExoCube
ExoCube is a space weather nanosatellite with the goal of performing in situ measurements of species densities in the Earth’s lower exosphere and upper ionosphere (
Table 7) [
58].
This satellite is a 3U CubeSat [
60] that was launched in January 2015 into a Sun-synchronous orbit (
Table 8), and it was predicted to operate for 6 to 12 months, but ended up operating for approximately 7 months [
61].
The mission was predicted to operate for 6 to 12 months. However, failure in the deployment of an antenna led to problems in the communication system, and the mission operated only for approximately 7 months. After a redesign of the antenna deployment mechanisms, a second satellite was launched in 2017, named ExoCube 2, to perform the same scientific mission [
59].
This mission is a consortium between California Polytechnic State University, NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, and the University of Wisconsin.
3.5. UNITE (Undergraduate Nano Ionospheric Temperature Explorer)
The UNITE (Undergraduate Nano Ionospheric Temperature Explorer) mission has the goal of measuring plasma properties in the lower ionosphere (
Table 9), measuring the satellite’s internal and skin temperatures, and recording the orbital decay of the satellite. UNITE was launched in December 2018 into a circular orbit (
Table 10) [
63].
This satellite was developed by an all-undergraduate team at University of Southern Indiana (USI) [
63].
3.6. Suomi-100
The scientific goal of this mission is to study the ionosphere and the auroras, using the instruments listed in
Table 12, combined with ground-based instruments [
64,
65].
This mission was built by the Aalto University, Finland, and GOMSpace in order to commemorate the 100th anniversary of Finland in 2017 [
66].
3.7. SORTIE (Scintillation Observations and Response of the Ionosphere to Electrodynamics)
SORTIE (
https://www.eoportal.org/satellite-missions/sortie (accessed on 15 June 2023)) is a 6U CubeSat of 10 × 20 × 30 cm with the goal to make in situ measurements of plasma density and ion drift in order to understand the spectrum of wave perturbations causing the plasma instabilities, mainly in the F-region of the ionosphere [
67].
To accomplish those goals, the satellite’s payload consists of three main instruments as listed in
Table 13.
The SORTIE mission is a consortium between industry and universities and it was launched in December 2019 into a near-circular orbit (
Table 14), with 1 year of on-orbit lifetime [
67].
Results of the first 60 h of IVM on-orbit, which were found to be fitting for characterization of the thermal plasma in the ionosphere, are presented in [
67]. The first measurements of a Traveling Ionospheric Disturbance (TID) are presented in [
68]. An atmospheric model is applied in [
69] to interpret SORTIE measurements.
3.8. PICASSO (Pico-Satellite for Atmospheric and Space Science Observations)
Regarding the measurement of the electron density and temperature in the ionosphere, PICASSO uses a Sweeping multi-needle Langmuir Probe, formed by 4 cylindrical Langmuir probes at the edge of solar panels. This Langmuir probe allows the study of the ionosphere–plasmasphere coupling, the aurora structure, ionosphere and magnetospheric features, and the ionospheric dynamics [
71,
72].
To accomplish those goals, it should be flying through the upper layers of the ionosphere, which translates into a high inclination low-Earth orbit (LEO) (
Table 16) with a lifetime of at least 2 years [
72].
The PICASSO mission is a project initiated by the Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BISA) and then became under the administration of the European Space Agency (ESA) within the frame of the General Support Technology Programme (GSTP) and of the Technology Research Programme (TRP). This consortium also includes Clyde-Space Ltd. (UK), VTT (Finland), and The Centre Spatial of Liège (Belgium) [
72].
3.9. IDEASSat (Ionosphere Dynamics Explorer and Attitude Subsystem Satellite)
IDEASSat (
http://www.ss.ncu.edu.tw/~ssoffice/ (accessed on 15 June 2023)) (Ionosphere Dynamics Explorer and Attitude Subsystem Satellite) is a 3U CubeSat mission with the purpose to take in situ measurements of ionospheric variability and irregularities to comprehend their effects on satellite navigation signals and radio communications [
73].
To achieve these goals, the science payload of this mission is called a Compact Ionospheric Probe (CIP) and its instruments are listed in
Table 17.
IDEASSat was launched in January 2021 into a Sun-synchronous orbit (
Table 18) [
74].
The IDEASSat is a mission executed by Taiwan National Central University (NCU) with the collaboration of the International Satellite Program in Research and Education (INSPIRE) consortium [
73]. Although it had a one and half month communications blackout due to a critical anomaly 22 days after launch, the flight data recovered will help to improve the designs of future spacecrafts [
75].
3.10. INSPIREsat 1 (International Satellites Program in Research and Education Satellite-1)
The INSPIREsat 1 (
https://lasp.colorado.edu/inspire/ (accessed on 15 June 2023)) is a 9U CubeSat, launched in February 2022 [
76] with two scientific instruments (
Table 19): a Dual Aperture X-ray Solar spectrometer (DAXSS) to measure Solar soft X-rays of
keV to 20 keV, and a Compact Ionosphere Probe (CIP) which is a 4-in-1 plasma sensor that allows the characterization of the temporal and spatial distributions of small-scale plasma irregularities in the ionosphere [
77]. Associated with these two main instruments are two main scientific goals [
77]: describe plasma properties and variations within the ionosphere at low and mid-latitudes, and enhance our comprehension of the mechanisms responsible for heating the Sun’s corona through the measurement of the Sun’s soft X-ray spectrum.
This mission was launched into a Sun-synchronous orbit with the parameters displayed in
Table 20.
INSPIRESat 1 is a collaboration between students from National Central University (NCU Taiwan) and Taiwan’s National Space Organization (NSPO), also including the Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology (IIST), the University of Colorado’s Laboratory for Atmospheric & Space Physics (LASP), and the Singapore’ Nanyang Technological University.
3.11. SPORT (Scintillation Prediction Observations Research Task)
SPORT (Scintillation Prediction Observations Research Task) is a 6U CubeSat mission, launched in November 2022 into a near-circular orbit (
Table 21) [
78,
79].
This mission aims to further comprehend the formation of plasma bubbles in the ionosphere and how they affect the propagation of electromagnetic waves and signals [
80,
81]. To accomplish those goals, the satellite’s payload is listed in
Table 22.
The SPORT mission is the result of a collaborative effort between NASA, the Brazilian National Institute for Space Research (INPE), and the Technical Aeronautics Institute under the Brazilian Air Force Command Department (DCTA/ITA) [
80].
3.12. INSPIREsat 7 (Ionospheric Dynamics Explorer and Attitude Subsystem Satellite 7)
The INSPIREsat 7 mission was launched in April 2023 [
82] into a Sun-synchronous orbit at 600 km altitude [
83].
Although the main goal of this mission is to measure the Earth’s radiation budget at the top of the atmosphere for climate change studies, it also has the objective to study the ionosphere using the CUIONO1 Payload to [
83]:
Help improve the International Reference (IRI) model;
Further comprehend the behavior of electromagnetic waves as they propagate through the ionosphere;
Comprehend the variations in time and space across multiple scales;
Investigate the interaction between the ionosphere and magnetosphere, and between the ionosphere and lithosphere.
It also uses a new approach by combining a ground-based High-Frequency (HF) transmitter with an HF receiver on board the satellite. Throughout its trajectory, the attenuation of HF waves as they pass through the ionosphere will be quantified whenever it is within range of the ground transmitter. This allows monitoring the state of the ionosphere since the radio wave propagation depends on its electron density [
83,
84].
INSPIREsat 7 was developed by students from the Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ) helped by the International Satellite Program in Research and Education (INSPIRE).
4. Instrumentation
All CubeSats have five common subsystems: Electric Power System (EPS), On-Board Computer (OBC), Communication system (COM), Attitude Determination and Control System (ADCS), and Support Structure [
23]. Adding to these subsystems, all CubeSats have a payload that depends on the scientific objectives of their particular mission. Taking the missions analyzed in
Section 3, we can group their payload according to the main target measurements, as shown in
Figure 3. A review of the main sensors used for plasma diagnostics such as Langmuir probes (LP), retarding potential analyzers (RPA), and ion drift meters, among others, is provided by [
85].
The specific instruments used for each mission have been mentioned in
Section 3. Here, we give a general overview of some of the most common techniques to study the ionosphere.
4.1. Langmuir Probe
Langmuir probes (LP) working principle is the single probe method (SPM), based on the electrostatic probe theory developed by Irving Langmuir and Mott-Smith [
86,
87]. This method consists in doing in situ measurements of stationary or slowly time-varying plasmas parameters by immersing in it a conductor with a bias voltage applied to it, assuming ions as single charge cold particles and electrons as having a Maxwellian velocity distribution. By varying the bias voltage, the current measured will be different, and that current-voltage (I-V) relation is characteristic of each LP (
Figure 4). The sensor is a single electrode that can be a plane, cylindrical, or spherical [
86,
88,
89].
