Next Article in Journal
Local Melon and Watermelon Crop Populations to Moderate Yield Responses to Climate Change in North Africa
Next Article in Special Issue
Challenges of Managing Maritime Cultural Heritage in Asia in the Face of Climate Change
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Weather Influences on Flight Punctuality Using Machine Learning Approach
Article

Adaptive Heritage: Is This Creative Thinking or Abandoning Our Values?

by 1,* and 2
1
Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota, 2003 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA
2
Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Steven McNulty
Climate 2021, 9(8), 128; https://doi.org/10.3390/cli9080128
Received: 17 July 2021 / Revised: 2 August 2021 / Accepted: 3 August 2021 / Published: 11 August 2021
Protected areas, such as natural World Heritage sites, RAMSAR wetlands and Biosphere Reserves, are ecosystems within landscapes. Each site meets certain criteria that allow it to qualify as a heritage or protected area. Both climate change and human influence (e.g., incursion, increased tourist visitation) are altering biophysical conditions at many such sites. As a result, conditions at many sites are falling outside the criteria for their original designation. The alternatives are to change the criteria, remove protection from the site, change site boundaries such that the larger or smaller landscape meets the criteria, or manage the existing landscape in some way that reduces the threat. This paper argues for adaptive heritage, an approach that explicitly recognizes changing conditions and societal value. We discuss the need to view heritage areas as parts of a larger landscape, and to take an adaptive approach to the management of that landscape. We offer five themes of adaptive heritage: (1) treat sites as living heritage, (2) employ innovative governance, (3) embrace transparency and accountability, (4) invest in monitoring and evaluation, and (5) manage adaptively. We offer the Australian Wet Tropics as an example where aspects of adaptive heritage currently are practiced, highlighting the tools being used. This paper offers guidance supporting decisions about natural heritage in the face of climate change and non-climatic pressures. Rather than delisting or lowering standards, we argue for adaptive approaches. View Full-Text
Keywords: natural heritage; world heritage; protected areas; Outstanding Universal Value (OUV); adaptive heritage; climate change; adaptive management natural heritage; world heritage; protected areas; Outstanding Universal Value (OUV); adaptive heritage; climate change; adaptive management
MDPI and ACS Style

Perry, J.; Gordon, I.J. Adaptive Heritage: Is This Creative Thinking or Abandoning Our Values? Climate 2021, 9, 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli9080128

AMA Style

Perry J, Gordon IJ. Adaptive Heritage: Is This Creative Thinking or Abandoning Our Values? Climate. 2021; 9(8):128. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli9080128

Chicago/Turabian Style

Perry, Jim, and Iain J. Gordon. 2021. "Adaptive Heritage: Is This Creative Thinking or Abandoning Our Values?" Climate 9, no. 8: 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli9080128

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop