Gravity’s Influence on Human Motivation
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
- -
- group trust [26], i.e., “I can rely on my team members to keep their word.”
- -
- group cohesion [27], i.e., “How much do you feel like your team has group spirit?”
- -
- team efficacy [28], i.e., “With focus and effort, my team can do anything we set out to accomplish.”
- -
- team potency [29], i.e., “My team feels it can solve any problem it encounters.”
- -
- group commitment adapted to teams from [30], for example “I am willing to contribute more than necessary to the success of the team.”
- -
- Satisfaction with the group [31], e.g., “I am very happy that I am a member of this team.”
3. Results
3.1. Higher Affiliation Motive after Altered Gravity Exposure Compared to Ground
3.2. Power Motive and Achievement Motive after Altered Gravity Exposure
4. Discussion
- (1)
- Insights about human intrinsic motivation: In accordance with the attachment theory, we propose that these detectable emotional responses are tied to the life-long strong implicit motive to restore bonding as soon there are signals that the primal attachment or, in this case, “gravitational” field is disrupted, hence humans compensate with stronger bonding as an instinctive reaction (as shown in Figure 1).
- (2)
- Benefits for teams: weightlessness exposure could benefit teams that need to demonstrate high performance that can be positively leveraged by development, maintenance, or reestablishment of the affiliation motive such as closeness, personal encounter, safety, and friendly relationships with other teammates [25,67]. Hence, microgravity short-duration flights could potentially serve as a psychological training area for high performance teams for which the attributes of the affiliation motives are mission critical, e.g., for sport teams, or teams operating in extreme environments like submarine or special task-force teams.
- (3)
- Benefits for astronaut team training: Following the basic heuristic that a stronger team bonding is mission critical for space teams—as it is proven for teams operating on Earth–astronaut teams could be trained for team success through greater bonding in a microgravity setting. This insight could benefit the functioning of astronaut teams, which is mission critical.
- (4)
- Benefits for astronaut selection: Our results could be considered in astronaut selection in two ways: (a) on the individual level, to determine if this beneficial capacity (trait) of greater bonding occurs in the respective person, and (b) on the team level, to evaluate different team constellations for optimal team bonding. Since the affiliation motive has trait and state character, it can be assumed that astronauts with a higher affiliation motive as a trait (which can easily be tested with classical measures such as the OMT) [35] would exhibit a beneficially low hurdle for arousal of the state of affiliation. Hence, astronauts with a higher affiliation motive could become the better team players in space. This result is particularly critical for selecting astronauts for the mission to Mars, where team functioning is even more mission critical, because they will be separated from family and other humans contacts for even longer, will not see Earth, which lacks the usual favourable psychological overview effect induced by Earth rise, and lack the security of the “emergency to earth procedure”.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Pfeiffer, C.; Grivaz, P.; Herbelin, B.; Serino, A.; Blanke, O. Visual gravity contributes to subjective first-person perspective. Neurosci. Conscious. 2016, 2016, niw006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jamon, M. The development of vestibular system and related functions in mammals: Impact of gravity. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2014, 8, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pozzo, T.; Papaxanthis, C.; Stapley, P.; Berthoz, A. The sensorimotor and cognitive integration of gravity. Brain Res. Rev. 1998, 28, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Clarac, F.; Vinay, L.; Cazalets, J.R.; Fady, J.C.; Jamon, M. Role of gravity in the development of posture and locomotion in the neonatal rat. Brain Res. Rev. 1998, 28, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gallagher, M.; Arshad, I.; Ferrè, E.R. Gravity modulates behaviour control strategy. Exp. Brain Res. 2019, 237, 989–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Zhou, R.L.; Zhao, X.; Chen, X.P.; Chen, S.G. Acclimation during space flight: Effects on human emotion. Mil. Med. Res. 2016, 3, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schneider, S.; Bruemmer, V.; Carnahan, H.; Dubrowski, A.; Askew, C.D.; Strueder, H.K. What happens to the brain in weightlessness? A first approach by EEG tomography. NeuroImage 2008, 42, 1316–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Ombergen, A.; Demertzi, A.; Tomilovskaya, E.; Jeurissen, B.; Sijbers, J.; Kozlovskaya, I.B.; Parizel, P.M.; Van de Heyning, P.H.; Sunaert, S.; Laureys, S.; et al. The effect of spaceflight and microgravity on the human brain. J. Neurol. 2017, 264 (Suppl. S1), 18–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McIntyre, J.; Zago, M.; Berthoz, A.; Lacquaniti, F. Does the brain model Newton’s laws? Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4, 693–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Indovina, I.; Maffei, V.; Bosco, G.; Zago, M.; Macaluso, E.; Lacquaniti, F. Representation of visual gravitational motion in the human vestibular cortex. Science 2005, 308, 416–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiliket, C.; Ventre-Dominey, J.; Vighetto, A.; Grochowicki, M. Room tilt illusion. A central otolith dysfunction. Arch. Neurol. 1996, 53, 1259–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Blanke, O.; Metzinger, T. Full-body illusions and minimal phenomenal selfhood. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2009, 13, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Blanke, O. Multisensory brain mechanisms of bodily self-consciousness. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2012, 13, 556–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lopez, C.; Halje, P.; Blanke, O. Body ownership and embodiment: Vestibular and multisensory mechanisms. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2008, 38, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jörges, B.; López-Moliner, J. Gravity as a Strong Prior: Implications for Perception and Action. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2017, 11, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davey, N.J.; Rawlinson, S.R.; Nowicky, A.V.; McGregor, A.H.; Dubois, K.; Strutton, P.H.; Schroter, R.C. Human corticospinal excitability in microgravity and hypergravity during parabolic flight. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 2004, 75, 359–363. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15086127 (accessed on 1 August 2023).
- Koppelmans, V.; Erdeniz, B.; De Dios, Y.E.; Wood, S.J.; Reuter-Lorenz, P.A.; Kofman, I.; Bloomberg, J.J.; Mulavara, A.P.; Seidler, R.D. Study protocol to examine the effects of spaceflight and a spaceflight analog on neurocognitive performance: Extent, longevity, and neural bases. BMC Neurol. 2013, 13, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Opsomer, L.; Théate, V.; Lefèvre, P.; Thonnard, J.L. Dexterous Manipulation During Rhythmic Arm Movements in Mars, Moon, and Micro-Gravity. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meigal, A. Interplanetary space flight compared with fetal/neonatal motor strategy: Theoretical and practical implications. Front. Physiol. 2012, 19, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Einspieler, C.; Prechtl, H.F.; Ferrari, F.; Cioni, G.; Bos, A.F. The qualitative assessment of general movements in preterm, term and young infants–review of the methodology. Early Hum. Dev. 1997, 50, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McClelland, D.C. Human Motivation; Scott, Foresman & Co.: Glenview, IL, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
- McClelland, D.C.; Koestner, R.; Weinberger, J. How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychol. Rev. 1989, 96, 690–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spangler, W.D. Validity of questionnaire and TAT measures of need for achievement: Two meta-analyses. Psychol. Bull. 1992, 112, 140–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McAdams, D.P. Experiences of intimacy and power: Relationships between social motives and autobiographical memory. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1982, 42, 292–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winter, D.G. Manual for Scoring Motive Imagery in Running Text (Version 4.2); University of Michigan: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- De Jong, B.A.; Elfring, T. How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. Acad. Manag. J. 2010, 53, 535–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chatman, J. Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Adm. Sci. Q. 1991, 36, 459–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edmondson, A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm. Sci. Q. 1999, 44, 350–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gibson, C.B.; Randel, A.; Earley, P.C. Work Team Efficacy: An Assessment of Group Confidence Estimation Methods. 2000. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:146604439 (accessed on 1 August 2023).
- Neininger, A.; Lehmann-Willenbrock, N.; Kauffeld, S.; Henschel, A. Effects of team and organizational commitment—A longitudinal study. J. Vocat. Behav. 2010, 76, 567–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tesluk, P.E.; Mathieu, J.E. Overcoming roadblocks to effectiveness: Incorporating management of performance barriers into models of work group effectiveness. J. Appl. Psychol. 1999, 84, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johannßen, D.; Biemann, C.; Scheffer, D. Reviving a psychometric measure: Classification and prediction of the Operant Motive Test. In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 6 June 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Kuhl, J.; Scheffer, D. The Operant Motiv-Test (OMT). In Scoring Manual, Test-Characteristics, and Empirical Validation; Universität Osnabrück: Osnabrück, Germany, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Kuhl, J.; Scheffer, D.; Eichstaedt, J. Der Operante Motiv-Test (OMT): Ein neuer Ansatz zur Messung impliziter Motive. [The Operant Motive-Test (OMT): A new approach in measuring implicit motives]. In Tests und Trends: N.F.2. Diagnostik von Motivation und Selbstkonzept; Stiensmeier-Pelster, J., Ed.; Hogrefe: Göttingen, Germany, 2003; pp. 129–150. [Google Scholar]
- Scheffer, D.; Kuhl, J.; Eichstaedt, J. Der Operante Motiv-Test (OMT): Inhaltsklassen, Auswertung, psychometrische Kennwerte und Validierung. In Tests und Trends: N.F.2. Diagnostik von Motivation und Selbstkonzept; Stiensmeier-Pelster, J., Ed.; Hogrefe: Göttingen, Germany, 2003; pp. 151–168. [Google Scholar]
- Scheffer, D.; Eichstaedt, J.; Chasiotis, A.; Kuhl, J. Towards an integrated measure of need affiliation and agreeableness derived from the Operant Motive Test. Psychol. Sci. 2007, 49, 308–324. [Google Scholar]
- Scheffer, D. Implizite Motive: Entwicklung, Struktur und Messung [Implicit Motives: Development, Structure and Measurement], 1st ed.; Hogrefe: Göttingen, Germany, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Chasiotis, A.; Hofer, J. Implicit Prosocial Power Motivation. In Why People Do the Things They Do: Building on Julius Kuhl’s Contributions to the Psychology of Motivation and Volition; Baumann, N., Kazén, M., Quirin, M., Eds.; Hogrefe: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2018; pp. 281–300. [Google Scholar]
- Hofer, J.; Busch, H.; Chasiotis, A.; Kärtner, J.; Campos, D. Concern for generativity and its relation to implicit pro-social power motivation, generative goals, and satisfaction with life: A cross-cultural investigation. J. Pers. 2007, 76, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Job, V.; Oertig, D.; Brandstätter, V.; Allemand, M. Discrepancies between implicit and explicit motivation and unhealthy eating behavior. J. Personal. 2010, 78, 1209–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schüler, J.; Job, V.; Fröhlich, S.M.; Brandstätter, V. Dealing with a “hidden stressor”: Emotional disclosure as a coping strategy to overcome the negative effects of motive incongruence on health. Stress Health 2009, 25, 221–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baumann, N.; Scheffer, D. Seeking flow in the achievement domain: The achievement flow motive behind flow experience. Motiv. Emot. 2011, 35, 267–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baumann, N.; Scheffer, D. Seeing and mastering difficulty: The role of affective change in achievement flow. Cogn. Emot. 2010, 24, 1304–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baumann, N.; Kaschel, R.; Kuhl, J. Striving for Unwanted Goals: Stress-Dependent Discrepancies Between Explicit and Implicit Achievement Motives Reduce Subjective Well-Being and Increase Psychosomatic Symptoms. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2005, 89, 781–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kazén, M.; Kuhl, J. Directional discrepancy between implicit and explicit power motives is related to well-being among managers. Motiv. Emot. 2011, 35, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schüler, J.; Job, V.; Fröhlich, S.; Brandstätter, V. Emotional disclosure buffers the negative effect of motive-incongruene on health. Int. J. Psychol. 2008, 43, 223. [Google Scholar]
- Gerathewohl, S.J. (Ed.) Zero-G Devices and Weightlessness Simulators; Report for the Armed Forces-NAS-NRC Committee on Bioastronautics Panel on Acceleration; Publication 781; National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council: Washington, DC, USA, 1961. [Google Scholar]
- Lewin, K. Über die Ursachen des seelischen Geschehens. Psychol. Forsch. 1926, 7, 310–316. [Google Scholar]
- Murray, H.A. Explorations in Personality; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1938. [Google Scholar]
- Scheffer, D.; Heckhausen, H. Trait Theories of Motivation. In Motivation and Action, 3rd ed.; Heckhausen, J., Heckhausen, H., Eds.; Springer International Publisher: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 42–65. [Google Scholar]
- Murray, H.A. Thematic Apperception Test Manual; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1943. [Google Scholar]
- Atkinson, J.W.; McClelland, D.C. The projective expression of needs: II. The effect of different intensities of the hunger drive on thematic apperception. J. Exp. Psychol. 1948, 33, 643–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winter, D.G.; Carlson, A. Using motive scores in the psychobiographical study of an individual: The case of Richard Nixon. J. Personal. 1988, 56, 75–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winter, D.G. The Power Motive; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1973. [Google Scholar]
- Winter, D.G. Personality: Analysis and Interpretation of Lives; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Meyer, D.E.; Schvaneveldt, R.W. Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operation. J. Exp. Psychol. 1971, 90, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bargh, J.A.; Chen, M.; Burrows, L. Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1996, 71, 230–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Greenwald, A.G.; Banaji, M.R. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychol. Rev. 1995, 102, 4–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kahneman, D. Thinking, Fast and Slow, 1st ed.; Farrar, Straus and Giroux: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Epstein, S.; Pacini, R.; Denes-Raj, V.; Heier, H. Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1996, 71, 390–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bowlby, J. Attachment and Loss: Attachment; Basic Books: New York, NY, USA, 1969. [Google Scholar]
- Bischof, N. A systems approach towards the functional connections of attachment and fear. Child Dev. 1975, 46, 801–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ainsworth, M.D.S.; Blehar, M.C.; Waters, E.; Wall, S. Patterns of Attachment. A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation; Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1978. [Google Scholar]
- Keller, H.; Lohaus, A.; Völker, S.; Cappenberg, M.; Chasiotis, A. Temporal contingency as a measure of interactional quality. Child Dev. 1999, 70, 474–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elliot, A.J.; Reis, H.T. Attachment and exploration in adulthood. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2003, 85, 317–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bowlby, J. A Secure Base: Clinical Applications of Attachment Theory; Routledge: London, UK, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- McAdams, D.P. A thematic coding system for the intimacy motive. J. Res. Pers. 1980, 14, 413–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Schoss, S.; Ullrich, O.; Clervoy, J.-F.; Scheffer, D. Gravity’s Influence on Human Motivation. Aerospace 2023, 10, 848. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10100848
Schoss S, Ullrich O, Clervoy J-F, Scheffer D. Gravity’s Influence on Human Motivation. Aerospace. 2023; 10(10):848. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10100848
Chicago/Turabian StyleSchoss, Stephanie, Oliver Ullrich, Jean-François Clervoy, and David Scheffer. 2023. "Gravity’s Influence on Human Motivation" Aerospace 10, no. 10: 848. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10100848
APA StyleSchoss, S., Ullrich, O., Clervoy, J.-F., & Scheffer, D. (2023). Gravity’s Influence on Human Motivation. Aerospace, 10(10), 848. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10100848