Regarding the measurements possible with this kind of probe, each region of the I–V curve (
Figure 4) has its role [
86,
89,
90]:
Region 1: ions are collected and electrons repelled, allowing us to determine the ion density and temperature of the plasma.
Region 2: both ions and electrons are attracted towards the probe and the electron temperature can be determined through the slope of the exponential.
Region 3: electrons are attracted and ions repelled, allowing us to determine the electron density of the plasma.
Another variation of the classic use of the Langmuir probe is the multi-needle Langmuir probe (m-NLP). This instrument has four individual probes (needles), each one smaller than the Debye length, providing higher resolution for small-scale ionospheric plasma density structures [
91,
92].
Of all the instrumentation payloads on ionospheric CubeSat missions, the Langmuir probe is the most common due to its ability to measure the main ionospheric plasma parameters, i.e., electron density and temperature.
4.2. Retarding Potential Analyzer
A retarding potential analyzer (RPA) is a type of electrostatic analyzer [
93] that works based on the Debye length, i.e., based on the distance that an electrostatic charge can significantly influence a particle. This length depends on the electrons’ temperature and density and defines the spacing between grids. The RPA is then a series of conductive grids (electrodes) parallel to each other and perpendicular to the direction of motion of the satellite [
94,
95].
After passing the grids, the ions arrive at the detector and strip off electrons, creating a current. In order to be able to use RPAs for ionospheric studies, there are some assumptions that need to be made, namely [
94,
95]:
Ions are in thermal equilibrium.
Grids are infinitesimally thin.
Potential distribution completely flat across the grid’s surfaces.
Negligible effects of non-uniform potential surfaces.
The ions’ thermal velocity is much smaller than the satellite velocity, which means they enter the aperture as a supersonic beam.
The aperture is smaller than the collector surface, allowing the measurement of particles that arrive at small angles relative to the grid’s normal direction.
In the RPA, one of its internal grids is swept over a range of voltages to work as a retarding grid, and by analyzing the current-voltage characteristic (i.e., total ion flux as a function of retarding voltage) of the instrument, it is possible to measure the ion temperature, plasma density, the component of the ion velocity along the orbit-track, and the ratio of light ions (H
+, He
+) to heavy ions (O
+, NO
+, …) [
94,
95,
96].
However, retarding potential analyzers have limitations regarding the characterization of the ions drift vectors, which leads to the use of ion drift meters (
Section 4.3).
4.3. Ion Drift Meter
As stated before, the limitation of the retarding potential analyzers on the characterization of the ions drift vectors leads to the need to use an ion drift meter (IDM). Just like a RPA, an ion drift meter (IDM) is a stack of parallel conductive grids; however, it has a diaphragm and a segmented collector electrode. It is a device used to take in situ measurements of the plasma, particularly ion velocity (used to determine the ion drift) and when used along with a Magnetometer (
Section 4.4), it allows us to estimate the local electric field [
85,
96].
The working principle is very similar to the RPA’s: the ions pass through an opening at the front and the currents produced at the collector are measured. The IDM has a grounded grid exposed to the plasma that faces the ram direction. The velocity of the satellite is assumed to be larger than the ions’ thermal velocity. However, the collector of the ion drift meter is segmented into four squares allowing to determine an angle of incidence through the ratio of the ram to cross-track speeds [
85,
96,
97]. This angle is given by
where
W is the width of the aperture,
D is the distance between the collector plates and the aperture, and
and
are the currents measured by adjacent collector plate halves [
97]. Through this arriving angle, it is possible to determine the transverse velocity [
97]:
with:
: spacecraft velocity;
: relative velocity of ions with respect to the sensor along the satellite track;
q: fundamental unit charge;
: spacecraft potential;
: ion mass.
4.4. Magnetometer
Magnetometers can be divided into two categories: scalar and vector magnetometers. Scalar magnetometers measure the strength or magnitude of the magnetic field and vector magnetometers provide directional information, which makes them more useful for space missions [
98,
99].
Within the various options of vector magnetometers, fluxgate magnetometers are the most common for space applications, with the mass and power requirements being the main advantages of it [
99,
100]. This instrument consists of a ferromagnetic core wrapped with two sets of coils: the drive coil that drives the core into and out of saturation, and the sense coil that senses the induced effect [
101,
102]. There is an alternating magnetic field in the core, induced by the alternate current applied to the drive coil, driving the core into saturation. When in the presence of an external magnetic field, the saturation of the core deflects in one direction. This deflection causes an asymmetry between the drive and sense currents, proportional to the magnitude of the external magnetic field [
100].
Regarding its sensitivity, the maximum is achieved when the magnetic field-magnetic induction (B-H) is square. This means that the induced electromotive force (emf) is the biggest for a given value of the magnetic field [
101].
4.5. Radio Occultation
The radio occultation technique (e.g., [
103,
104,
105]) provides an efficient tool for global profiling of the ionosphere. It consists of having transmitters on GPS satellites and GPS receivers on low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites located on the opposite sides of the planetary limb, providing high precision and vertical resolution at long wavelengths that penetrate through the atmosphere in nearly all conditions [
106].
The reception of multi-satellite navigation signals, affected by their travel path through the ionosphere, provides key information on the ionospheric state. Satellite missions with a GNSS receiver onboard enable permanent monitoring of the Earth’s co-rotating plasma environment, (e.g., [
106]). Dedicated constellations ([
107] enable a thorough characterization of the state of the ionosphere.
For the missions considered in this paper, SPORT (
Section 3.11) uses the Compact Total Electron Content Sensor (CTECS), which is a GPS occultation sensor to gather electron density profiles at low latitudes and to detect the presence of scintillation [
78].
5. Orbits
The orbits of satellite missions for the study of the Earth are divided into five main groups: Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO), Low Earth Orbit (LEO), Medium height Earth Orbit (MEO), Highly Elliptical Orbit (HEO), and Non-geocentric orbits such as Lagrange points or interplanetary. Each of these orbits has specifications regarding altitude, position relative to Earth, and communication system with the ground, among others. The CubeSat missions described in
Section 3 have different orbits, depending on their goals. However, since they all aim to study the ionosphere, all of their orbits are LEO, i.e., with an altitude below 2000 km.
Table 1 shows that the most used orbits are circular and Sun-synchronous. Sun-synchronous orbit (SSO) is a polar near-circular Low-Earth Orbit (LEO) [
108]. Satellites in this type of orbit are synchronous with the Sun, i.e., they always have the same position relative to the Sun. Although this is a type of orbit frequently used for earth science missions, sometimes it is quite challenging to choose the orbit parameters, and Ref. [
109] is a step-by-step guide on how to accomplish it.
Different types of orbits have different applications, and they should be defined based on mission requirements that are unique to each mission. An example of each type of orbit is shown in
Figure 5.
Sun-synchronous orbit (SSO) is a polar near-circular Low-Earth Orbit (LEO) [
108]. Satellites in this type of orbit are synchronous with the Sun, i.e., they always have the same position relative to the Sun. Although this is a type of orbit frequently used for Earth science missions, sometimes it is quite challenging to choose the orbit parameters, and Ref. [
109] is a step-by-step guide on how to accomplish it.
6. Data and Metadata
Despite the exploratory nature of many CubeSat missions, data acquisition and data management play a critical role. Even if CubeSats are deployed just for testing purposes (e.g., of a new payload or satellite component) the retrieval of data is fundamental to assess the behavior of the assets under consideration and further scientific exploration of CubeSat measurements.
Not only data but metadata—data about data—is fundamental to enhance the usefulness of CubeSat missions. By their nature, most space missions are not limited to the collection of a single data theme, but include several although often interrelated data themes. Each theme can be divided by temporal, geographical, or other criteria, designated as a resource. The metadata characterizing a resource should at least provide information on [
110]:
What it is and what it refers to.
Why it was built or carried out, to what purpose it was created.
When it was produced, published, or updated.
Who created, supported, or developed it.
How it was collected, produced, it is reliable, how to access it.
Where it refers to, what area, in what geography, or position.
Metadata improves data management by allowing the information to be cataloged in a standard way so that it is searchable and comparable. Three levels of metadata are typically considered: discovery, exploration and exploitation [
111]. Discovery metadata aims to classify or reference, allowing data to be searched and found in the midst of other data sets. Exploration metadata aims to add detailed information about the quality, accuracy, and origin of the data. Exploitation metadata explains how to read, transfer and integrate data into applications. These levels have no rigid borders, and some directives, e.g., Ref. [
112], refer to only discovery and interoperability metadata.
The INSPIRE framework for metadata presents a comprehensive and parameterized view. That is evident in the way it proposes how the theme/keywords are chosen and indexed, as well as in the care to fulfill the terms/values for the compliance degree of the resource, through the listing of standards and publications, as themselves, as part of the reference in the metadata.
The ISO core metadata elements for spatial dataset and spatial dataset series, propounds the dataset title, the dataset reference date (publication, revision, or creating), the responsible party (organization name and email contact address), the dataset language, the dataset character set, the dataset topic category, the metadata file identifier (plus name and version), the metadata language and character set. The
INSPIRE propounds many other demanding attributes, and a specific directive [
113] of the European Parliament and Council on the interoperability of spatial data sets and services.
There are two topics to emphasize. One is, that even these rich standards, do not have a specific attribute to record the answer to why it was built or carried out.
The other is the care to clearly define three degrees of compliance about a resource and to enforce that assessment is based on a document, a standard, a citation, being able to take only these values:
Conformant—the resource fully complies with the stated specification.
Not conformant—the resource does not conform to the referenced specification.
Not evaluated—the compliance has not been assessed.
It is precisely the fact that a resource is compliant that renders it the value to be used by the scientific community [
114]. Also, it is still necessary that the resource be accessible, through well-known (public) formats and structured in such a way that the research and information extraction is not hidden by technical or reproducibility difficulties.
The adoption of a data standard might broaden the reach of scientific information, to a larger community, and even to the citizen. Filling some of the core tables of a data model might assist and guide to improve the CubeSat mission objectives definition, in particular by focusing on which variables are intended to be measured, which methods of measurement (and respective instruments will be applied), which people and institutions will be responsible, which actions and the sequence of actions will be adopted before and during in the mission, and what and how the information will be available during and after the mission.
Currently, space agencies have an open data policy, aiming to facilitate the broadest use of its contents. For example, NASA has an open data policy for Earth exploration (
https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/learn/articles/nasa-earth-science-data-yours-use-fully-and-without-restrictions (accessed on 15 June 2023)), and ESA has a policy of free and open access to its contents (
https://open.esa.int/ (accessed on 15 June 2023)). However, CubeSat missions typically involve cooperation between diverse educational institutions and often include a heterogeneous mix of universities, companies, and other stakeholders. While for space agencies it is straightforward to clear access to content it fully owns, in the case of a heterogeneous consortium third-party rights have to be cleared and an open data policy might not be a priority. This could partly explain the lack of accessible data from the diverse CubeSat missions considered in this review.
7. Ionospheric Models
The Ionospheric Models parameterize the behavior of both electron and ion densities and temperatures in space and time. They can be used to identify regions of interest according to the scientific goals of the mission, helping to plan its orbiting parameters. On the other hand, all ionospheric missions can help to improve the accuracy of the models with the data they collect. There are several Ionospheric Models, for example:
SAMI3 is a global, 3D, first-principles physics model of the ionosphere/plasmasphere system [
115,
116].
The Thermosphere Ionosphere Electrodynamics General Circulation Model (TIE-GCM) model [
117] is a first-principles, three-dimensional model from NASA’s Community Coordinated Modeling Centre (CCMC) describing the coupled thermosphere and ionosphere system [
118].
The International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) model (
https://irimodel.org/ (accessed on 15 June 2023)) [
119] is an empirical model primarily based on observational data, synthesizing almost all available and reliable ionospheric data from both ground and space data sources.
The NeQuick model [
120] and its subsequent updated versions, Refs. [
121,
122] is an analytical model of the electron density of ionosphere above 90 km and up to the peak of the F2 layer. For a given location, time, and solar conditions (solar flux or sunspot number) the model returns the electron concentration, enabling us to evaluate the electron density along any ground-to-satellite ray-path and the corresponding total electron content (TEC) by numerical integration.
The NRLMSISE-00 Atmospheric Model is an empirical representation of Earth’s atmosphere, spanning from the Earth’s surface to outer space, and it models the temperatures and densities of the atmosphere’s components [
123].
The IRI model is the most commonly used. It is possible to simulate multiple model parameters for a given time and location. This model is also used to help plan CubeSat missions. For example, Ref. [
124] uses IRI data to study how a Langmuir probe will be affected by the magnetic field orientation. So far, ionospheric models are being used to plan the missions and simulate the behavior of satellites.
Regarding the ionospheric missions listed in
Section 3, there are no data available and their contribution to existing ionospheric models are yet to be found. The exception is the DICE mission, as Ref. [
35] shows that the measurements of the Langmuir Probes match the predictions from ionospheric models.